Shachar, Ayelet

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","45"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","International Journal of Constitutional Law"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","50"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","18"],["dc.contributor.author","Shachar, Ayelet"],["dc.contributor.author","Hirschl, Ran"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-04-14T08:27:32Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-04-14T08:27:32Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1093/icon/moaa013"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/82321"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-399"],["dc.relation.eissn","1474-2659"],["dc.relation.issn","1474-2640"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Institut für Politikwissenschaft"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Arbeitsbereich Vergleichende Verfassungsforschung"],["dc.title","Spatial statism: A rejoinder"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","253"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Political Theory"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","287"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","35"],["dc.contributor.author","Shachar, Ayelet"],["dc.contributor.author","Hirschl, Ran"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-10-16T10:55:22Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-10-16T10:55:22Z"],["dc.date.issued","2007"],["dc.description.abstract","The global distributive implications of automatically allocating political membership according to territoriality (jus soli) and parentage (jus sanguinis) principles have largely escaped critical scrutiny. This article begins to address this considerable gap. Securing membership status in a given state or region— with its specific level of wealth, degree of stability, and human rights record— is a crucial factor in the determination of life chances. However, birthright entitlements still dominate both our imagination and our laws in the allotment of political membership to a given state. In this article we explore the striking conceptual and legal similarities between intergenerational transfers of citizenship and property. The analogy between inherited citizenship and the intergenerational transfer of property allows us to use existing qualifications found in the realm of inheritance as a model for imposing restrictions on the unlimited and perpetual transmission of membership—with the aim of ameliorating its most glaring opportunity inequalities."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1177/0090591707299808"],["dc.identifier.gro","3146925"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/9572"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.issn","0090-5917"],["dc.title","Citizenship as Inherited Property"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","2535"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Cardozo Law Review"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","2560"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","30"],["dc.contributor.author","Shachar, Ayelet"],["dc.contributor.author","Hirschl, Ran"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-03-06T10:04:43Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-03-06T10:04:43Z"],["dc.date.issued","2009"],["dc.description.abstract","In recent years, the specter of litigants turning to religious or customary sources of law as authoritative guides to regulate their behavior, alongside or in lieu of secular norms, has risen to the forefront of politics in many countries worldwide. In this essay, we draw upon citizenship theory and comparative constitutional jurisprudence to identify two different categories of judicial response to religious-based claims for recognition, accommodation, and exemption: 1) 'diversity as inclusion;' and 2) 'non-state law as competition.' As long as legal claims for accommodation are not seen by courts as challenging the lexical superiority of the constitutional religion itself ('diversity as inclusion'), they stand a fair chance of success. Contrast that with the unyielding reluctance of legislatures and judiciaries to accept as binding or even cognizable any potentially competing legal order that originates in sacred or customary sources of identity and authority. This pattern of clamping down and refusing to accept any alternative sources of regulation becomes particularly visible where the legal challenge at issue is interpreted as raising doubts regarding which set of norms and institutions, or what set of high priests, should have the final word in authoritatively resolving legal disputes within a given society ('non-state law as competition'). This is a challenge that no secular legal order, no matter how tolerant and otherwise open to providing exemptions and accommodations to religious believers, can accept with indifference. For what perceived to be at stake here is the very authority and source of legitimacy of the accepted civil religion. We demonstrate these claims by focusing on recent jurisprudence from Canada and South Africa, two polities that represent the most difficult cases for our argument; if there is any place we would expect to find recognition by secular countries of religious or customary sources of law and authority, it would be in these diverse societies that have made an explicit constitutional commitment to promote their citizens’ freedom to preserve and enhance their multitude of backgrounds and distinctive cultural, linguistic and religious heritages as part of their 'mosaic' (Canada) or 'rainbow nation' (South Africa) conceptions of citizenship. Although operating in different contexts, the South African Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court of Canada seem to have made every effort to subject traditional legal regimes to general principles of constitutional law. By so doing, they have erected a new wall of separation that places noncompliance with the values of the civil religion beyond the pale of accepted accommodation, offering to those who espouse them the potential to either bring these alternative legal domains under the general rule of constitutional law or encounter the wrath of state fiat."],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/12805"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.title","The New Wall of Separation: Permitting Diversity, Restricting Competition"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","135"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","The University of Chicago law review"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","162"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","84"],["dc.contributor.author","Shachar, Ayelet"],["dc.contributor.author","Hirschl, Ran"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:49:39Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:49:39Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.identifier.gro","3145764"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/3493"],["dc.notes.intern","religion"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.notes.submitter","oschaef1"],["dc.relation.eissn","1939-859X"],["dc.relation.issn","0041-9494"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Institut für Politikwissenschaft"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Arbeitsbereich Vergleichende Verfassungsforschung"],["dc.title","The Limits of Constitutionalism: The Challenge of Religion"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","231"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Political Philosophy"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","257"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","22"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volumetitle","Philosophy, Politics & Society"],["dc.contributor.author","Shachar, Ayelet"],["dc.contributor.author","Hirschl, Ran"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-10-16T10:55:42Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-10-16T10:55:42Z"],["dc.date.issued","2014"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/jopp.12034"],["dc.identifier.gro","3147101"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/9765"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.issn","0963-8016"],["dc.title","On Citizenship, States, and Markets"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","175"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","191"],["dc.contributor.author","Hirschl, Ran"],["dc.contributor.author","Shachar, Ayelet"],["dc.contributor.editor","Rosenfeld, Michel"],["dc.contributor.editor","Mancini, Susanna"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:49:10Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:49:10Z"],["dc.date.issued","2014"],["dc.identifier.gro","3145636"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/3351"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","religion"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.notes.submitter","oschaef1"],["dc.publisher","Oxford Univerity Press"],["dc.publisher.place","Oxford"],["dc.relation.isbn","978-0-19-966038-4"],["dc.relation.ispartof","Constitutional secularism in an age of religious revival"],["dc.title","The constitutional boundaries of religious accommodation"],["dc.type","book_chapter"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","425"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","The University of Chicago Law Review"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","455"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","85"],["dc.contributor.author","Shachar, Ayelet"],["dc.contributor.author","Hirschl, Ran"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-03-05T13:04:51Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-03-05T13:04:51Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/12771"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Institut für Politikwissenschaft"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Arbeitsbereich Vergleichende Verfassungsforschung"],["dc.title","Competing Orders? The Challenge of Religion to Modern Constitutionalism"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","205"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","229"],["dc.contributor.author","Hirschl, Ran"],["dc.contributor.author","Shachar, Ayelet"],["dc.contributor.editor","Baines, Beverley"],["dc.contributor.editor","Rubio-Marin, Ruth"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-10-16T10:55:19Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-10-16T10:55:19Z"],["dc.date.issued","2004"],["dc.description.abstract","Open any traveler's guidebook about Israel, and you will soon find a photo of a young woman in military uniform carrying a weapon. She is the female soldier. Just like her male peers, she is subject to mandatory conscription to the defense forces when she reaches the age of eighteen. Her image is an emblem of gender equality. Unfortunately, the status of women in Israel does not match the mythology this image suggests. This gap between myth and reality makes Israel a living laboratory for the study of women's rights. As a Jewish and democratic state, it hosts a constant battle over its religious, national, and cultural identity, as well as engaging daily with internal and external challenges to its very existence. In each of these struggles, women's rights, among others, are tested to the limit. This chapter provides an overview of the current status of women's rights in Israel. Our intention is to analyze how, why, and under what conditions individual women and feminist organizations have been successful in advancing the gender equality agenda through constitutional rights jurisprudence and legislative initiatives. We also hope to evaluate the limits of such change by addressing the nature of the enduring inequalities that Israeli women still face in navigating the obstacles of a deeply divided society.Our discussion is divided into three major sections. We begin with an outline of pertinent elements of Israel's unique constitutional system."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1017/cbo9780511617393.010"],["dc.identifier.gro","3146906"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/9551"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.publisher","Cambridge University Press"],["dc.publisher.place","Cambridge"],["dc.relation.doi","10.1017/CBO9780511617393"],["dc.relation.isbn","978-0-511-61739-3"],["dc.relation.ispartof","The Gender of Constitutional Jurisprudence"],["dc.title","Constitutional Transformation, Gender Equality, and Religious/National Conflict in Israel: Tentative Progress through the Obstacle Course"],["dc.type","book_chapter"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","81"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","97"],["dc.contributor.author","Shachar, Ayelet"],["dc.contributor.author","Hirschl, Ran"],["dc.contributor.editor","Cunliffe, John"],["dc.contributor.editor","Erreygers, Guido"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-03-05T14:01:59Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-03-05T14:01:59Z"],["dc.date.issued","2013"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/12791"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.publisher","Routledge"],["dc.relation.isbn","978-0-415-51692-1"],["dc.relation.ispartof","Inherited Wealth, Justice and Equality"],["dc.title","Entailed Citizenship"],["dc.type","book_chapter"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.contributor.author","Hirschl, Ran"],["dc.contributor.author","Shachar, Ayelet"],["dc.contributor.editor","Graber, Mark"],["dc.contributor.editor","Levinson, Sanford"],["dc.contributor.editor","Tushnet, Mark"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-03-15T19:13:25Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-03-15T19:13:25Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/13032"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.publisher","Oxford University Press"],["dc.publisher.place","Oxford"],["dc.relation.ispartof","Constitutional Democracies in Crisis?"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Institut für Politikwissenschaft"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Arbeitsbereich Vergleichende Verfassungsforschung"],["dc.title","Religious Talk’ in Narratives of Membership"],["dc.type","book_chapter"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]