Pena, Rodica

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","5"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Forest Ecosystems"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","8"],["dc.contributor.author","Simons, Nadja K."],["dc.contributor.author","Felipe-Lucia, María R."],["dc.contributor.author","Schall, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Ammer, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Bauhus, Jürgen"],["dc.contributor.author","Blüthgen, Nico"],["dc.contributor.author","Boch, Steffen"],["dc.contributor.author","Buscot, François"],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Goldmann, Kezia"],["dc.contributor.author","Gossner, Martin M."],["dc.contributor.author","Hänsel, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Jung, Kirsten"],["dc.contributor.author","Manning, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Nauss, Thomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Oelmann, Yvonne"],["dc.contributor.author","Pena, Rodica"],["dc.contributor.author","Polle, Andrea"],["dc.contributor.author","Renner, Swen C."],["dc.contributor.author","Schloter, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Schöning, Ingo"],["dc.contributor.author","Schulze, Ernst-Detlef"],["dc.contributor.author","Solly, Emily F."],["dc.contributor.author","Sorkau, Elisabeth"],["dc.contributor.author","Stempfhuber, Barbara"],["dc.contributor.author","Wubet, Tesfaye"],["dc.contributor.author","Müller, Jörg"],["dc.contributor.author","Seibold, Sebastian"],["dc.contributor.author","Weisser, Wolfgang W."],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-04-14T08:29:56Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-04-14T08:29:56Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.date.updated","2022-07-29T12:18:47Z"],["dc.description.abstract","Abstract\r\n \r\n Background\r\n Forests perform various important ecosystem functions that contribute to ecosystem services. In many parts of the world, forest management has shifted from a focus on timber production to multi-purpose forestry, combining timber production with the supply of other forest ecosystem services. However, it is unclear which forest types provide which ecosystem services and to what extent forests primarily managed for timber already supply multiple ecosystem services. Based on a comprehensive dataset collected across 150 forest plots in three regions differing in management intensity and species composition, we develop models to predict the potential supply of 13 ecosystem services. We use those models to assess the level of multifunctionality of managed forests at the national level using national forest inventory data.\r\n \r\n \r\n Results\r\n Looking at the potential supply of ecosystem services, we found trade-offs (e.g. between both bark beetle control or dung decomposition and both productivity or soil carbon stocks) as well as synergies (e.g. for temperature regulation, carbon storage and culturally interesting plants) across the 53 most dominant forest types in Germany. No single forest type provided all ecosystem services equally. Some ecosystem services showed comparable levels across forest types (e.g. decomposition or richness of saprotrophs), while others varied strongly, depending on forest structural attributes (e.g. phosphorous availability or cover of edible plants) or tree species composition (e.g. potential nitrification activity). Variability in potential supply of ecosystem services was only to a lesser extent driven by environmental conditions. However, the geographic variation in ecosystem function supply across Germany was closely linked with the distribution of main tree species.\r\n \r\n \r\n Conclusions\r\n Our results show that forest multifunctionality is limited to subsets of ecosystem services. The importance of tree species composition highlights that a lack of multifunctionality at the stand level can be compensated by managing forests at the landscape level, when stands of complementary forest types are combined. These results imply that multi-purpose forestry should be based on a variety of forest types requiring coordinated planning across larger spatial scales."],["dc.identifier.citation","Forest Ecosystems. 2021 Jan 27;8(1):5"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1186/s40663-021-00280-5"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/17724"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/83038"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-399"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.publisher","Springer Singapore"],["dc.relation.eissn","2197-5620"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Zentrum für Biodiversität und Nachhaltige Landnutzung"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.holder","The Author(s)"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"],["dc.subject","Ecosystem processes and services"],["dc.subject","Forest management"],["dc.subject","Structural diversity"],["dc.subject","Tree species composition"],["dc.subject","Trade-offs and synergies"],["dc.subject","Forest productivity"],["dc.title","National Forest Inventories capture the multifunctionality of managed forests in Germany"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","31439"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Scientific Reports"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","10"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","6"],["dc.contributor.author","Goldmann, Kezia"],["dc.contributor.author","Schröter, Kristina"],["dc.contributor.author","Pena, Rodica"],["dc.contributor.author","Schöning, Ingo"],["dc.contributor.author","Schrumpf, Marion"],["dc.contributor.author","Buscot, François"],["dc.contributor.author","Polle, Andrea"],["dc.contributor.author","Wubet, Tesfaye"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:50:37Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:50:37Z"],["dc.date.issued","2016"],["dc.description.abstract","Distance decay, the general reduction in similarity of community composition with increasing geographical distance, is known as predictor of spatial variation and distribution patterns of organisms. However, changes in fungal communities along environmental gradients are little known. Here we show that distance decays of soil-inhabiting and root-associated fungal assemblages differ, and identify explanatory environmental variables. High-throughput sequencing analysis of fungal communities of beech-dominated forests at three study sites across Germany shows that root-associated fungi are recruited from the soil fungal community. However, distance decay is substantially weaker in the root-associated than in the soil community. Variance partitioning of factors contributing to the observed distance decay patterns support the hypothesis that host trees stabilize the composition of root-associated fungi communities, relative to soil communities. Thus, they not only have selective impacts on associated communities, but also buffer effects of changes in microclimatic and environmental variables that directly influence fungal community composition."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1038/srep31439"],["dc.identifier.gro","3147708"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/13684"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/5111"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","public"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.notes.submitter","chake"],["dc.relation.issn","2045-2322"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"],["dc.title","Divergent habitat filtering of root and soil fungal communities in temperate beech forests"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","4839"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Nature Communications"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","9"],["dc.contributor.author","Felipe-Lucia, María R."],["dc.contributor.author","Soliveres, Santiago"],["dc.contributor.author","Penone, Caterina"],["dc.contributor.author","Manning, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","van der Plas, Fons"],["dc.contributor.author","Boch, Steffen"],["dc.contributor.author","Prati, Daniel"],["dc.contributor.author","Ammer, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Schall, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Gossner, Martin M."],["dc.contributor.author","Bauhus, Jürgen"],["dc.contributor.author","Buscot, Francois"],["dc.contributor.author","Blaser, Stefan"],["dc.contributor.author","Blüthgen, Nico"],["dc.contributor.author","de Frutos, Angel"],["dc.contributor.author","Ehbrecht, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Frank, Kevin"],["dc.contributor.author","Goldmann, Kezia"],["dc.contributor.author","Hänsel, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Jung, Kirsten"],["dc.contributor.author","Kahl, Tiemo"],["dc.contributor.author","Nauss, Thomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Oelmann, Yvonne"],["dc.contributor.author","Pena, Rodica"],["dc.contributor.author","Polle, Andrea"],["dc.contributor.author","Renner, Swen"],["dc.contributor.author","Schloter, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Schöning, Ingo"],["dc.contributor.author","Schrumpf, Marion"],["dc.contributor.author","Schulze, Ernst-Detlef"],["dc.contributor.author","Solly, Emily"],["dc.contributor.author","Sorkau, Elisabeth"],["dc.contributor.author","Stempfhuber, Barbara"],["dc.contributor.author","Tschapka, Marco"],["dc.contributor.author","Weisser, Wolfgang W."],["dc.contributor.author","Wubet, Tesfaye"],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Allan, Eric"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-09T11:50:47Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-09T11:50:47Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.description.abstract","Trade-offs and synergies in the supply of forest ecosystem services are common but the drivers of these relationships are poorly understood. To guide management that seeks to promote multiple services, we investigated the relationships between 12 stand-level forest attributes, including structure, composition, heterogeneity and plant diversity, plus 4 environmental factors, and proxies for 14 ecosystem services in 150 temperate forest plots. Our results show that forest attributes are the best predictors of most ecosystem services and are also good predictors of several synergies and trade-offs between services. Environmental factors also play an important role, mostly in combination with forest attributes. Our study suggests that managing forests to increase structural heterogeneity, maintain large trees, and canopy gaps would promote the supply of multiple ecosystem services. These results highlight the potential for forest management to encourage multifunctional forests and suggest that a coordinated landscape-scale strategy could help to mitigate trade-offs in human-dominated landscapes."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1038/s41467-018-07082-4"],["dc.identifier.pmid","30446752"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/15998"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/59828"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"],["dc.subject.ddc","570"],["dc.title","Multiple forest attributes underpin the supply of multiple ecosystem services"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","210"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Microorganisms"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","8"],["dc.contributor.author","Goldmann, Kezia"],["dc.contributor.author","Ammerschubert, Silke"],["dc.contributor.author","Pena, Rodica"],["dc.contributor.author","Polle, Andrea"],["dc.contributor.author","Wu, Bin-Wei"],["dc.contributor.author","Wubet, Tesfaye"],["dc.contributor.author","Buscot, François"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T18:47:16Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T18:47:16Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.description.sponsorship","Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3390/microorganisms8020210"],["dc.identifier.eissn","2076-2607"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/78698"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.publisher","MDPI"],["dc.relation.eissn","2076-2607"],["dc.rights","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"],["dc.title","Early Stage Root-Associated Fungi Show a High Temporal Turnover, but Are Independent of Beech Progeny"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]