Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • 2010Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1983"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","9"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Molecular Biology and Evolution"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1987"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","27"],["dc.contributor.author","Pick, Kerstin"],["dc.contributor.author","Philippe, Herve"],["dc.contributor.author","Schreiber, F."],["dc.contributor.author","Erpenbeck, D."],["dc.contributor.author","Jackson, Daniel John"],["dc.contributor.author","Wrede, P."],["dc.contributor.author","Wiens, M."],["dc.contributor.author","Alie, A."],["dc.contributor.author","Morgenstern, Burkhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Manuel, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Woerheide, Gert"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:39:58Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:39:58Z"],["dc.date.issued","2010"],["dc.description.abstract","Despite expanding data sets and advances in phylogenomic methods, deep-level metazoan relationships remain highly controversial. Recent phylogenomic analyses depart from classical concepts in recovering ctenophores as the earliest branching metazoan taxon and propose a sister-group relationship between sponges and cnidarians (e.g., Dunn CW, Hejnol A, Matus DQ, et al. (18 co-authors). 2008. Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life. Nature 452:745-749). Here, we argue that these results are artifacts stemming from insufficient taxon sampling and long-branch attraction (LBA). By increasing taxon sampling from previously unsampled nonbilaterians and using an identical gene set to that reported by Dunn et al., we recover monophyletic Porifera as the sister group to all other Metazoa. This suggests that the basal position of the fast-evolving Ctenophora proposed by Dunn et al. was due to LBA and that broad taxon sampling is of fundamental importance to metazoan phylogenomic analyses. Additionally, saturation in the Dunn et al. character set is comparatively high, possibly contributing to the poor support for some nonbilaterian nodes."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1093/molbev/msq089"],["dc.identifier.isi","000281184100002"],["dc.identifier.pmid","20378579"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/19123"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Oxford Univ Press"],["dc.relation.issn","1537-1719"],["dc.relation.issn","0737-4038"],["dc.title","Improved Phylogenomic Taxon Sampling Noticeably Affects Nonbilaterian Relationships"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI PMID PMC WOS
  • 2009Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","706"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","8"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Current Biology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","712"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","19"],["dc.contributor.author","Philippe, Herve"],["dc.contributor.author","Derelle, Romain"],["dc.contributor.author","Lopez, Philippe"],["dc.contributor.author","Pick, Kerstin"],["dc.contributor.author","Borchiellini, Carole"],["dc.contributor.author","Boury-Esnault, Nicole"],["dc.contributor.author","Vacelet, Jean"],["dc.contributor.author","Renard, Emmanuelle"],["dc.contributor.author","Houliston, Evelyn"],["dc.contributor.author","Queinnec, Eric"],["dc.contributor.author","Da Silva, Corinne"],["dc.contributor.author","Wincker, Patrick"],["dc.contributor.author","Le Guyader, Herve"],["dc.contributor.author","Leys, Sally"],["dc.contributor.author","Jackson, Daniel John"],["dc.contributor.author","Schreiber, Fabian"],["dc.contributor.author","Erpenbeck, Dirk"],["dc.contributor.author","Morgenstern, Burkhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Woerheide, Gert"],["dc.contributor.author","Manuel, Michael"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:30:40Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:30:40Z"],["dc.date.issued","2009"],["dc.description.abstract","The origin of many of the defining features of animal body plans, such as symmetry, nervous system, and the mesoderm, remains shrouded in mystery because of major uncertainty regarding the emergence order of the early branching taxa: the sponge groups, ctenophores, placozoans, cnidarians, and bilaterians. The \"phylogenomic\" approach [1] has recently provided a robust picture for intrabilaterian relationships [2, 3] but not yet for more early branching metazoan clades. We have assembled a comprehensive 128 gene data set including newly generated sequence data from ctenophores, cnidarians, and all four main sponge groups. The resulting phylogeny yields two significant conclusions reviving old views that have been challenged in the molecular era: (1) that the sponges (Porifera) are monophyletic and not paraphyletic as repeatedly proposed [4-9], thus undermining the idea that ancestral metazoans had a sponge-like body plan; (2) that the most likely position for the ctenophores is together with the cnidarians in a \"coelenterate\" clade. The Porifera and the Placozoa branch basally with respect to a moderately supported \"eumetazoan\" clade containing the three taxa with nervous system and muscle cells (Cnidaria, Ctenophora, and Bilateria). This new phylogeny provides a stimulating framework for exploring the important changes that shaped the body plans of the early diverging phyla."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.cub.2009.02.052"],["dc.identifier.isi","000265718300035"],["dc.identifier.pmid","19345102"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/16944"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Cell Press"],["dc.relation.issn","1879-0445"],["dc.relation.issn","0960-9822"],["dc.title","Phylogenomics Revives Traditional Views on Deep Animal Relationships"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI PMID PMC WOS