Herrmann‐Lingen, Christoph

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1609"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","5"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Quality of Life Research"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1618"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","23"],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, H. Felix"],["dc.contributor.author","Klug, Cassandra"],["dc.contributor.author","Roeper, Koosje"],["dc.contributor.author","Blozik, Eva"],["dc.contributor.author","Edelmann, Frank T."],["dc.contributor.author","Eisele, Marion"],["dc.contributor.author","Stork, Stefan"],["dc.contributor.author","Wachter, R. Rolf"],["dc.contributor.author","Scherer, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Rose, Matthias"],["dc.contributor.author","Herrmann-Lingen, Christoph"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:39:46Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:39:46Z"],["dc.date.issued","2014"],["dc.description.abstract","Item response theory is increasingly used in the development of psychometric tests. This paper evaluates whether these modern psychometric methods can improve self-reported screening for depression and anxiety in patients with heart failure. The mental health status of 194 patients with heart failure was assessed using six screening tools for depression (Patient Health Questionnaire -9 (9 items), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) (7 items), PROMIS-Depression Short Form 8a (8 items)) and Anxiety (GAD-7 (7 items), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) (7 items), PROMIS-Anxiety Short Form 8a (8 items)). An in-person structured clinical interview was used as the current gold standard to identify the presence of a mental disorder. The diagnostic accuracy of all static tools was compared when item response theory (IRT)-based person parameter were estimated instead of sum scores. Furthermore, we compared performance of static instruments with post hoc simulated individual-tailored computer-adaptive test (CATs) for both disorders and a common negative affect CAT. In general, screening for depression was highly efficient and showed a better performance than screening for anxiety with only minimal differences among the assessed instruments. IRT-based person parameters yielded the same diagnostic accuracy as sum scores. CATs showed similar screening performance compared to legacy instruments but required significantly fewer items to identify patients without mental conditions. Ideal cutoffs varied between male and female samples. Overall, the diagnostic performance of all investigated instruments was similar, regardless of the methods being used. However, CATs can individually tailor the test to each patient, thus significantly decreasing the respondent burden for patients with and without mental conditions. Such approach could efficiently increase the acceptability of mental health screening in clinical practice settings."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s11136-013-0599-y"],["dc.identifier.isi","000336423200020"],["dc.identifier.pmid","24338104"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/33361"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Springer"],["dc.relation.issn","1573-2649"],["dc.relation.issn","0962-9343"],["dc.title","Screening for mental disorders in heart failure patients using computer-adaptive tests"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","801"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","543"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","British Journal of General Practice"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","807"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","57"],["dc.contributor.author","Scherer, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Himmel, Wolfgang"],["dc.contributor.author","Stanske, Beate"],["dc.contributor.author","Scherer, Franziska"],["dc.contributor.author","Koschack, Janka"],["dc.contributor.author","Kochen, Michael M."],["dc.contributor.author","Herrmann-Lingen, Christoph"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:57:56Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:57:56Z"],["dc.date.issued","2007"],["dc.description.abstract","Background Psychological distress is a common phenomenon in patients with heart failure. Depressive symptoms are often under-diagnosed or inadequately treated in primary care. Aim To analyse anxiety and/or depression in primary care patients with heart failure according to psychosocial factors, and to identify protective factors for the resolution of psychological distress. Design of study Longitudinal observation study. Setting Primary care practices in lower Saxony, Germany. Method In 291 primary care patients with heart failure the following factors were measured using validated questionnaires at baseline and 9 months later: anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS]), quality of life (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire), coping with illness (Freiburg questionnaire for coping with illness), and social support (social support questionnaire). Severity of heart failure (New York Heart Association [NYHA] classification and Goldman's Specific Activity Scale), and sociodemographic characteristics were documented using self-report instruments. Results Twenty-six (32.5%) of the 80 patients who were distressed at baseline had normal HADS scores 9 months later, while the remainder stayed distressed. In logistic regression, baseline distress (odds ratios [OR] 5.51; 95% confidence intervals [Cl] = 2.56 to 11.62), emotional problems (OR = 1.08; 95% Cl = 1.00 to 1.17), social support (OR = 0.54; 95% Cl = 0.35 to 0.83), and NYHA classification (OR = 1.70; 95% Cl = 1.05 to 2.77) independently predicted distress at follow up. High social support contributed to a resolution of anxiety or depression, while partnership and low levels of emotional problems protected patients who began the study in a good emotional state from psychological distress. Conclusion In everyday practice it is important to consider that a high NYHA classification and emotional problems may contribute to anxiety or depression, while high social support and living in a relationship may positively influence the psychological health of patients with heart failure."],["dc.identifier.isi","000250860300008"],["dc.identifier.pmid","17925137"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/50369"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.relation.issn","0960-1643"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Institut für Allgemeinmedizin"],["dc.title","Psychological distress in primary care patients with heart failure: a longitudinal study"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","14"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","BMC Family Practice"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","9"],["dc.contributor.author","Koschack, Janka"],["dc.contributor.author","Scherer, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Luers, Claus"],["dc.contributor.author","Kochen, Michael M."],["dc.contributor.author","Wetzel, Dirk"],["dc.contributor.author","Kleta, Sibylle"],["dc.contributor.author","Pouwels, Claudia"],["dc.contributor.author","Wachter, R. Rolf"],["dc.contributor.author","Herrmann-Lingen, Christoph"],["dc.contributor.author","Pieske, Burkert M."],["dc.contributor.author","Binder, Lutz"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T11:18:13Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T11:18:13Z"],["dc.date.issued","2008"],["dc.description.abstract","Background: Screening of primary care patients at risk for left ventricular systolic dysfunction by a simple blood-test might reduce referral rates for echocardiography. Whether or not natriuretic peptide testing is a useful and cost-effective diagnostic instrument in primary care settings, however, is still a matter of debate. Methods: N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels, clinical information, and echocardiographic data of left ventricular systolic function were collected in 542 family practice patients with at least one cardiovascular risk factor. We determined the diagnostic power of the NT-proBNP assessment in ruling out left ventricular systolic dysfunction and compared it to a risk score derived from a logistic regression model of easily acquired clinical information. Results: 23 of 542 patients showed left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Both NT-proBNP and the clinical risk score consisting of dyspnea at exertion and ankle swelling, coronary artery disease and diuretic treatment showed excellent diagnostic power for ruling out left ventricular systolic dysfunction. AUC of NT-proBNP was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.75 to 0.92) with a sensitivity of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.71 to 0.98) and a specificity of 0.46 (95% CI, 0.41 to 0.50). AUC of the clinical risk score was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.79 to 0.91) with a sensitivity of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.71 to 0.98) and a specificity of 0.64 (95% CI, 0.59 to 0.67). 148 misclassifications using NT-proBNP and 55 using the clinical risk score revealed a significant difference (McNemar test; p < 0.001) that was based on the higher specificity of the clinical risk score. Conclusion: The evaluation of clinical information is at least as effective as NT-proBNP testing in ruling out left ventricular systolic dysfunction in family practice patients at risk. If these results are confirmed in larger cohorts and in different samples, family physicians should be encouraged to rely on the diagnostic power of the clinical information from their patients."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1186/1471-2296-9-14"],["dc.identifier.isi","000254051900001"],["dc.identifier.pmid","18298821"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/8928"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/54989"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.relation.issn","1471-2296"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Institut für Allgemeinmedizin"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.title","Natriuretic peptide vs. clinical information for diagnosis of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in primary care"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","797"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","4"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","American Heart Journal"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","804"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","161"],["dc.contributor.author","Edelmann, Frank"],["dc.contributor.author","Stahrenberg, Raoul"],["dc.contributor.author","Polzin, Friederike"],["dc.contributor.author","Kockskaemper, Anke"],["dc.contributor.author","Duengen, Hans-Dirk"],["dc.contributor.author","Duvinage, Andre"],["dc.contributor.author","Binder, Lutz"],["dc.contributor.author","Kunde, Jan"],["dc.contributor.author","Scherer, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Gelbrich, Götz"],["dc.contributor.author","Hasenfuß, Gerd"],["dc.contributor.author","Pieske, Burkert"],["dc.contributor.author","Wachter, Rolf"],["dc.contributor.author","Herrmann-Lingen, Christoph"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:44:20Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:44:20Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.description.abstract","Background Quality of life (QoL) is impaired in diastolic heart failure. Little is known about QoL in diastolic dysfunction (DD) without heart failure. Methods In the DIAST-CHF observational study, outpatients with risk factors for or a history of heart failure were included. In a cross-sectional analysis, we classified patients with preserved systolic function as having normal diastolic function (N, n = 264) or DD without (DD-, n = 957) or with (DD+, n = 321) elevated filling pressures according to echocardiography. Quality of life was evaluated by the Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire. Results Short Form 36 physical function (SF-36-PF) was worse in DD+ (mean +/- SD 67.2 +/- 25.6) than in DD- (76.2 +/- 22.7, P < .05) than in N (mean +/- SD 81.1 +/- 23.5, P < .01). Other physical dimensions and the physical component score were also lower in DD, whereas the mental component score did not differ. The SF-36-PF correlated weakly with echocardiographic indicators of diastolic function. In multivariate linear regression controlling for age, sex, body mass index, depressiveness as assessed by Patient Health Questionnaire 9, N-terminal probrain-type natriuretic peptide, and midregional proadrenomedullin (MR-proADM), individual echocardiographic parameters or grade of DD was not independently associated with SF-36-PF, whereas the presence of DD+ was. Both N-terminal probrain-type natriuretic peptide and MR-proADM were independently associated with SF-36-PF, with MR-proADM showing the stronger association. Conclusions Physical dimensions of QoL are reduced in DD. Impaired SF-36-PF is only weakly associated with DD per se but rather seems to be contingent on the presence of elevated filling pressures. Biomarkers are more strongly and independently associated with SF-36-PF and may be more adequate surrogate markers of QoL in DD than echocardiographic measurements. (Am Heart J 2011; 161: 797-804.)"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.ahj.2011.01.003"],["dc.identifier.gro","3142750"],["dc.identifier.isi","000289190500025"],["dc.identifier.pmid","21473981"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/188"],["dc.notes.intern","WoS Import 2017-03-10"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.notes.submitter","PUB_WoS_Import"],["dc.publisher","Mosby-elsevier"],["dc.relation.eissn","1097-5330"],["dc.relation.issn","0002-8703"],["dc.title","Impaired physical quality of life in patients with diastolic dysfunction associates more strongly with neurohumoral activation than with echocardiographic parameters: Quality of life in diastolic dysfunction"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","13"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","10"],["dc.contributor.author","Blozik, Eva"],["dc.contributor.author","Laptinskaya, Daria"],["dc.contributor.author","Herrmann-Lingen, Christoph"],["dc.contributor.author","Schaefer, Helene"],["dc.contributor.author","Kochen, Michael M."],["dc.contributor.author","Himmel, Wolfgang"],["dc.contributor.author","Scherer, Martin"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:33:26Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:33:26Z"],["dc.date.issued","2009"],["dc.description.abstract","Background: Although psychosocial factors are known to be highly linked with neck pain, current therapies focus on somatically based interventions such as medicinal or manipulatory therapies. This study examines how socio-demographic, psychosocial and medical history and health-promoting lifestyle factors interact with neck pain in general practice patients. Methods: This is a cross-sectional survey including 448 patients from a general practice setting in Germany. Participants completed a comprehensive questionnaire including the Neck Pain and Disability Scale German version (NPAD-d) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Crude and adjusted regression analyses were done to assess the relationship between neck pain and socio-demographic, psychosocial and medical history and health-promoting lifestyle factors. Results: Both in crude and adjusted regression analyses, depression and anxiety were highly significantly linked with increasing levels of neck pain. Educational level, deficits in social support and physical exercise were associated with neck pain in bivariate analyses, but these associations did not persist with adjustment for depression and anxiety. When investigating levels of depression and anxiety by NPAD-d quartile subgroups, those who were identified to have depressive mood or to be anxious were very likely to be in the group with the highest levels of neck pain. Conclusion: The higher the neck pain level, the more attention should be paid to psychosocial distress as a related burden. Further research is needed to elucidate the causality and the direction of the association between psychosocial distress and neck pain and to determine the benefit of psychosocial interventions."],["dc.description.sponsorship","German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [01 GK 0516]; BMBF"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1186/1471-2474-10-13"],["dc.identifier.isi","000263230600001"],["dc.identifier.pmid","19171034"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/17577"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.relation.issn","1471-2474"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Institut für Allgemeinmedizin"],["dc.rights","CC BY 2.0"],["dc.title","Depression and anxiety as major determinants of neck pain: a cross-sectional study in general practice"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","Doc09"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","German medical science : GMS e-journal"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","12"],["dc.contributor.author","Ladwig, Karl-Heinz"],["dc.contributor.author","Lederbogen, Florian"],["dc.contributor.author","Albus, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Angermann, Christiane"],["dc.contributor.author","Borggrefe, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, Denise"],["dc.contributor.author","Fritzsche, Kurt"],["dc.contributor.author","Haass, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Jordan, Jochen"],["dc.contributor.author","Jünger, Jana"],["dc.contributor.author","Kindermann, Ingrid"],["dc.contributor.author","Köllner, Volker"],["dc.contributor.author","Kuhn, Bernhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Scherer, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Seyfarth, Melchior"],["dc.contributor.author","Völler, Heinz"],["dc.contributor.author","Waller, Christiane"],["dc.contributor.author","Herrmann-Lingen, Christoph"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-09T11:41:21Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-09T11:41:21Z"],["dc.date.issued","2014"],["dc.description.abstract","BACKGROUND: The rapid progress of psychosomatic research in cardiology and also the increasing impact of psychosocial issues in the clinical daily routine have prompted the Clinical Commission of the German Heart Society (DGK) to agree to an update of the first state of the art paper on this issue which was originally released in 2008. METHODS: The circle of experts was increased, general aspects were implemented and the state of the art was updated. Particular emphasis was dedicated to coronary heart diseases (CHD), heart rhythm diseases and heart failure because to date the evidence-based clinical knowledge is most advanced in these particular areas. Differences between men and women and over the life span were considered in the recommendations as were influences of cognitive capability and the interactive and synergistic impact of classical somatic risk factors on the affective comorbidity in heart disease patients. RESULTS: A IA recommendation (recommendation grade I and evidence grade A) was given for the need to consider psychosocial risk factors in the estimation of coronary risks as etiological and prognostic risk factors. Furthermore, for the recommendation to routinely integrate psychosocial patient management into the care of heart surgery patients because in these patients, comorbid affective disorders (e.g. depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder) are highly prevalent and often have a malignant prognosis. A IB recommendation was given for the treatment of psychosocial risk factors aiming to prevent the onset of CHD, particularly if the psychosocial risk factor is harmful in itself (e.g. depression) or constrains the treatment of the somatic risk factors. Patients with acute and chronic CHD should be offered anti-depressive medication if these patients suffer from medium to severe states of depression and in this case medication with selective reuptake inhibitors should be given. In the long-term course of treatment with implanted cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) a subjective health technology assessment is warranted. In particular, the likelihood of affective comorbidities and the onset of psychological crises should be carefully considered. CONCLUSIONS: The present state of the art paper presents an update of current empirical evidence in psychocardiology. The paper provides evidence-based recommendations for the integration of psychosocial factors into cardiological practice and highlights areas of high priority. The evidence for estimating the efficiency for psychotherapeutic and psychopharmacological interventions has increased substantially since the first release of the policy document but is, however, still weak. There remains an urgent need to establish curricula for physician competence in psychodiagnosis, communication and referral to ensure that current psychocardiac knowledge is translated into the daily routine."],["dc.description.abstract","Hintergrund: Die rasche Weiterentwicklung der psychokardiologischen Forschung, aber auch die wachsende Verankerung psychosozialer Fragestellungen im klinischen Alltag haben die Klinische Kommission der DGK bewogen, einer Aktualisierung und Weiterentwicklung des 2008 erstmals publizierten Positionspapiers zur Bedeutung psychosozialer Faktoren in der Kardiologie zuzustimmen. Methoden: Der Kreis der Autoren wurde vergrößert, allgemeine Aspekte eingefügt und das Wissen in allen Abschnitten auf den heutigen Stand gebracht. Schwerpunkte der Empfehlungen sind die koronare Herzerkrankung, Herzrhythmusstörungen und die Herzinsuffizienz, da hier der Stand der empirischen Evidenz und des klinisches Wissens zu psychosozialen Fragestellungen am weitesten entwickelt ist. Berücksichtigt wurden bei den Empfehlungen Besonderheiten von Frauen und Männern, Unterschiede bzgl. der Lebensspanne, Einflüsse auf die kognitive Leistungsfähigkeit und die interaktive synergistische Bedeutung klassischer Risikofaktoren bei affektiver Komorbidität. Ergebnisse: Eine I-A-Empfehlung (Empfehlungsgrad I, Evidenzgrad A) wurde vergeben für die Aufforderung, psychosoziale Risikofaktoren bei der Einschätzung des KHK-Risikos zu berücksichtigen, die als unabhängige ätiologische und prognostische Risikofaktoren für das Auftreten der koronaren Herzerkrankung (KHK) und für Komplikationen im Behandlungsverlauf der KHK bedeutsam sind. Ferner für die Empfehlung, Patienten mit Herzoperationen von einem interdisziplinären Team zu betreuten, in dem die Möglichkeit besteht, auf psychosoziale Aspekte einzugehen, da bei diesen Patienten komorbide psychische Störungen wie Depressivität, Angst und posttraumatische Belastungsstörung häufig und prognostisch ungünstig sind. Eine I-B-Empfehlung wurde vergeben für die Behandlung psychosozialer Risikofaktoren mit dem Ziel einer Primärprävention der KHK, wenn das Risikomerkmal an sich Krankheitswert hat (z. B. Depression) oder die Behandlung klassischer Risikofaktoren erschwert ist. Eine antidepressive Pharmakotherapie soll Patienten nach akutem Koronarsyndrom sowie in der Phase der chronischen KHK angeboten werden, die an einer mindestens mittelschweren rezidivierenden depressiven Störung leiden. Dabei sollen vorzugsweise Substanzen aus der Gruppe der selektiven Serotoninwiederaufnahmehemmer (SSRI) zum Einsatz kommen. Bei der langfristigen ärztlichen Begleitung von ICD-Patienten sollen die psychosozialen Folgen der ICD-Technologie beachtet und insbesondere relevante Affektstörungen sowie Krisen bei ICD-Patienten erkannt und fachgerecht behandelt werden. Schlussfolgerungen: Das Positionspapier formuliert konkrete Anwendungsfelder mit hoher Priorität für die Einbeziehung psychosozialer Faktoren in die kardiologische Praxis, die eine leitlinienkonforme Evidenz aufweisen. Trotz deutlicher Fortschritte seit der Erstveröffentlichung des Positionspapiers existieren weiterhin Forschungsdefizite für die Bewertung der Wirksamkeit psychotherapeutischer und psychopharmakologischer Konzepte bei kardialen Patienten. Curricula für die Vermittlung von (psycho-)diagnostischer, kommunikativer und differenzialdiagnostischer Kompetenz müssen rasch entwickelt werden, um eine Transmission des aktuellen Wissensstands in die Alltagspraxis zu ermöglichen."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3205/000194"],["dc.identifier.fs","610882"],["dc.identifier.pmid","24808816"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/11990"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/58411"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.relation.issn","1612-3174"],["dc.rights","CC BY-NC-ND 3.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0"],["dc.subject.mesh","Cardiology"],["dc.subject.mesh","Cardiovascular Diseases"],["dc.subject.mesh","Germany"],["dc.subject.mesh","Humans"],["dc.subject.mesh","Mental Disorders"],["dc.subject.mesh","Practice Guidelines as Topic"],["dc.subject.mesh","Psychology"],["dc.subject.mesh","Psychotherapy"],["dc.title","Position paper on the importance of psychosocial factors in cardiology: Update 2013."],["dc.title.translated","Positionspapier zur Bedeutung psychosozialer Faktoren in der Kardiologie: Update 2013"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","922"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","7"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","European Spine Journal"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","929"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","17"],["dc.contributor.author","Scherer, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Blozik, Eva"],["dc.contributor.author","Himmel, Wolfgang"],["dc.contributor.author","Laptinskaya, Daria"],["dc.contributor.author","Kochen, Michael M."],["dc.contributor.author","Herrmann-Lingen, Christoph"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T11:13:24Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T11:13:24Z"],["dc.date.issued","2008"],["dc.description.abstract","The aim of this study is to evaluate the validity and the psychometric properties of a German version of the 20-item neck pain and disability scale (NPAD) for use in primary care settings. Four hundred and forty-eight participants from 15 general practices in the area of Gottingen Germany completed a multidimensional questionnaire including a newly developed German version of the NPAD (NPAD-d) and self-reported demographic and clinical information. Reliability was tested using Cronbach's alpha. Item-to-total score correlations were analysed. Factor structure was explored by using unrestricted principal factor analysis. Construct validity of the NPAD-d was evaluated by simple correlation analyses (Pearson's rho) with social and clinical characteristics. The discriminative abilities of the NPAD-d were examined by comparing differences between subgroups stratified on non-NPAD-d pain related characteristics using t tests for mean scores. Cronbach's alpha of NPAD-d was 0.94. Item-to-total scale correlations ranged between 0.414 and 0.829. Exploratory principal factor analysis indicated that the NPAD-d covers one factor with an explained variance of 48%. Correlation analysis showed high correlations with criterion variables. The NAPD-d scores of subgroups of patients were significantly different showing good discriminative validity of the scale. The NPAD-d demonstrated good validity and reliability in this general practice setting. The NPAD-d may be useful in the clinical assessment process and the management of neck pain."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00586-008-0677-y"],["dc.identifier.isi","000257392100003"],["dc.identifier.pmid","18437433"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?goescholar/3096"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/53886"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.relation.issn","0940-6719"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Institut für Allgemeinmedizin"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.title","Psychometric properties of a German version of the neck pain and disability scale"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1175"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","11"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Clinical Research in Cardiology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1196"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","108"],["dc.contributor.author","Albus, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Waller, Christiane"],["dc.contributor.author","Fritzsche, Kurt"],["dc.contributor.author","Gunold, Hilka"],["dc.contributor.author","Haass, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Hamann, Bettina"],["dc.contributor.author","Kindermann, Ingrid"],["dc.contributor.author","Köllner, Volker"],["dc.contributor.author","Leithäuser, Boris"],["dc.contributor.author","Marx, Nikolaus"],["dc.contributor.author","Meesmann, Malte"],["dc.contributor.author","Michal, Matthias"],["dc.contributor.author","Ronel, Joram"],["dc.contributor.author","Scherer, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Schrader, Volker"],["dc.contributor.author","Schwaab, Bernhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Weber, Cora Stefanie"],["dc.contributor.author","Herrmann-Lingen, Christoph"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T14:10:23Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T14:10:23Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00392-019-01488-w"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1861-0692"],["dc.identifier.issn","1861-0684"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/70743"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","Significance of psychosocial factors in cardiology: update 2018"],["dc.title.alternative","Position paper of the German Cardiac Society"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","71"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","BMC Family Practice"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","18"],["dc.contributor.author","Eisele, Marion"],["dc.contributor.author","Rakebrandt, Anja"],["dc.contributor.author","Boczor, Sigrid"],["dc.contributor.author","Kazek, Agata"],["dc.contributor.author","Pohontsch, Nadine"],["dc.contributor.author","Okolo-Kulak, Magdalena"],["dc.contributor.author","Blozik, Eva"],["dc.contributor.author","Traeder, Jens-Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Stoerk, Stefan"],["dc.contributor.author","Herrmann-Lingen, Christoph"],["dc.contributor.author","Scherer, Martin"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:22:44Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:22:44Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.description.abstract","Background: Depression is more prevalent in patients with heart failure (HF) than in those without, but its detection is complicated by the symptom overlap between the two diseases. General practitioners (GPs) are the first point of contact for patients with HF. Therefore, this study aims to investigate GPs' awareness of depression in their HF patients and factors associated with this awareness. Methods: In this cross-sectional, observational study 3224 primary care patients with HF were screened for depressive symptomatology using an algorithm based on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the 9-item subscale on Depression of the Patient Health Questionnaire, and selected items from the PROMIS Depression and Anxiety scales. The 272 GPs of all patients involved in the study were interviewed by telephone regarding their patients' somatic and psychological comorbidities. The awareness rates of depressive symptomatology by the patients' GPs are analyzed using descriptive statistics. Logistic regression analyses are applied to investigate the patient-and GP-based factors associated with the GPs' awareness of depressive symptomatology. Results: GPs were aware of their patients' depressive symptomatology in 35% of all cases. Factors associated with the awareness of depressive symptomatology were: higher patient education levels, a history of depression known to the GP, GP-consultations due to emotional distress within the last 6 months, a higher frequency of GP-contacts within the last 6 months, a higher New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification and more severe depressive symptomatology. The GPs' characteristics, including further education in psychology/psychiatry, were not associated with GP awareness. Conclusions: Many aspects, including the definition of awareness and the practical issues in primary care, may contribute to the unexpectedly low awareness rates of depressive symptomatology in HF patients in primary care. Awareness rates might increase, if GPs encouraged their patients to talk about emotional distress, held detailed medical interviews including a patient's history of depression and payed special attention to HF patients with low education levels. However, it remains to be investigated whether GPs' judgement of depressive symptomatology is a better or worse indicator for the future prognosis and quality of life of HF patients than psychiatry based diagnostic criteria."],["dc.description.sponsorship","German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [01GY1150, 01EO1004]"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1186/s12875-017-0641-1"],["dc.identifier.isi","000403401700001"],["dc.identifier.pmid","28599626"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/14505"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/42330"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","PUB_WoS_Import"],["dc.publisher","Biomed Central Ltd"],["dc.relation.issn","1471-2296"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"],["dc.title","Factors associated with general practitioners' awareness of depression in primary care patients with heart failure: baseline-results from the observational RECODE-HF study"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","695"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","5"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Family Practice"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","702"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","37"],["dc.contributor.author","Eisele, Marion"],["dc.contributor.author","Harder, Malte"],["dc.contributor.author","Rakebrandt, Anja"],["dc.contributor.author","Boczor, Sigrid"],["dc.contributor.author","Marx, Gabriella"],["dc.contributor.author","Blozik, Eva"],["dc.contributor.author","Träder, Jens-Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Störk, Stefan"],["dc.contributor.author","Herrmann-Lingen, Christoph"],["dc.contributor.author","Scherer, Martin"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-04-14T08:31:38Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-04-14T08:31:38Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1093/fampra/cmaa042"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/83662"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-399"],["dc.relation.eissn","1460-2229"],["dc.title","Association of depression and anxiety with adherence in primary care patients with heart failure—cross-sectional results of the observational RECODE-HF cohort study"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]