Thiele, Jan Christoph

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Nature Ecology & Evolution"],["dc.contributor.author","Le Provost, Gaëtane"],["dc.contributor.author","Schenk, Noëlle V."],["dc.contributor.author","Penone, Caterina"],["dc.contributor.author","Thiele, Jan"],["dc.contributor.author","Westphal, Catrin"],["dc.contributor.author","Allan, Eric"],["dc.contributor.author","Ayasse, Manfred"],["dc.contributor.author","Blüthgen, Nico"],["dc.contributor.author","Boeddinghaus, Runa S."],["dc.contributor.author","Boesing, Andrea Larissa"],["dc.contributor.author","Manning, Peter"],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-12-01T08:30:52Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-12-01T08:30:52Z"],["dc.date.issued","2022"],["dc.description.sponsorship"," Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft https://doi.org/10.13039/501100001659"],["dc.description.sponsorship"," Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung https://doi.org/10.13039/501100001711"],["dc.description.sponsorship","Ministry of Universities and European Union-Next Generation plan"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1038/s41559-022-01918-5"],["dc.identifier.pii","1918"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/118002"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-621"],["dc.relation.eissn","2397-334X"],["dc.rights.uri","https://www.springer.com/tdm"],["dc.title","The supply of multiple ecosystem services requires biodiversity across spatial scales"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Landscape Ecology"],["dc.contributor.author","Scherreiks, Pascal"],["dc.contributor.author","Gossner, Martin M."],["dc.contributor.author","Ambarlı, Didem"],["dc.contributor.author","Ayasse, Manfred"],["dc.contributor.author","Blüthgen, Nico"],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Klaus, Valentin H."],["dc.contributor.author","Kleinebecker, Till"],["dc.contributor.author","Neff, Felix"],["dc.contributor.author","Prati, Daniel"],["dc.contributor.author","Thiele, Jan"],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-02-01T10:31:57Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-02-01T10:31:57Z"],["dc.date.issued","2022"],["dc.description.abstract","Abstract Context Current diversity and species composition of ecological communities can often not exclusively be explained by present land use and landscape structure. Historical land use may have considerably influenced ecosystems and their properties for decades and centuries. Objectives We analysed the effects of present and historical landscape structure on plant and arthropod species richness in temperate grasslands, using data from comprehensive plant and arthropod assessments across three regions in Germany and maps of current and historical land cover from three time periods between 1820 and 2016. Methods We calculated local, grassland class and landscape scale metrics for 150 grassland plots. Class and landscape scale metrics were calculated in buffer zones of 100 to 2000 m around the plots. We considered effects on total species richness as well as on the richness of species subsets determined by taxonomy and functional traits related to habitat use, dispersal and feeding. Results Overall, models containing a combination of present and historical landscape metrics showed the best fit for several functional groups. Comparing three historical time periods, data from the 1820/50s was among the most frequent significant time periods in our models (29.7% of all significant variables). Conclusions Our results suggest that the historical landscape structure is an important predictor of current species richness across different taxa and functional groups. This needs to be considered to better identify priority sites for conservation and to design biodiversity-friendly land use practices that will affect landscape structure in the future."],["dc.description.abstract","Abstract Context Current diversity and species composition of ecological communities can often not exclusively be explained by present land use and landscape structure. Historical land use may have considerably influenced ecosystems and their properties for decades and centuries. Objectives We analysed the effects of present and historical landscape structure on plant and arthropod species richness in temperate grasslands, using data from comprehensive plant and arthropod assessments across three regions in Germany and maps of current and historical land cover from three time periods between 1820 and 2016. Methods We calculated local, grassland class and landscape scale metrics for 150 grassland plots. Class and landscape scale metrics were calculated in buffer zones of 100 to 2000 m around the plots. We considered effects on total species richness as well as on the richness of species subsets determined by taxonomy and functional traits related to habitat use, dispersal and feeding. Results Overall, models containing a combination of present and historical landscape metrics showed the best fit for several functional groups. Comparing three historical time periods, data from the 1820/50s was among the most frequent significant time periods in our models (29.7% of all significant variables). Conclusions Our results suggest that the historical landscape structure is an important predictor of current species richness across different taxa and functional groups. This needs to be considered to better identify priority sites for conservation and to design biodiversity-friendly land use practices that will affect landscape structure in the future."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s10980-021-01392-7"],["dc.identifier.pii","1392"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/98986"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-517"],["dc.relation.eissn","1572-9761"],["dc.relation.issn","0921-2973"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"],["dc.title","Present and historical landscape structure shapes current species richness in Central European grasslands"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","3918"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Nature Communications"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","12"],["dc.contributor.author","Le Provost, Gaëtane"],["dc.contributor.author","Thiele, Jan"],["dc.contributor.author","Westphal, Catrin"],["dc.contributor.author","Penone, Caterina"],["dc.contributor.author","Allan, Eric"],["dc.contributor.author","Neyret, Margot"],["dc.contributor.author","van der Plas, Fons"],["dc.contributor.author","Ayasse, Manfred"],["dc.contributor.author","Bardgett, Richard D."],["dc.contributor.author","Manning, Peter"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-08-12T07:44:56Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-08-12T07:44:56Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.description.abstract","Abstract Land-use intensification is a major driver of biodiversity loss. However, understanding how different components of land use drive biodiversity loss requires the investigation of multiple trophic levels across spatial scales. Using data from 150 agricultural grasslands in central Europe, we assess the influence of multiple components of local- and landscape-level land use on more than 4,000 above- and belowground taxa, spanning 20 trophic groups. Plot-level land-use intensity is strongly and negatively associated with aboveground trophic groups, but positively or not associated with belowground trophic groups. Meanwhile, both above- and belowground trophic groups respond to landscape-level land use, but to different drivers: aboveground diversity of grasslands is promoted by diverse surrounding land-cover, while belowground diversity is positively related to a high permanent forest cover in the surrounding landscape. These results highlight a role of landscape-level land use in shaping belowground communities, and suggest that revised agroecosystem management strategies are needed to conserve whole-ecosystem biodiversity."],["dc.description.abstract","Abstract Land-use intensification is a major driver of biodiversity loss. However, understanding how different components of land use drive biodiversity loss requires the investigation of multiple trophic levels across spatial scales. Using data from 150 agricultural grasslands in central Europe, we assess the influence of multiple components of local- and landscape-level land use on more than 4,000 above- and belowground taxa, spanning 20 trophic groups. Plot-level land-use intensity is strongly and negatively associated with aboveground trophic groups, but positively or not associated with belowground trophic groups. Meanwhile, both above- and belowground trophic groups respond to landscape-level land use, but to different drivers: aboveground diversity of grasslands is promoted by diverse surrounding land-cover, while belowground diversity is positively related to a high permanent forest cover in the surrounding landscape. These results highlight a role of landscape-level land use in shaping belowground communities, and suggest that revised agroecosystem management strategies are needed to conserve whole-ecosystem biodiversity."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1038/s41467-021-23931-1"],["dc.identifier.pii","23931"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/88332"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-448"],["dc.relation.eissn","2041-1723"],["dc.title","Contrasting responses of above- and belowground diversity to multiple components of land-use intensity"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]