Hauswaldt, Johannes

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","53"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","European Journal of General Practice"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","56"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","23"],["dc.contributor.author","Barais, Marie"],["dc.contributor.author","Hauswaldt, Johannes"],["dc.contributor.author","Dinant, Geert-Jan"],["dc.contributor.author","van de Wiel, Margje"],["dc.contributor.author","Stolper, C. F."],["dc.contributor.author","van Royen, Paul"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:28:39Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:28:39Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.description.abstract","The role of gut feelings in diagnostic reasoning is recognized by most GPs throughout Europe, and probably throughout the world. Studies on this topic have emerged from different countries but there is the risk that authors will use different terms for similar concepts. The European Expert Group on Cognitive and Interactive Processes in Diagnosis and Management in General Practice, COGITA for short, was founded in 2008 to conduct cross-border research in the area of non-analytical diagnostic reasoning. Academic GPs, PhD students, psychologists, linguists and students meet once a year to share their experiences, exchange results and initiate new studies on the topic. A milestone in their research is this publication of a short glossary of diagnostic reasoning terms relating to the gut feelings research topic. It was constructed by the COGITA group members following a literature review, which aimed to define salient terms used in their publications. They described the terms, cross-reviewed the wording and reached consensus within the group. Two sections were created: (1) a diagnostic reasoning section that describes concepts such as analytical and non-analytical reasoning, clinical mind lines, and intuition, and (2) a research methods section describing concepts such as linguistic validity and saturation. The glossary, including relevant literature, has been published on the website http://www.gutfeelingsingeneralpractice.eu. In the future, the glossary will be modified if necessary and completed by members of the COGITA group."],["dc.description.sponsorship","European General Practice Research Network (EGPRN)"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1080/13814788.2016.1242569"],["dc.identifier.isi","000399576900009"],["dc.identifier.pmid","28271949"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/43470"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","PUB_WoS_Import"],["dc.relation.issn","1751-1402"],["dc.relation.issn","1381-4788"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Institut für Allgemeinmedizin"],["dc.title","COGITA network has constructed a glossary of diagnostic reasoning terms"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","54"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","BMC Family Practice"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","18"],["dc.contributor.author","Barais, Marie"],["dc.contributor.author","Hauswaldt, Johannes"],["dc.contributor.author","Hausmann, Daniel"],["dc.contributor.author","Czachowski, Slawomir"],["dc.contributor.author","Sowinska, Agnieszka"],["dc.contributor.author","Van Royen, Paul"],["dc.contributor.author","Stolper, Erik"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-09T11:43:22Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-09T11:43:22Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.description.abstract","Abstract Background Physicians’ clinical decision-making may be influenced by non‐analytical thinking, especially when perceiving uncertainty. Incidental gut feelings in general practice have been described, namely, as “a sense of alarm” and “a sense of reassurance”. A Dutch Gut Feelings Questionnaire (GFQ) was developed, validated and afterwards translated into English following a linguistic validation procedure. The aims were to translate the GFQ from English into French, German and Polish; to describe uniform elements as well as differences and difficulties in the linguistic validation processes; to propose a procedural scheme for future GFQ translations into other languages. Methods We followed a structured, similar and equivalent procedure. Forward and backward-translations, repeated consensus procedures and cultural validations performed in six steps. Exchanges between the several research teams, the authors of the Dutch GFQ, and the translators involved continued throughout the procedure. Results 12 translators, 52 GPs and 8 researchers in the field participated to the study in France, Germany, Switzerland and Poland. The collaborating research teams created three versions of the 10-item GFQ. Each research team found and agreed on compromises between comparability and similarity on one hand, and linguistic and cultural specificities on the other. Conclusions The gut feeling questionnaire is now available in five European languages: Dutch, English, French, German and Polish. The uniform procedural validation scheme presented, and agreed upon by the teams, can be used for the translation of the GFQ into other languages. Comparing results of research into the predictive value of gut feelings and into the significance of the main determinants in five European countries is now possible."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1186/s12875-017-0626-0"],["dc.identifier.pmid","28521742"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/14458"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/58869"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Institut für Allgemeinmedizin"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"],["dc.title","The linguistic validation of the gut feelings questionnaire in three European languages"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]