Options
Sirmpilatze, Nikoloz
Loading...
Preferred name
Sirmpilatze, Nikoloz
Official Name
Sirmpilatze, Nikoloz
Alternative Name
Sirmpilatze, N.
Main Affiliation
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
2019Preprint [["dc.contributor.author","Sirmpilatze, Nikoloz"],["dc.contributor.author","Baudewig, Jürgen"],["dc.contributor.author","Boretius, Susann"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-08-05T10:24:39Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-08-05T10:24:39Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.description.abstract","Medetomidine has become a popular choice for anesthetizing rats during long-lasting sessions of blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Despite this, it has not yet been established how commonly reported fMRI readouts evolve over several hours of medetomidine anesthesia and how they are affected by the precise timing, dose, and route of administration. We used four different protocols of medetomidine administration to anesthetize rats for up to six hours and repeatedly evaluated somatosensory stimulus-evoked BOLD responses and resting state functional connectivity throughout. We found that the temporal evolution of fMRI readouts strongly depended on the method of administration. Protocols that combined an initial medetomidine bolus (0.05 mg/kg) together with a subsequent continuous infusion (0.1 mg/kg/h) led to temporally stable measures of stimulus-evoked activity and functional connectivity. However, when the bolus was omitted, or the dose of medetomidine lowered, the measures attenuated in a time-dependent manner. We conclude that medetomidine can sustain consistent fMRI readouts for up to six hours of anesthesia, but only with an appropriate administration protocol. This factor should be considered for the design and interpretation of future preclinical fMRI studies in rats."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1101/667659"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/62281"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.title","Temporal stability of fMRI in medetomidine-anesthetized rats"],["dc.type","preprint"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI2020Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1427"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Cerebral Cortex"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1443"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","31"],["dc.contributor.author","Hafner, Georg"],["dc.contributor.author","Guy, Julien"],["dc.contributor.author","Witte, Mirko"],["dc.contributor.author","Truschow, Pavel"],["dc.contributor.author","Rüppel, Alina"],["dc.contributor.author","Sirmpilatze, Nikoloz"],["dc.contributor.author","Dadarwal, Rakshit"],["dc.contributor.author","Boretius, Susann"],["dc.contributor.author","Staiger, Jochen F"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-06-01T09:41:52Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-06-01T09:41:52Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.description.abstract","Abstract The neocortex is composed of layers. Whether layers constitute an essential framework for the formation of functional circuits is not well understood. We investigated the brain-wide input connectivity of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) expressing neurons in the reeler mouse. This mutant is characterized by a migration deficit of cortical neurons so that no layers are formed. Still, neurons retain their properties and reeler mice show little cognitive impairment. We focused on VIP neurons because they are known to receive strong long-range inputs and have a typical laminar bias toward upper layers. In reeler, these neurons are more dispersed across the cortex. We mapped the brain-wide inputs of VIP neurons in barrel cortex of wild-type and reeler mice with rabies virus tracing. Innervation by subcortical inputs was not altered in reeler, in contrast to the cortical circuitry. Numbers of long-range ipsilateral cortical inputs were reduced in reeler, while contralateral inputs were strongly increased. Reeler mice had more callosal projection neurons. Hence, the corpus callosum was larger in reeler as shown by structural imaging. We argue that, in the absence of cortical layers, circuits with subcortical structures are maintained but cortical neurons establish a different network that largely preserves cognitive functions."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1093/cercor/bhaa280"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/85068"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-425"],["dc.relation.eissn","1460-2199"],["dc.relation.issn","1047-3211"],["dc.title","Increased Callosal Connectivity in Reeler Mice Revealed by Brain-Wide Input Mapping of VIP Neurons in Barrel Cortex"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI2021Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","117519"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","NeuroImage"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","226"],["dc.contributor.author","Messinger, Adam"],["dc.contributor.author","Sirmpilatze, Nikoloz"],["dc.contributor.author","Heuer, Katja"],["dc.contributor.author","Loh, Kep Kee"],["dc.contributor.author","Mars, Rogier B."],["dc.contributor.author","Sein, Julien"],["dc.contributor.author","Xu, Ting"],["dc.contributor.author","Glen, Daniel"],["dc.contributor.author","Jung, Benjamin"],["dc.contributor.author","Seidlitz, Jakob"],["dc.contributor.author","Taylor, Paul"],["dc.contributor.author","Toro, Roberto"],["dc.contributor.author","Garza-Villarreal, Eduardo A."],["dc.contributor.author","Sponheim, Caleb"],["dc.contributor.author","Wang, Xindi"],["dc.contributor.author","Benn, R. Austin"],["dc.contributor.author","Cagna, Bastien"],["dc.contributor.author","Dadarwal, Rakshit"],["dc.contributor.author","Evrard, Henry C."],["dc.contributor.author","Garcia-Saldivar, Pamela"],["dc.contributor.author","Giavasis, Steven"],["dc.contributor.author","Hartig, Renée"],["dc.contributor.author","Lepage, Claude"],["dc.contributor.author","Liu, Cirong"],["dc.contributor.author","Majka, Piotr"],["dc.contributor.author","Merchant, Hugo"],["dc.contributor.author","Milham, Michael P."],["dc.contributor.author","Rosa, Marcello G.P."],["dc.contributor.author","Tasserie, Jordy"],["dc.contributor.author","Uhrig, Lynn"],["dc.contributor.author","Margulies, Daniel S."],["dc.contributor.author","Klink, P. Christiaan"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-04-14T08:30:25Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-04-14T08:30:25Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117519"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/83231"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-399"],["dc.relation.issn","1053-8119"],["dc.title","A collaborative resource platform for non-human primate neuroimaging"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI2022Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","e74813"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","eLife"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","11"],["dc.contributor.author","Sirmpilatze, Nikoloz"],["dc.contributor.author","Mylius, Judith"],["dc.contributor.author","Ortiz-Rios, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Baudewig, Jürgen"],["dc.contributor.author","Paasonen, Jaakko"],["dc.contributor.author","Golkowski, Daniel"],["dc.contributor.author","Ranft, Andreas"],["dc.contributor.author","Ilg, Rüdiger"],["dc.contributor.author","Gröhn, Olli"],["dc.contributor.author","Boretius, Susann"],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-06-01T09:40:03Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-06-01T09:40:03Z"],["dc.date.issued","2022"],["dc.description.abstract","During deep anesthesia, the electroencephalographic (EEG) signal of the brain alternates between bursts of activity and periods of relative silence (suppressions). The origin of burst-suppression and its distribution across the brain remain matters of debate. In this work, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to map the brain areas involved in anesthesia-induced burst-suppression across four mammalian species: humans, long-tailed macaques, common marmosets, and rats. At first, we determined the fMRI signatures of burst-suppression in human EEG-fMRI data. Applying this method to animal fMRI datasets, we found distinct burst-suppression signatures in all species. The burst-suppression maps revealed a marked inter-species difference: in rats, the entire neocortex engaged in burst-suppression, while in primates most sensory areas were excluded—predominantly the primary visual cortex. We anticipate that the identified species-specific fMRI signatures and whole-brain maps will guide future targeted studies investigating the cellular and molecular mechanisms of burst-suppression in unconscious states."],["dc.description.abstract","The development of anesthesia was a significant advance in medicine. It allows individuals to undergo surgery without feeling pain or remembering the experience. But scientists still do not know how anesthesia works. During anesthesia, scientists have measured brain activity using electroencephalograms (EEG) and found that the brain appears to turn on and off. Comatose patients also have similar switches between bursts of electrical activity and periods of silence. This burst-suppression pattern may be related to unconsciousness. But scientists still have many questions about how anesthesia causes burst-suppression. One challenge is that while an EEG can tell scientists when the brain turns on and off, it does not show exactly where this occurs. Another imaging method called functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) may fill this gap by allowing scientists to map where the brain activity occurs. Sirmpilatze et al. have created detailed maps of burst-suppression in humans, primates, and rats under anesthesia by analyzing brain scans using fMRI. In rats, the entire outer layer or cortex of the brain underwent a synchronized pattern of burst-suppression. In humans and primates, areas of the brain like those responsible for eyesight did not follow the rest of the cortex in switching on and off. The experiments reveal crucial differences in how rats and humans and other primates respond to anesthesia. The fMRI mapping technique Sirmpilatze et al. created may help scientists learn more about these differences and why some parts of human brains do not undergo burst-suppression. This may help scientists learn more about unconsciousness and help improve anesthesia or the care of comatose patients."],["dc.description.sponsorship"," Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft"],["dc.description.sponsorship","Leibniz Science Campus Primate Cognition"],["dc.description.sponsorship","International Max Planck Research School for Neurosciences"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.7554/eLife.74813"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/108627"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-572"],["dc.relation.eissn","2050-084X"],["dc.rights.uri","http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"],["dc.title","Spatial signatures of anesthesia-induced burst-suppression differ between primates and rodents"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI