Kovács-Hostyánszki, Anikó

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","722"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","6"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Diversity and Distributions"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","730"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","21"],["dc.contributor.author","Sutcliffe, Laura M. E."],["dc.contributor.author","Batáry, Péter"],["dc.contributor.author","Kormann, Urs G."],["dc.contributor.author","Báldi, András"],["dc.contributor.author","Dicks, Lynn V."],["dc.contributor.author","Herzon, Irina"],["dc.contributor.author","Kleijn, David"],["dc.contributor.author","Tryjanowski, Piotr"],["dc.contributor.author","Apostolova, Iva"],["dc.contributor.author","Arlettaz, Raphael"],["dc.contributor.author","Aunins, Ainars"],["dc.contributor.author","Aviron, Stéphanie"],["dc.contributor.author","Baležentienė, Ligita"],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, Christina"],["dc.contributor.author","Halada, Lubos"],["dc.contributor.author","Hartel, Tibor"],["dc.contributor.author","Helm, Aveliina"],["dc.contributor.author","Hristov, Iordan"],["dc.contributor.author","Jelaska, Sven D."],["dc.contributor.author","Kaligarič, Mitja"],["dc.contributor.author","Kamp, Johannes"],["dc.contributor.author","Klimek, Sebastian"],["dc.contributor.author","Koorberg, Pille"],["dc.contributor.author","Kostiuková, Jarmila"],["dc.contributor.author","Kovács-Hostyánszki, Anikó"],["dc.contributor.author","Kuemmerle, Tobias"],["dc.contributor.author","Leuschner, Christoph"],["dc.contributor.author","Lindborg, Regina"],["dc.contributor.author","Loos, Jacqueline"],["dc.contributor.author","Maccherini, Simona"],["dc.contributor.author","Marja, Riho"],["dc.contributor.author","Máthé, Orsolya"],["dc.contributor.author","Paulini, Inge"],["dc.contributor.author","Proença, Vânia"],["dc.contributor.author","Rey Benayas, José M."],["dc.contributor.author","Sans, F. Xavier"],["dc.contributor.author","Seifert, Charlotte"],["dc.contributor.author","Stalenga, Jarosław"],["dc.contributor.author","Timaeus, Johannes"],["dc.contributor.author","Török, Péter"],["dc.contributor.author","van Swaay, Chris"],["dc.contributor.author","Viik, Eneli"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.editor","Kühn, Ingolf"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:54:49Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:54:49Z"],["dc.date.issued","2014"],["dc.description.abstract","A large proportion of European biodiversity today depends on habitat provided by low-intensity farming practices, yet this resource is declining as European agriculture intensifies. Within the European Union, particularly the central and eastern new member states have retained relatively large areas of species-rich farmland, but despite increased investment in nature conservation here in recent years, farmland biodiversity trends appear to be worsening. Although the high biodiversity value of Central and Eastern European farmland has long been reported, the amount of research in the international literature focused on farmland biodiversity in this region remains comparatively tiny, and measures within the EU Common Agricultural Policy are relatively poorly adapted to support it. In this opinion study, we argue that, 10 years after the accession of the first eastern EU new member states, the continued under-representation of the low-intensity farmland in Central and Eastern Europe in the international literature and EU policy is impeding the development of sound, evidence-based conservation interventions. The biodiversity benefits for Europe of existing low-intensity farmland, particularly in the central and eastern states, should be harnessed before they are lost. Instead of waiting for species-rich farmland to further decline, targeted research and monitoring to create locally appropriate conservation strategies for these habitats is needed now."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/ddi.12288"],["dc.identifier.gro","3150100"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/11674"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6830"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.issn","1366-9516"],["dc.rights","CC BY-NC-ND 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0"],["dc.title","Harnessing the biodiversity value of Central and Eastern European farmland"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","86"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Wildlife Biology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","94"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","22"],["dc.contributor.author","Schlinkert, Hella"],["dc.contributor.author","Ludwig, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Batáry, Péter"],["dc.contributor.author","Holzschuh, Andrea"],["dc.contributor.author","Kovács-Hostyánszki, Anikó"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, Christina"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:50:52Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:50:52Z"],["dc.date.issued","2016"],["dc.description.abstract","Agricultural intensification often leads to fragmentation of natural habitats, such as forests, and thereby negatively affects forest specialist species. However, human introduced habitats, such as hedges, may counteract negative effects of forest fragmentation and increase dispersal, particularly of forest specialists. We studied effects of habitat type (forest edge versus hedge) and hedge isolation from forests (connected versus isolated hedge) in agricultural landscapes on abundance, species richness and community composition of mice, voles and shrews in forest edges and hedges. Simultaneously to these effects of forest edge/hedge type we analysed impacts of habitat structure, namely percentage of bare ground and forest edge/hedge width, on abundance, species richness and community composition of small mammals. Total abundance and forest specialist abundance (both driven by the most abundant species Myodes glareolus, bank vole) were higher in forest edges than in hedges, while hedge isolation had no effect. In contrast, abundance of habitat generalists was higher in isolated compared to connected hedges, with no effect of habitat type (forest edge versus hedge). Species richness as well as abundance of the most abundant habitat generalist Sorex araneus (common shrew), were not affected by habitat type or hedge isolation. Decreasing percentage of bare ground and increasing forest edge/hedge width was associated with increased abundance of forest specialists, while habitat structure was unrelated to species richness or abundance of any other group. Community composition was driven by forest specialists, which exceeded habitat generalist abundance in forest edges and connected hedges, while abundances were similar to each other in isolated hedges. Our results show that small mammal forest specialists prefer forest edges as habitats over hedges, while habitat generalists are able to use unoccupied ecological niches in isolated hedges. Consequently even isolated hedges can be marginal habitats for forest specialists and habitat generalists and thereby may increase regional farmland biodiversity."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.2981/wlb.00176"],["dc.identifier.gro","3149943"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/14130"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6656"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","public"],["dc.relation.issn","0909-6396"],["dc.rights","CC BY-NC-ND 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0"],["dc.title","Forest specialist and generalist small mammals in forest edges and hedges"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]