Rödig, Tina

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1753"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","5"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Clinical Oral Investigations"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1759"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","21"],["dc.contributor.author","Roedig, Tina"],["dc.contributor.author","Endres, Sarah"],["dc.contributor.author","Konietschke, Frank"],["dc.contributor.author","Zimmermann, Ortrud"],["dc.contributor.author","Sydow, Hans Georg"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiegand, Annette"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:23:17Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:23:17Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.description.abstract","This in vitro study evaluated the effect of fiber insertion depth on antimicrobial efficacy of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) using a photosensitizer (PS; toluidine blue) and a red light-emitting diode (LED) in root canals infected with Enterococcus faecalis. Single-rooted extracted teeth were prepared with nickel-titanium-instruments, sterilized, contaminated with E. faecalis, and incubated for 72 h. Roots were randomly divided into four experimental groups: PS only, LED only, aPDT with LED in the apical third, aPDT with LED in the coronal third, as well as into infection and sterile controls (each n = 10). Samples were taken by collecting standardized dentine shavings from the root canal walls. After serial dilution and culturing on blood agar, colony-forming units (CFU) were counted. Both aPDT groups showed a CFU reduction of 1-2 log(10) steps compared with the infection control, whereas the effect of fiber insertion depth was negligible (< 0.5 log(10) steps). CFU reduction of approximately 0.5 log(10) steps for PS alone was detected compared with the infection control, but PS alone was less effective than both aPDT groups. No antibacterial effect was detected for LED alone. aPDT reduced E. faecalis within the root canal, whereas fiber insertion depth had a negligible influence on antimicrobial effectiveness of aPDT. The insertion depth of the light-emitting diode may not influence the antibacterial efficacy of photodynamic therapy against E. faecalis in straight root canals."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00784-016-1948-3"],["dc.identifier.isi","000402011500036"],["dc.identifier.pmid","27591860"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/42428"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","PUB_WoS_Import"],["dc.publisher","Springer"],["dc.publisher.place","Heidelberg"],["dc.relation.issn","1436-3771"],["dc.relation.issn","1432-6981"],["dc.title","Effect of fiber insertion depth on antibacterial efficacy of photodynamic therapy against Enterococcus faecalis in rootcanals"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","171"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Endodontics"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","178"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","48"],["dc.contributor.author","Frank, Ariadne Charis"],["dc.contributor.author","Kanzow, Philipp"],["dc.contributor.author","Rödig, Tina"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiegand, Annette"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-12-01T09:23:00Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-12-01T09:23:00Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021-11-08"],["dc.description.abstract","Introduction: The aim of this study was to analyze and compare the efficacy of different bleaching agents typically used for internal bleaching of endodontically treated discolored teeth.\r\nMethods: Electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) were searched by 2 reviewers for clinical trials in which the color of endodontically treated discolored teeth before and after internal bleaching was examined using shade guide units (ΔSGU) or a spectrophotometer/colorimeter (ΔE). The efficacies of the bleaching agents were compared using subgroup analyses. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed with the Cochran Q test and I2 statistic. Publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots.\r\nResults: Eight studies were included in the systematic review, 6 of which could be included in the meta-analyses. Internal bleaching led to a significant change in tooth shade (ΔSGU: 6.27 [95% confidence interval, 5.36-7.17], ΔE: 12.83 [95% confidence interval, 9.46-16.20]). With regard to ΔSGU, the use of carbamide peroxide (35% or 37%), hydrogen peroxide (35%), and the combination of sodium perborate and hydrogen peroxide (3% or 30%) led to a better bleaching effect than sodium perborate (adjusted P value ≤ .026). Regarding ΔE, there were no significant differences between carbamide peroxide (37%), hydrogen peroxide (35%), and sodium perborate mixed with hydrogen peroxide (P = .051). The risk of bias of the included studies was classified as moderate to high.\r\nConclusions: Carbamide peroxide, hydrogen peroxide, and sodium perborate have a significant bleaching effect on discolored, root canal-treated teeth. For a valid assessment of shade stability and a comparison of bleaching agents and their concentrations, further studies with long-term recalls are necessary."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.joen.2021.10.011"],["dc.identifier.pii","S0099239921007925"],["dc.identifier.pmid","34762968"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/94535"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-478"],["dc.relation.issn","0099-2399"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Poliklinik für Präventive Zahnmedizin, Parodontologie und Kariologie"],["dc.rights.uri","https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/"],["dc.subject.gro","bleaching"],["dc.subject.gro","color change"],["dc.subject.gro","discoloration"],["dc.subject.gro","nonvital teeth"],["dc.subject.gro","walking bleach technique"],["dc.title","Comparison of the bleaching efficacy of different agents used for internal bleaching – a systematic review and meta-analysis"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1436"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","9"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Endodontics"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1441"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","44"],["dc.contributor.author","Haupt, Franziska"],["dc.contributor.author","Seidel, Miriam"],["dc.contributor.author","Rizk, Marta"],["dc.contributor.author","Sydow, Hans-Georg"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiegand, Annette"],["dc.contributor.author","Rödig, Tina"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-05-22T09:39:42Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-05-22T09:39:42Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.description.abstract","Introduction Manufacturers offer single-file instrumentation systems with matching gutta-percha (GP) cones to simplify root canal preparation and obturation. The purpose of this study was to determine whether file diameters and tapers match with corresponding cone diameters and tapers (precision) as well as industry standards (accuracy). Methods Twenty files and corresponding GP cones from each size of F360 (#25, #35, #45, #55 with .04 taper) and Reciproc (#25, #40, #50 with variable tapers) instruments were examined by using optical microscopy (×32) to determine their diameter and taper. Precision was evaluated by using one-way analysis of variance (α = 0.05) with Scheffé post hoc tests and t tests with Bonferroni correction. Accuracy was calculated by subtracting the nominal values from the measured values of all files and GP cones, and mean diameter and taper differences were compared by using one-way analysis of variance (α = 0.05) and Scheffé post hoc test for pairwise comparison. Results For F360, the majority of file and cone diameters were within the tolerance levels, but most of the file diameters were significantly larger than GP cone diameters ( P < .05), but the majority of all measured values were within the tolerance levels. For Reciproc, file and cone diameters at D1 and D3 mostly approached the nominal values. At the coronal end, file diameters #25 and #50 were significantly smaller than cone diameters ( P < .05). For both instrumentation systems, almost all file and cone tapers matched with the preset tolerance ranges. For Reciproc, significant differences between file and GP cone demonstrated either smaller cone or smaller file diameters and tapers, depending on the size. Most of the measured values were within the acceptable range, but diameters at the coronal end exhibited the highest percent difference from the nominal values. Conclusions Despite the call for standardization, variability in diameter and taper dimensions between single-file instrumentation systems and their corresponding GP cones can be expected."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.joen.2018.06.005"],["dc.identifier.pmid","30078573"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/65710"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.relation.eissn","1878-3554"],["dc.relation.issn","0099-2399"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Poliklinik für Präventive Zahnmedizin, Parodontologie und Kariologie"],["dc.title","Diameter and Taper Variability of Single-file Instrumentation Systems and Their Corresponding Gutta-percha Cones"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1245"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","6"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1251"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","128"],["dc.contributor.author","Lechte, Clemens"],["dc.contributor.author","Hausdörfer, Tim"],["dc.contributor.author","Kanzow, Philipp"],["dc.contributor.author","Rödig, Tina"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiegand, Annette"],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-12-01T08:30:42Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-12-01T08:30:42Z"],["dc.date.issued","2022-11-04"],["dc.description.abstract","Statement of problem: Less-experienced operators have been shown to require additional training to achieve results similar to those of experienced operators. However, clinical data comparing the survival and success of ceramic restorations by experienced and less-experienced operators by using the computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) technology are lacking.\r\nPurpose: The purpose of this retrospective clinical study was to analyze and compare the clinical performance of CAD-CAM lithium disilicate restorations fabricated by less-experienced (predoctoral dental students) and experienced (dentists) operators.\r\nMaterial and methods: Patients who received an adhesively luted CAD-CAM lithium disilicate restoration between 2011 and 2019 were included in the study. Clinical performance was assessed by calibrated examiners by using World Dental Federation (FDI) criteria. Success and survival were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and statistically compared by log-rank tests and univariate Cox regression analyses. FDI criteria were compared by using Mann-Whitney-U tests (α=.05).\r\nResults: Ninety-two restorations (students: n=65, dentists: n=27) were assessed (mean ±standard deviation time from insertion: 4.04 ±1.55 years). The survival rates after 2 years (students: 93.8%, mean annual failure rate [mAFR]: 3.1%; dentist: 96.3%, mAFR: 1.9%) and after 4 years (students: 87.3%, mAFR: 3.3%; dentists: 88.3%, mAFR: 3.1%) were not significantly different (P=.525). Also, success rates after 2 (students: 90.8%, mAFR: 4.7%; dentists: 92.6%, mAFR: 3.8%) and 4 years (students: 82.4%, mAFR: 4.7%; dentists: 76.1%, mAFR: 6.6%) were not significantly different (P=.778). FDI criteria were also not significantly different between less-experienced and experienced operators (P≥.110).\r\nConclusions: Operator experience did not affect the short-term clinical performance of CAD-CAM lithium disilicate restorations."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.09.011"],["dc.identifier.pii","S0022391322006242"],["dc.identifier.pmid","36344298"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/117957"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-621"],["dc.relation.issn","0022-3913"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Poliklinik für Präventive Zahnmedizin, Parodontologie und Kariologie"],["dc.rights.uri","https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/"],["dc.title","Clinical performance of CAD-CAM partial-coverage restorations: Experienced versus less-experienced operators"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1087"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","4"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Clinical Oral Investigations"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1093"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","21"],["dc.contributor.author","Kanzow, Philipp"],["dc.contributor.author","Hoffmann, Robin"],["dc.contributor.author","Tschammler, Claudia"],["dc.contributor.author","Kruppa, Jochen"],["dc.contributor.author","Rödig, Tina"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiegand, Annette"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:24:35Z"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-05-22T06:54:35Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:24:35Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-05-22T06:54:35Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017-06-02"],["dc.description.abstract","Objectives: The aim of the present study was to perform a representative survey among German dentists about attitudes, practice, and experience regarding single-tooth repair restorations.\r\nMaterials and methods: An anonymous questionnaire was designed and mailed to all registered dentists in Lower Saxony (n = 6600). Twenty-eight percent were returned (n = 1852), and n = 1805 could be analyzed. Statistical analyses were done by Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, Kruskal-Wallis tests, and ordered logistic regressions (p < 0.05).\r\nResults: Only 2.2 % of the dentists declared to never perform repair restorations. Composite restorations were repaired significantly more often than all other materials. Frequency of performing repair restorations was partially associated to dentist-related factors. The decision for repairing a restoration was dependent on several tooth- and restoration-associated variables. The main indications for repair were the partial loss of restoration or adjacent tooth structure as well as chipping and endodontic access cavities of crowns. Repair restorations were mostly done with composite using various different preconditioning techniques. Overall patients' acceptance was reported to be high. Most of the dentists considered repair restorations as permanent restoration with a moderate to high longevity. Estimated success of repair restorations depended significantly on the dentists' experiences (frequency and techniques of repair restorations).\r\nConclusions: Repair restorations were often performed and were well accepted by dentists and patients, but indications for repair restorations as well as applied materials and techniques varied distinctly.\r\nClinical relevance: Repairs of single-tooth restorations are well accepted and frequently performed, but indications, techniques, and materials require further research."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Zahnarztekammer Niedersachsen"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00784-016-1859-3"],["dc.identifier.isi","000399888600015"],["dc.identifier.pmid","27255959"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/65675"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/42689"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","PUB_WoS_Import"],["dc.relation.eissn","1436-3771"],["dc.relation.issn","1432-6981"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Poliklinik für Präventive Zahnmedizin, Parodontologie und Kariologie"],["dc.subject.gro","Experience"],["dc.subject.gro","Patient’s acceptance"],["dc.subject.gro","Questionnaire"],["dc.subject.gro","Repair restorations"],["dc.subject.gro","Success"],["dc.title","Attitudes, practice, and experience of German dentists regarding repair restorations"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","394"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Australian Endodontic Journal"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","399"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","45"],["dc.contributor.author","Rödig, Tina"],["dc.contributor.author","Krämer, Juliane"],["dc.contributor.author","Müller, Christine"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiegand, Annette"],["dc.contributor.author","Haupt, Franziska"],["dc.contributor.author","Rizk, Marta"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-11-05T15:13:42Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-11-05T15:13:42Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/aej.v45.3"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/68535"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-352.9"],["dc.relation.eissn","1747-4477"],["dc.relation.issn","1329-1947"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Poliklinik für Präventive Zahnmedizin, Parodontologie und Kariologie"],["dc.title","Incidence of microcracks after preparation of straight and curved root canals with three different NiTi instrumentation techniques assessed by micro‐ CT"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","9180"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","17"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","18"],["dc.contributor.author","Kanzow, Philipp Clemens"],["dc.contributor.author","Dylla, Viktoria"],["dc.contributor.author","Mahler, Alannah Malina"],["dc.contributor.author","Hrasky, Valentina"],["dc.contributor.author","Rödig, Tina"],["dc.contributor.author","Barre, Felix"],["dc.contributor.author","Scheithauer, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiegand, Annette"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-09-02T06:02:42Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-09-02T06:02:42Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021-08-31"],["dc.description.abstract","Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of face masks has increased, resulting in potential health-related side-effects. Therefore, the study aimed to analyse the effect of wearing face masks on self-perceived dry mouth and halitosis. A questionnaire addressing the daily wearing time of different face masks (community masks, surgical/medical masks and KN95-/N95-/FFP2-masks) and self-perceived dry mouth and halitosis was given to adults attending or working at a university hospital. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test and multiple linear regression analysis (p < 0.05). 3750 participants (age: 50.4 ± 15.5 years; 60.0% female) were included. During the pandemic, face masks were used for 4.7 ± 3.8 h per day: community masks: 0.9 ± 2.0 h, medical/surgical masks: 1.9 ± 2.8 h and KN95-/N95-/FFP2-masks: 1.9 ± 2.5 h per day. The use of face masks significantly increased self-perceived dry mouth and halitosis (both p < 0.001). Self-perceived dry mouth and halitosis increased with increasing wearing time (community masks: dry mouth: p < 0.001, halitosis: p = 0.014; medical/surgical masks: both: p < 0.001; KN95-/N95-/FFP2-masks: dry mouth: p < 0.001, halitosis: p = 0.011). The perception of dry mouth and halitosis was increased in females compared to males (both: p < 0.001). Participants used to wearing face masks prior to the pandemic perceived dry mouth to a higher extent (p = 0.043). Self-perceived halitosis was lower in older than in younger participants (p < 0.001). Due to the increased perception of dry mouth and halitosis, people might abstain from wearing face masks. Further studies need to analyse measurable changes in dry mouth or halitosis."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Open Access Publication Funds of Göttingen University"],["dc.description.sponsorship","Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2021"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3390/ijerph18179180"],["dc.identifier.pmcid","PMC8431486"],["dc.identifier.pmid","34501768"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/17863"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/89257"],["dc.identifier.url","https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/17/9180"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.relation.eissn","1660-4601"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Poliklinik für Präventive Zahnmedizin, Parodontologie und Kariologie"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Institut für Krankenhaushygiene und Infektiologie"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.subject.gro","COVID-19"],["dc.subject.gro","dry mouth"],["dc.subject.gro","face masks"],["dc.subject.gro","halitosis"],["dc.title","COVID-19 Pandemic: Effect of Different Face Masks on Self-Perceived Dry Mouth and Halitosis"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","689"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","9"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Quintessence International"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","697"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","49"],["dc.contributor.author","Rödig, Tina"],["dc.contributor.author","Zimmermann, Felix"],["dc.contributor.author","Konietschke, Frank"],["dc.contributor.author","Sydow, Hans-Georg"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiegand, Annette"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-05-22T09:34:34Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-05-22T09:34:34Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.description.abstract","Objective: This in-vitro study evaluated the antibacterial efficacy of sonic and ultrasonic irrigation with either intermittent or continuous flush in root canals infected with Enterococcus faecalis. Method and Materials: Seventy single-rooted, extracted teeth with straight root canals were prepared with FlexMaster NiTi-instruments, sterilized, inoculated with E faecalis and incubated for 72 hours. Sixty roots were randomly divided into four experimental groups as well as into infection and sterile controls (n = 10 each). The remaining teeth were used for SEM analysis of smear layer removal (n = 5) and infection with E faecalis (n = 5). Irrigation in the experimental groups was performed with 1% NaOCl and syringe irrigation, sonic activation of the irrigant with EndoActivator, ultrasonic activation with intermittent flush, or ultrasonic activation with continuous flush. Microbial sampling was performed by collecting dentin shavings from the root canal walls. Colony-forming units were counted and statistical analysis was performed using nonparametric rank-based ANOVA-type tests for longitudinal data (P < .05). Results: A significant reduction of E faecalis of 3 log10 steps compared to the infection control was achieved by all irrigation techniques (P < .0001). There were no significant differences in antibacterial efficacy between syringe irrigation, sonically, or ultrasonically activated irrigation (P > .45). Conclusion: Activation of 1% NaOCl with either sonic or ultrasonic devices did not increase the antimicrobial efficacy against E faecalis compared to conventional syringe irrigation in straight root canals."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3290/j.qi.a40776"],["dc.identifier.pmid","30027169"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/65708"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.relation.eissn","1936-7163"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Poliklinik für Präventive Zahnmedizin, Parodontologie und Kariologie"],["dc.title","Comparison of the antibacterial efficacy of sonic- and two ultrasonic-activated irrigation techniques in reducing intracanal Enterococcus faecalis populations"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]