Beier, Katharina

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","633"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","6"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","652"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","40"],["dc.contributor.author","Beier, Katharina"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:48:00Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:48:00Z"],["dc.date.issued","2015"],["dc.description.abstract","Because it is often argued that surrogacy should not be treated as contractual, the question arises in which terms this practice might then be couched. In this article, I argue that a phenomenology of surrogacy centering on the notion of trust provides a description that is illuminating from the moral point of view. My thesis is that surrogacy establishes a complex and extended reproductive unit-the \"surrogacy triad\" consisting of the surrogate mother, the child, and the intending parents-whose constituents are bound together by mutual trustful commitments. Even though a trust-based approach does not provide an ultimate answer to whether surrogacy should be sanctioned or prohibited, it allows for at least some practical suggestions. In particular, I will argue that, under certain conditions, surrogacy is tenable within familial or other significant relationships, and I will stress the necessity of acknowledging the new relationships and moral commitments that result from this practice."],["dc.description.sponsorship","German VolkswagenStiftung [II/84654]"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1093/jmp/jhv024"],["dc.identifier.isi","000368260200002"],["dc.identifier.pmid","26449234"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/35220"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Oxford Univ Press Inc"],["dc.relation.issn","1744-5019"],["dc.relation.issn","0360-5310"],["dc.title","Surrogate Motherhood: A Trust-Based Approach"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","111"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Ethik in der Medizin"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","118"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","34"],["dc.contributor.author","Beier, Katharina"],["dc.contributor.author","Simon, Alfred"],["dc.contributor.author","Schön, Michael P."],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-04-01T10:02:16Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-04-01T10:02:16Z"],["dc.date.issued","2022"],["dc.description.sponsorship","Georg-August-Universität Göttingen"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00481-022-00682-1"],["dc.identifier.pii","682"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/105866"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-530"],["dc.relation.eissn","1437-1618"],["dc.relation.issn","0935-7335"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"],["dc.title","Priorisierung von Beschäftigten einer medizinischen Einrichtung der Maximalversorgung bei der Impfung gegen COVID-19: Herausforderungen und Lösungsansätze"],["dc.title.alternative","Ein Diskussionsbeitrag aus der Praxis"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","855"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","6"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","871"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","58"],["dc.contributor.author","Beier, Katharina"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiesemann, Claudia"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:44:17Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:44:17Z"],["dc.date.issued","2010"],["dc.description.abstract","Human reproduction in the age of reprogenetics raises fundamental ethical and political questions. Critics of so-called liberal eugenics like Jürgen Habermas have sparked an ethical debate on whether selective genetic manipulation might undermine the natural basis of the moral self-conception and autonomy of future generations. Contrary to this perception, the authors of this article argue for a dialectic understanding of the moral challenges arising from human natality: Freedom and dependency, sociality and human embodiment, autonomy and relatedness likewise determine our human existence as moral beings. As an answer to these challenges, the authors develop a dialectic understanding of parenthood in the age of reprogenetics, thereby transcending present debates of modern reproductive medicine."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1524/dzph.2010.0066"],["dc.identifier.gro","3145411"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/3118"],["dc.notes.intern","aufklaerung"],["dc.notes.status","public"],["dc.notes.submitter","chake"],["dc.publisher","Walter de Gruyter GmbH"],["dc.relation.issn","0012-1045"],["dc.subject","Habermas natality parenthood reproduction genetics"],["dc.title","Die Dialektik der Elternschaft im Zeitalter der Reprogenetik. Ein ethischer Dialog"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","411"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","422"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","19"],["dc.contributor.author","Beier, Katharina"],["dc.contributor.author","Jordan, Isabella"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiesemann, Claudia"],["dc.contributor.author","Schicktanz, Silke"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-10-16T10:54:29Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-10-16T10:54:29Z"],["dc.date.issued","2016"],["dc.description.abstract","Bioethicists tend to focus on the individual as the relevant moral subject. Yet, in highly complex and socially differentiated healthcare systems a number of social groups, each committed to a common cause, are involved in medical decisions and sometimes even try to influence bioethical discourses according to their own agenda. We argue that the significance of these collective actors is unjustifiably neglected in bioethics. The growing influence of collective actors in the fields of biopolitics and bioethics leads us to pursue the question as to how collective moral claims can be characterized and justified. We pay particular attention to elaborating the circumstances under which collective actors can claim ‘collective agency.’ Specifically, we develop four normative-practical criteria for collective agency in order to determine the conditions that must be given to reasonably speak of ‘collective autonomy’. For this purpose, we analyze patient organizations and families, which represent two quite different kinds of groups and can both be conceived as collective actors of high relevance for bioethical practice. Finally, we discuss some practical implications and explain why the existence of a shared practice of trust is of immediate normative relevance in this respect."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s11019-016-9695-4"],["dc.identifier.gro","3146751"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/9426"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.issn","1386-7423"],["dc.title","Understanding collective agency in bioethics"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Ethik in der Medizin"],["dc.contributor.author","Beier, Katharina"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-10-01T09:58:54Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-10-01T09:58:54Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00481-021-00661-y"],["dc.identifier.pii","661"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/90170"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-469"],["dc.relation.eissn","1437-1618"],["dc.relation.issn","0935-7335"],["dc.title","Barbara Bleisch, Andrea Büchler (2020) Kinder wollen. Über Autonomie und Verantwortung"],["dc.title.alternative","Carl Hanser Verlag, München, 303 Seiten, 22,00 €, ISBN 978-3-446-26575-2"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","123"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Ethik in der Medizin"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","139"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","30"],["dc.contributor.author","Beier, Katharina"],["dc.contributor.author","Frebel, Lisa"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T14:10:42Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T14:10:42Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00481-018-0486-8"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1437-1618"],["dc.identifier.issn","0935-7335"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/70848"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","Brain Banking für die Forschung – eine empirisch-ethische Analyse praktischer Herausforderungen"],["dc.title.alternative","Brain banking for research—an empirical-ethical analysis of practical challenges"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.contributor.author","Lenk, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Hoppe, Nils"],["dc.contributor.author","Beier, Katharina"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiesemann, Claudia"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-10-16T10:54:28Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-10-16T10:54:28Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.description.abstract","The use of human tissue for medical research and scientific progress raises many ethical and legal challenges. The procurement, storage, and transfer of human tissue for research purposes have posed significant questions over recent years, and a number of high profile scandals in the UK prompted the publication of the Madden Report on Post Mortem Practice and Procedures in Irish hospitals in 2006. Additionally, tissue-related research tends to be most promising if samples and information are shared across national borders, but the heterogeneity of current rules and guidelines within the member states of the European Union calls all the more for clarification. This book explores many of the issues concerning biobank-related research and aims to provide answers to the most urgent questions by means of ethical, philosophical, and legal investigation. It provides insight into a wide range of interlinking research perspectives and serves as a reference to the state of play ethically and legally in Europe."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199587551.001.0001"],["dc.identifier.gro","3146743"],["dc.identifier.isbn","978-0-19958-755-1"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/9417"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.publisher","Oxford University Press"],["dc.title","Human Tissue Research"],["dc.type","book"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","163"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","200"],["dc.contributor.author","Beier, Katharina"],["dc.contributor.author","Jordan, Isabella"],["dc.contributor.author","Schicktanz, Silke"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiesemann, Claudia"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-10-16T10:54:27Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-10-16T10:54:27Z"],["dc.date.issued","2015"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/978-3-658-11074-1_5"],["dc.identifier.gro","3146732"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/9405"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.publisher","Springer Fachmedien"],["dc.publisher.place","Wiesbaden"],["dc.relation.isbn","978-3-65811-073-4"],["dc.relation.ispartof","Autonomie und Vertrauen"],["dc.title","Familien und Patientenorganisationen als kollektive Akteure in der Bioethik: vernachlässigt und unterschätzt?"],["dc.type","book_chapter"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","unknown"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","261"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Ethik in der Medizin"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","266"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","31"],["dc.contributor.author","Beier, Katharina"],["dc.contributor.author","Schickhardt, Christoph"],["dc.contributor.author","Langhof, Holger"],["dc.contributor.author","Schumacher, Tobin"],["dc.contributor.author","Winkler, Eva C."],["dc.contributor.author","Schweda, Mark"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T14:10:42Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T14:10:42Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00481-019-00541-6"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1437-1618"],["dc.identifier.issn","0935-7335"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/70854"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","Effiziente medizinische Forschung oder gläserner Patient? Szenarien der Big Data Medizin – Ethische und soziale Aspekte der Datenintegration im Gesundheitswesen"],["dc.title.alternative","Workshop, Köln, 14. September 2018"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]