Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • 2020-02-20Journal Article Research Paper
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","103303"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Dentistry"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","95"],["dc.contributor.author","Kanzow, Philipp"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiegand, Annette"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-05-20T13:09:53Z"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-05-22T07:47:36Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-05-20T13:09:53Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-05-22T07:47:36Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020-02-20"],["dc.description.abstract","Objectives: Repairs are frequently taught at dental schools around the world. Various studies regarding the teaching of composite repairs were performed over the past 20 years. However, it is unclear if teaching reflects current evidence and if clinical recommendations have changed over time.\r\nSources: Electronic databases (Embase, Scopus, PubMed) were searched.\r\nStudy selection: Studies reporting on teaching concepts (i.e. recommended treatment steps) were included. Teaching was analysed regarding key treatment steps for conditioning of the repair surface (use of (1) diamond burs, (2) air abrasion/silica coating, (3) application of silane or universal primers, and (4) application of adhesives) using random-effects meta-analyses, meta-regressions, and an overall quality score.\r\nData: 63 records were assessed, and 12 studies having surveyed 331 dental schools were included. The mean (95 % CI) proportion of dental schools teaching the use of diamond burs for roughening of the repair surface amounted to 83.0 % (71.0-90.7 %). Air abrasion / silica coating, the use of silane/universal primers and adhesives was taught by 29.8 % (18.7-44.1 %), 32.4 % (21.1-46.2 %), and 86.4 % (73.5-93.6 %), respectively. In recent years, dental schools more often taught the use of adhesives (padj. = 0.012) and the mean overall quality score of teaching improved (p = 0.007).\r\nConclusions: Share of dental schools recommending most of the key treatment steps did not significantly increase over the past 20 years. However, the overall quality of teaching improved, and teaching is nowadays more consistent with recently published recommendations.\r\nClinical significance: Repairs are not only frequently taught, but the mean overall quality score did improve in recent years."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103303"],["dc.identifier.pmid","32088217"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/65697"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/65638"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.relation.eissn","1879-176X"],["dc.relation.issn","0300-5712"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Poliklinik für Präventive Zahnmedizin, Parodontologie und Kariologie"],["dc.subject.gro","Minimally invasive dentistry"],["dc.subject.gro","Restoration repair"],["dc.subject.gro","Systematic review"],["dc.subject.gro","Teaching"],["dc.title","Teaching of composite restoration repair: Trends and quality of teaching over the past 20 years"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI PMID PMC
  • 2019-05-17Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Dentistry"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","16"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","86"],["dc.contributor.author","Kanzow, Philipp"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiegand, Annette"],["dc.contributor.author","Schwendicke, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Göstemeyer, Gerd"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-05-22T07:01:08Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-05-22T07:01:08Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019-05-17"],["dc.description.abstract","Objectives: While repairs are increasingly recommended to manage partially defective restorations, performing the repair (including bonding to different substrates) can be challenging, and dentists should adhere to established repair protocols. We aimed to systematically assess the consistency and quality of repair protocols.\r\nData: 808 records were initially identified and 71 repair protocols based on 84 sources included. The number of published sources over time increased exponentially (p < 0.001). Recommended treatment steps varied widely. Some treatment steps were only recommended by a minority of protocols, while others were consistently recommended (e.g. surface roughening, hydrofluoric acid etching of silicate ceramics, application of an adhesive/bonding agent). The overall quality of included sources was moderate (mean ± SD 3.7 ± 0.9 out of 7 points).\r\nSources: Electronic databases (Medline via PubMed, Embase) were searched, hand searches using Google and Google Scholar conducted, and the reference lists of included full texts screened and cross-referenced.\r\nStudy selection: (Non-)systematic reviews, working instructions, and textbooks with protocols on direct composite repair restorations for partially defective (1) composite, (2) amalgam, (3) porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFMs) with exposed metal base, (4) ceramic/PFMs without exposed metal base, and (5) full metal restorations were included. Data synthesis was performed by tabulation of recommended treatment steps and descriptive statistics. The quality of included sources was assessed based on a checklist for guideline appraisal (MiChe).\r\nConclusions: The main treatment steps were consistently reported across repair protocols.\r\nClinical significance: Dentists may want to adopt widely recommended treatment steps when performing repairs of different restoration materials in their daily practice."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.jdent.2019.05.021"],["dc.identifier.pmid","31108118"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/65677"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.relation.eissn","1879-176X"],["dc.relation.issn","0300-5712"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Poliklinik für Präventive Zahnmedizin, Parodontologie und Kariologie"],["dc.subject.gro","Decision-making"],["dc.subject.gro","Evidence-based practice"],["dc.subject.gro","Minimally invasive dentistry"],["dc.subject.gro","Restoration repair"],["dc.subject.gro","Systematic review"],["dc.title","Same, same, but different? A systematic review of protocols for restoration repair"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI PMID PMC