Wöhlke, Sabine

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","56"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","BMC Medical Ethics"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","15"],["dc.contributor.author","Inthorn, Julia"],["dc.contributor.author","Woehlke, Sabine"],["dc.contributor.author","Schmidt, Fabian"],["dc.contributor.author","Schicktanz, Silke"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:37:47Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:37:47Z"],["dc.date.issued","2014"],["dc.description.abstract","Background: There is an ongoing expert debate with regard to financial incentives in order to increase organ supply. However, there is a lacuna of empirical studies on whether citizens would actually support financial incentives for organ donation. Methods: Between October 2008 and February 2009 a quantitative survey was conducted among German students of medicine and economics to gain insights into their point of view regarding living and deceased organ donation and different forms of commercialization (n = 755). Results: The average (passive) willingness to donate is 63.5% among medical students and 50.0% among students of economics (p = 0.001), while only 24.1% of the respondents were actually holding an organ donor card. 11.3% of students of economics had signed a donor card, however, the number is significantly higher among students of medicine (31.9%, p < 0.001). Women held donor cards significantly more often (28.6%) than men (19.4%, p = 0.004). The majority of students were against direct payments as incentives for deceased and living donations. Nevertheless, 37.5% of the respondents support the idea that the funeral expenses of deceased organ donors should be covered. Women voted significantly less often for the coverage of expenses than men (women 31.6%, men 44.0%, p = 0.003). The number of those in favor of allowing to sell one's organs for money (living organ donation) was highest among students of economics (p = 0.034). Conclusion: Despite a generally positive view on organ donation the respondents refuse to consent to commercialization, but are in favor of removing disincentives or are in favor of indirect models of reward."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1186/1472-6939-15-56"],["dc.identifier.isi","000339287300001"],["dc.identifier.pmid","24996438"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/10484"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/32920"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Biomed Central Ltd"],["dc.relation.issn","1472-6939"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"],["dc.title","Impact of gender and professional education on attitudes towards financial incentives for organ donation: results of a survey among 755 students of medicine and economics in Germany"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","17"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","BMC Medical Ethics"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","15"],["dc.contributor.author","Mertz, Marcel"],["dc.contributor.author","Inthorn, Julia"],["dc.contributor.author","Renz, Guenter"],["dc.contributor.author","Rothenberger, Lillian Geza"],["dc.contributor.author","Salloch, Sabine"],["dc.contributor.author","Schildmann, Jan"],["dc.contributor.author","Wohlke, Sabine"],["dc.contributor.author","Schicktanz, Silke"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:43:12Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:43:12Z"],["dc.date.issued","2014"],["dc.description.abstract","Background: Research in the field of Empirical Ethics (EE) uses a broad variety of empirical methodologies, such as surveys, interviews and observation, developed in disciplines such as sociology, anthropology, and psychology. Whereas these empirical disciplines see themselves as purely descriptive, EE also aims at normative reflection. Currently there is literature about the quality of empirical research in ethics, but little or no reflection on specific methodological aspects that must be considered when conducting interdisciplinary empirical ethics. Furthermore, poor methodology in an EE study results in misleading ethical analyses, evaluations or recommendations. This not only deprives the study of scientific and social value, but also risks ethical misjudgement. Discussion: While empirical and normative-ethical research projects have quality criteria in their own right, we focus on the specific quality criteria for EE research. We develop a tentative list of quality criteria - a \"road map\" - tailored to interdisciplinary research in EE, to guide assessments of research quality. These quality criteria fall into the categories of primary research question, theoretical framework and methods, relevance, interdisciplinary research practice and research ethics and scientific ethos. Summary: EE research is an important and innovative development in bioethics. However, a lack of standards has led to concerns about and even rejection of EE by various scholars. Our suggested orientation list of criteria, presented in the form of reflective questions, cannot be considered definitive, but serves as a tool to provoke systematic reflection during the planning and composition of an EE research study. These criteria need to be tested in different EE research settings and further refined."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1186/1472-6939-15-17"],["dc.identifier.isi","000333171200001"],["dc.identifier.pmid","24580847"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/10037"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/34125"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Biomed Central Ltd"],["dc.relation.issn","1472-6939"],["dc.rights","CC BY 2.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0"],["dc.title","Research across the disciplines: a road map for quality criteria in empirical ethics research"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","10"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Transplantation Journal"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","94"],["dc.contributor.author","Woehlke, Sabine"],["dc.contributor.author","Inthorn, Julia"],["dc.contributor.author","Schmidt, Fabian"],["dc.contributor.author","Schicktanz, Silke"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:03:13Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:03:13Z"],["dc.date.issued","2012"],["dc.format.extent","145"],["dc.identifier.isi","000209846401066"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/24862"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Lippincott Williams & Wilkins"],["dc.publisher.place","Philadelphia"],["dc.relation.issn","1534-6080"],["dc.relation.issn","0041-1337"],["dc.title","The Willingness to Donate An Organ: Aspects of Identity and Body Image in University Students"],["dc.type","conference_abstract"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","10"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Transplantation Journal"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","94"],["dc.contributor.author","Inthorn, Julia"],["dc.contributor.author","Woehlke, Sabine"],["dc.contributor.author","Schmidt, Fabian"],["dc.contributor.author","Schicktanz, Silke"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:03:14Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:03:14Z"],["dc.date.issued","2012"],["dc.format.extent","146"],["dc.identifier.isi","000209846401068"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/24863"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Lippincott Williams & Wilkins"],["dc.publisher.place","Philadelphia"],["dc.relation.issn","1534-6080"],["dc.relation.issn","0041-1337"],["dc.title","Students' Perspective About Financial Incentives for Organ Donation: Differences Between Gender and Medical and Economy Students"],["dc.type","conference_abstract"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]