Roessler, Markus

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","105"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Notfall + Rettungsmedizin"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","112"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","11"],["dc.contributor.author","Roessler, M."],["dc.contributor.author","Lott, C."],["dc.contributor.author","Timmermann, Arnd"],["dc.contributor.author","Russo, Sebastian Giuseppe"],["dc.contributor.author","Graf, Bernhard Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Eich, Christoph B."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T11:17:59Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T11:17:59Z"],["dc.date.issued","2008"],["dc.description.abstract","November 28(th) 2005 the revised guidelines for resuscitation have been published by the European Resuscitation Council (ERC). Subsequently the modifications and innovations not only had to be passed on to lay persons and professionals but also as soon as possible to medical students. With commencement of the new regulations for the license to practice medicine (Approbationsordnung fur Arzte) on October 1(st) 2003, Emergency Medicine is an independent cross-section subject within the curriculum for a medical degree since summer-semester 2004. With this the structural prerequisites for teaching cardiopulmonary resuscitation according to the guidelines already had been established. Thereby it already has been possible to adapt the content of teaching with the summer-semester 2006. This article describes what methods are feasible to teach cardiopulmonary resuscitation according to the ERC guidelines 2005, how they can be examined and what efforts are necessary for realization."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s10049-008-1023-y"],["dc.identifier.isi","000254513100007"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/54940"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Springer"],["dc.relation.issn","1434-6222"],["dc.title","Implementation of the resuscitation guidelines 2005 in student education"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","888"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","8"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Resuscitation"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","892"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","80"],["dc.contributor.author","Eich, Christoph B."],["dc.contributor.author","Russo, Sebastian Giuseppe"],["dc.contributor.author","Heuer, J. F."],["dc.contributor.author","Timmermann, Arnd"],["dc.contributor.author","Gentkow, Uta"],["dc.contributor.author","Quintel, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Roessler, Markus"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:27:33Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:27:33Z"],["dc.date.issued","2009"],["dc.description.abstract","Background: In Germany, as in many other countries, for the vast majority of cases, critical out-of-hospital (OOH) paediatric emergencies are attended by non-specialised emergency physicians (EPs). As it is assumed that this may lead to deficient service we aimed to gather robust data on the characteristics of OOH paediatric emergencies. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated all OOH paediatric emergencies (0-14years) within a 9-year period and attended by physician-staffed ground- or helicopter-based emergency medical service (EMS or HEMS) teams from our centre. Results: We identified 2271 paediatric emergencies, making up 6.3% of all cases (HEMS 8.5%). NACA scores IV-VII were assigned in 27.3% (HEMS 32.0%). The leading diagnosis groups were age dependent: respiratory disorders (infants 34.5%, toddlers 21.8%, school children 15.0%), convulsions (17.2%, 43.2%, and 16.0%, respectively), and trauma (16.0%, 19.5%, and 44.4%, respectively). Endotracheal intubation was performed in 4.2% (HEMS 7.6%) and intraosseous canulation in 0.7% (HEMS 1.0%) of children. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was commenced in 2.3% (HEMS 3.4%). Thoracocentesis, chest drain insertion and defibrillation were rarities. HEMS physicians attended a particularly high fraction of drowning (80.0%). head injury (73.9%) and SIDS (60.0%) cases, whereas 75.6% of all respiratory emergencies were attended by ground-based EPs. Conclusions: Our data suggest that EPs need to be particularly confident with the care of children suffering respiratory disorders, convulsions, and trauma. The incidence of severe paediatric OOH emergencies requiring advanced interventions is higher in HEMS-attended cases. However, well-developed skills in airway management, CPR, and intraosseous canulation in children are essential for all EPs. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.05.008"],["dc.identifier.isi","000268862100010"],["dc.identifier.pmid","19520484"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/6223"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/16228"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Elsevier Ireland Ltd"],["dc.relation.issn","0300-9572"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.title","Characteristics of out-of-hospital paediatric emergencies attended by ambulance- and helicopter-based emergency physicians"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1371"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","12"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Resuscitation"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1377"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","80"],["dc.contributor.author","Eich, Christoph B."],["dc.contributor.author","Roessler, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Nemeth, Marcus"],["dc.contributor.author","Russo, Sebastian Giuseppe"],["dc.contributor.author","Heuer, J. F."],["dc.contributor.author","Timmermann, Arnd"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T11:21:46Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T11:21:46Z"],["dc.date.issued","2009"],["dc.description.abstract","Aim: To collect data regarding prehospital paediatric tracheal intubation by emergency physicians skilled in advanced airway management. Methods: A prospective 8-year observational study of a single emergency physician-staffed emergency medical service. Self-reporting by emergency physicians of all children aged 0-14 years who had prehospital tracheal intubation and were attended by either anaesthesia-trained emergency physicians (group 1) or by a mixture of anaesthesia and non-anaesthesia-trained emergency physicians (group 2). Results: Eighty-two out of 2040 children (4.0%) had prehospital tracheal intubation (58 in group 1). The most common diagnoses were trauma (50%; in school children, 73.0%), convulsions (13.4%) and SIDS (12.2%: in infants, 58.8%). The overall tracheal intubation success rate was 57 out of 58 attempts (98.3%). Compared to older children, infants had a higher number of Cormack-Lehane scores of 3 or 4, \"difficult to intubate\" status (both 3 Out of 13; 23.1%) and a lower first attempt Success Fate for tracheal intubation (p = 0.04). Among all 82 children 71 (86.6%) survived to hospital admission and 63 (76.8%) to discharge. Of the 63 survivors, 54 (85.7%) demonstrated a favourable OF Unchanged neurological outcome (PCPC 1-3). The survival and neurological outcomes of infants were inferior compared to older children (p < 0.001). On average an emergency physician performed one prehospital tracheal intubation in 3 years in a child and one in 13 years in an infant. Conclusions: Anaesthesia-trained emergency physicians working in our system report high success rates for prehospital tracheal intubation in children. Survival and neurological Outcomes were considerably better than reported in previous Studies. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.09.004"],["dc.identifier.isi","000273575400010"],["dc.identifier.pmid","19804939"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/55856"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Elsevier Ireland Ltd"],["dc.relation.issn","0300-9572"],["dc.title","Characteristics and outcome of prehospital paediatric tracheal intubation attended by anaesthesia-trained emergency physicians"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","876"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","9"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Der Anaesthesist"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","883"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","58"],["dc.contributor.author","Eich, Christoph B."],["dc.contributor.author","Roessler, M."],["dc.contributor.author","Timmermann, Arnd"],["dc.contributor.author","Heuer, J. F."],["dc.contributor.author","Gentkow, Uta"],["dc.contributor.author","Albrecht, B."],["dc.contributor.author","Russo, Sebastian Giuseppe"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T11:24:30Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T11:24:30Z"],["dc.date.issued","2009"],["dc.description.abstract","Out-of-hospital (OOH) pediatric emergencies have a relatively low prevalence. In Germany the vast majority of cases are attended by non-specialized emergency physicians (EPs) for whom these are not routine procedures. This may lead to insecurity and fear. However, it is unknown how EPs perceive and assess pediatric emergencies and how they could be better prepared for them. All active EPs (n=50) of the Department of Anaesthesiology, Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine at the University Medical Centre of Gottingen were presented with a structured questionnaire in order to evaluate their perception and assessment of OOH pediatric emergencies. The 43 participating EPs made highly detailed statements on the expected characteristics of OOH pediatric emergencies. Their confidence level grew with the children's age (p < 0.03) and with their own experience (p < 0.01). The EPs felt particular deficits in the fields of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (n=18) and trauma management (n=8). The preferred educational strategies included simulator-based training (n=24) as well as more exposure to pediatric intensive care and pediatric anesthesia (n=12). Despite their own limited experience EPs can realistically assess the incidence and severity of pediatric emergencies. They felt the greatest deficits were in the care of infrequent but life-threatening emergencies. Three educational groups can be differentiated: knowledge and skills to be gained with children in hospital, clinical experience from adult care also applicable in children and rare diagnoses and interventions to be trained with manikins or simulators."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00101-009-1603-3"],["dc.identifier.isi","000270439100003"],["dc.identifier.pmid","19693447"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/56420"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Springer"],["dc.relation.issn","0003-2417"],["dc.title","Out-of-hospital pediatric emergencies. Perception and assessment by emergency physicians"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","286"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","BJA British Journal of Anaesthesia"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","291"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","99"],["dc.contributor.author","Timmermann, Arnd"],["dc.contributor.author","Russo, Sebastian Giuseppe"],["dc.contributor.author","Rosenblatt, William H."],["dc.contributor.author","Eich, Christoph B."],["dc.contributor.author","Barwing, Juergen"],["dc.contributor.author","Roessler, M."],["dc.contributor.author","Graf, Bernhard Martin"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:59:48Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:59:48Z"],["dc.date.issued","2007"],["dc.description.abstract","Background. Out-of-hospital airway management is a critical skill, demanding expert knowledge and experience. The intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) is a ventilatory and intubating device which may be of value in this arena. We evaluated the ILMA for out-of-hospital management of the difficult airway. Methods. Twenty-one anaesthesia-trained emergency physicians (EPs) completed a training programme and used the ILMA in patients with difficult-to-manage airways. Indications for use of the ILMA included patients with difficult laryngoscopy, multiple intubation attempts, limited access to the patient's head, presence of pharyngo-laryngeal trauma; and gastric fluids or bleeding obscuring the view of the vocal cords. Results. During the study period, 146 of 2513 patients underwent tracheal intubation or alternate rescue airway insertion. In 135 patients, laryngoscopy was performed and Cormack-Lehane view was recorded as grade I in 72 (53.3%), II in 45 (33.3%), III in 10 (7.4%), and IV in 8 (5.9%). EPs encountered I I patients (7.5%) with difficult-to-manage airways. ILMA insertion and ventilation was possible in 10 patients in the first and one patient in the second attempt. ILMA-guided tracheal intubation was successful in all patients, in 10 after the first and in I after two attempts. Conclusions. In this study, ventilation and intubation with ILMA was successful in all patients with difficult-to-manage airways. Our data support the use of the ILMA as rescue device for out-of-hospital airway management by staff who have appropriate airway skills and have received appropriate training."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1093/bja/aem136"],["dc.identifier.isi","000248683000022"],["dc.identifier.pmid","17584849"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/50781"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Oxford Univ Press"],["dc.relation.issn","0007-0912"],["dc.title","Intubating laryngeal mask airway for difficult out-of-hospital airway management: A prospective evaluation"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","70"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Der Anaesthesist"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","80"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","57"],["dc.contributor.author","Russo, Sebastian Giuseppe"],["dc.contributor.author","Eich, Christoph B."],["dc.contributor.author","Roessler, M."],["dc.contributor.author","Graf, Bernhard Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Quintel, M."],["dc.contributor.author","Timmermann, Arnd"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T11:19:20Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T11:19:20Z"],["dc.date.issued","2008"],["dc.description.abstract","Severe clinical incidents occur in up to 10% of all non-intensive care unit (ICU) patients, which have an estimated mortality of 5-8%. As in the prehospital setting, early clinical warning signs can be identified in the majority of cases. Studies suggest that introduction of an in-hospital medical emergency team (MET) which responds to objective criteria of physiological deterioration, may effectively reduce the incidence of in-hospital cardiac arrests as well as unanticipated or readmissions to the ICU. According to this concept, METs would evaluate and treat non-ICU patients at risk at an early stage before a potentially fatal deterioration of cardiorespiratory parameters occurs. This article reviews available data on preventive in-hospital intensive care medicine and reflects on the circumstances for an implementation of METs in Germany, Austria and Switzerland."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00101-007-1271-0"],["dc.identifier.isi","000252689900010"],["dc.identifier.pmid","17960348"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/55251"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Springer"],["dc.relation.issn","0003-2417"],["dc.title","Medical emergency teams. Current situation and perspectives of preventive in-hospital intensive care medicine"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","212"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Resuscitation"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","218"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","79"],["dc.contributor.author","Nickel, Eike A."],["dc.contributor.author","Timmermann, Arnd"],["dc.contributor.author","Roessler, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Cremer, Stephan"],["dc.contributor.author","Russo, Sebastian Giuseppe"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T11:09:46Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T11:09:46Z"],["dc.date.issued","2008"],["dc.description.abstract","Aim of the study: Airway management in an out-of-hospital setting is a critical and demanding skill. Previous studies evaluated the intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) as a valuable toot in this area. The LMA CTrach (TM) Laryngeal. Mask Airway (CTrach) may increase intubation success. Therefore, we evaluated the CTrach as the primary toot for airway management in the out-of-hospital setting in adult patients. Methods: From October 2006 until September 2007 EAN and SGR included all patients who needed advanced airway management during out-of-hospital emergency medicine service. Ventilation and intubation has been performed via the CTrach as the primary choice. Before intubation, visualization of the vocal cords was optimized under continuous ventilation via the CTrach. The time needed, manoeuvres to optimize vision, grades of vision and success rates have been documented. Results: 16 patients have been included. Ventilation and intubation via the CTrach was possible in all patients. Ventilation was mostly established in less than 15 s and was established in 15 of 16 (94%) patients at the first attempt. Intubation was successful in 15 of 16 (94%) patients on the first attempt. Visualization of the laryngeal structures was achieved in 69% of patients, while intubation without sight was performed in 31%, respectively. Conclusion: In this study, ventilation and intubation via the CTrach was successful and could be rapidly established in all patients. Our data suggest that the use of the CTrach may be suitable for the out-of-hospital setting as it provides ventilation and facilitates intubation with a very high success rate. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.resuscitation.2008.06.020"],["dc.identifier.isi","000261355700008"],["dc.identifier.pmid","18691800"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/53079"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Elsevier Ireland Ltd"],["dc.relation.issn","0300-9572"],["dc.title","Out-of-hospital airway management with the LMA CTrach (TM)-A prospective evaluation"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","619"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Anesthesia & Analgesia"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","623"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","104"],["dc.contributor.author","Timmermann, Arnd"],["dc.contributor.author","Russo, Sebastian Giuseppe"],["dc.contributor.author","Eich, Christoph B."],["dc.contributor.author","Roessler, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Braun, Ulrich"],["dc.contributor.author","Rosenblatt, William H."],["dc.contributor.author","Quintel, Micheal"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T11:04:13Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T11:04:13Z"],["dc.date.issued","2007"],["dc.description.abstract","BACKGROUND: Rapid establishment of a patent airway in ill or injured patients is a priority for prehospital rescue personnel. Out-of-hospital tracheal intubation can be challenging. Unrecognized esophageal intubation is a clinical disaster. METHODS: We performed an observational, prospective study of consecutive patients requiring transport by air and out-of-hospital tracheal intubation, performed by primary emergency physicians to quantify the number of unrecognized esophageal and endobronchial intubations. Tracheal tube placement was verified on scene by a study physician using a combination of direct visualization, end-tidal carbon dioxide detection, esophageal detection device, and physical examination. RESULTS: During the 5-yr study period 149 consecutive out-of-hospital tracheal intubations were performed by primary emergency physicians and subsequently evaluated by the study physicians. The mean patient age was 57.0 (+/- 22.7) yr and 99 patients (66.4%) were men. The tracheal tube was determined by the study physician to have been placed in the right mainstem bronchus or esophagus in 16 (10.7%) and 10 (6.7%) patients, respectively. All esophageal intubations were detected and corrected by the study physician at the scene, but 7 of these 10 patients died within the first 24 h of treatment. CONCLUSION: The incidence of unrecognized esophageal intubation is frequent and is associated with a high mortality rate. Esophageal intubation can be detected with end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring and an esophageal detection device. Out-of-hospital care providers should receive continuing training in airway management, and should be provided additional confirmatory adjuncts to aid in the determination of tracheal tube placement."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1213/01.ane.0000253523.80050.e9"],["dc.identifier.isi","000244431500036"],["dc.identifier.pmid","17312220"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/51784"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Lippincott Williams & Wilkins"],["dc.relation.issn","0003-2999"],["dc.title","The out-of-hospital esophageal and endobronchial intubations performed by emergency physicians"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","634"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","5"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Resuscitation"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","635"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","81"],["dc.contributor.author","Eich, Christoph B."],["dc.contributor.author","Roessler, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Russo, Sebastian Giuseppe"],["dc.contributor.author","Heuer, J. F."],["dc.contributor.author","Timmermann, Arnd"],["dc.contributor.author","Nemeth, Marcus"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:43:52Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:43:52Z"],["dc.date.issued","2010"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.01.016"],["dc.identifier.isi","000278282600032"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/20073"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Elsevier Ireland Ltd"],["dc.relation.issn","0300-9572"],["dc.title","Reply to Letter: Paediatric tracheal prehospital intubation-What makes different our practice across the Ocean?"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dc.type.subtype","letter_note"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","84"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Notfall + Rettungsmedizin"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","90"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","11"],["dc.contributor.author","Roessler, M."],["dc.contributor.author","Eich, Christoph B."],["dc.contributor.author","Quintel, M."],["dc.contributor.author","Timmermann, Arnd"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T11:17:59Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T11:17:59Z"],["dc.date.issued","2008"],["dc.description.abstract","Under coordination of the International Liason Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) for several years experts all over the world allocated resuscitation measures by their level of evidence, that would lead to improved survival after cardiac arrest. Derived from the \"Consensus of Science\" in 2005 the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) published the reedited guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The most important effect of the guideline changes is that external cardiac compressions can be performed for longer periods without interruptions. This has been possible since resuscitation measures that have not shown to improve survival now have to be done less frequently. Hereby it seems to be easier to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation more efficiently and structured. But it also had to be noticed that some changes, e.g. immediate continuation of external cardiac compressions following defibrillation, are more difficult to teach. New conclusions indicate that further guideline changes can be expected."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s10049-008-1021-0"],["dc.identifier.isi","000254513100004"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/54939"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Springer"],["dc.relation.issn","1434-6222"],["dc.title","Guidelines for resuscitation 2005 - What is their effect, what is new?"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]