Barkmann, Jan

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","6980"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","17"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Sustainability"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","12"],["dc.contributor.author","Böhm, Marko"],["dc.contributor.author","Barkmann, Jan"],["dc.contributor.author","Eggert, Sabina"],["dc.contributor.author","Carstensen, Claus H."],["dc.contributor.author","Bögeholz, Susanne"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-09-28T14:01:10Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-09-28T14:01:10Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.description.sponsorship","Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3390/su12176980"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/17537"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/67901"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-344"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.publisher","MDPI"],["dc.relation.eissn","2071-1050"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Abteilung Didaktik der Biologie"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Zentrum für Biodiversität und Nachhaltige Landnutzung"],["dc.rights","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.title","Quantitative Modelling and Perspective Taking: Two Competencies of Decision Making for Sustainable Development"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1443"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","4"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Sustainability"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1460"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","5"],["dc.contributor.author","Koch, Sebastian"],["dc.contributor.author","Barkmann, Jan"],["dc.contributor.author","Strack, Micha"],["dc.contributor.author","Sundawati, Leti"],["dc.contributor.author","Boegeholz, Susanne"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:26:10Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:26:10Z"],["dc.date.issued","2013"],["dc.description.abstract","Graduates of university programs addressing sustainable resource management are likely to shape strategies for natural resource use in the future. Their academic training needs to foster student knowledge of the multiple dimensions of natural resource management. This paper investigates university student understanding of such challenges. We differentiated situational, conceptual, and procedural types of knowledge, and three domains of knowledge (ecological, socio-economic and institutional knowledge), and sampled beginners (third semester) and seniors (seventh semester) of seven natural resource related programs at the leading Indonesian institution of higher education in the field of natural resource management (IPB Bogor; n = 882). The questionnaire consisted of multiple choice and rating scale items covering 'locally' relevant open-access resource use issues. With a confirmatory tau-equivalent LISREL model, construct validity was assessed. The ability to extract relevant information from problem descriptions provided (situational knowledge) did not differ between third and seventh semester students. While it was high for ecological and socio-economic items, it was markedly lower for institutional knowledge. Knowledge of relevant scientific concepts (conceptual knowledge) increased in the ecological and socio-economic domains but the effect was small. Conceptual knowledge in the socio-economical and institutional domains tended to be lower than ecological knowledge. Although there was certain improvement, student judgments on the efficacy of resource management options (procedural knowledge) differed strongly from expert judgments for beginners as well as for senior students. We conclude that many of the university students in the sampled programs displayed substantial gaps in their capacity to solve complex, real-world natural resource management problems. Specifically, the socio-economic and institutional knowledge domains-and their integration with ecological knowledge-may require attention by educational planners."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2013"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3390/su5041443"],["dc.identifier.isi","000324048200005"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/8763"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/30238"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Mdpi Ag"],["dc.relation.issn","2071-1050"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Abteilung Didaktik der Biologie"],["dc.rights","CC BY 3.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/"],["dc.title","Knowledge of Indonesian University Students on the Sustainable Management of Natural Resources"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","645"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Sustainability"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","11"],["dc.contributor.author","Riechers, Maraja"],["dc.contributor.author","Strack, Micha"],["dc.contributor.author","Barkmann, Jan"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-02-19T15:47:05Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-02-19T15:47:05Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3390/su11030645"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/57598"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DeepGreen Import"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.publisher","MDPI"],["dc.relation.eissn","2071-1050"],["dc.rights","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"],["dc.title","Cultural Ecosystem Services Provided by Urban Green Change along an Urban-Periurban Gradient"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","71"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","82"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","4"],["dc.contributor.author","Gamboa, Vladimir Gonzalez"],["dc.contributor.author","Barkmann, Jan"],["dc.contributor.author","Marggraf, Rainer"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-09T11:40:45Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-09T11:40:45Z"],["dc.date.issued","2010"],["dc.description.abstract","A case study in South Ecuador serves as an example to understand the dynamics of adoption of agroforestry species. Qualitative research shows that there are potential differences in adoption between two ethnic groups. The adoption rate of Saraguro communal leaders may be an indicator of lower contagion than Mestizo-colonos. Thus, we propose a heterogeneous diffusion model that addresses network exposure effects and a generalized blockmodel for relational data analysis. We hypothesize that Mestizo-colonos have higher adoption rate than Saraguros. The Saraguro indigenous group may have lower access to the information necessary for the adoption of the innovation than Mestizo-Colonos."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.484"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/11281"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/58239"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.rights","CC BY-NC-ND 3.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0"],["dc.title","Social network effects on the adoption of agroforestry species: Preliminary results of a study on differences on adoption patterns in Southern Ecuador"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","8311"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","20"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","8316"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","108"],["dc.contributor.author","Clough, Yann"],["dc.contributor.author","Barkmann, Jan"],["dc.contributor.author","Juhrbandt, Jana"],["dc.contributor.author","Kessler, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Wanger, Thomas Cherico"],["dc.contributor.author","Anshary, Alam"],["dc.contributor.author","Buchori, Damayanti"],["dc.contributor.author","Cicuzza, Daniele"],["dc.contributor.author","Darras, Kevin"],["dc.contributor.author","Putra, Dadang Dwi"],["dc.contributor.author","Erasmi, Stefan"],["dc.contributor.author","Pitopang, Ramadhanil"],["dc.contributor.author","Schmidt, Carsten"],["dc.contributor.author","Schulze, Christian H."],["dc.contributor.author","Seidel, Dominik"],["dc.contributor.author","Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf"],["dc.contributor.author","Stenchly, Kathrin"],["dc.contributor.author","Vidal, Stefan"],["dc.contributor.author","Weist, Maria"],["dc.contributor.author","Wielgoss, Arno Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:54:44Z"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-05-11T13:18:51Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:54:44Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-05-11T13:18:51Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.description.abstract","Local and landscape-scale agricultural intensification is a major driver of global biodiversity loss. Controversially discussed solutions include wildlife-friendly farming or combining high-intensity farming with land-sparing for nature. Here, we integrate biodiversity and crop productivity data for smallholder cacao in Indonesia to exemplify for tropical agroforests that there is little relationship between yield and biodiversity under current management, opening substantial opportunities for wildlife-friendly management. Species richness of trees, fungi, invertebrates, and vertebrates did not decrease with yield. Moderate shade, adequate labor, and input level can be combined with a complex habitat structure to provide high biodiversity as well as high yields. Although livelihood impacts are held up as a major obstacle for wildlife-friendly farming in the tropics, our results suggest that in some situations, agroforests can be designed to optimize both biodiversity and crop production benefits without adding pressure to convert natural habitat to farmland."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1073/pnas.1016799108"],["dc.identifier.gro","3150093"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/8611"],["dc.identifier.scopus","2-s2.0-79957762227"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6823"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/65024"],["dc.identifier.url","http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-79957762227&partnerID=MN8TOARS"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.eissn","1091-6490"],["dc.relation.issn","0027-8424"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.title","Combining high biodiversity with high yields in tropical agroforests"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","59"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Austrian Journal of South East Asian Studies"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","81"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","1"],["dc.contributor.author","Koch, Sebastian"],["dc.contributor.author","Faust, Heiko"],["dc.contributor.author","Barkmann, Jan"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-10T08:13:58Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-10T08:13:58Z"],["dc.date.issued","2008"],["dc.description.abstract","The mountain forests of the Indonesian province of Central Sulawesi include core areas of the global Wallacea biodiversity “hotspot”. Remote sensing data indicated that deforestation rates around Central Sulawesi’s Lore-Lindu National Park differ more strongly between villages than could be explained by differences in the individual characteristics of the village households as assessed by quantitative village censuses. This setting provided the background for a study into inter-village differences in power structures regarding access to natural resources. Our results are abstracted from 3 10 semi-structured, qualitative interviews with key informants from the leading groups of autochthonous and migrant households of three contrasting villages. In village A, nearly feudal power relationships are exerted by a group of local “fi rst settler” families that dominate formal village leadership as well as the infl uential Council of Traditional Leaders (Lembaga Adat), and that restrict deforestation and land transactions. No such institutional restrictions exist in village C. Traditional power relationships are replaced by economic power based on petty capitalisttype production of the international agricultural commodity cocoa. Deforestation is much higher in village C. In village B, traditional institutions and power structures still appear in place although land transactions are less restricted than in village A, resulting also in high deforestation rates. While contrasting problematic social effects, our study highlights the potential effi cacy of traditional institutions in the regulation of access to resources."],["dc.identifier.fs","323023"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/8417"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/61396"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.relation.issn","1999-2521"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Fakultät für Geowissenschaften und Geographie"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.subject.ddc","550"],["dc.title","Diff erences in Power Structures Regarding Access to Natural Resources at the Village Level in Central Sulawesi (Indonesia)"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","42"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Ecology and Society"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","22"],["dc.contributor.author","Hänke, Hendrik"],["dc.contributor.author","Barkmann, Jan"],["dc.contributor.author","Coral, Claudia"],["dc.contributor.author","Enfors Kaustky, Elin"],["dc.contributor.author","Marggraf, Rainer"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T18:48:01Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T18:48:01Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.description.abstract","The semiarid Mahafaly region in southwestern Madagascar is not only a unique biodiversity hotspot, but also one of the poorest regions in the world. Crop failures occur frequently, and despite a great number of rural development programs, no effective progress in terms of improved yields, agricultural income, or well-being among farming households has been observed. In addition to the severe development challenges in the region, environmental degradation and the loss of biodiversity are prevailing issues. This paper takes a social-ecological systems perspective to analyze why the region appears locked in poverty. Specifically, we address the social-ecological interaction between environmental factors such as low and variable precipitation, the lack of sustainable intensification in agriculture resulting in recalcitrant hunger, and several environmental degradation trends. The study is based on (i) longitudinal data from 150 farming households interviewed at high temporal resolution during the course of 2014, and (ii) extensive recall surveys from the southwestern Madagascar project region. The analysis reveals a complex interplay of pronounced seasonality in income generation due to recurrent droughts and crop failures making local farmers highly risk averse. This interplay results in a gradual depletion of environmental assets and hinders the accumulation of capital in the hands of smallholder farmers, and improvements in agricultural production even where environmental conditions would allow for it. As a result, households are insufficiently buffered and insured against repetitive income and food security shocks. This can be understood as a set of interacting, partly nested social-ecological traps, which entrench the Mahafalian smallholder population in deep poverty while the productivity of the environment declines. We provide new insights on the interplay between hunger, poverty, and loss of environmental assets in a global biodiversity hotspot. Finally, we propose a set of key issues that need to be considered to unlock this severe lock-in and enable transformation toward a more sustainable development in southwestern Madagascar."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.5751/ES-09130-220142"],["dc.identifier.isi","000399397700047"],["dc.identifier.issn","1708-3087"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/14954"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/78981"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","PUB_WoS_Import"],["dc.publisher","Resilience Alliance"],["dc.relation.issn","1708-3087"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.title","Social-ecological traps hinder rural development in southwestern Madagascar"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]