Schmidt, Birgit

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","275"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","283"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","46"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Stisser, Anna;"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Jahn, Najko;"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Schmidt, Birgit;"],["dc.contributor.author","Stisser, Anna"],["dc.contributor.author","Jahn, Najko"],["dc.contributor.author","Schmidt, Birgit"],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-07-06T07:22:13Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-07-06T07:22:13Z"],["dc.date.issued","2022-07-06"],["dc.date.updated","2022-07-06T00:37:11Z"],["dc.description.abstract","Zusammenfassung Der Beitrag untersucht die Wechselbeziehungen zwischen Bibliometrie und Open Access bei der Serviceentwicklung an deutschen Universitäten. Trotz der wissenschaftspolitischen und praktischen Relevanz der Bibliometrie beziehen Open-Access-Angebote nur bedingt entsprechende Verfahren und Expertise ein. Während Bibliometrieangebote verstärkt berufsethische Aspekte im Sinne eines verantwortungsbewussten Umgangs reflektieren, finden sich bei Open-Access-Angeboten problematische Praxen. Im Gegenzug profitieren institutionelle Angebote im Bereich des Publikationsmonitorings sowohl von standardisierter und vernetzter Forschungsinformation als auch von einer arbeitsteiligen Organisation des Berichtswesens innerhalb eines Universitätsverbunds."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1515/bfp-2021-0098"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/112393"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.relation.eissn","1865-7648"],["dc.relation.issn","0341-4183"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Niedersächsische Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"],["dc.title","Stand und Perspektiven bibliometriegestützter Open-Access-Services an Universitäten in Deutschland"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","73"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","79"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","62"],["dc.contributor.author","Schmidt, Birgit"],["dc.contributor.author","Jahn, Najko"],["dc.contributor.author","Horstmann, Wolfram"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-05-23T09:00:59Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-05-23T09:00:59Z"],["dc.date.issued","2015"],["dc.description.abstract","Während Informationspraxis in Forschung und Bibliothek früher vom Umgang mit Literatur dominiert war, kommen heute viele neue Werkzeuge zum Einsatz. Office-Produkte, Datenbanken und Online-Plattformen verändern den Alltag in Forschung und Bibliothek und definieren zum Teil völlig neue Felder wissenschaftlicher Informationspraxis, z. B. im Kontext der Bibliometrie, virtueller Forschungsumgebungen oder Forschungsdaten. Der vorliegende Beitrag vergleicht die aktuelle Informationspraxis in der Forschung mit den Schulungsangeboten von Bibliotheken und weist nach, dass sich Forschung und Bibliothek zum Teil voneinander entkoppelt haben und ein zusammenhängendes Angebot zur Vermittlung wissenschaftlicher Informationspraxis am Campus in Gefahr ist. Um ein solches Angebot aufzubauen, wird vorgeschlagen, dass Bibliotheken sich mit Rechenzentren und Fakultäten zusammentun und die Bibliothek als Lernraum und zentralen Ort des wissenschaftlichen Informationsmanagements weiter etablieren. Dabei sollten neue Wege zum Aufbau von Expertise in der Informationspraxis von Bibliotheken beschritten werden, etwa die direkte Beteiligung an wissenschaftlichen Projekten, die Unterstützung von Eigeninitiative des Personals oder gezielte Rekrutierungsstrategien sowie der koordinierte Austausch zwischen Bibliotheken durch Experten und Materialien zu Spezialthemen"],["dc.description.abstract","While information management in research and libraries used to be dominated by the handling of literature, nowadays many new tools are available. The advent of office products, databases and online platforms have not only radically changed the day-to-day work in research and libraries, but in some cases introduced entirely new fields of academic information practice: in the con-texts of bibliometrics, virtual research environments or research data, for example. This article compares current research infor-mation practice with library training courses. It argues that the two have become divergent and that the provision of a coherent range of on-campus academic information practice services has come under threat. Two proposals are made to counteract such trends: firstly, that libraries collaborate with computing centres and academic faculties to establish services that foster infor-mation practices and secondly that libraries continue to estab-lish themselves as centres of learning and research information management. New methods in the teaching of information skills need to be explored, such as direct involvement in academic projects, supporting staff initiatives and targeted recruiting strat-egies, and the coordinated sharing of expertise and materials between libraries."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3196/186429501562223"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/14482"],["dc.identifier.uri","http://hdl.handle.net/2/14718"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.eissn","1864-2950"],["dc.relation.issn","0044-2380"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.title","Der Wandel der Informationspraxis in Forschung und Bibliothek"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","27"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Publications"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","6"],["dc.contributor.author","Schmidt, Birgit"],["dc.contributor.author","Bertino, Andrea"],["dc.contributor.author","Beucke, Daniel"],["dc.contributor.author","Brinken, Helene"],["dc.contributor.author","Jahn, Najko"],["dc.contributor.author","Matthias, Lisa"],["dc.contributor.author","Mimkes, Julika"],["dc.contributor.author","Müller, Katharina"],["dc.contributor.author","Orth, Astrid"],["dc.contributor.author","Bargheer, Margo"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-07-27T13:10:49Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-07-27T13:10:49Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.description.abstract","Together with many other universities worldwide, the University of Göttingen has aimed to unlock the full potential of networked digital scientific communication by strengthening open access as early as the late 1990s. Open science policies at the institutional level consequently followed and have been with us for over a decade. However, for several reasons, their adoption often is still far from complete when it comes to the practices of researchers or research groups. To improve this situation at our university, there is dedicated support at the infrastructural level: the university library collaborates with several campus units in developing and running services, activities and projects in support of open access and open science. This article outlines our main activity areas and aligns them with the overall rationale to reach higher uptake and acceptance of open science practice at the university. The mentioned examples of our activities highlight how we seek to advance open science along the needs and perspectives of diverse audiences and by running it as a multi-stakeholder endeavor. Therefore, our activities involve library colleagues with diverse backgrounds, faculty and early career researchers, research managers, as well as project and infrastructure staff. We conclude with a summary of achievements and challenges to be faced."],["dc.description.sponsorship","European Commission"],["dc.description.sponsorship","German Research Foundation"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3390/publications6020027"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/15250"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/15205"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.publisher","MDPI"],["dc.relation.eissn","2304-6775"],["dc.relation.issn","2304-6775"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Niedersächsische Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"],["dc.title","Open Science Support as a Portfolio of Services and Projects: From Awareness to Engagement"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","9751"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","12"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Scientometrics"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","9777"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","126"],["dc.contributor.author","Hobert, Anne"],["dc.contributor.author","Jahn, Najko"],["dc.contributor.author","Mayr, Philipp"],["dc.contributor.author","Schmidt, Birgit"],["dc.contributor.author","Taubert, Niels"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-07-05T15:00:56Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-07-05T15:00:56Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.description.abstract","Abstract This study investigates the development of open access (OA) to journal articles from authors affiliated with German universities and non-university research institutions in the period 2010–2018. Beyond determining the overall share of openly available articles, a systematic classification of distinct categories of OA publishing allowed us to identify different patterns of adoption of OA. Taking into account the particularities of the German research landscape, variations in terms of productivity, OA uptake and approaches to OA are examined at the meso-level and possible explanations are discussed. The development of the OA uptake is analysed for the different research sectors in Germany (universities, non-university research institutes of the Helmholtz Association, Fraunhofer Society, Max Planck Society, Leibniz Association, and government research agencies). Combining several data sources (incl. Web of Science, Unpaywall, an authority file of standardised German affiliation information, the ISSN-Gold-OA 3.0 list, and OpenDOAR), the study confirms the growth of the OA share mirroring the international trend reported in related studies. We found that 45% of all considered articles during the observed period were openly available at the time of analysis. Our findings show that subject-specific repositories are the most prevalent type of OA. However, the percentages for publication in fully OA journals and OA via institutional repositories show similarly steep increases. Enabling data-driven decision-making regarding the implementation of OA in Germany at the institutional level, the results of this study furthermore can serve as a baseline to assess the impact recent transformative agreements with major publishers will likely have on scholarly communication."],["dc.description.abstract","Abstract This study investigates the development of open access (OA) to journal articles from authors affiliated with German universities and non-university research institutions in the period 2010–2018. Beyond determining the overall share of openly available articles, a systematic classification of distinct categories of OA publishing allowed us to identify different patterns of adoption of OA. Taking into account the particularities of the German research landscape, variations in terms of productivity, OA uptake and approaches to OA are examined at the meso-level and possible explanations are discussed. The development of the OA uptake is analysed for the different research sectors in Germany (universities, non-university research institutes of the Helmholtz Association, Fraunhofer Society, Max Planck Society, Leibniz Association, and government research agencies). Combining several data sources (incl. Web of Science, Unpaywall, an authority file of standardised German affiliation information, the ISSN-Gold-OA 3.0 list, and OpenDOAR), the study confirms the growth of the OA share mirroring the international trend reported in related studies. We found that 45% of all considered articles during the observed period were openly available at the time of analysis. Our findings show that subject-specific repositories are the most prevalent type of OA. However, the percentages for publication in fully OA journals and OA via institutional repositories show similarly steep increases. Enabling data-driven decision-making regarding the implementation of OA in Germany at the institutional level, the results of this study furthermore can serve as a baseline to assess the impact recent transformative agreements with major publishers will likely have on scholarly communication."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s11192-021-04002-0"],["dc.identifier.pii","4002"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/87941"],["dc.identifier.url","https://publications.goettingen-research-online.de/handle/2/87941"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import DOI-Import GROB-441"],["dc.relation","OAUNI"],["dc.relation.eissn","1588-2861"],["dc.relation.issn","0138-9130"],["dc.relation.issn","1588-2861"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Niedersächsische Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen"],["dc.title","Open access uptake in Germany 2010–2018: adoption in a diverse research landscape"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]