Yu, Xiaohua

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","101347"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","China Economic Review"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","62"],["dc.contributor.author","Zhang, Xiaoheng"],["dc.contributor.author","Yu, Xiaohua"],["dc.contributor.author","You, Liangzhi"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-04-14T08:24:37Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-04-14T08:24:37Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.chieco.2019.101347"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/81359"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-399"],["dc.relation.issn","1043-951X"],["dc.title","Does the Granary County Subsidy Program Lead to manipulation of grain production data in China?"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1819168"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Ecosystem Health and Sustainability"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","6"],["dc.contributor.author","Zhang, Xiaoheng"],["dc.contributor.author","Wang, Zhina"],["dc.contributor.author","Qing, Ping"],["dc.contributor.author","Koemle, Dieter"],["dc.contributor.author","Yu, Xiaohua"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-04-14T08:25:16Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-04-14T08:25:16Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1080/20964129.2020.1819168"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/81576"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-399"],["dc.relation.eissn","2332-8878"],["dc.relation.issn","2096-4129"],["dc.title","Wheat yield convergence and its driving factors in countries along the Belt and Road"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","69"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Sustainability"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","9"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Zhang, Xiaoheng; \t\t \r\n\t\t College of Economic and Management, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China, \t\t \r\n\t\t Laboratory Informatique, Biologie Intégrative et Systèmes Complexes, University of Évry-Val d’Essonne, Évry 91020, France,"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Chu, Feng; \t\t \r\n\t\t Laboratory Informatique, Biologie Intégrative et Systèmes Complexes, University of Évry-Val d’Essonne, Évry 91020, France, \t\t \r\n\t\t Management Engineering Research Center, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China,"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Yu, Xiaohua; \t\t \r\n\t\t Courant Research Centre Poverty, Inequity and Growth, University of Gottingen, Gottingen 37073, Germany,"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Zhou, Yingheng; \t\t \r\n\t\t College of Economic and Management, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China,"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Tian, Xu; \t\t \r\n\t\t College of Economic and Management, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China,"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Geng, Xianhui; \t\t \r\n\t\t College of Economic and Management, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China,"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Yang, Jinyang; \t\t \r\n\t\t College of Economic and Management, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China, \t\t \r\n\t\t Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA,"],["dc.contributor.author","Chu, Feng"],["dc.contributor.author","Zhou, Yingheng"],["dc.contributor.author","Geng, Xianhui"],["dc.contributor.author","Zhang, Xiaoheng"],["dc.contributor.author","Yu, Xiaohua"],["dc.contributor.author","Tian, Xu"],["dc.contributor.author","Yang, Jinyang"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:29:06Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:29:06Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.date.updated","2022-02-09T13:23:39Z"],["dc.description.abstract","Supply shortages and competitive disadvantages are the main problems faced by China's hog sector. The non-essential import of pork products, triggered by competitive disadvantages, poses great challenges to hog farms. Structural changes are an important policy concern in China and elsewhere. Previous literature has ignored whether the ongoing structural changes from backyard to large farms can contribute to sustainable development. This study adopts the micro-level data of hog farms collected from Jiangsu Province, and uses a two-step metafrontier model and a primal system approach. The empirical results reveal that the ongoing structural changes are capable of boosting the growth in output in China's hog sector, since the stronger increase in comparable technical efficiency compensates for the inappropriate technology. Furthermore, the ongoing structural changes are also beneficial in the reduction of production costs and in improving competitiveness in China's hog sector. The decline in technical and allocative inefficiency costs, particularly for technical inefficiency costs, contributes to the cost advantage with the increasing farm size."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3390/su9010069"],["dc.identifier.eissn","2071-1050"],["dc.identifier.isi","000394842700069"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/14944"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/43569"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DeepGreen Import"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","PUB_WoS_Import"],["dc.publisher","MDPI"],["dc.relation.eissn","2071-1050"],["dc.relation.issn","2071-1050"],["dc.rights","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"],["dc.rights.access","openAccess"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"],["dc.subject.ddc","630"],["dc.title","Changing Structure and Sustainable Development for China's Hog Sector"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","50"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Economic Modelling"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","58"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","56"],["dc.contributor.author","Tian, Xu"],["dc.contributor.author","Zhang, Xiaoheng"],["dc.contributor.author","Zhou, Yingheng"],["dc.contributor.author","Yu, Xiaohua"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-11-28T10:03:22Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-11-28T10:03:22Z"],["dc.date.issued","2016"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.econmod.2016.02.028"],["dc.identifier.fs","622686"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/10579"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.relation.issn","0264-9993"],["dc.title","Regional income inequality in China revisited: A perspective from club convergence"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","unknown"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","57"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1-3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Productivity Analysis"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","68"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","52"],["dc.contributor.author","Zhang, Xiaoheng"],["dc.contributor.author","Yu, Xiaohua"],["dc.contributor.author","Tian, Xu"],["dc.contributor.author","Geng, Xianhui"],["dc.contributor.author","Zhou, Yingheng"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-04-06T07:50:39Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-04-06T07:50:39Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s11123-019-00557-6"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/63787"],["dc.relation.issn","0895-562X"],["dc.relation.issn","1573-0441"],["dc.title","Farm size, inefficiency, and rice production cost in China"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","282"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","306"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","63"],["dc.contributor.author","Zhang, Xiaoheng"],["dc.contributor.author","Qing, Ping"],["dc.contributor.author","Yu, Xiaohua"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-12-08T12:27:41Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-12-08T12:27:41Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/1467-8489.12299"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1467-8489"],["dc.identifier.issn","1364-985X"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/95420"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-476"],["dc.relation.eissn","1467-8489"],["dc.relation.issn","1364-985X"],["dc.rights.uri","http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor"],["dc.title","Short supply chain participation and market performance for vegetable farmers in China"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","ahead-of-print"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","China Agricultural Economic Review"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","ahead-of-print"],["dc.contributor.author","Zhang, Xiaoheng"],["dc.contributor.author","Yu, Xiaohua"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-07-05T14:57:39Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-07-05T14:57:39Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.description.abstract","Purpose Overuse of chemical fertilizers and pesticides is a major policy concern for many countries. Chinese government has adopted many technologies and management practices to reduce their use. However, little is known about the effects of social-economic method such as short supply chain (SSC) participation. SSC is an important organizational innovation in fresh food supply chains aiming at directly connecting farmers and consumers. Closer relationships between farmers and consumers may result in production behavioral changes. Thus the purpose of this paper is to investigate the impacts of SSC participation on agrochemicals application. Design/methodology/approach Based on the household level data collected from Jiangsu province in China, this paper employs an instrumental variable (IV) method to address the self-selection bias when we evaluate the effects of SSC participation on use of chemical fertilizer and pesticides. In addition, this paper also distinguishes between growth inputs and facilitating inputs in the production function when we calculate the marginal production values of chemical fertilizer and pesticides. Findings The empirical results show that SSC participation significantly reduces chemical fertilizer use by 351 kg and pesticides costs by 1659 Yuan (RMB) per hectare, accounting for 43.4% of the average chemical fertilizer use and 49.4% of the average pesticide costs, respectively for Chinese vegetable farms. However, SSC participation still cannot improve the use efficiency of agrochemicals. Originality/value This paper uses both application quantities and allocation efficiencies of chemical fertilizer and pesticides to comprehensively evaluate the effects of SSC participations. The results will reveal the core role of SSC played in promoting sustainable development of Chinese agricultural sector dominated by small-scale farmers."],["dc.description.abstract","Purpose Overuse of chemical fertilizers and pesticides is a major policy concern for many countries. Chinese government has adopted many technologies and management practices to reduce their use. However, little is known about the effects of social-economic method such as short supply chain (SSC) participation. SSC is an important organizational innovation in fresh food supply chains aiming at directly connecting farmers and consumers. Closer relationships between farmers and consumers may result in production behavioral changes. Thus the purpose of this paper is to investigate the impacts of SSC participation on agrochemicals application. Design/methodology/approach Based on the household level data collected from Jiangsu province in China, this paper employs an instrumental variable (IV) method to address the self-selection bias when we evaluate the effects of SSC participation on use of chemical fertilizer and pesticides. In addition, this paper also distinguishes between growth inputs and facilitating inputs in the production function when we calculate the marginal production values of chemical fertilizer and pesticides. Findings The empirical results show that SSC participation significantly reduces chemical fertilizer use by 351 kg and pesticides costs by 1659 Yuan (RMB) per hectare, accounting for 43.4% of the average chemical fertilizer use and 49.4% of the average pesticide costs, respectively for Chinese vegetable farms. However, SSC participation still cannot improve the use efficiency of agrochemicals. Originality/value This paper uses both application quantities and allocation efficiencies of chemical fertilizer and pesticides to comprehensively evaluate the effects of SSC participations. The results will reveal the core role of SSC played in promoting sustainable development of Chinese agricultural sector dominated by small-scale farmers."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1108/CAER-05-2020-0108"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/87698"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-441"],["dc.relation.issn","1756-137X"],["dc.title","Short supply chain participation, and agrochemicals' use intensity and efficiency: evidence from vegetable farms in China"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]