Pena, Rodica

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","5"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Forest Ecosystems"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","8"],["dc.contributor.author","Simons, Nadja K."],["dc.contributor.author","Felipe-Lucia, María R."],["dc.contributor.author","Schall, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Ammer, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Bauhus, Jürgen"],["dc.contributor.author","Blüthgen, Nico"],["dc.contributor.author","Boch, Steffen"],["dc.contributor.author","Buscot, François"],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Goldmann, Kezia"],["dc.contributor.author","Gossner, Martin M."],["dc.contributor.author","Hänsel, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Jung, Kirsten"],["dc.contributor.author","Manning, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Nauss, Thomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Oelmann, Yvonne"],["dc.contributor.author","Pena, Rodica"],["dc.contributor.author","Polle, Andrea"],["dc.contributor.author","Renner, Swen C."],["dc.contributor.author","Schloter, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Schöning, Ingo"],["dc.contributor.author","Schulze, Ernst-Detlef"],["dc.contributor.author","Solly, Emily F."],["dc.contributor.author","Sorkau, Elisabeth"],["dc.contributor.author","Stempfhuber, Barbara"],["dc.contributor.author","Wubet, Tesfaye"],["dc.contributor.author","Müller, Jörg"],["dc.contributor.author","Seibold, Sebastian"],["dc.contributor.author","Weisser, Wolfgang W."],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-04-14T08:29:56Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-04-14T08:29:56Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.date.updated","2022-07-29T12:18:47Z"],["dc.description.abstract","Abstract\r\n \r\n Background\r\n Forests perform various important ecosystem functions that contribute to ecosystem services. In many parts of the world, forest management has shifted from a focus on timber production to multi-purpose forestry, combining timber production with the supply of other forest ecosystem services. However, it is unclear which forest types provide which ecosystem services and to what extent forests primarily managed for timber already supply multiple ecosystem services. Based on a comprehensive dataset collected across 150 forest plots in three regions differing in management intensity and species composition, we develop models to predict the potential supply of 13 ecosystem services. We use those models to assess the level of multifunctionality of managed forests at the national level using national forest inventory data.\r\n \r\n \r\n Results\r\n Looking at the potential supply of ecosystem services, we found trade-offs (e.g. between both bark beetle control or dung decomposition and both productivity or soil carbon stocks) as well as synergies (e.g. for temperature regulation, carbon storage and culturally interesting plants) across the 53 most dominant forest types in Germany. No single forest type provided all ecosystem services equally. Some ecosystem services showed comparable levels across forest types (e.g. decomposition or richness of saprotrophs), while others varied strongly, depending on forest structural attributes (e.g. phosphorous availability or cover of edible plants) or tree species composition (e.g. potential nitrification activity). Variability in potential supply of ecosystem services was only to a lesser extent driven by environmental conditions. However, the geographic variation in ecosystem function supply across Germany was closely linked with the distribution of main tree species.\r\n \r\n \r\n Conclusions\r\n Our results show that forest multifunctionality is limited to subsets of ecosystem services. The importance of tree species composition highlights that a lack of multifunctionality at the stand level can be compensated by managing forests at the landscape level, when stands of complementary forest types are combined. These results imply that multi-purpose forestry should be based on a variety of forest types requiring coordinated planning across larger spatial scales."],["dc.identifier.citation","Forest Ecosystems. 2021 Jan 27;8(1):5"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1186/s40663-021-00280-5"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/17724"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/83038"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-399"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.publisher","Springer Singapore"],["dc.relation.eissn","2197-5620"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Zentrum für Biodiversität und Nachhaltige Landnutzung"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.holder","The Author(s)"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"],["dc.subject","Ecosystem processes and services"],["dc.subject","Forest management"],["dc.subject","Structural diversity"],["dc.subject","Tree species composition"],["dc.subject","Trade-offs and synergies"],["dc.subject","Forest productivity"],["dc.title","National Forest Inventories capture the multifunctionality of managed forests in Germany"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","31439"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Scientific Reports"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","10"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","6"],["dc.contributor.author","Goldmann, Kezia"],["dc.contributor.author","Schröter, Kristina"],["dc.contributor.author","Pena, Rodica"],["dc.contributor.author","Schöning, Ingo"],["dc.contributor.author","Schrumpf, Marion"],["dc.contributor.author","Buscot, François"],["dc.contributor.author","Polle, Andrea"],["dc.contributor.author","Wubet, Tesfaye"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:50:37Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:50:37Z"],["dc.date.issued","2016"],["dc.description.abstract","Distance decay, the general reduction in similarity of community composition with increasing geographical distance, is known as predictor of spatial variation and distribution patterns of organisms. However, changes in fungal communities along environmental gradients are little known. Here we show that distance decays of soil-inhabiting and root-associated fungal assemblages differ, and identify explanatory environmental variables. High-throughput sequencing analysis of fungal communities of beech-dominated forests at three study sites across Germany shows that root-associated fungi are recruited from the soil fungal community. However, distance decay is substantially weaker in the root-associated than in the soil community. Variance partitioning of factors contributing to the observed distance decay patterns support the hypothesis that host trees stabilize the composition of root-associated fungi communities, relative to soil communities. Thus, they not only have selective impacts on associated communities, but also buffer effects of changes in microclimatic and environmental variables that directly influence fungal community composition."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1038/srep31439"],["dc.identifier.gro","3147708"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/13684"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/5111"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","public"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.notes.submitter","chake"],["dc.relation.issn","2045-2322"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"],["dc.title","Divergent habitat filtering of root and soil fungal communities in temperate beech forests"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","348"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Molecular Ecology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","364"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","28"],["dc.contributor.author","Schröter, Kristina"],["dc.contributor.author","Wemheuer, Bernd"],["dc.contributor.author","Pena, Rodica"],["dc.contributor.author","Schöning, Ingo"],["dc.contributor.author","Ehbrecht, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Schall, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Ammer, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Daniel, Rolf"],["dc.contributor.author","Polle, Andrea"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-04-28T12:40:52Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-04-28T12:40:52Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.description.abstract","Root-associated mycobiomes (RAMs) link plant and soil ecological processes, thereby supporting ecosystem functions. Understanding the forces that govern the assembly of RAMs is key to sustainable ecosystem management. Here, we dissected RAMs according to functional guilds and combined phylogenetic and multivariate analyses to distinguish and quantify the forces driving RAM assembly processes. Across large biogeographic scales (>1,000 km) in temperate forests (>100 plots), RAMs were taxonomically highly distinct but composed of a stable trophic structure encompassing symbiotrophic, ectomycorrhizal (55%), saprotrophic (7%), endotrophic (3%) and pathotrophic fungi (<1%). Taxonomic community composition of RAMs is explained by abiotic factors, forest management intensity, dominant tree family (Fagaceae, Pinaceae) and root resource traits. Local RAM assemblies are phylogenetically clustered, indicating stronger habitat filtering on roots in dry, acid soils and in conifer stands than in other forest types. The local assembly of ectomycorrhizal communities is driven by forest management intensity. At larger scales, root resource traits and soil pH shift the assembly process of ectomycorrhizal fungi from deterministic to neutral. Neutral or weak deterministic assembly processes are prevalent in saprotrophic and endophytic guilds. The remarkable consistency of the trophic composition of the RAMs suggests that temperate forests attract fungal assemblages that afford functional resilience under the current range of climatic and edaphic conditions. At local scales, the filtering processes that structure symbiotrophic assemblies can be influenced by forest management and tree selection, but at larger scales, environmental cues and host resource traits are the most prevalent forces."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/mec.14887"],["dc.identifier.pmid","30276908"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/64443"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.relation.eissn","1365-294X"],["dc.relation.issn","0962-1083"],["dc.relation.issn","1365-294X"],["dc.title","Assembly processes of trophic guilds in the root mycobiome of temperate forests"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","233"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Mycorrhiza"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","245"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","27"],["dc.contributor.author","Pena, Rodica"],["dc.contributor.author","Lang, Christa"],["dc.contributor.author","Lohaus, Gertrud"],["dc.contributor.author","Boch, Steffen"],["dc.contributor.author","Schall, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Schöning, Ingo"],["dc.contributor.author","Ammer, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Polle, Andrea"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:47:23Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:47:23Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.description.abstract","Ectomycorrhizal (EM) fungal taxonomic, phylogenetic, and trait diversity (exploration types) were analyzed in beech and conifer forests along a north-to-south gradient in three biogeographic regions in Germany. The taxonomic community structures of the ectomycorrhizal assemblages in top soil were influenced by stand density and forest type, by biogeographic environmental factors (soil physical properties, temperature, and precipitation), and by nitrogen forms (amino acids, ammonium, and nitrate). While α-diversity did not differ between forest types, β-diversity increased, leading to higher γ-diversity on the landscape level when both forest types were present. The highest taxonomic diversity of EM was found in forests in cool, moist climate on clay and silty soils and the lowest in the forests in warm, dry climate on sandy soils. In the region with higher taxonomic diversity, phylogenetic clustering was found, but not trait clustering. In the warm region, trait clustering occurred despite neutral phylogenetic effects. These results suggest that different forest types and favorable environmental conditions in forests promote high EM species richness in top soil presumably with both high functional diversity and phylogenetic redundancy, while stressful environmental conditions lead to lower species richness and functional redundancy."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00572-016-0742-z"],["dc.identifier.gro","3146757"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/4556"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.issn","0940-6360"],["dc.title","Phylogenetic and functional traits of ectomycorrhizal assemblages in top soil from different biogeographic regions and forest types"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","4839"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Nature Communications"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","9"],["dc.contributor.author","Felipe-Lucia, María R."],["dc.contributor.author","Soliveres, Santiago"],["dc.contributor.author","Penone, Caterina"],["dc.contributor.author","Manning, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","van der Plas, Fons"],["dc.contributor.author","Boch, Steffen"],["dc.contributor.author","Prati, Daniel"],["dc.contributor.author","Ammer, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Schall, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Gossner, Martin M."],["dc.contributor.author","Bauhus, Jürgen"],["dc.contributor.author","Buscot, Francois"],["dc.contributor.author","Blaser, Stefan"],["dc.contributor.author","Blüthgen, Nico"],["dc.contributor.author","de Frutos, Angel"],["dc.contributor.author","Ehbrecht, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Frank, Kevin"],["dc.contributor.author","Goldmann, Kezia"],["dc.contributor.author","Hänsel, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Jung, Kirsten"],["dc.contributor.author","Kahl, Tiemo"],["dc.contributor.author","Nauss, Thomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Oelmann, Yvonne"],["dc.contributor.author","Pena, Rodica"],["dc.contributor.author","Polle, Andrea"],["dc.contributor.author","Renner, Swen"],["dc.contributor.author","Schloter, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Schöning, Ingo"],["dc.contributor.author","Schrumpf, Marion"],["dc.contributor.author","Schulze, Ernst-Detlef"],["dc.contributor.author","Solly, Emily"],["dc.contributor.author","Sorkau, Elisabeth"],["dc.contributor.author","Stempfhuber, Barbara"],["dc.contributor.author","Tschapka, Marco"],["dc.contributor.author","Weisser, Wolfgang W."],["dc.contributor.author","Wubet, Tesfaye"],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Allan, Eric"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-09T11:50:47Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-09T11:50:47Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.description.abstract","Trade-offs and synergies in the supply of forest ecosystem services are common but the drivers of these relationships are poorly understood. To guide management that seeks to promote multiple services, we investigated the relationships between 12 stand-level forest attributes, including structure, composition, heterogeneity and plant diversity, plus 4 environmental factors, and proxies for 14 ecosystem services in 150 temperate forest plots. Our results show that forest attributes are the best predictors of most ecosystem services and are also good predictors of several synergies and trade-offs between services. Environmental factors also play an important role, mostly in combination with forest attributes. Our study suggests that managing forests to increase structural heterogeneity, maintain large trees, and canopy gaps would promote the supply of multiple ecosystem services. These results highlight the potential for forest management to encourage multifunctional forests and suggest that a coordinated landscape-scale strategy could help to mitigate trade-offs in human-dominated landscapes."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1038/s41467-018-07082-4"],["dc.identifier.pmid","30446752"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/15998"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/59828"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"],["dc.subject.ddc","570"],["dc.title","Multiple forest attributes underpin the supply of multiple ecosystem services"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","3081"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","8"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Environmental Microbiology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","3095"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","22"],["dc.contributor.author","Nguyen, Dung Quang"],["dc.contributor.author","Schneider, Dominik"],["dc.contributor.author","Brinkmann, Nicole"],["dc.contributor.author","Song, Bin"],["dc.contributor.author","Janz, Dennis"],["dc.contributor.author","Schöning, Ingo"],["dc.contributor.author","Daniel, Rolf"],["dc.contributor.author","Pena, Rodica"],["dc.contributor.author","Polle, Andrea"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-04-14T08:25:29Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-04-14T08:25:29Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.description.abstract","Summary Root‐associated fungi (RAF) link nutrient fluxes between soil and roots and thus play important roles in ecosystem functioning. To enhance our understanding of the factors that control RAF, we fitted statistical models to explain variation in RAF community structure using data from 150 temperate forest sites covering a broad range of environmental conditions and chemical root traits. We found that variation in RAF communities was related to both root traits (e.g., cations, carbohydrates, NO3−) and soil properties (pH, cations, moisture, C/N). The identified drivers were the combined result of distinct response patterns of fungal taxa (determined at the rank of orders) to biotic and abiotic factors. Our results support that RAF community variation is related to evolutionary adaptedness of fungal lineages and consequently, drivers of RAF communities are context‐dependent."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Program 1374 \"Infrastructure‐Biodiversity‐Exploratories\""],["dc.description.sponsorship","Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development Vietnam"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/1462-2920.15037"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/81645"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-399"],["dc.publisher","John Wiley \\u0026 Sons, Inc."],["dc.relation.eissn","1462-2920"],["dc.relation.issn","1462-2912"],["dc.rights","This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited."],["dc.title","Soil and root nutrient chemistry structure root‐associated fungal assemblages in temperate forests"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","9"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Soil Biology and Biochemistry"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","18"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","131"],["dc.contributor.author","Awad, Abdallah"],["dc.contributor.author","Majcherczyk, Andrzej"],["dc.contributor.author","Schall, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Schröter, Kristina"],["dc.contributor.author","Schöning, Ingo"],["dc.contributor.author","Schrumpf, Marion"],["dc.contributor.author","Ehbrecht, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Boch, Steffen"],["dc.contributor.author","Kahl, Tiemo"],["dc.contributor.author","Bauhus, Jürgen"],["dc.contributor.author","Seidel, Dominik"],["dc.contributor.author","Ammer, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Kües, Ursula"],["dc.contributor.author","Pena, Rodica"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T15:21:24Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T15:21:24Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.12.014"],["dc.identifier.issn","0038-0717"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/73015"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","Ectomycorrhizal and saprotrophic soil fungal biomass are driven by different factors and vary among broadleaf and coniferous temperate forests"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]