Ilse, Benjamin

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","275"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Der Schmerz"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","280"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","27"],["dc.contributor.author","Schiessl, Christine"],["dc.contributor.author","Ilse, Benjamin"],["dc.contributor.author","Hildebrandt, J."],["dc.contributor.author","Scherg, Alexandra"],["dc.contributor.author","Giegerich, A."],["dc.contributor.author","Alt-Epping, Bernd"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:24:12Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:24:12Z"],["dc.date.issued","2013"],["dc.description.abstract","In 2013 palliative medicine (PM) will be integrated into the undergraduate curriculum as part of the mandatory education in German medical universities. The aim of this study is to determine the current state of implementation at German medical faculties (MF). All German MFs were contacted using a written postal survey in June 2012. A total of 32 out of 36 MFs participated. Teaching staff consists of 15 or more lecturers in 8 MFs (30 %) and includes psychologists in 24 MFs (75 %) and also nurses in 18 MFs (56 %). Participating physicians are specialized in anesthesiology, internal medicine and general medicine. Teaching staff include palliative outpatient (20 MFs, 63 %) and consultation services (22 MFs, 69 %). Bedside teaching is provided in 15 MFs (47 %). Multiple choice tests are the major form of assessment (29 MFs, 84 %). The total number of teaching units in PM is between 12 and 43 and is usually provided at the end of medical school education. Nurses are employed in the education significantly more in MFs with a chair in PM. General practitioners were engaged only by faculties without a chair in PM. The implementation of the mandatory training in PM at MFs in Germany is inhomogeneous. Further steps include in particular the development of a competence-based curriculum and assessment."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00482-013-1322-1"],["dc.identifier.isi","000320036100005"],["dc.identifier.pmid","23736747"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/29767"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Springer"],["dc.relation.issn","0932-433X"],["dc.title","Implementation of intersectional field 13. A survey of medical faculties in Germany"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","151"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","BMC Medical Education"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","15"],["dc.contributor.author","Ilse, Benjamin"],["dc.contributor.author","Alt-Epping, Bernd"],["dc.contributor.author","Kiesewetter, Isabel"],["dc.contributor.author","Elsner, Frank"],["dc.contributor.author","Hildebrandt, Johanna"],["dc.contributor.author","Laske, Alexander"],["dc.contributor.author","Scherg, Alexandra"],["dc.contributor.author","Schiessl, Christine"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:51:35Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:51:35Z"],["dc.date.issued","2015"],["dc.description.abstract","Background: In 2009, palliative medicine became an integrated and compulsory part of undergraduate training in Germany by legislation. After a transitional period, all medical faculties were required to provide adequate teaching with an according examination and certification procedure. In parallel, we conducted bi-annual surveys on all medical faculties in Germany to examine for potential discrepancies between the implementation process and their intended consequences on teaching time and content. Methods: Four consecutive bi-annual surveys (2006, 2008, 2010, 2012) of all 36 medical faculties in Germany were performed, using purposively for this study developed questionnaires. Likert scales and closed questions were analyzed descriptively. Results: Medical Faculty response rate increased from 50 % in 2006 to 88.9 % in 2012. Teaching coordinators in palliative medicine primarily had an anesthesiology or internal medicine background. There was a noted increase over time of the involvement of specialized palliative care units (PCUs) as providing the setting for education. The number of faculties that were able to offer a complete 16 weeks of training in palliative medicine during the \"final year\" rose steadily. In addition, increased patient-centered teaching formats have been implemented over time. The faculties which offered innovative teaching formats with actors as patients (standardized patient interaction) increased, as did the total number of mandatory examinations. The number of faculties that provided compulsory teaching in a condensed manner within a single academic year increased sharply from 3 of 31 responding faculties in 2010 to 19 of 32 responding faculties in 2012. Conclusions: Until now, teaching conditions and structures in palliative medicine in Germany have proven to be extraordinarily heterogeneous. Although professorships (\"Chairs\") in palliative medicine proved to be particularly beneficial and supportive in curricular and structural development, only a minority of faculties provide leading academic positions in palliative medicine."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1186/s12909-015-0439-6"],["dc.identifier.isi","000361280100001"],["dc.identifier.pmid","26383546"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/12293"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/35944"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Biomed Central Ltd"],["dc.relation.issn","1472-6920"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"],["dc.title","Undergraduate education in palliative medicine in Germany: a longitudinal perspective on curricular and infrastructural development"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","12"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","GMS Zeitschrift für medizinische Ausbildung"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","12"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","29"],["dc.contributor.author","Ilse, B."],["dc.contributor.author","Hildebrandt, J."],["dc.contributor.author","Posselt, J."],["dc.contributor.author","Laske, A."],["dc.contributor.author","Dietz, I."],["dc.contributor.author","Borasio, G. D."],["dc.contributor.author","Kopf, A."],["dc.contributor.author","Nauck, F."],["dc.contributor.author","Elsner, F."],["dc.contributor.author","Wedding, U."],["dc.contributor.author","Alt-Epping, B."],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-10T08:14:07Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-10T08:14:07Z"],["dc.date.issued","2012"],["dc.description.abstract","Fragestellung: Mit der Änderung der ärztlichen Approbationsordnung (ÄApprO) im Jahre 2009 wurde die Palliativmedizin als 13. Querschnittsfach (Q13) verpflichtend in das studentische Curriculum eingeführt. Die Umsetzung dieser Änderung muss bis zum Beginn des Praktischen Jahres im August 2013 oder bei der Meldung zum Zweiten Abschnitt der Ärztlichen Prüfung für den Prüfungstermin im Oktober 2014 erfolgen. In vorangegangenen Umfragen wurden an den medizinischen Fakultäten in Deutschland sehr heterogene palliativmedizinische Lehrstrukturen beschrieben. Daher sollten nun die curricularen und prüfungsbezogenen Planungen der jeweiligen Fakultäten zur Implementierung eines verpflichtenden Q13 Palliativmedizin erfragt werden. Methodik: Die Bundesvertretung der Medizinstudierenden Deutschlands (bvmd) führt seit 2006 zweijährliche Umfragen an allen medizinischen Fakultäten in Deutschland zum gegenwärtigen Stand der palliativmedizinischen Lehre durch. Nach Konzeption eines Online-Fragebogens und Pilotierung erfolgte im Mai 2010 eine einmonatige Online-Umfrage. Die Daten wurden deskriptiv ausgewertet. Ergebnisse: 31 von 36 medizinischen Fakultäten nahmen an der Befragung teil. An 15 Fakultäten existierten zum Befragungszeitpunkt bereits verpflichtende Lehrveranstaltungen entsprechend der Vorgabe der neuen ÄApprO; an drei Standorten soll das Q13 Palliativmedizin erst ab dem Sommersemester 2012 verpflichtend eingeführt werden. An 15 Fakultäten bestand bereits ein Lehrcurriculum für Q13, teils angelehnt an die curricularen Vorgaben der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Palliativmedizin. Sechs Standorte beschrieben einen begonnenen Implementierungsprozess noch ohne Curriculum. An den meisten Fakultäten werden 21-40 Lehrveranstaltungsstunden angestrebt, die überwiegend in Form von Vorlesungen oder Seminaren, seltener auch in betreuungsintensiveren Formaten angeboten werden sollen. Die Mehrzahl der teilnehmenden Fakultäten strebt eine Prüfung in Form von Multiple Choice Fragen an. An 8 Universitäten bestand ein eigenständiger Lehrstuhl für Palliativmedizin (5 weitere in Planung); dies war mit einem höheren Maß an Pflichtlehre analog der Vorgabe der ÄApprO verbunden. Ein breites Spektrum an lehrbeteiligten Berufsgruppen, Fachdisziplinen und externen Kooperationspartnern wurde angegeben. Schlussfolgerung: Die infrastrukturellen Voraussetzungen, die bisherigen curricularen Planungen und der Grad der Implementierung des Q13 analog der Vorgabe der neuen ÄApprO divergieren zwischen den einzelnen medizinischen Fakultäten erheblich. Die Bemühungen um eine qualitativ hochwertige Lehre in Hinblick auf die vielschichtigen Fragestellungen bei der Betreuung schwerst- und sterbenskranker Patienten spiegeln sich in der Umfrage ebenso wider wie der besondere Stellenwert eines eigenständigen Lehrstuhls für Palliativmedizin für die Umsetzung der gesetzlichen Vorgaben. Die Mitwirkung der verschiedenen Berufsverbände an dieser Umfrage sowie das große Spektrum der Lehrbeteiligten unterstreicht die interdisziplinäre und multiprofessionelle Dimension palliativmedizinischer Lehre."],["dc.identifier.fs","591769"],["dc.identifier.pmid","22737202"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/9539"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/61440"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.relation.issn","1860-3572"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Universitätsmedizin Göttingen"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Klinik für Palliativmedizin"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.subject.ddc","610"],["dc.title","Palliativmedizinische Lehre in Deutschland – Planungen der Fakultäten zum zukünftigen Querschnittsfach 13"],["dc.title.translated","Palliative Care teaching in Germany – concepts and future developments"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","05"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Zeitschrift für Palliativmedizin"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","59"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","17"],["dc.contributor.author","Isermeyer, Leonie"],["dc.contributor.author","Ilse, Benjamin"],["dc.contributor.author","Marx, Gabriella"],["dc.contributor.author","Seidemann, S"],["dc.contributor.author","Jünger, J"],["dc.contributor.author","Nauck, Friedemann"],["dc.contributor.author","Alt-Epping, Bernd"],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-03-07T07:26:21Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-03-07T07:26:21Z"],["dc.date.issued","2016"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1055/s-0036-1594125"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/104369"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.relation.issn","1615-2921"],["dc.relation.issn","1615-293X"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Klinik für Palliativmedizin"],["dc.title","Förderliche und hinderliche Faktoren bei der Implementierung des Querschnittsbereich 13 Palliativmedizin (Q13)"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","174"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Der Schmerz"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","180"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","30"],["dc.contributor.author","Seidemann, S."],["dc.contributor.author","Juenger, Jana"],["dc.contributor.author","Alt-Epping, Bernd"],["dc.contributor.author","Ilse, Benjamin"],["dc.contributor.author","Isermeyer, L."],["dc.contributor.author","Doll, A."],["dc.contributor.author","Schiessl, Christine"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:16:18Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:16:18Z"],["dc.date.issued","2016"],["dc.description.abstract","In 2009 palliative medicine was integrated into the undergraduate curriculum as cross-disciplinary subject 13 and is now part of mandatory education in German medical faculties (MF). Surveys across German MFs have shown an inhomogeneous development of this cross-disciplinary subject. The aim of this study was to assess the current state and the needs in terms of assessments in the cross-disciplinary subject 13 at German MFs. Palliative care coordinators at German MFs were surveyed by using a standardized telephone interview. Closed-ended questions were analyzed by descriptive analysis and open-ended questions by content analysis. A total of 34 out of 36 MFs participated. Multiple choice tests were the major form of assessment (94.1 %) and 9 MFs planned to implement another form of assessment, mainly an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) station (55.5 %). The majority of the MFs (91.2 %) had no blueprint to develop assessments but conducted a review (78.8 %) afterwards. A successful implementation of the assessment was mostly achieved when the concept of the assessment was felt to be suitable. The lack of human resources was found to be the most relevant obstacle for the implementation of a practical assessment format. The major form of assessment in palliative care is still a written examination, especially multiple choice tests. This format is considered to be of limited value for assessing communicative competencies and attitudes in palliative medical care. Further steps should include the development of a competence-based assessment that is also feasible for smaller MFs with limited resources."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00482-015-0057-6"],["dc.identifier.isi","000373990800008"],["dc.identifier.pmid","26391690"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/41010"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Springer"],["dc.relation.issn","1432-2129"],["dc.relation.issn","0932-433X"],["dc.title","Student assessments in palliative medicine as the cross-disciplinary subject 13"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","216"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","BMC Neurology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","21"],["dc.contributor.author","Ilse, Benjamin"],["dc.contributor.author","Alt-Epping, Bernd"],["dc.contributor.author","Günther, Albrecht"],["dc.contributor.author","Liman, Jan"],["dc.contributor.author","Simon, Alfred"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-11-25T11:00:22Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-11-25T11:00:22Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021-06-04"],["dc.date.updated","2021-11-19T12:47:30Z"],["dc.description.abstract","Abstract Background The concept of clinical ethics consultation (CECs) was implemented to provide support in ethical controversies in clinical settings and are offered in at least every second hospital in Germany. Neurological disorders often require complex decision-making. The aims of this study were to determine which situations lead to CEC in neurology and to investigate the influence of the individual patient’s wishes on the recommendation. Methods Standardised CEC protocols in the years 2011 to 2017 at the University Hospitals of Goettingen and Jena were retrospectively surveyed. The contents were categorised along existing protocol templates of CEC scenarios and subsequently paraphrased and reduced to significant meanings. Results 27 CEC scenarios which were facilitated by various professional disciplines were reviewed. Stroke was the most frequent underlying condition. Nearly all patients were not able to consent. Mostly, the relatives acted as representatives or health advocates. In 67 % of cases, a sense of conflict triggered a CEC; in 33 % a sense of uncertainty was the reason for the CEC request. In 21 CEC scenarios, a recommendation was reached in consensus with all parties involved. In 59 % of cases, a decision was made to continue medical therapy. In seven cases, the patient’s wishes led to a limitation of therapy, while in just two cases this decision was made primarily relying on the patient’s best interest. In only 13 % of cases, a valid advance directive led to respective therapeutic consequences. Conclusions CEC is feasible for consensus-finding not only in conflicts, but also in situations of therapeutic uncertainty in neurology. There is a special importance of the patient’s wishes in decision-making in neurology. However, only in a few cases were advance directives precise and specific enough to have sufficient and decisive weight in therapeutic decision-making."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2021"],["dc.identifier.citation","BMC Neurology. 2021 Jun 04;21(1):216"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1186/s12883-021-02244-2"],["dc.identifier.pii","2244"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/93520"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import DOI-Import GROB-441"],["dc.publisher","BioMed Central"],["dc.relation.eissn","1471-2377"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.holder","The Author(s)"],["dc.subject","Clinical decision-making"],["dc.subject","Clinical ethics consultation (CEC)"],["dc.subject","Neurology"],["dc.subject","Individual patient will"],["dc.title","Clinical Ethics Consultation in Neurology – a case series"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","e167"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","23"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","e174"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","142"],["dc.contributor.author","Isermeyer, Leonie"],["dc.contributor.author","Ilse, Benjamin"],["dc.contributor.author","Marx, Gabriella"],["dc.contributor.author","Seidemann, Stephanie"],["dc.contributor.author","Jünger, Jana"],["dc.contributor.author","Nauck, Friedemann"],["dc.contributor.author","Alt-Epping, Bernd"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T18:12:26Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T18:12:26Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1055/s-0043-115776"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1439-4413"],["dc.identifier.issn","0012-0472"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/74375"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Klinik für Palliativmedizin"],["dc.title","Implementierung des Q13 Palliativmedizin – Sicht der Lehrbeauftragten"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]