Simon, Alfred

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","A212"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","5"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Deutsches Ärzteblatt"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","A216"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","108"],["dc.contributor.author","Lipp, Volker"],["dc.contributor.author","Simon, Alfred"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-10T08:13:56Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-10T08:13:56Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.description.abstract","Im Zusammenhang mit dem Berufsrecht geht es beim ärztlich assistierten Suizid weniger um grundsätzliche moralische als vielmehr um praktische Probleme."],["dc.identifier.fs","576009"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/8347"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/61384"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.relation.issn","0012-1207"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Universitätsmedizin Göttingen"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.subject.ddc","610"],["dc.title","Beihilfe zum Suizid : keine ärztliche Aufgabe"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","105"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","22"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Diametros"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","115"],["dc.contributor.author","Simon, Alfred"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-10T08:13:28Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-10T08:13:28Z"],["dc.date.issued","2009"],["dc.description.abstract","Due to the increasing significance of clinical ethics consultation the question arises concerning the quality of these services. The author develops criteria for the quality of structure, process, and outcomes of ethics consultation on the basis of his own experiences in ethics consultation and of the US-American debate."],["dc.identifier.fs","562389"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/5963"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/61252"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.relation.issn","1733-5566"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Universitätsmedizin Göttingen"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.subject.ddc","610"],["dc.title","Quality standards for clinical ethics consultation"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","217"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Ethik in der Medizin"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","28"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","16"],["dc.contributor.author","Simon, Alfred"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-10T08:13:35Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-10T08:13:35Z"],["dc.date.issued","2004"],["dc.description.abstract","Der Beitrag untersucht mögliche Kriterien für die normative Bewertung der künstlichen Ernährung bei nichteinwilligungsfähigen Patienten. Der in der aktuellen Diskussion immer wieder unternommene Versuch, den verpflichtenden Charakter bestimmter Formen der Ernährung aufgrund ihrer Zuordnung zu den Kategorien Basisbetreuung oder Remedia ordinaria zu begründen, erweist sich als naturalistischer Fehlschluss. Die Rechtfertigung der künstlichen Nahrungs- und Flüssigkeitszufuhr setzt vielmehr—wie die jeder anderen medizinischen Maßnahme—voraus, dass ihre Durchführung medizinisch begründet und vom Patienten gewollt ist. Dies trifft grundsätzlich auch auf den nicht mehr einwilligungsfähigen Patienten zu; bei diesem kommt es auf den früher erklärten oder mutmaßlichen Willen an."],["dc.identifier.fs","17621"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/6373"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/61281"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.relation.issn","0935-7335"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Universitätsmedizin Göttingen"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.subject.ddc","610"],["dc.title","Ethische Aspekte der künstlichen Ernährung bei nichteinwilligungsfähigen Patienten"],["dc.title.translated","Ethical aspects of artificial feeding in incompetent patients"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","67"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","69"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","6"],["dc.contributor.author","Fangerau, Heiner"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiesemann, Claudia"],["dc.contributor.author","Simon, A."],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-10-16T10:54:30Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-10-16T10:54:30Z"],["dc.date.issued","2003"],["dc.description.abstract","The efforts of the European Commission to create a “European Research Area” in the field of biotechnology are accompanied by a growing demand for an ethical discourse. Cultural differences between the European Union's member states create a vital need to improve bioethical information structures in Europe so as to foster European bioethics discourses and to cope with ethical pluralism. Responding to the need for an increased European contribution to the international discussion on ethics in medicine and biotechnology, some of Europe's leading bioethics institutions have joined forces to establish the international network “EURETHNET”. 18 partners from nine European countries agreed to develop an information network and knowledge base in the field of ethics in medicine and biotechnology. This short communication displays the aims, scope and realisation of the network."],["dc.format.mimetype","application/pdf"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1023/a:1022564332516"],["dc.identifier.fs","14718"],["dc.identifier.gro","3146759"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?goescholar/4138"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/9435"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Migrated from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.issn","1386-7423"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.access","openAccess"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.subject","bioethics; biotechnology; cultural diversity; database; ethics; Europe; European union; internet; literature; medicine"],["dc.subject.ddc","610"],["dc.title","Improving information systems in Europe: EURETHNET"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dc.type.version","submitted_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]