Heinrichs, Steffi

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","567"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","9"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Forests"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","9"],["dc.contributor.author","Heinrichs, Steffi"],["dc.contributor.author","Pauchard, Aníbal"],["dc.contributor.author","Schall, Peter"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-09T11:45:55Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-09T11:45:55Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.description.abstract","Alien tree plantations are expanding globally with potential negative effects for native biodiversity. We investigated plant species diversity and composition in a Pinus radiata landscape in south-central Chile, a biodiversity hotspot, by sampling understory vegetation in different plantation age classes, along forest roads and in natural forest remnants in order to find effective conservation measures for native biodiversity. Plantations, including different age classes and roadsides, maintained high native species richness at the landscape scale but supported a completely different community composition than natural forests. Thus, natural forest remnants must be conserved as plantations cannot replace them. Certain natural forest species occurred frequently in mature plantations and can represent starting points for retaining natural elements in plantations. Generalist native and alien species benefited from plantation management, mainly in young plantations and along roadsides. Stand maturation and a closed canopy, though, reduced alien species occurrences within plantations. Along roads, shade-tolerant aliens should be monitored and removed as they can potentially invade natural forests. Native species conservation in plantations requires a holistic approach of the full mosaic of land uses including the protection of remaining natural forests, alien species monitoring along roadsides and patches with continuous canopy cover to reduce pressure by alien species."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3390/f9090567"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/15342"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/59335"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.publisher","MDPI"],["dc.relation.eissn","1999-4907"],["dc.relation.issn","1999-4907"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"],["dc.subject.ddc","570"],["dc.title","Native Plant Diversity and Composition Across a Pinus radiata D.Don Plantation Landscape in South-Central Chile—The Impact of Plantation Age, Logging Roads and Alien Species"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","915"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","6"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","European Journal of Forest Research"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","934"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","139"],["dc.contributor.author","Hoffmann, Nils"],["dc.contributor.author","Heinrichs, Steffi"],["dc.contributor.author","Schall, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Vor, Torsten"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-04-14T08:26:08Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-04-14T08:26:08Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s10342-020-01295-3"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/81844"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-399"],["dc.relation.eissn","1612-4677"],["dc.relation.haserratum","/handle/2/89116"],["dc.relation.issn","1612-4669"],["dc.title","Climatic factors controlling stem growth of alien tree species at a mesic forest site: a multispecies approach"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1363"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","7"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Applied Ecology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1375"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","57"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Heinrichs, Steffi; 1Silviculture and Forest Ecology of the Temperate Zones University of Göttingen Göttingen Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Ammer, Christian; 1Silviculture and Forest Ecology of the Temperate Zones University of Göttingen Göttingen Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Ayasse, Manfred; 2Institute of Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics University of Ulm Ulm Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Boch, Steffen; 3Biodiversity and Conservation Biology Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL Birmensdorf Switzerland"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Buscot, François; 5Department of Soil Ecology UFZ‐Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research Halle‐Saale Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Fischer, Markus; 4Institute of Plant Sciences University of Bern Bern Switzerland"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Goldmann, Kezia; 5Department of Soil Ecology UFZ‐Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research Halle‐Saale Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Overmann, Jörg; 7Leibniz‐Institute DSMZ ‐ German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures GmbH Braunschweig Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Schulze, Ernst‐Detlef; 8Max‐Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry Jena Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Sikorski, Johannes; 7Leibniz‐Institute DSMZ ‐ German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures GmbH Braunschweig Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Weisser, Wolfgang W.; 9Terrestrial Ecology Research Group Department of Ecology and Ecosystem Management School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan Technische Universität München Freising Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Wubet, Tesfaye; 5Department of Soil Ecology UFZ‐Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research Halle‐Saale Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Gossner, Martin M.; 9Terrestrial Ecology Research Group Department of Ecology and Ecosystem Management School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan Technische Universität München Freising Germany"],["dc.contributor.author","Schall, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Heinrichs, Steffi"],["dc.contributor.author","Ammer, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Ayasse, Manfred"],["dc.contributor.author","Boch, Steffen"],["dc.contributor.author","Buscot, François"],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Goldmann, Kezia"],["dc.contributor.author","Overmann, Jörg"],["dc.contributor.author","Schulze, Ernst‐Detlef"],["dc.contributor.author","Sikorski, Johannes"],["dc.contributor.author","Weisser, Wolfgang W."],["dc.contributor.author","Wubet, Tesfaye"],["dc.contributor.author","Gossner, Martin M."],["dc.contributor.editor","Mori, Akira"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-04-14T08:26:38Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-04-14T08:26:38Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.date.updated","2022-02-09T13:21:57Z"],["dc.description.abstract","Abstract Forest management greatly influences biodiversity across spatial scales. At the landscape scale, combining management systems that create different stand properties might promote biodiversity due to complementary species assemblages. In European beech forests, nature conservation and policy advocate a mixture of unmanaged (UNM) forests and uneven‐aged (UEA) forests managed at fine spatial grain at the expense of traditionally managed even‐aged shelterwood forests (EA). Evidence that such a landscape composition enhances forest biodiversity is still missing. We studied the biodiversity (species richness 0D, Shannon diversity 1D, Simpson diversity 2D) of 14 taxonomic groups from bacteria to vertebrates in ‘virtual’ beech forest landscapes composed of varying shares of EA, UEA and UNM and investigated how γ‐diversity responds to landscape composition. Groups were sampled in the largest contiguous beech forest in Germany, where EA and UEA management date back nearly two centuries, while management was abandoned 20–70 years ago (UNM). We used a novel resampling approach that created all compositional combinations of management systems. Pure EA landscapes preserved a maximum of 97.5% γ‐multidiversity (0D, 1D) across all taxa. Pure and mixed UEA/UNM landscapes reduced γ‐multidiversity by up to 12.8% (1D). This effect was consistent for forest specialists (1D: −15.3%). We found only weak complementarity among management systems. Landscape composition significantly affected γ‐diversity of 6–9 individual taxa, depending on the weighting of species frequencies with strongest responses for spiders, beetles, vascular plants and birds. Most showed maximum diversity in pure EA landscapes. Birds benefited from UNM in EA‐dominated landscapes. Deadwood fungi showed highest diversity in UNM. Synthesis and applications. Our study shows that combining fine‐grained forest management and management abandonment at the landscape scale will reduce, rather than enhance, regional forest biodiversity. We found an even‐aged shelterwood management system alone operating at intermediate spatial scales and providing stands with high environmental heterogeneity was able to support regional biodiversity. However, some taxa require certain shares of uneven‐aged and unmanaged forests, emphasizing their general importance. We encourage using the here presented resampling approach to verify our results in forest landscapes of different composition and configuration across the temperate zone."],["dc.description.abstract","Our study shows that combining fine‐grained forest management and management abandonment at the landscape scale will reduce, rather than enhance, regional forest biodiversity. We found an even‐aged shelterwood management system alone operating at intermediate spatial scales and providing stands with high environmental heterogeneity was able to support regional biodiversity. However, some taxa require certain shares of uneven‐aged and unmanaged forests, emphasizing their general importance. We encourage using the here presented resampling approach to verify our results in forest landscapes of different composition and configuration across the temperate zone. image"],["dc.description.sponsorship","Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001659"],["dc.description.sponsorship","Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001711"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/1365-2664.13635"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1365-2664"],["dc.identifier.issn","0021-8901"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/82026"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-399"],["dc.relation.eissn","1365-2664"],["dc.relation.issn","0021-8901"],["dc.rights","This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited."],["dc.title","Can multi‐taxa diversity in European beech forest landscapes be increased by combining different management systems?"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","European Journal of Forest Research"],["dc.contributor.author","Hoffmann, Nils"],["dc.contributor.author","Heinrichs, Steffi"],["dc.contributor.author","Schall, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Vor, Torsten"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-09-01T06:42:40Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-09-01T06:42:40Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s10342-021-01406-8"],["dc.identifier.pii","1406"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/89116"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-455"],["dc.relation.eissn","1612-4677"],["dc.relation.iserratumof","/handle/2/81844"],["dc.relation.issn","1612-4669"],["dc.title","Correction to: Climatic factors controlling stem growth of alien tree species at a mesic forest site: a multispecies approach"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","erratum_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","73"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Forests"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","10"],["dc.contributor.author","Heinrichs, Steffi"],["dc.contributor.author","Ammer, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Mund, Martina"],["dc.contributor.author","Boch, Steffen"],["dc.contributor.author","Budde, Sabine"],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Müller, Jörg"],["dc.contributor.author","Schöning, Ingo"],["dc.contributor.author","Schulze, Ernst-Detlef"],["dc.contributor.author","Schmidt, Wolfgang"],["dc.contributor.author","Weckesser, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Schall, Peter"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-09T11:50:48Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-09T11:50:48Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.description.abstract","Tree species diversity can positively affect the multifunctionality of forests. This is why conifer monocultures of Scots pine and Norway spruce, widely promoted in Central Europe since the 18th and 19th century, are currently converted into mixed stands with naturally dominant European beech. Biodiversity is expected to benefit from these mixtures compared to pure conifer stands due to increased abiotic and biotic resource heterogeneity. Evidence for this assumption is, however, largely lacking. Here, we investigated the diversity of vascular plants, bryophytes and lichens at the plot (alpha diversity) and at the landscape (gamma diversity) level in pure and mixed stands of European beech and conifer species (Scots pine, Norway spruce, Douglas fir) in four regions in Germany. We aimed to identify compositions of pure and mixed stands in a hypothetical forest landscape that can optimize gamma diversity of vascular plants, bryophytes and lichens within regions. Results show that gamma diversity of the investigated groups is highest when a landscape comprises different pure stands rather than tree species mixtures at the stand scale. Species mainly associated with conifers rely on light regimes that are only provided in pure conifer forests, whereas mixtures of beech and conifers are more similar to beech stands. Combining pure beech and pure conifer stands at the landscape scale can increase landscape level biodiversity and conserve species assemblages of both stand types, while landscapes solely composed of stand scale tree species mixtures could lead to a biodiversity reduction of a combination of investigated groups of 7 up to 20%."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3390/f10010073"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/16004"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/59834"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.publisher","MDPI"],["dc.relation.eissn","1999-4907"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"],["dc.subject.ddc","570"],["dc.title","Landscape-Scale Mixtures of Tree Species are More Effective than Stand-Scale Mixtures for Biodiversity of Vascular Plants, Bryophytes and Lichens"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1817"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","9"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Applied Ecology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1826"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","58"],["dc.contributor.author","Schall, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Heinrichs, Steffi"],["dc.contributor.author","Ammer, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Ayasse, Manfred"],["dc.contributor.author","Boch, Steffen"],["dc.contributor.author","Buscot, François"],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Goldmann, Kezia"],["dc.contributor.author","Overmann, Jörg"],["dc.contributor.author","Schulze, Ernst‐Detlef"],["dc.contributor.author","Gossner, Martin M."],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-10-01T09:57:58Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-10-01T09:57:58Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/1365-2664.13959"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/89956"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-469"],["dc.relation.eissn","1365-2664"],["dc.relation.issn","0021-8901"],["dc.title","Among stand heterogeneity is key for biodiversity in managed beech forests but does not question the value of unmanaged forests: Response to Bruun and Heilmann‐Clausen (2021)"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","267"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Applied Ecology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","278"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","55"],["dc.contributor.author","Schall, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Goßner, Martin M."],["dc.contributor.author","Heinrichs, Steffi"],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Boch, Steffen"],["dc.contributor.author","Prati, Daniel"],["dc.contributor.author","Jung, Kirsten"],["dc.contributor.author","Baumgartner, Vanessa"],["dc.contributor.author","Blaser, Stefan"],["dc.contributor.author","Böhm, Stefan"],["dc.contributor.author","Buscot, François"],["dc.contributor.author","Daniel, Rolf"],["dc.contributor.author","Goldmann, Kezia"],["dc.contributor.author","Kaiser, Kristin"],["dc.contributor.author","Kahl, Tiemo"],["dc.contributor.author","Lange, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Müller, Jörg"],["dc.contributor.author","Overmann, Jörg"],["dc.contributor.author","Renner, Swen C."],["dc.contributor.author","Schulze, Ernst-Detlef"],["dc.contributor.author","Sikorski, Johannes"],["dc.contributor.author","Tschapka, Marco"],["dc.contributor.author","Türke, Manfred"],["dc.contributor.author","Weisser, Wolfgang W."],["dc.contributor.author","Wemheuer, Bernd"],["dc.contributor.author","Wubet, Tesfaye"],["dc.contributor.author","Ammer, Christian"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-04-28T12:41:02Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-04-28T12:41:02Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.description.abstract","For managed temperate forests, conservationists and policymakers favour fine‐grained uneven‐aged (UEA) management over more traditional coarse‐grained even‐aged (EA) management, based on the assumption that within‐stand habitat heterogeneity enhances biodiversity. There is, however, little empirical evidence to support this assumption. We investigated for the first time how differently grained forest management systems affect the biodiversity of multiple above‐ and below‐ground taxa across spatial scales. We sampled 15 taxa of animals, plants, fungi and bacteria within the largest contiguous beech forest landscape of Germany and classified them into functional groups. Selected forest stands have been managed for more than a century at different spatial grains. The EA (coarse‐grained management) and UEA (fine‐grained) forests are comparable in spatial arrangement, climate and soil conditions. These were compared to forests of a nearby national park that have been unmanaged for at least 20 years. We used diversity accumulation curves to compare γ‐diversity for Hill numbers 0D (species richness), 1D (Shannon diversity) and 2D (Simpson diversity) between the management systems. Beta diversity was quantified as multiple‐site dissimilarity. Gamma diversity was higher in EA than in UEA forests for at least one of the three Hill numbers for six taxa (up to 77%), while eight showed no difference. Only bacteria showed the opposite pattern. Higher γ‐diversity in EA forests was also found for forest specialists and saproxylic beetles. Between‐stand β‐diversity was higher in EA than in UEA forests for one‐third (all species) and half (forest specialists) of all taxa, driven by environmental heterogeneity between age‐classes, while α‐diversity showed no directional response across taxa or for forest specialists. Synthesis and applications. Comparing EA and uneven‐aged forest management in Central European beech forests, our results show that a mosaic of different age‐classes is more important for regional biodiversity than high within‐stand heterogeneity. We suggest reconsidering the current trend of replacing even‐aged management in temperate forests. Instead, the variability of stages and stand structures should be increased to promote landscape‐scale biodiversity."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/1365-2664.12950"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/64444"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.relation.issn","0021-8901"],["dc.title","The impact of even-aged and uneven-aged forest management on regional biodiversity of multiple taxa in European beech forests"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","eabd9920"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","6522"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Science"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","370"],["dc.contributor.author","Schall, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Heinrichs, Steffi"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-04-14T08:23:13Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-04-14T08:23:13Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1126/science.abd9920"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/80830"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-399"],["dc.relation.eissn","1095-9203"],["dc.relation.issn","0036-8075"],["dc.title","Comment on “Forest microclimate dynamics drive plant responses to warming”"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Basic and Applied Ecology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","25"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","32"],["dc.contributor.author","Ammer, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Fichtner, Andreas"],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, Anton"],["dc.contributor.author","Gossner, Martin M."],["dc.contributor.author","Meyer, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Seidl, Rupert"],["dc.contributor.author","Thomas, Frank M."],["dc.contributor.author","Annighöfer, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Kreyling, Jürgen"],["dc.contributor.author","Ohse, Bettina"],["dc.contributor.author","Berger, Uta"],["dc.contributor.author","Feldmann, Eike"],["dc.contributor.author","Häberle, Karl-Heinz"],["dc.contributor.author","Heer, Katrin"],["dc.contributor.author","Heinrichs, Steffi"],["dc.contributor.author","Huth, Franka"],["dc.contributor.author","Krämer-Klement, Klara"],["dc.contributor.author","Mölder, Andreas"],["dc.contributor.author","Müller, Jörg"],["dc.contributor.author","Mund, Martina"],["dc.contributor.author","Opgenoorth, Lars"],["dc.contributor.author","Schall, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Scherer-Lorenzen, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Seidel, Dominik"],["dc.contributor.author","Vogt, Juliane"],["dc.contributor.author","Wagner, Sven"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T14:22:31Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T14:22:31Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.baae.2018.07.006"],["dc.identifier.issn","1439-1791"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/71643"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","Key ecological research questions for Central European forests"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","20"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","17"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","AFZ, der Wald"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","25"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","72"],["dc.contributor.author","Ammer, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Schall, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Goßner, Martin M."],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Heinrichs, Steffi"],["dc.contributor.author","Boch, Steffen"],["dc.contributor.author","Prati, Daniel"],["dc.contributor.author","Jung, Kirsten"],["dc.contributor.author","Baumgartner, Vanessa"],["dc.contributor.author","Blaser, Stefan"],["dc.contributor.author","Böhm, Stefan"],["dc.contributor.author","Buscot, François"],["dc.contributor.author","Daniel, Rolf"],["dc.contributor.author","Goldmann, Kezia"],["dc.contributor.author","Kaiser, Kristin"],["dc.contributor.author","Kahl, Tiemo"],["dc.contributor.author","Lange, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Müller, Jörg"],["dc.contributor.author","Overmann, Jörg"],["dc.contributor.author","Renner, Swen C."],["dc.contributor.author","Schulze, Ernst-Detlef"],["dc.contributor.author","Sikorski, Johannes"],["dc.contributor.author","Tschapka, Marco"],["dc.contributor.author","Türke, Manfred"],["dc.contributor.author","Weisser, Wolfgang W."],["dc.contributor.author","Wemheuer, Bernd"],["dc.contributor.author","Wubet, Tesfaye"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-12-12T14:36:11Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-12-12T14:36:11Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/11493"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.title","Waldbewirtschaftung und Biodiversität: Vielfalt ist gefragt"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]