Now showing 1 - 10 of 10
  • 2013Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","63"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","The International Journal of Biostatistics"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","73"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","9"],["dc.contributor.author","Konietschke, Frank"],["dc.contributor.author","Boesiger, Sandra"],["dc.contributor.author","Brunner, Edgar"],["dc.contributor.author","Hothorn, Ludwig A."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:24:47Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:24:47Z"],["dc.date.issued","2013"],["dc.description.abstract","Multiple contrast tests can be used to test arbitrary linear hypotheses by providing local and global test decisions as well as simultaneous confidence intervals. The ANOVA-F-test on the contrary can be used to test the global null hypothesis of no treatment effect. Thus, multiple contrast tests provide more information than the analysis of variance (ANOVA) by offering which levels cause the significance. We compare the exact powers of the ANOVA-F-test and multiple contrast tests to reject the global null hypothesis. Hereby, we compute their least favorable configurations (LFCs). It turns out that both procedures have the same LFCs under certain conditions. Exact power investigations show that their powers are equal to detect their LFCs."],["dc.description.sponsorship","German Research Foundation [DFG-Br 655/16-1, Ho 1687/9-1]"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1515/ijb-2012-0020"],["dc.identifier.isi","000329433300005"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/29910"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Walter De Gruyter Gmbh"],["dc.relation.issn","1557-4679"],["dc.relation.issn","2194-573X"],["dc.title","Are Multiple Contrast Tests Superior to the ANOVA?"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI WOS
  • 2015Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","461"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","473"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","77"],["dc.contributor.author","Pauly, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Brunner, Edgar"],["dc.contributor.author","Konietschke, Frank"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:00:44Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:00:44Z"],["dc.date.issued","2015"],["dc.description.abstract","In general factorial designs where no homoscedasticity or a particular error distribution is assumed, the well-known Wald-type statistic is a simple asymptotically valid procedure. However, it is well known that it suffers from a poor finite sample approximation since the convergence to its (2) limit distribution is quite slow. This becomes even worse with an increasing number of factor levels. The aim of the paper is to improve the small sample behaviour of the Wald-type statistic, maintaining its applicability to general settings as crossed or hierarchically nested designs by applying a modified permutation approach. In particular, it is shown that this approach approximates the null distribution of the Wald-type statistic not only under the null hypothesis but also under the alternative yielding an asymptotically valid permutation test which is even finitely exact under exchangeability. Finally, its small sample behaviour is compared with competing procedures in an extensive simulation study."],["dc.description.sponsorship","German Research Foundation [DFG-Br 655/16-1, Ho 1687/9-1]"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/rssb.12073"],["dc.identifier.isi","000349206900007"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/37872"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Wiley-blackwell"],["dc.relation.issn","1467-9868"],["dc.relation.issn","1369-7412"],["dc.title","Asymptotic permutation tests in general factorial designs"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI WOS
  • 2012-09Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","12"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Statistical Software"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","50"],["dc.contributor.author","Noguchi, Kimihiro"],["dc.contributor.author","Gel, Yulia R."],["dc.contributor.author","Brunner, Edgar"],["dc.contributor.author","Konietschke, Frank"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-10T08:14:06Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-10T08:14:06Z"],["dc.date.issued","2012-09"],["dc.description.abstract","Longitudinal data from factorial experiments frequently arise in various elds of study, ranging from medicine and biology to public policy and sociology. In most practical situations, the distribution of observed data is unknown and there may exist a number of atypical measurements and outliers. Hence, use of parametric and semiparametric procedures that impose restrictive distributional assumptions on observed longitudinal samples becomes questionable. This, in turn, has led to a substantial demand for statistical procedures that enable us to accurately and reliably analyze longitudinal measurements in factorial experiments with minimal conditions on available data, and robust nonparametric methodology o ering such a possibility becomes of particular practical importance. In this article, we introduce a new R package nparLD which provides statisticians and researchers from other disciplines an easy and user-friendly access to the most up-todate robust rank-based methods for the analysis of longitudinal data in factorial settings. We illustrate the implemented procedures by case studies from dentistry, biology, and medicine."],["dc.format.extent","23"],["dc.identifier.fs","592126"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/9492"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/61433"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.relation.issn","1548-7660"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Universitätsmedizin Göttingen"],["dc.rights","CC BY 3.0"],["dc.rights.uri","http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0"],["dc.subject.ddc","610"],["dc.title","nparLD: An R Software Package for the Nonparametric Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Factorial Experiments"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details
  • 2020Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","International Statistical Review"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Konietschke, Frank; 2\r\nInstitute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology\r\nCharité\r\nBerlin Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Bathke, Arne C.; 3\r\nIntelligent Data Analytics (IDA) Lab\r\nSalzburg Austria"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Pauly, Markus; 4\r\nFaculty of Statistics\r\nTU Dortmund University\r\nDortmund Germany"],["dc.contributor.author","Brunner, Edgar"],["dc.contributor.author","Konietschke, Frank"],["dc.contributor.author","Bathke, Arne C."],["dc.contributor.author","Pauly, Markus"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-04-14T08:31:29Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-04-14T08:31:29Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.date.updated","2022-02-09T13:21:26Z"],["dc.description.abstract","Summary Rank‐based inference methods are applied in various disciplines, typically when procedures relying on standard normal theory are not justifiable. Various specific rank‐based methods have been developed for two and more samples and also for general factorial designs (e.g. Kruskal–Wallis test or Akritas–Arnold–Brunner test). It is the aim of the present paper (1) to demonstrate that traditional rank procedures for several samples or general factorial designs may lead to surprising results in case of unequal sample sizes as compared with equal sample sizes, (2) to explain why this is the case and (3) to provide a way to overcome these disadvantages. Theoretical investigations show that the surprising results can be explained by considering the non‐centralities of the test statistics, which may be non‐zero for the usual rank‐based procedures in case of unequal sample sizes, while they may be equal to 0 in case of equal sample sizes. A simple solution is to consider unweighted relative effects instead of weighted relative effects. The former effects are estimated by means of the so‐called pseudo‐ranks, while the usual ranks naturally lead to the latter effects. A real data example illustrates the practical meaning of the theoretical discussions."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Fonds zur Förderung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002428"],["dc.description.sponsorship","I 2697‐N31"],["dc.description.sponsorship","Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001659"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/insr.12418"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/83611"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-399"],["dc.relation.eissn","1751-5823"],["dc.relation.issn","0306-7734"],["dc.rights","This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes."],["dc.title","Ranks and Pseudo‐ranks—Surprising Results of Certain Rank Tests in Unbalanced Designs"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI
  • 2009Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","730"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Computational Statistics & Data Analysis"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","741"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","53"],["dc.contributor.author","Konietschke, Frank"],["dc.contributor.author","Brunner, Edgar"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:33:29Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:33:29Z"],["dc.date.issued","2009"],["dc.description.abstract","In diagnostic trials, clustered data are obtained when several subunits ( e. g., organs or vessels) of the same patient are observed where no, several, or all subunits may be diseased or non-diseased as classified by a gold standard. In such a design, repeated measures appear in a natural way since the same patient is observed under different conditions by several readers and the repeated measures may have a quite involved correlation structure. A nonparametric method for clustered data in multiple reader studies to estimate the area under the ROC curve has been previously considered. The disadvantage of this procedure is that the test statistic ( a quadratic form) can become negative in case of small samples. Therefore, a slightly different approach by weighting the estimators of the areas under the curves (AUC) is proposed. It is shown that the proposed new estimator of the covariance matrix of the weighted AUC estimators is always positive semidefinite. Simulation studies show that the new statistic maintains the pre-assigned type-I error level quite well even in case of small sample sizes. The method is motivated by a real data example where the previously suggested statistic becomes negative. This example demonstrates the advantage of the new method. (C) 2008 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.csda.2008.08.006"],["dc.identifier.isi","000263837100015"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/17589"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Elsevier Science Bv"],["dc.relation.issn","0167-9473"],["dc.title","Nonparametric analysis of clustered data in diagnostic trials: Estimation problems in small sample sizes"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI WOS
  • 2010Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1895"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","8"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Computational Statistics & Data Analysis"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1905"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","54"],["dc.contributor.author","Konietschke, Frank"],["dc.contributor.author","Bathke, Arne C."],["dc.contributor.author","Hothorn, Ludwig A."],["dc.contributor.author","Brunner, E."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:40:41Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:40:41Z"],["dc.date.issued","2010"],["dc.description.abstract","The several sample case of the so-called nonparametric Behrens-Fisher problem in repeated measures designs is considered. That is, even under the null hypothesis, the marginal distribution functions in the different groups may have different shapes, and are not assumed to be equal. Moreover, the continuity of the marginal distribution functions is not required so that data with ties and, particularly, ordered categorical data are covered by this model. A multiple relative treatment effect is defined which can be estimated by using the mid-ranks of the observations within pairwise samples. The asymptotic distribution of this estimator is derived, along with a consistent estimator of its asymptotic covariance matrix. In addition, a multiple contrast test and related simultaneous confidence intervals for the relative marginal effects are derived and compared to rank-based Wald-type and ANOVA-type statistics. Simulations show that the ANOVA-type statistic and the multiple contrast test appear to maintain the pre-assigned level of the test quite accurately (even for rather small sample sizes) while the Wald-type statistic leads, as expected, to somewhat liberal decisions. Regarding the power, none of the statistics is uniformly superior. A real data set illustrates the application. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.csda.2010.02.019"],["dc.identifier.isi","000278155100001"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/19290"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Elsevier Science Bv"],["dc.relation.issn","0167-9473"],["dc.title","Testing and estimation of purely nonparametric effects in repeated measures designs"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI WOS
  • 2009Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","313"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Lasers in Medical Science"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","320"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","24"],["dc.contributor.author","Sennhenn-Kirchner, Sabine"],["dc.contributor.author","Schwarz, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Schliephake, Henning"],["dc.contributor.author","Konietschke, Frank"],["dc.contributor.author","Brunner, Edgar"],["dc.contributor.author","Borg-von Zepelin, Margarete"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-06-25T07:08:41Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-06-25T07:08:41Z"],["dc.date.issued","2009"],["dc.description.abstract","The different forms of superficial and systemic candidiasis are often associated with biofilm formation on surfaces of host tissues or medical devices. The biofilm formation of Candida spp., in general, necessitates significantly increased amounts of antifungal agents for therapy. Often the therapeutic effect is doubtful. A 5-day biofilm model with oral Candida isolates was established according to Chandra et al. (J Dent Res 80:903-908, 2001) on glass and titanium surfaces and was modified by Sennhenn-Kirchner et al. (Z Zahnärztl Implantol 3:45-51, 2007) to investigate different aspects unanswered in the field of dentistry. In this model, the efficacy of erbium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet (Er:YAG) light (2940 nm, 100 mJ, 10 Hz, 300 micros pulsed mode applied for 80 s) and diode laser light (810 nm, 1 W, continuous wave mode applied for 20 s with four repetitions after 30 s pauses each) was evaluated and compared to untreated controls. The photometric evaluation of the samples was completed by observations on morphological changes of yeast cells grown in the biofilm. Compared to the untreated controls Candida cells grown in mature in vitro biofilms were significantly reduced by both wavelengths investigated. Comparison between the different methods of laser treatment additionally revealed a significantly greater effect of the Er:YAG over the diode laser. Scanning electron microscopy findings proved that the diode laser light was effective in direct contact mode. In contrast, in the areas without direct contact, the fungal cells were left almost unchanged. The Er:YAG laser damaged the fungal cells to a great extent wherever it was applied."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s10103-008-0561-3"],["dc.identifier.pmid","18458992"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?goescholar/3106"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/15129"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.eissn","1435-604X"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.title","Decontamination efficacy of erbium:yttrium–aluminium–garnet and diode laser light on oral Candida albicans isolates of a 5-day in vitro biofilm model"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI PMID PMC
  • 2010Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","735"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","8"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Der Chirurg"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","+"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","81"],["dc.contributor.author","Langer, C."],["dc.contributor.author","Forster, H. J."],["dc.contributor.author","Konietschke, Frank"],["dc.contributor.author","Raab, B.-W."],["dc.contributor.author","Schaper, A."],["dc.contributor.author","Brunner, E."],["dc.contributor.author","Becker, H."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:40:41Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:40:41Z"],["dc.date.issued","2010"],["dc.description.abstract","According to an estimated mesh shrinkage following hernia repair of up to 40% a current dogma in hernia surgery requires a mesh overlap of 5 cm around the hernia. However, no valid data addressing this problem of mesh shrinkage are available at present. Within the framework of a prospective randomized double-blinded clinical trial, 50 patients were operated on for a ventral abdominal hernia with the open sublay technique using specially prepared radio-opaque polypropylene (PP) meshes. Of the patients 27 received a conventional heavyweight mesh (P group) and 23 a new lightweight mesh construction (NK group). Follow-up for at least 2 years after mesh repair included conventional abdominal x-rays after 7 days, 3 weeks and 4, 12 and 24 months, as well as computed tomography after 7 days and 4 and 12 months. Main criteria were mesh shrinkage, recurrence and complication rates and quality of life comparing groups P and NK. In 46 cases (92%) no mesh shrinkage could be detected and only 4 meshes (8%) showed a moderate shrinkage (1 of 22.2%, 2 of 8% and 1 of 3%) all from the P group. While no hernia recurrences were found, 2 surgical complications occurred with 1 seroma in the P group and 1 hematoma in the NK group. Quality of life showed a linear improvement over time up to the 2 year time point following mesh repair with advantages for the NK group. Pain and mobility scores reached standard values 12 months postoperatively without significant differences between the two groups. In principle PP meshes following an uncomplicated ventral hernia repair do not shrink at all. A moderate shrinkage in isolated cases might occur following heavyweight mesh implantation. Under controlled conditions recurrence as well as complication rates are equal for heavyweight and lightweight PP meshes. Quality of life improves up to 2 years following mesh repair with a trend to a better outcome for lightweight meshes. Pain and mobility scores reached standard values 12 months postoperatively without significant differences between the lightweight and heavyweight meshes."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00104-009-1853-2"],["dc.identifier.isi","000280702500010"],["dc.identifier.pmid","20186380"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/19288"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Springer"],["dc.relation.issn","0009-4722"],["dc.title","Mesh shrinkage in hernia surgery"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI PMID PMC WOS
  • 2012Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1090"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","5"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Computational Statistics & Data Analysis"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1102"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","56"],["dc.contributor.author","Konietschke, Frank"],["dc.contributor.author","Harrar, S. W."],["dc.contributor.author","Lange, K."],["dc.contributor.author","Brunner, E."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:11:01Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:11:01Z"],["dc.date.issued","2012"],["dc.description.abstract","Nonparametric methods for matched pairs with data missing completely at random are considered. It is not assumed that the observations are coming from distribution functions belonging to a certain parametric or semi-parametric family. In particular, the distributions can have different shapes under the null hypothesis. Hence, the so-called nonparametric Behrens-Fisher problem for matched pairs with missing data is considered. Moreover, a new approach for confidence intervals for nonparametric effects is presented. In particular, no restriction on the ratio of the number of complete and incomplete cases is required to derive the asymptotic results. Simulations show that for arbitrary settings of complete data and missing values, the resulting confidence intervals maintain the pre-assigned coverage probability quite accurately. Regarding the power, none of the proposed tests is uniformly superior to the other. A real data set illustrates the application. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved."],["dc.description.sponsorship","German Research Foundation [Br-655/16-1]"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.csda.2011.03.022"],["dc.identifier.isi","000301688100010"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/26628"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Elsevier Science Bv"],["dc.relation.issn","0167-9473"],["dc.title","Ranking procedures for matched pairs with missing data - Asymptotic theory and a small sample approximation"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI WOS
  • 2015Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","43"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","BMC Medical Research Methodology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","15"],["dc.contributor.author","Zapf, Antonia"],["dc.contributor.author","Brunner, Edgar"],["dc.contributor.author","Konietschke, Frank"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:57:49Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:57:49Z"],["dc.date.issued","2015"],["dc.description.abstract","Background: In early diagnostic trials, particularly in biomarker studies, the aim is often to select diagnostic tests among several methods. In case of metric, discrete, or even ordered categorical data, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (denoted by AUC) is an appropriate overall accuracy measure for the selection, because the AUC is independent of cut-off points. Methods: For selection of biomarkers the individual AUC's are compared with a pre-defined threshold. To keep the overall coverage probability or the multiple type-I error rate, simultaneous confidence intervals and multiple contrast tests are considered. We propose a purely nonparametric approach for the estimation of the AUC's with the corresponding confidence intervals and statistical tests. This approach uses the correlation among the statistics to account for multiplicity. For small sample sizes, a Wild-Bootstrap approach is presented. It is shown that the corresponding intervals and tests are asymptotically exact. Results: Extensive simulation studies indicate that the derived Wild-Bootstrap approach keeps and exploits the nominal type-I error at best, even for high accuracies and in case of small samples sizes. The strength of the correlation, the type of covariance structure, a skewed distribution, and also a moderate imbalanced case-control ratio do not have any impact on the behavior of the approach. A real data set illustrates the application of the proposed methods. Conclusion: We recommend the new Wild Bootstrap approach for the selection of biomarkers in early diagnostic trials, especially for high accuracies and small samples sizes."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2015"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1186/s12874-015-0025-y"],["dc.identifier.isi","000354085400001"],["dc.identifier.pmid","25925052"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/13454"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/37244"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Biomed Central Ltd"],["dc.relation.issn","1471-2288"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"],["dc.title","A Wild Bootstrap approach for the selection of biomarkers in early diagnostic trials"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI PMID PMC WOS