Wienbeck, Susanne

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","7435"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Scientific reports"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","7"],["dc.contributor.author","Wienbeck, Susanne"],["dc.contributor.author","Meyer, Hans Jonas"],["dc.contributor.author","Uhlig, Johannes"],["dc.contributor.author","Herzog, Aimee"],["dc.contributor.author","Nemat, Sogand"],["dc.contributor.author","Teifke, Andrea"],["dc.contributor.author","Heindel, Walter"],["dc.contributor.author","Schäfer, Fritz"],["dc.contributor.author","Kinner, Sonja"],["dc.contributor.author","Surov, Alexey"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-09T11:43:40Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-09T11:43:40Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017-08-07"],["dc.description.abstract","To assess radiological procedures and imaging characteristics in patients with intramammary hematological malignancies (IHM). Radiological imaging studies of histopathological proven IHM cases from ten German University affiliated breast imaging centers from 1997-2012 were retrospectively evaluated. Imaging modalities included ultrasound (US), mammography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Two radiologists blinded to the histopathological diagnoses independently assessed all imaging studies. Imaging studies of 101 patients with 204 intramammary lesions were included. Most patients were women (95%) with a median age of 64 years. IHM were classified as Non Hodgkin lymphoma (77.2%), plasmacytoma (11.9%), leukemia (9.9%), and Hodgkin lymphoma (1%). The mean lesion size was 15.8 ± 10.1 mm. Most IHM presented in mammography as lesions with comparable density to the surrounding tissue, and a round or irregular shape with indistinct margins. On US, most lesions were of irregular shape with complex echo pattern and indistinct margins. MRI shows lesions with irregular or spiculated margins and miscellaneous enhancement patterns. Using US or MRI, IHM were more frequently classified as BI-RADS 4 or 5 than using mammography (96.2% and 89.3% versus 75.3%). IHM can present with miscellaneous radiological patterns. Sensitivity for detection of IHM lesions was higher in US and MRI than in mammography."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1038/s41598-017-07409-z"],["dc.identifier.pmid","28785116"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/14617"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/58941"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.relation.issn","2045-2322"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"],["dc.subject.ddc","610"],["dc.title","Radiological imaging characteristics of intramammary hematological malignancies: results from a german multicenter study."],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","9"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","European Journal of Radiology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","16"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","99"],["dc.contributor.author","Uhlig, Johannes"],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, Uwe"],["dc.contributor.author","Surov, Alexey"],["dc.contributor.author","Lotz, Joachim"],["dc.contributor.author","Wienbeck, Susanne"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T14:23:42Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T14:23:42Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.12.003"],["dc.identifier.issn","0720-048X"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/72020"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","Contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast-CT: Analysis of optimal acquisition time for discrimination of breast lesion malignancy"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","599"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","4"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Translational oncology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","603"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","10"],["dc.contributor.author","Wienbeck, Susanne"],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, Uwe"],["dc.contributor.author","Perske, Christina"],["dc.contributor.author","Wienke, Andreas"],["dc.contributor.author","Meyer, Hans Jonas"],["dc.contributor.author","Lotz, Joachim"],["dc.contributor.author","Surov, Alexey"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-09T11:43:26Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-09T11:43:26Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017-06-27"],["dc.description.abstract","PURPOSE: Recently, cone-beam breast computed tomography (CBCT) is established for the breast investigation. The purpose of the present study was to investigate possible associations between CBCT findings and histopathological features in breast cancer. METHODS: Overall, 59 female patients, mean age of 64.6 years with histological proven breast cancer were included into the study. In all cases, non-contrast CBCT examination was done. The diagnosis of the identified lesions was confirmed histologically by biopsy. Immunohistochemical staining against estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and Ki-67 was performed for every lesion. Collected data were evaluated by means of descriptive statistics. Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to analyze the association between CT density and Ki-67 values. P values <0.05 were taken to indicate statistical significance in all instances. RESULTS: The size of the lesion varied from 2.7 to 90.0, mean size, 15.88±13.0 mm. The mean value of CT density of the lesions was 63.95±38.18 HU. The density tended to be higher in tubular carcinoma. Correlation analysis identified no significant correlations between CT density and Ki-67 level (r=-0.031, P=.784). There were no statistically significant differences of CT density between tumors with different receptor status. CONCLUSIONS: No significant associations between CT density and receptor status in breast cancer. Tubular carcinoma tended to have higher CT density in comparison to other subtypes of breast carcinomas."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.tranon.2017.05.004"],["dc.identifier.pmid","28666188"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/14534"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/58889"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.relation.issn","1936-5233"],["dc.rights","CC BY-NC-ND 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0"],["dc.subject.ddc","610"],["dc.title","Cone-beam Breast Computed Tomography: CT Density Does Not Reflect Proliferation Potential and Receptor Expression of Breast Carcinoma."],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","e17082"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","37"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Medicine"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","98"],["dc.contributor.author","Wienbeck, Susanne"],["dc.contributor.author","Uhlig, Johannes"],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, Uwe"],["dc.contributor.author","Hellriegel, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","von Fintel, Eva"],["dc.contributor.author","Kulenkampff, Dietrich"],["dc.contributor.author","Surov, Alexey"],["dc.contributor.author","Lotz, Joachim"],["dc.contributor.author","Perske, Christina"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T18:20:08Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T18:20:08Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1097/MD.0000000000017082"],["dc.identifier.issn","0025-7974"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/16517"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/75461"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.rights","CC BY-NC-ND 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0"],["dc.title","Breast lesion size assessment in mastectomy specimens"],["dc.title.alternative","Correlation of cone-beam breast-CT, digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography with histopathology"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","787"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","09"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","RöFo"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","789"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","191"],["dc.contributor.author","Meyer, Hans Jonas"],["dc.contributor.author","Wienbeck, Susanne"],["dc.contributor.author","Surov, Alexey"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T18:12:11Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T18:12:11Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1055/a-0900-4260"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1438-9010"],["dc.identifier.issn","1438-9029"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/74271"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","Hämatologische kardiale Malignome – typische Befallsmuster in der Bildgebung"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","BMC Cancer"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","19"],["dc.contributor.author","Meyer, Hans-Jonas"],["dc.contributor.author","Pönisch, Wolfram"],["dc.contributor.author","Schmidt, Stefan Andreas"],["dc.contributor.author","Wienbeck, Susanne"],["dc.contributor.author","Braulke, Friederike"],["dc.contributor.author","Schramm, Dominik"],["dc.contributor.author","Surov, Alexey"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T18:38:54Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T18:38:54Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1186/s12885-019-6357-y"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1471-2407"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/17100"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/77474"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"],["dc.title","Clinical and imaging features of myeloid sarcoma: a German multicenter study"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","361"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Clinical Imaging"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","364"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","40"],["dc.contributor.author","Wienbeck, Susanne"],["dc.contributor.author","Herzog, Aimee"],["dc.contributor.author","Kinner, Sonja"],["dc.contributor.author","Surov, Alexey"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:14:52Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:14:52Z"],["dc.date.issued","2016"],["dc.description.abstract","The purpose of this study was to identify magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of intramammary metastases (IM). We identified 8 cases with IM, which were investigated by breast MRI (1.5 T). In every case, the diagnosis of IM was proven histopathologically on breast biopsy specimens. Overall, 187 IM were identified. IM had inconsistent MRI features, which cannot be clearly classify as benign or malignant. IM should be taken into consideration in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions to avoid possible misinterpretations. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.clinimag.2015.12.014"],["dc.identifier.isi","000376054500004"],["dc.identifier.pmid","27133668"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/40706"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Elsevier Science Inc"],["dc.relation.issn","1873-4499"],["dc.relation.issn","0899-7071"],["dc.title","Magnetic resonance imaging findings of intramammary metastases"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","219"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","03"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","RöFo"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","222"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","192"],["dc.contributor.author","Wienbeck, Susanne"],["dc.contributor.author","Meyer, Hans Jonas"],["dc.contributor.author","Surov, Alexey"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T18:12:13Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T18:12:13Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1055/a-0993-5418"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1438-9010"],["dc.identifier.issn","1438-9029"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/74284"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","Radiologische Bildgebungsbefunde bei Brustsarkomen"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","European Journal of Radiology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","7"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","88"],["dc.contributor.author","Wienbeck, Susanne"],["dc.contributor.author","Meyer, Hans Jonas"],["dc.contributor.author","Herzog, Aimee"],["dc.contributor.author","Nemat, Sogand"],["dc.contributor.author","Teifke, Andrea"],["dc.contributor.author","Heindel, Walter"],["dc.contributor.author","Schaefer, Fritz"],["dc.contributor.author","Kinner, Sonja"],["dc.contributor.author","Mueller-Schimpfle, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Surov, Alexey"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:26:31Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:26:31Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.description.abstract","Purpose: To investigate imaging findings in patients with primary breast sarcoma (PBS). Materials and methods: A retrospective search in the databases of 10 radiological departments in Germany from 2000 to 2011 was performed. Only histologically proven cases of PBS were included into the study. Mammography was available in 31 patients (33 lesions), ultrasound images in 24 patients (24 lesions), and for 10 patients (14 lesions) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast was performed. The breast findings were classified according to the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (BI-RADS) 5th edition categories. Collected data were evaluated by means of descriptive statistics. Results: Forty-two female patients (mean age 62.0 years, range, 30-86 years) were included in the study. Clinically, all women had painless lumps. Irregular (53.3% [16/30]) or oval (30.0% [9/30]) mass with indistinct (73.3% [22/30]) or microlobulated (10% [3/30]) margins were common findings on mammograms. Ultrasound revealed typically an irregular (79.2% [19/24]), hypoechoic (62.5% [15/24]) mass, with indistinct margins (79.2% [19/24]), and posterior acoustic shadowing (79.2% [19/24]). MRI showed irregular masses (81.8% [9/11]) with irregular or spiculated margins, and a rapid initial signal increase with a delayed washout in kinetic analysis. Conclusion: Overall, PBS has no pathognomonic imaging features and can mimic those of invasive mammary carcinoma. Breast sarcoma should be taken into the differential diagnosis of breast findings described above. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.12.020"],["dc.identifier.isi","000397269600001"],["dc.identifier.pmid","28189193"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/43061"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","PUB_WoS_Import"],["dc.publisher","Elsevier Ireland Ltd"],["dc.relation.issn","1872-7727"],["dc.relation.issn","0720-048X"],["dc.title","Imaging findings of primary breast sarcoma: Results of a first multicenter study"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dc.type.subtype","letter_note"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","459"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","6"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Der Radiologe"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","465"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","57"],["dc.contributor.author","Wienbeck, Susanne"],["dc.contributor.author","Nemat, S."],["dc.contributor.author","Lotz, Joachim"],["dc.contributor.author","Surov, Alexey"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:23:07Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:23:07Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.description.abstract","Breast metastases of solid extramammary tumors are very rare in comparison to primary malignancies of the breast and account for only 0.33-6.3% of all malignant neoplasms of the breast. The most common primary tumors are malignant melanoma, distant sarcomas, lung cancer, ovarian cancer, renal cell cancer and thyroid cancer in decreasing order of frequency. This review article summarizes the clinical features and the different imaging findings of breast metastases from different extramammary solid tumors. Breast metastases are often incidental findings in computed tomography (CT) or positron emission tomography CT (PET-CT) imaging. Mammography shows two different imaging patterns, namely focal lesions and diffuse architectural distortion with skin thickening. Breast metastases presenting as focal masses usually occur as solitary and more rarely as multiple round lesions with a smooth edge boundary. Associated calcifications are rare findings. Diffuse architectural distortion with skin thickening is more common in breast metastases from most gastric tumors, ovarian cancer and rhabdomyosarcoma. Using ultrasound most lesions are hypoechoic, oval or round with smooth boundaries and posterior acoustic enhancement. The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) criteria of breast metastases show an inconstant signal behavior that cannot be safely classified as benign or malignant. In summary, in patients with known malignancies the presence of breast metastases should be considered even with imposing clinically and radiologically benign findings."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00117-017-0247-6"],["dc.identifier.isi","000403046500006"],["dc.identifier.pmid","28447112"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/42398"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","PUB_WoS_Import"],["dc.publisher","Springer"],["dc.relation.issn","1432-2102"],["dc.relation.issn","0033-832X"],["dc.title","Imaging Diagnostics of Breast Metastases from extramammary Tumors"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]