Schall, Peter

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","144"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Insect Conservation and Diversity"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","148"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","14"],["dc.contributor.author","Seibold, Sebastian"],["dc.contributor.author","Hothorn, Torsten"],["dc.contributor.author","Gossner, Martin M."],["dc.contributor.author","Simons, Nadja K."],["dc.contributor.author","Blüthgen, Nico"],["dc.contributor.author","Müller, Jörg"],["dc.contributor.author","Ambarlı, Didem"],["dc.contributor.author","Ammer, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Bauhus, Jürgen"],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Habel, Jan C."],["dc.contributor.author","Penone, Caterina"],["dc.contributor.author","Schall, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Schulze, Ernst‐Detlef"],["dc.contributor.author","Weisser, Wolfgang W."],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-04-14T08:30:04Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-04-14T08:30:04Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.description.abstract","Abstract Reports of major losses in insect biodiversity have stimulated an increasing interest in temporal population changes. Existing datasets are often limited to a small number of study sites, few points in time, a narrow range of land‐use intensities and only some taxonomic groups, or they lack standardised sampling. While new monitoring programs have been initiated, they still cover rather short time periods. Daskalova et al. 2021 (Insect Conservation and Diversity, 14, 1‐18) argue that temporal trends of insect populations derived from short time series are biased towards extreme trends, while their own analysis of an assembly of shorter‐ and longer‐term time series does not support an overall insect decline. With respect to the results of Seibold et al. 2019 (Nature, 574, 671–674) based on a 10‐year multi‐site time series, they claim that the analysis suffers from not accounting for temporal pseudoreplication. Here, we explain why the criticism of missing statistical rigour in the analysis of Seibold et al. (2019) is not warranted. Models that include ‘year’ as random effect, as suggested by Daskalova et al. (2021), fail to detect non‐linear trends and assume that consecutive years are independent samples which is questionable for insect time‐series data. We agree with Daskalova et al. (2021) that the assembly and analysis of larger datasets is urgently needed, but it will take time until such datasets are available. Thus, short‐term datasets are highly valuable, should be extended and analysed continually to provide a more detailed understanding of insect population changes under the influence of global change, and to trigger immediate conservation actions."],["dc.description.sponsorship","ProjektDEAL"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/icad.12467"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/83090"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-399"],["dc.publisher","John Wiley \\u0026 Sons, Ltd."],["dc.relation.eissn","1752-4598"],["dc.relation.issn","1752-458X"],["dc.rights","This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made."],["dc.title","Insights from regional and short‐term biodiversity monitoring datasets are valuable: a reply to Daskalova et al . 2021"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","232"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Forest Ecology and Management"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","245"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","437"],["dc.contributor.author","Leidinger, Jan"],["dc.contributor.author","Seibold, Sebastian"],["dc.contributor.author","Weisser, Wolfgang W."],["dc.contributor.author","Lange, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Schall, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Türke, Manfred"],["dc.contributor.author","Gossner, Martin M."],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T14:24:07Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T14:24:07Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.foreco.2019.01.013"],["dc.identifier.issn","0378-1127"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/72143"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","Effects of forest management on herbivorous insects in temperate Europe"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","671"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","7780"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Nature"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","674"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","574"],["dc.contributor.author","Seibold, Sebastian"],["dc.contributor.author","Gossner, Martin M."],["dc.contributor.author","Simons, Nadja K."],["dc.contributor.author","Blüthgen, Nico"],["dc.contributor.author","Müller, Jörg"],["dc.contributor.author","Ambarlı, Didem"],["dc.contributor.author","Ammer, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Bauhus, Jürgen"],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Habel, Jan C."],["dc.contributor.author","Linsenmair, Karl Eduard"],["dc.contributor.author","Nauss, Thomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Penone, Caterina"],["dc.contributor.author","Prati, Daniel"],["dc.contributor.author","Schall, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Schulze, Ernst-Detlef"],["dc.contributor.author","Vogt, Juliane"],["dc.contributor.author","Wöllauer, Stephan"],["dc.contributor.author","Weisser, Wolfgang W."],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T18:10:02Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T18:10:02Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1038/s41586-019-1684-3"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1476-4687"],["dc.identifier.issn","0028-0836"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/73830"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","Arthropod decline in grasslands and forests is associated with landscape-level drivers"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","e02303"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","6"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Ecosphere"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","9"],["dc.contributor.author","Grevé, Michael E."],["dc.contributor.author","Hager, Jörg"],["dc.contributor.author","Weisser, Wolfgang W."],["dc.contributor.author","Schall, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Gossner, Martin M."],["dc.contributor.author","Feldhaar, Heike"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T14:06:05Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T14:06:05Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1002/ecs2.2303"],["dc.identifier.issn","2150-8925"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/69773"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","Effect of forest management on temperate ant communities"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","5"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Forest Ecosystems"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","8"],["dc.contributor.author","Simons, Nadja K."],["dc.contributor.author","Felipe-Lucia, María R."],["dc.contributor.author","Schall, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Ammer, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Bauhus, Jürgen"],["dc.contributor.author","Blüthgen, Nico"],["dc.contributor.author","Boch, Steffen"],["dc.contributor.author","Buscot, François"],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Goldmann, Kezia"],["dc.contributor.author","Gossner, Martin M."],["dc.contributor.author","Hänsel, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Jung, Kirsten"],["dc.contributor.author","Manning, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Nauss, Thomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Oelmann, Yvonne"],["dc.contributor.author","Pena, Rodica"],["dc.contributor.author","Polle, Andrea"],["dc.contributor.author","Renner, Swen C."],["dc.contributor.author","Schloter, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Schöning, Ingo"],["dc.contributor.author","Schulze, Ernst-Detlef"],["dc.contributor.author","Solly, Emily F."],["dc.contributor.author","Sorkau, Elisabeth"],["dc.contributor.author","Stempfhuber, Barbara"],["dc.contributor.author","Wubet, Tesfaye"],["dc.contributor.author","Müller, Jörg"],["dc.contributor.author","Seibold, Sebastian"],["dc.contributor.author","Weisser, Wolfgang W."],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-04-14T08:29:56Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-04-14T08:29:56Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.date.updated","2022-07-29T12:18:47Z"],["dc.description.abstract","Abstract\r\n \r\n Background\r\n Forests perform various important ecosystem functions that contribute to ecosystem services. In many parts of the world, forest management has shifted from a focus on timber production to multi-purpose forestry, combining timber production with the supply of other forest ecosystem services. However, it is unclear which forest types provide which ecosystem services and to what extent forests primarily managed for timber already supply multiple ecosystem services. Based on a comprehensive dataset collected across 150 forest plots in three regions differing in management intensity and species composition, we develop models to predict the potential supply of 13 ecosystem services. We use those models to assess the level of multifunctionality of managed forests at the national level using national forest inventory data.\r\n \r\n \r\n Results\r\n Looking at the potential supply of ecosystem services, we found trade-offs (e.g. between both bark beetle control or dung decomposition and both productivity or soil carbon stocks) as well as synergies (e.g. for temperature regulation, carbon storage and culturally interesting plants) across the 53 most dominant forest types in Germany. No single forest type provided all ecosystem services equally. Some ecosystem services showed comparable levels across forest types (e.g. decomposition or richness of saprotrophs), while others varied strongly, depending on forest structural attributes (e.g. phosphorous availability or cover of edible plants) or tree species composition (e.g. potential nitrification activity). Variability in potential supply of ecosystem services was only to a lesser extent driven by environmental conditions. However, the geographic variation in ecosystem function supply across Germany was closely linked with the distribution of main tree species.\r\n \r\n \r\n Conclusions\r\n Our results show that forest multifunctionality is limited to subsets of ecosystem services. The importance of tree species composition highlights that a lack of multifunctionality at the stand level can be compensated by managing forests at the landscape level, when stands of complementary forest types are combined. These results imply that multi-purpose forestry should be based on a variety of forest types requiring coordinated planning across larger spatial scales."],["dc.identifier.citation","Forest Ecosystems. 2021 Jan 27;8(1):5"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1186/s40663-021-00280-5"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/17724"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/83038"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-399"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.publisher","Springer Singapore"],["dc.relation.eissn","2197-5620"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Zentrum für Biodiversität und Nachhaltige Landnutzung"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.holder","The Author(s)"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"],["dc.subject","Ecosystem processes and services"],["dc.subject","Forest management"],["dc.subject","Structural diversity"],["dc.subject","Tree species composition"],["dc.subject","Trade-offs and synergies"],["dc.subject","Forest productivity"],["dc.title","National Forest Inventories capture the multifunctionality of managed forests in Germany"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1363"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","7"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Applied Ecology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1375"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","57"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Heinrichs, Steffi; 1Silviculture and Forest Ecology of the Temperate Zones University of Göttingen Göttingen Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Ammer, Christian; 1Silviculture and Forest Ecology of the Temperate Zones University of Göttingen Göttingen Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Ayasse, Manfred; 2Institute of Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics University of Ulm Ulm Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Boch, Steffen; 3Biodiversity and Conservation Biology Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL Birmensdorf Switzerland"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Buscot, François; 5Department of Soil Ecology UFZ‐Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research Halle‐Saale Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Fischer, Markus; 4Institute of Plant Sciences University of Bern Bern Switzerland"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Goldmann, Kezia; 5Department of Soil Ecology UFZ‐Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research Halle‐Saale Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Overmann, Jörg; 7Leibniz‐Institute DSMZ ‐ German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures GmbH Braunschweig Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Schulze, Ernst‐Detlef; 8Max‐Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry Jena Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Sikorski, Johannes; 7Leibniz‐Institute DSMZ ‐ German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures GmbH Braunschweig Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Weisser, Wolfgang W.; 9Terrestrial Ecology Research Group Department of Ecology and Ecosystem Management School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan Technische Universität München Freising Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Wubet, Tesfaye; 5Department of Soil Ecology UFZ‐Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research Halle‐Saale Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Gossner, Martin M.; 9Terrestrial Ecology Research Group Department of Ecology and Ecosystem Management School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan Technische Universität München Freising Germany"],["dc.contributor.author","Schall, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Heinrichs, Steffi"],["dc.contributor.author","Ammer, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Ayasse, Manfred"],["dc.contributor.author","Boch, Steffen"],["dc.contributor.author","Buscot, François"],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Goldmann, Kezia"],["dc.contributor.author","Overmann, Jörg"],["dc.contributor.author","Schulze, Ernst‐Detlef"],["dc.contributor.author","Sikorski, Johannes"],["dc.contributor.author","Weisser, Wolfgang W."],["dc.contributor.author","Wubet, Tesfaye"],["dc.contributor.author","Gossner, Martin M."],["dc.contributor.editor","Mori, Akira"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-04-14T08:26:38Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-04-14T08:26:38Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.date.updated","2022-02-09T13:21:57Z"],["dc.description.abstract","Abstract Forest management greatly influences biodiversity across spatial scales. At the landscape scale, combining management systems that create different stand properties might promote biodiversity due to complementary species assemblages. In European beech forests, nature conservation and policy advocate a mixture of unmanaged (UNM) forests and uneven‐aged (UEA) forests managed at fine spatial grain at the expense of traditionally managed even‐aged shelterwood forests (EA). Evidence that such a landscape composition enhances forest biodiversity is still missing. We studied the biodiversity (species richness 0D, Shannon diversity 1D, Simpson diversity 2D) of 14 taxonomic groups from bacteria to vertebrates in ‘virtual’ beech forest landscapes composed of varying shares of EA, UEA and UNM and investigated how γ‐diversity responds to landscape composition. Groups were sampled in the largest contiguous beech forest in Germany, where EA and UEA management date back nearly two centuries, while management was abandoned 20–70 years ago (UNM). We used a novel resampling approach that created all compositional combinations of management systems. Pure EA landscapes preserved a maximum of 97.5% γ‐multidiversity (0D, 1D) across all taxa. Pure and mixed UEA/UNM landscapes reduced γ‐multidiversity by up to 12.8% (1D). This effect was consistent for forest specialists (1D: −15.3%). We found only weak complementarity among management systems. Landscape composition significantly affected γ‐diversity of 6–9 individual taxa, depending on the weighting of species frequencies with strongest responses for spiders, beetles, vascular plants and birds. Most showed maximum diversity in pure EA landscapes. Birds benefited from UNM in EA‐dominated landscapes. Deadwood fungi showed highest diversity in UNM. Synthesis and applications. Our study shows that combining fine‐grained forest management and management abandonment at the landscape scale will reduce, rather than enhance, regional forest biodiversity. We found an even‐aged shelterwood management system alone operating at intermediate spatial scales and providing stands with high environmental heterogeneity was able to support regional biodiversity. However, some taxa require certain shares of uneven‐aged and unmanaged forests, emphasizing their general importance. We encourage using the here presented resampling approach to verify our results in forest landscapes of different composition and configuration across the temperate zone."],["dc.description.abstract","Our study shows that combining fine‐grained forest management and management abandonment at the landscape scale will reduce, rather than enhance, regional forest biodiversity. We found an even‐aged shelterwood management system alone operating at intermediate spatial scales and providing stands with high environmental heterogeneity was able to support regional biodiversity. However, some taxa require certain shares of uneven‐aged and unmanaged forests, emphasizing their general importance. We encourage using the here presented resampling approach to verify our results in forest landscapes of different composition and configuration across the temperate zone. image"],["dc.description.sponsorship","Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001659"],["dc.description.sponsorship","Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001711"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/1365-2664.13635"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1365-2664"],["dc.identifier.issn","0021-8901"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/82026"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-399"],["dc.relation.eissn","1365-2664"],["dc.relation.issn","0021-8901"],["dc.rights","This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited."],["dc.title","Can multi‐taxa diversity in European beech forest landscapes be increased by combining different management systems?"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["cris.virtual.author-orcid","#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#"],["cris.virtual.author-orcid","#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#"],["cris.virtual.author-orcid","#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#"],["cris.virtual.author-orcid","0000-0003-4808-818X"],["cris.virtual.author-orcid","0000-0002-4235-0135"],["cris.virtual.author-orcid","#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#"],["cris.virtual.author-orcid","#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#"],["cris.virtual.author-orcid","#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#"],["cris.virtual.author-orcid","#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#"],["cris.virtual.department","#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#"],["cris.virtual.department","#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#"],["cris.virtual.department","#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#"],["cris.virtual.department","Abteilung Waldbau und Waldökologie der gemäßigten Zonen"],["cris.virtual.department","Präsidium"],["cris.virtual.department","#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#"],["cris.virtual.department","#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#"],["cris.virtual.department","#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#"],["cris.virtual.department","#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#"],["cris.virtualsource.author-orcid","#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#"],["cris.virtualsource.author-orcid","#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#"],["cris.virtualsource.author-orcid","#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#"],["cris.virtualsource.author-orcid","c1dcdb07-4da0-4402-be5d-566653a69b5f"],["cris.virtualsource.author-orcid","2301d346-4dea-4aa5-a716-15beccf00827"],["cris.virtualsource.author-orcid","#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#"],["cris.virtualsource.author-orcid","#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#"],["cris.virtualsource.author-orcid","#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#"],["cris.virtualsource.author-orcid","#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#"],["cris.virtualsource.department","#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#"],["cris.virtualsource.department","#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#"],["cris.virtualsource.department","#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#"],["cris.virtualsource.department","c1dcdb07-4da0-4402-be5d-566653a69b5f"],["cris.virtualsource.department","2301d346-4dea-4aa5-a716-15beccf00827"],["cris.virtualsource.department","#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#"],["cris.virtualsource.department","#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#"],["cris.virtualsource.department","#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#"],["cris.virtualsource.department","#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","120532"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Forest Ecology and Management"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","524"],["dc.contributor.author","Edelmann, Pascal"],["dc.contributor.author","Ambarlı, Didem"],["dc.contributor.author","Gossner, Martin M."],["dc.contributor.author","Schall, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Ammer, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Wende, Beate"],["dc.contributor.author","Schulze, Ernst-Detlef"],["dc.contributor.author","Weisser, Wolfgang W."],["dc.contributor.author","Seibold, Sebastian"],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-12-01T08:30:34Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-12-01T08:30:34Z"],["dc.date.issued","2022"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120532"],["dc.identifier.pii","S0378112722005266"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/117922"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-621"],["dc.relation.issn","0378-1127"],["dc.rights.uri","https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/"],["dc.title","Forest management affects saproxylic beetles through tree species composition and canopy cover"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","439"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Diversity & Distributions"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","453"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","27"],["dc.contributor.author","Bae, Soyeon"],["dc.contributor.author","Heidrich, Lea"],["dc.contributor.author","Levick, Shaun R."],["dc.contributor.author","Gossner, Martin M."],["dc.contributor.author","Seibold, Sebastian"],["dc.contributor.author","Weisser, Wolfgang W."],["dc.contributor.author","Magdon, Paul"],["dc.contributor.author","Serebryanyk, Alla"],["dc.contributor.author","Bässler, Claus"],["dc.contributor.author","Schäfer, Deborah"],["dc.contributor.author","Schulze, Ernst‐Detlef"],["dc.contributor.author","Doerfler, Inken"],["dc.contributor.author","Müller, Jörg"],["dc.contributor.author","Jung, Kirsten"],["dc.contributor.author","Heurich, Marco"],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Roth, Nicolas"],["dc.contributor.author","Schall, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Boch, Steffen"],["dc.contributor.author","Wöllauer, Stephan"],["dc.contributor.author","Renner, Swen C."],["dc.contributor.editor","Barnes, Andrew"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-04-14T08:24:04Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-04-14T08:24:04Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/ddi.13204"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/81151"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-399"],["dc.relation.eissn","1472-4642"],["dc.relation.issn","1366-9516"],["dc.title","Dispersal ability, trophic position and body size mediate species turnover processes: Insights from a multi‐taxa and multi‐scale approach"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","1365-2435.14186"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Functional Ecology"],["dc.contributor.author","Neff, Felix"],["dc.contributor.author","Hagge, Jonas"],["dc.contributor.author","Achury, Rafael"],["dc.contributor.author","Ambarlı, Didem"],["dc.contributor.author","Ammer, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Schall, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Seibold, Sebastian"],["dc.contributor.author","Staab, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Weisser, Wolfgang W."],["dc.contributor.author","Gossner, Martin M."],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-11-01T10:17:00Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-11-01T10:17:00Z"],["dc.date.issued","2022"],["dc.description.sponsorship"," Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft https://doi.org/10.13039/501100001659"],["dc.description.sponsorship"," Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung https://doi.org/10.13039/501100001711"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/1365-2435.14186"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/116711"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-605"],["dc.relation.eissn","1365-2435"],["dc.relation.issn","0269-8463"],["dc.rights.uri","http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor"],["dc.title","Hierarchical trait filtering at different spatial scales determines beetle assemblages in deadwood"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","92"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Biological Conservation"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","102"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","201"],["dc.contributor.author","Gossner, Martin M."],["dc.contributor.author","Wende, Beate"],["dc.contributor.author","Levick, Shaun"],["dc.contributor.author","Schall, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Floren, Andreas"],["dc.contributor.author","Linsenmair, Karl Eduard"],["dc.contributor.author","Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf D."],["dc.contributor.author","Schulze, Ernst-Detlef"],["dc.contributor.author","Weisser, Wolfgang W."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:09:06Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:09:06Z"],["dc.date.issued","2016"],["dc.description.abstract","Modification of natural ecosystems has threatened biodiversity worldwide, with forests suffering especially. Strategies aimed at mitigating such loss in forests often include enrichment of deadwood, a critical resource for many decomposer species. However, it remains unclear how deadwood can best be enriched to most effectively promote the diversity of saproxylic species. In this study, we investigated saproxylic beetle diversity in experimentally exposed deadwood logs of 13 different tree species across 30 forests in three regions of Germany. We tested whether gamma-diversity differs between tree species and whether the alpha-diversity within an individual log depended on whether logs were placed in unmanaged beech forests, managed beech forests, or managed conifer forests. We found significant differences in gamma- and alpha-diversity of saproxylic beetles among tree species, but the ranking of tree species differed between regions, suggesting differences in regional beetle species pools. Randomization tests aiming to identify how many and which deadwood logs would need to be exposed to best conserve saproxylic beetle diversity, showed that the overall diversity of beetles increased with the number of tree species exposed, due to turnover of beetle species between tree species. However, some species (e.g. Carpinus) and species combinations (e.g. Carpinus-Picea) reached exceptionally high beetle diversity. Alpha-diversity was higher in conifer than in beech forests, but did not differ between managed and unmanaged beech forests. Canopy cover above logs and average stand temperature strongly influenced alpha-diversity, suggesting that environmental conditions that may be affected by management act as habitat filters for species assemblages. We conclude that deadwood enrichment strategies would be most effective when combining particular tree species that support highest diversity. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.biocon.2016.06.032"],["dc.identifier.isi","000384782800010"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/39596"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Elsevier Sci Ltd"],["dc.relation.issn","1873-2917"],["dc.relation.issn","0006-3207"],["dc.title","Deadwood enrichment in European forests - Which tree species should be used to promote saproxylic beetle diversity?"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]