Lemken, Dominic

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Q Open"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","2"],["dc.contributor.author","Iweala, Sarah"],["dc.contributor.author","Spiller, Achim"],["dc.contributor.author","Nayga, Rodolfo M."],["dc.contributor.author","Lemken, Dominic"],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-11-10T15:40:38Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-11-10T15:40:38Z"],["dc.date.issued","2022"],["dc.description.sponsorship","Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2022"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1093/qopen/qoac020"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/117031"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.relation.issn","2633-9048"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.title","Warm glow and consumers’ valuation of ethically certified products"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","20"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Ecological Economics"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","28"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","137"],["dc.contributor.author","Lemken, Dominic"],["dc.contributor.author","Spiller, Achim"],["dc.contributor.author","von Meyer-Hoefer, Marie"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:22:27Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:22:27Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.description.abstract","Mixed cropping (MC), the growing of two or more coexisting crops in one field, specifically the mix of cereal and grain legumes, can contribute to a more sustainable agricultural land use. Despite a variety of ecological benefits and promising grain productivity, applications are scarce among farmers in developed countries. In consideration of MC's potential this study interviews farm managers to profile characteristics of adopters. The transtheoretical model (TTM) is applied to capture adoption and adoption tendencies. The results point to a significant positive role of land owned vs. leased, adoption of reduced tillage and adoption intensity of legumes in general. The perception of technical barriers and the perception of MC's usefulness are also major drivers that proponents need to address. In general, the TTM provides a gradual measure of farmer's willingness to adopt, leading to more variance than binary classifications, which makes TTM especially useful to adoption research of marginalized ecological practices. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Germany Federal Ministry of Education and Research [FTCZ 031A35]"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.02.021"],["dc.identifier.isi","000400532400003"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/42278"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","PUB_WoS_Import"],["dc.relation.issn","1873-6106"],["dc.relation.issn","0921-8009"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Zentrum für Biodiversität und Nachhaltige Landnutzung"],["dc.title","The Case of Legume-Cereal Crop Mixtures in Modern Agriculture and the Transtheoretical Model of Gradual Adoption"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","363"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","4"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Gaia"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","372"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","27"],["dc.contributor.author","Lemken, Dominic"],["dc.contributor.author","Kraus, Katharina"],["dc.contributor.author","Nitzko, Sina"],["dc.contributor.author","Spiller, Achim"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T18:42:14Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T18:42:14Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.14512/gaia.27.4.8"],["dc.identifier.issn","0940-5550"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/16368"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/77852"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.rights","CC BY 3.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0"],["dc.title","Staatliche Eingriffe in die Lebensmittelwahl: Welche klimapolitischen Instrumente unterstützt die Bevölkerung?"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","23"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","EuroChoices"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","29"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","20"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Lemken, Dominic; 1\r\nUniversity of Goettingen\r\nGermany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Zühlsdorf, Anke; 3\r\nCEO Zühlsdorf & Partner Marketing Consulting\r\nGermany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Spiller, Achim; 2\r\nUniversity of Goettingen\r\nGermany"],["dc.contributor.author","Lemken, Dominic"],["dc.contributor.author","Zühlsdorf, Anke"],["dc.contributor.author","Spiller, Achim"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-12-08T12:27:42Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-12-08T12:27:42Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.date.updated","2022-03-21T02:33:17Z"],["dc.description.abstract","Summary Today, the food sector is largely excluded from climate protection policies. Nevertheless, the food sector is responsible for about 20 per cent of greenhouse gases. Food policies could substantially contribute to the EU’s ambitious climate goals. Currently, the debate on CO2‐e labelling is gaining momentum. Consumers know very little about the climate footprint associated with food choices. A climate label would strengthen consumer knowledge, may eventually influence food choices, could trigger reformulation efforts, raises awareness, and contribute to better informed discussions about climate policy. Based on a review of the current state of research and industry developments on designing CO2 footprint labels, this article provides recommendations on how to develop a clearly understood and trustworthy label. We propose a government approved, multi‐level, and categorical CO2‐e label, with colour coding and numeric CO2 equivalents; primarily based initially on median values. The design of the label should allow for an adoption of other environmental dimensions in the future. It should be scaled to weight (CO2‐e per kg) and apply to food products and meals. In the proposed form, a CO2‐e label is a low‐cost instrument. As more and more companies are already starting to label their products in different ways, consumer confusion is likely to rise if no uniform guidelines are established."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/1746-692X.12321"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/95425"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-476"],["dc.relation.eissn","1746-692X"],["dc.relation.issn","1478-0917"],["dc.rights","This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited."],["dc.rights.uri","http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"],["dc.title","Improving Consumers’ Understanding and Use of Carbon Footprint Labels on Food: Proposal for a Climate Score Label"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","104412"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Appetite"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","143"],["dc.contributor.author","Lemken, D."],["dc.contributor.author","Spiller, Achim"],["dc.contributor.author","Schulze-Ehlers, B."],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T14:22:26Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T14:22:26Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.appet.2019.104412"],["dc.identifier.issn","0195-6663"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/71610"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","More room for legume – Consumer acceptance of meat substitution with classic, processed and meat-resembling legume products"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","1340"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","8"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Sustainability"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","9"],["dc.contributor.author","Lemken, Dominic"],["dc.contributor.author","Knigge, Mandy"],["dc.contributor.author","Meyerding, Stephan"],["dc.contributor.author","Spiller, Achim"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-09T11:43:40Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-09T11:43:40Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.description.abstract","Legumes are valued in agricultural systems, as they can contribute to a more sustainable land use. However, their economic value is low. Despite health and environmental benefits, marketers struggle to communicate the worth of legumes to consumers. We evaluate the worth of health and, in particular, environmental claims that would spread consumers’ awareness of ecological advantages. Utilizing a large consumer sample, we execute binding online auctions. Comparing claim-treated and untreated subjects (between design), we model the price premium that potential customers are willing to pay (WTP) for having pasta in a legume instead of a wheat version. We find that claims may increase the WTP, however, a mix of environmental and health claims is superior to individual claims. Effect sizes suggest that the mix of claims increases the WTP by roughly 35% (20 cents). The link of WTP and food attitudes, such as concern for health in eating habits or social reservations towards legumes, varies depending on whether the green-pea or chickpea pasta was evaluated. A critical perception of legumes’ association with flatulence reduces the WTP. Developing the online auction may enable researchers to increase the external validity of consumer samples. We discuss implications for researchers and marketers."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3390/su9081340"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/14619"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/58942"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.publisher","MDPI"],["dc.relation.eissn","2071-1050"],["dc.relation.issn","2071-1050"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Zentrum für Biodiversität und Nachhaltige Landnutzung"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"],["dc.subject.ddc","630"],["dc.title","The Value of Environmental and Health Claims on New Legume Products: A Non-Hypothetical Online Auction"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]