Wiesemann, Claudia

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","855"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","6"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","871"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","58"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiesemann, Claudia"],["dc.contributor.author","Beier, Katharina"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-10T08:13:33Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-10T08:13:33Z"],["dc.date.issued","2010"],["dc.description.abstract","Human reproduction in the age of reprogenetics raises fundamental ethical and political questions. Critics of so-called liberal eugenics like Jürgen Habermas have sparked an ethical debate on whether selective genetic manipulation might undermine the natural basis of the moral self-conception and autonomy of future generations. Contrary to this perception, the authors of this article argue for a dialectic understanding of the moral challenges arising from human natality: Freedom and dependency, sociality and human embodiment, autonomy and relatedness likewise determine our human existence as moral beings. As an answer to these challenges, the authors develop a dialectic understanding of parenthood in the age of reprogenetics, thereby transcending present debates of modern reproductive medicine."],["dc.identifier.fs","576851"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/6172"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/61272"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Universitätsmedizin Göttingen"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.subject.ddc","610"],["dc.title","Die Dialektik der Elternschaft im Zeitalter der Reprogenetik"],["dc.title.alternative","Ein ethischer Dialog"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","85"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Medical Ethics"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","87"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","30"],["dc.contributor.author","Lenk, C."],["dc.contributor.author","Radenbach, K."],["dc.contributor.author","Dahl, Matthias"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiesemann, Claudia"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-10-16T10:54:28Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-10-16T10:54:28Z"],["dc.date.issued","2004"],["dc.description.abstract","Objectives: Clinical trials in humans in Germany—as in many other countries—must be approved by localresearch ethics committees (RECs). The current study has been designed to document and evaluatedecisions of chairpersons of RECs in the problematic field of non-therapeutic research with minors. Theauthors’ purpose was to examine whether non-therapeutic research was acceptable for chairpersons atall, and whether there was certainty on how to decide in research trials involving more than minimal risk.Design: In a questionnaire, REC chairpersons had to evaluate five different scenarios with (in parts) nontherapeuticresearch. The scenarios described realistic potential research projects with minors, involvingincreasing levels of risk for the research participants. The chairpersons had to decide whether therespective projects should be approved.Methods: A total of 49 German REC chairpersons were sent questionnaires; 29 questionnaires werereturned. The main measurements were approval or rejection of research scenarios.Results: Chairpersons of German RECs generally tend to accept non-therapeutic research with minors ifthe apparent risk for the participating children is low. If the risk is clearly higher than ‘‘minimal’’, thechairpersons’ decisions differ widely.Conclusion: The fact that there seem to be different attitudes of chairpersons to non-therapeutic researchwith minors is problematic from an ethical point of view. It suggests a general uncertainty about thestandards of protection for minor research participants in Germany. Therefore, further ethical and legalregulation of non-therapeutic research with minors in Germany seems necessary."],["dc.format.mimetype","application/pdf"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1136/jme.2003.005900"],["dc.identifier.fs","17497"],["dc.identifier.gro","3146746"],["dc.identifier.pmid","14872082"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?goescholar/4135"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/9420"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Migrated from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.issn","0306-6800"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.access","openAccess"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.subject","REC, research ethics committee"],["dc.subject.ddc","610"],["dc.title","Non-therapeutic research with minors: how do chairpersons of German research ethics committees decide?"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dc.type.version","submitted_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","79"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Ethik in der Medizin"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","80"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","22"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiesemann, Claudia"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-09T11:52:25Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-09T11:52:25Z"],["dc.date.issued","2010"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00481-009-0042-7"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?goescholar/4154"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/60183"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.publisher","Springer"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.subject.ddc","610"],["dc.title","Jochen Vollmann (2008) Patientenselbstbestimmung und Selbstbestimmungsfähigkeit. Beiträge zur Klinischen Ethik"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","67"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","69"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","6"],["dc.contributor.author","Fangerau, Heiner"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiesemann, Claudia"],["dc.contributor.author","Simon, A."],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-10-16T10:54:30Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-10-16T10:54:30Z"],["dc.date.issued","2003"],["dc.description.abstract","The efforts of the European Commission to create a “European Research Area” in the field of biotechnology are accompanied by a growing demand for an ethical discourse. Cultural differences between the European Union's member states create a vital need to improve bioethical information structures in Europe so as to foster European bioethics discourses and to cope with ethical pluralism. Responding to the need for an increased European contribution to the international discussion on ethics in medicine and biotechnology, some of Europe's leading bioethics institutions have joined forces to establish the international network “EURETHNET”. 18 partners from nine European countries agreed to develop an information network and knowledge base in the field of ethics in medicine and biotechnology. This short communication displays the aims, scope and realisation of the network."],["dc.format.mimetype","application/pdf"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1023/a:1022564332516"],["dc.identifier.fs","14718"],["dc.identifier.gro","3146759"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?goescholar/4138"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/9435"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Migrated from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.issn","1386-7423"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.access","openAccess"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.subject","bioethics; biotechnology; cultural diversity; database; ethics; Europe; European union; internet; literature; medicine"],["dc.subject.ddc","610"],["dc.title","Improving information systems in Europe: EURETHNET"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dc.type.version","submitted_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","117"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Ethik in der Medizin"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","121"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","15"],["dc.contributor.author","Biller-Andorno, Nikola"],["dc.contributor.author","Frewer, Andreas"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiesemann, Claudia"],["dc.contributor.author","Neitzke, G."],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-10-16T10:54:27Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-10-16T10:54:27Z"],["dc.date.issued","2003"],["dc.format.mimetype","application/pdf"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00481-003-0224-7"],["dc.identifier.fs","14730"],["dc.identifier.gro","3146738"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?goescholar/4134"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/9411"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.intern","Migrated from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.issn","0935-7335"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.access","openAccess"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.subject","Medizinethik; Lehre"],["dc.subject.ddc","610"],["dc.title","Lehrziele \"Medizinethik im Medizinstudium\""],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dc.type.version","submitted_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","601"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","5"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Ethical Theory and Moral Practice"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","603"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","14"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiesemann, Claudia"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-09T11:53:21Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-09T11:53:21Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s10677-011-9278-7"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/7356"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/60408"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.publisher","Springer"],["dc.publisher.place","Dordrecht"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.subject.ddc","610"],["dc.title","Michael Quante, Menschenwürde und personale Autonomie. Demokratische Werte im Kontext der Lebenswissenschaften"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]