Wöhlke, Sabine

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","10"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Transplantation Journal"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","94"],["dc.contributor.author","Woehlke, S."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:03:16Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:03:16Z"],["dc.date.issued","2012"],["dc.identifier.isi","000209846404126"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/24869"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Lippincott Williams & Wilkins"],["dc.publisher.place","Philadelphia"],["dc.title","Autonomy and Family: The Example of Living Organ Donation"],["dc.type","conference_abstract"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","424"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","5"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","427"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","14"],["dc.contributor.author","Wöhlke, Sabine"],["dc.contributor.author","Schicktanz, Silke"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T18:38:34Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T18:38:34Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1177/1556264619862395"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1556-2654"],["dc.identifier.issn","1556-2646"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/77371"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","Special Issue: Why Ethically Reflect on Empirical Studies in Empirical Ethics? Case Studies and Commentaries"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","23"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Ethik in der Medizin"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","34"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","27"],["dc.contributor.author","Hansen, Solveig Lena"],["dc.contributor.author","Woehlke, Sabine"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:00:38Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:00:38Z"],["dc.date.issued","2015"],["dc.description.abstract","Background In the movie Never Let Me Go, clones are depicted as highly vulnerable and heteronomous individuals, forced to donate their organs anonymously. In this paper, we analyze the depiction of the clones' socialization and personal development, scrutinizing references to bioethical aspects. Arguments As a symbolic work of fiction, this movie can be regarded as an abstract negotiation of limited agency. The clones are situated in \"privileged deprivation\"; from the audience's point of view, they are deprived and unable to evolve into autonomous agents-but from their own perspective within the dystopian system, they are still \"privileged\". We argue that this movie symbolically focuses on individuals who do not profit from modern medical progress or do not have enough agency to refuse it. Results Movies such as Never Let Me Go evoke a confrontation with underprivileged positions in the medical system, encouraging the audience to take the perspective of the marginalized.."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00481-014-0331-7"],["dc.identifier.isi","000349766500003"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/37849"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Springer"],["dc.relation.issn","1437-1618"],["dc.relation.issn","0935-7335"],["dc.title","\"We all know it; we just never say it.\" - Institutionalized disinformation as a precondition for vulnerability in the context of cloning and organ donation in Never Let Me Go"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Social Theory & Health"],["dc.contributor.author","Wöhlke, Sabine"],["dc.contributor.author","Perry, Julia"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T18:12:34Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T18:12:34Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1057/s41285-019-00127-8"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1477-822X"],["dc.identifier.issn","1477-8211"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/17165"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/74413"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"],["dc.title","Responsibility in dealing with genetic risk information"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","31"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","40"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","22"],["dc.contributor.author","Schaper, Manuel"],["dc.contributor.author","Wöhlke, Sabine"],["dc.contributor.author","Schicktanz, Silke"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T14:11:43Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T14:11:43Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s11019-018-9837-y"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1572-8633"],["dc.identifier.issn","1386-7423"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/71180"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","“I would rather have it done by a doctor”—laypeople’s perceptions of direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTC GT) and its ethical implications"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","e12563"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","5"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","European Journal of Cancer Care"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","26"],["dc.contributor.author","Perry, J."],["dc.contributor.author","Wöhlke, S."],["dc.contributor.author","Heßling, A.C."],["dc.contributor.author","Schicktanz, S."],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T18:27:23Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T18:27:23Z"],["dc.date.issued","2016"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/ecc.12563"],["dc.identifier.issn","0961-5423"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/76327"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Institut für Allgemeinmedizin"],["dc.title","Why take part in personalised cancer research? Patients’ genetic misconception, genetic responsibility and incomprehension of stratification-an empirical-ethical examination"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","10"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Transplantation Journal"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","94"],["dc.contributor.author","Woehlke, Sabine"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:03:14Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:03:14Z"],["dc.date.issued","2012"],["dc.format.extent","264"],["dc.identifier.isi","000209846401286"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/24864"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Lippincott Williams & Wilkins"],["dc.publisher.place","Philadelphia"],["dc.relation.issn","1534-6080"],["dc.relation.issn","0041-1337"],["dc.title","Gender Differences in Living Organ Recipients' Conceptions of the Body - Medical Anthropological and Ethical Perspectives"],["dc.type","conference_abstract"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","56"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","BMC Medical Ethics"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","15"],["dc.contributor.author","Inthorn, Julia"],["dc.contributor.author","Woehlke, Sabine"],["dc.contributor.author","Schmidt, Fabian"],["dc.contributor.author","Schicktanz, Silke"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:37:47Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:37:47Z"],["dc.date.issued","2014"],["dc.description.abstract","Background: There is an ongoing expert debate with regard to financial incentives in order to increase organ supply. However, there is a lacuna of empirical studies on whether citizens would actually support financial incentives for organ donation. Methods: Between October 2008 and February 2009 a quantitative survey was conducted among German students of medicine and economics to gain insights into their point of view regarding living and deceased organ donation and different forms of commercialization (n = 755). Results: The average (passive) willingness to donate is 63.5% among medical students and 50.0% among students of economics (p = 0.001), while only 24.1% of the respondents were actually holding an organ donor card. 11.3% of students of economics had signed a donor card, however, the number is significantly higher among students of medicine (31.9%, p < 0.001). Women held donor cards significantly more often (28.6%) than men (19.4%, p = 0.004). The majority of students were against direct payments as incentives for deceased and living donations. Nevertheless, 37.5% of the respondents support the idea that the funeral expenses of deceased organ donors should be covered. Women voted significantly less often for the coverage of expenses than men (women 31.6%, men 44.0%, p = 0.003). The number of those in favor of allowing to sell one's organs for money (living organ donation) was highest among students of economics (p = 0.034). Conclusion: Despite a generally positive view on organ donation the respondents refuse to consent to commercialization, but are in favor of removing disincentives or are in favor of indirect models of reward."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1186/1472-6939-15-56"],["dc.identifier.isi","000339287300001"],["dc.identifier.pmid","24996438"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/10484"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/32920"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Biomed Central Ltd"],["dc.relation.issn","1472-6939"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"],["dc.title","Impact of gender and professional education on attitudes towards financial incentives for organ donation: results of a survey among 755 students of medicine and economics in Germany"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","380"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Frontiers in Genetics"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","10"],["dc.contributor.author","Wöhlke, Sabine"],["dc.contributor.author","Schaper, Manuel"],["dc.contributor.author","Schicktanz, Silke"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-09T11:51:15Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-09T11:51:15Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.description.abstract","The interpretation of genetic information in clinical settings raises moral issues about adequate risk communication and individual responsibility about one’s health behavior. However, it is not well-known what role numeric probabilities and/or the conception of disease and genetics play in the lay understanding of predictive genetic diagnostics. This is an important question because lay understanding of genetic risk information might have particular implications for self-responsibility of the patients. Aim: Analysis of lay attitudes and risk perceptions of German lay people on genetic testing with a special focus on how they deal with the numerical information. Methods: We conducted and analyzed seven focus group discussions (FG) with lay people (n = 43). Results: Our participants showed a positive attitude toward predictive genetic testing. We identified four main topics: (1) Anumeric risk instead of statistical information; (2) Treatment options as a factor for risk evaluation; (3) Epistemic and aleatory uncertainty as moral criticism; (4) Ambivalence as a sign of uncertainty. Conclusion: For lay people, risk information, including the statistical numeric part, is perceived as highly normatively charged, often as an emotionally significant threat. It seems necessary to provide lay people with a deeper understanding of risk information and of the limitations of genetic knowledge with respect to one’s own health responsibility."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3389/fgene.2019.00380"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/16087"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/59909"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.publisher","Frontiers Media S.A."],["dc.relation.eissn","1664-8021"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"],["dc.subject.ddc","610"],["dc.title","How Uncertainty Influences Lay People’s Attitudes and Risk Perceptions Concerning Predictive Genetic Testing and Risk Communication"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","S0955470X21000793"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","100673"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Transplantation Reviews"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","36"],["dc.contributor.author","Molina-Pérez, Alberto"],["dc.contributor.author","Delgado, Janet"],["dc.contributor.author","Frunza, Mihaela"],["dc.contributor.author","Morgan, Myfanwy"],["dc.contributor.author","Randhawa, Gurch"],["dc.contributor.author","de Wijdeven, Jeantine Reiger-Van"],["dc.contributor.author","Schicktanz, Silke"],["dc.contributor.author","Schiks, Eline"],["dc.contributor.author","Wöhlke, Sabine"],["dc.contributor.author","Rodríguez-Arias, David"],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-06-01T09:39:02Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-06-01T09:39:02Z"],["dc.date.issued","2022"],["dc.description.sponsorship"," Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad"],["dc.description.sponsorship"," Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad"],["dc.description.sponsorship"," Agencia Estatal de Investigación"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.trre.2021.100673"],["dc.identifier.pii","S0955470X21000793"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/108373"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-572"],["dc.relation.issn","0955-470X"],["dc.rights.uri","https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/"],["dc.title","Should the family have a role in deceased organ donation decision-making? A systematic review of public knowledge and attitudes towards organ procurement policies in Europe"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]