Tschammler, Claudia Andrea

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1087"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","4"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Clinical Oral Investigations"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1093"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","21"],["dc.contributor.author","Kanzow, Philipp"],["dc.contributor.author","Hoffmann, Robin"],["dc.contributor.author","Tschammler, Claudia"],["dc.contributor.author","Kruppa, Jochen"],["dc.contributor.author","Rödig, Tina"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiegand, Annette"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:24:35Z"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-05-22T06:54:35Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:24:35Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-05-22T06:54:35Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017-06-02"],["dc.description.abstract","Objectives: The aim of the present study was to perform a representative survey among German dentists about attitudes, practice, and experience regarding single-tooth repair restorations.\r\nMaterials and methods: An anonymous questionnaire was designed and mailed to all registered dentists in Lower Saxony (n = 6600). Twenty-eight percent were returned (n = 1852), and n = 1805 could be analyzed. Statistical analyses were done by Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, Kruskal-Wallis tests, and ordered logistic regressions (p < 0.05).\r\nResults: Only 2.2 % of the dentists declared to never perform repair restorations. Composite restorations were repaired significantly more often than all other materials. Frequency of performing repair restorations was partially associated to dentist-related factors. The decision for repairing a restoration was dependent on several tooth- and restoration-associated variables. The main indications for repair were the partial loss of restoration or adjacent tooth structure as well as chipping and endodontic access cavities of crowns. Repair restorations were mostly done with composite using various different preconditioning techniques. Overall patients' acceptance was reported to be high. Most of the dentists considered repair restorations as permanent restoration with a moderate to high longevity. Estimated success of repair restorations depended significantly on the dentists' experiences (frequency and techniques of repair restorations).\r\nConclusions: Repair restorations were often performed and were well accepted by dentists and patients, but indications for repair restorations as well as applied materials and techniques varied distinctly.\r\nClinical relevance: Repairs of single-tooth restorations are well accepted and frequently performed, but indications, techniques, and materials require further research."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Zahnarztekammer Niedersachsen"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00784-016-1859-3"],["dc.identifier.isi","000399888600015"],["dc.identifier.pmid","27255959"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/65675"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/42689"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","PUB_WoS_Import"],["dc.relation.eissn","1436-3771"],["dc.relation.issn","1432-6981"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Poliklinik für Präventive Zahnmedizin, Parodontologie und Kariologie"],["dc.subject.gro","Experience"],["dc.subject.gro","Patient’s acceptance"],["dc.subject.gro","Questionnaire"],["dc.subject.gro","Repair restorations"],["dc.subject.gro","Success"],["dc.title","Attitudes, practice, and experience of German dentists regarding repair restorations"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","943"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","9"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Dental Education"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","948"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","82"],["dc.contributor.author","Hausdörfer, Tim"],["dc.contributor.author","Kanzow, Philipp"],["dc.contributor.author","Tschammler, Claudia"],["dc.contributor.author","Herrmann, Manfred"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiegand, Annette"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-02-14T11:45:56Z"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-05-22T07:02:52Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-02-14T11:45:56Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-05-22T07:02:52Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.description.abstract","The aim of this study was to evaluate dental students' retention of factual and procedural knowledge gained in a preclinical course in operative dentistry during a clinical dental curriculum. In 2017, all 157 seventh- to tenth-semester dental students at a dental school in Germany were asked to repeat the same written examination performed at the end of the preclinical course in the sixth semester. The examinations consisted of 30 multiple-choice questions covering factual and procedural knowledge. The percentage of correctly answered questions per exam and differences in correct answers between the original examination and the re-examination (per question) were analyzed. Students were also asked to self-rate their percentage of correctly answered questions and their knowledge in various disciplines of operative dentistry at the times of the original examination and the re-examination. After exclusions, data were analyzed for 129 students, for a participation rate of 82%. For the seventh- and tenth-semester students, the results on the original examination and the re-examination were not significantly different, while the eighth- and ninth-semester students performed significantly better on the original examination than the re-examination. In all semesters, procedural knowledge remained stable between the original examination and the re-examination, while factual knowledge decreased slightly. Their performance on the original examination was underestimated by the eighth- and ninth-semester students. All the students underestimated their performance on the re-examination. Students mostly rated their knowledge level significantly higher on the original examination than on the re-examination. Overall, this study found that factual and procedural knowledge gained in a preclinical course in operative dentistry was not increased during the clinical dental curriculum."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.21815/jde.018.092"],["dc.identifier.pmid","30173190"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/57560"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/65678"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.eissn","1930-7837"],["dc.relation.issn","0022-0337"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Poliklinik für Präventive Zahnmedizin, Parodontologie und Kariologie"],["dc.subject.gro","assessment"],["dc.subject.gro","dental education"],["dc.subject.gro","operative dentistry"],["dc.subject.gro","self-assessment"],["dc.title","Dental Students' Factual and Procedural Knowledge Retention in Operative Dentistry in a Clinical Dental Curriculum"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]