Boztuǧ, Yasemin

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","871"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","11"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Nutrition Reviews"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","882"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","75"],["dc.contributor.author","Sanjari, Setareh"],["dc.contributor.author","Jahn, Steffen"],["dc.contributor.author","Boztuǧ, Yasemin"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-03-09T14:01:56Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-03-09T14:01:56Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017-01-01"],["dc.description.abstract","Nutrition labeling literature yields fragmented results about the effect of front-of-package (FOP) nutrition label formats on healthy food choice. Specifically, it is unclear which type of nutrition label format is effective across different shopping situations. To address this gap, the present review investigates the available nutrition labeling literature through the prism of dual-process theory, which posits that decisions are made either quickly and automatically (system 1) or slowly and deliberately (system 2). A systematically performed review of nutrition labeling literature returned 59 papers that provide findings that can be explained according to dual-process theory. The findings of these studies suggest that the effectiveness of nutrition label formats is influenced by the consumer's dominant processing system, which is a function of specific contexts and personal variables (eg, motivation, nutrition knowledge, time pressure, and depletion). Examination of reported findings through a situational processing perspective reveals that consumers might prefer different FOP nutrition label formats in different situations and can exhibit varying responses to the same label format across situations. This review offers several suggestions for policy makers and researchers to help improve current FOP nutrition label formats."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1093/nutrit/nux043"],["dc.identifier.pmid","29069484"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/63243"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.relation.eissn","1753-4887"],["dc.relation.issn","0029-6643"],["dc.relation.issn","1753-4887"],["dc.relation.workinggroup","RTG 2654: Sustainable Food Systems (Related Publications)"],["dc.title","Dual-process theory and consumer response to front-of-package nutrition label formats"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","201"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Appetite"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","209"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","126"],["dc.contributor.author","Jahn, Steffen"],["dc.contributor.author","Schuch-Haellmigk, Jutta"],["dc.contributor.author","Dannewald, Till"],["dc.contributor.author","Boztuǧ, Yasemin"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-03-09T14:00:22Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-03-09T14:00:22Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.description.abstract","Improving diet quality is as important as it is difficult. Market-level information such as summary information in the form of an average (i.e., category average reference point [CARP]) discloses information otherwise difficult to obtain by comparing different products. The results of a choice-based conjoint experiment (N = 698) show that CARP affects food choice in multicue environments and interacts with source credibility in driving consumer acceptance of sugar content. In particular, the likelihood of choosing high amounts of sugar increases when a high CARP is provided by a credible source because of increased consumer acceptance of higher levels of that nutrient. Implications of the findings for research and public policy conclude the article."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.appet.2018.04.001"],["dc.identifier.pmid","29634987"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/63242"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.relation.eissn","1095-8304"],["dc.relation.issn","0195-6663"],["dc.relation.workinggroup","RTG 2654: Sustainable Food Systems (Related Publications)"],["dc.title","How category average reference points affect choice of sugary foods"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","76"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Marketing"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","98"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","39"],["dc.contributor.author","Demming, Carsten L."],["dc.contributor.author","Jahn, Steffen"],["dc.contributor.author","Boztuǧ, Yasemin"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-03-09T14:05:26Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-03-09T14:05:26Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.description.abstract","Research ArticlesCarsten L. Demming is re-search assistant and doctoralstudent at the Chair of Market-ing and Consumer Behavior,University of Goettingen,Platz der Goettinger Sieben 3,37073 Goettingen, Germany,Phone: +49551/39-7270,Fax: +49551/39-5849,E-Mail: cdemmin@wiwi.uni-goettingen.de. Corresponding Author.Steffen Jahn#is assistant pro-fessor at the Chair of Marketingand Consumer Behavior,University of Goettingen,Platz der Goettinger Sieben 3,37073 Goettingen, Germany,Phone: +49551/39-7407,Fax: +49551/39-5849,E-Mail: steffen.jahn@wiwi.uni-goettingen.de.#The first two authors contri-buted equally to this research.Yasemin Boztu ̆gis Professor ofMarketing and ConsumerBehavior, University of Goettin-gen, Platz der GoettingerSieben 3, 37073 Goettingen,Germany, Phone: +49551/39-7328, Fax: +49551/39-5849,E-Mail: boztug@wiwi.uni-goettingen.de.Conducting Mediation Analysis in Marketing ResearchBy Carsten L. Demming, Steffen Jahn and Yasemin Boztu ̆gMarketing researchers frequently conductmediation analysis to enrich their understand-ing of a focal causal relationship by examin-ing its underlying mechanism. The main pur-pose of this review is to provide an overviewof what mediation analysis means, which ap-proaches exist to establish mediation, andhow to conduct mediation analysis with thestate-of-the-art methodology. In the first partof the paper we review conceptual consider-ations of mediation for the most commonlyused mediation model groups. We further dis-cuss the suitability of different mediation anal-ysis approaches, focusing on the bootstrap-ping approach. The second part of the paperis organized as a tutorial. Based on an exam-ple from the marketing field, we illustrate howto specify, estimate, and interpret mediationmodels with a tool for SPSS and SAS calledPROCESS (Hayes 2017). We recommend ahierarchical procedure in which simple media-tion models are examined first, followed bymore complex models."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.15358/0344-1369-2017-3-76"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/63246"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.relation.issn","0344-1369"],["dc.title","Conducting Mediation Analysis in Marketing Research"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","104"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of the Association for Consumer Research"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","114"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","1"],["dc.contributor.author","Elshiewy, Ossama"],["dc.contributor.author","Jahn, Steffen"],["dc.contributor.author","Boztuǧ, Yasemin"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-03-09T14:08:54Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-03-09T14:08:54Z"],["dc.date.issued","2016"],["dc.description.abstract","As consumers pay greater attention to nutrition content when choosing food, voluntary front-of-pack labels have become popular tools for food marketers. However, voluntary nutrition labels provide certain freedoms regarding the disclosed information, which can be exploited. A common strategy is to disclose nutrition values based on smaller recommended serving sizes, which presents the nutrition amounts favorably on the label. Problematically, consumers can misinterpret such information and draw biased conclusions regarding product healthiness. This study uses purchase data with 61 products from both healthy (yogurt) and unhealthy (cookies) categories to analyze how recommended serving sizes on nutrition labels affect food sales. In line with our predictions, sales increased after a label introduction in the healthy (but not in the unhealthy) category for products with smaller recommended serving sizes. Since the least healthy versions within the category tend to have smaller recommended serving sizes, nutrition labels can stimulate sales of unhealthier food."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1086/684286"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/63247"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.relation.issn","2378-1815"],["dc.relation.issn","2378-1823"],["dc.relation.workinggroup","RTG 2654: Sustainable Food Systems (Related Publications)"],["dc.title","Seduced by the Label: How the Recommended Serving Size on Nutrition Labels Affects Food Sales"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]