Options
Bevacizumab Plus Irinotecan Versus Temozolomide in Newly Diagnosed O6-Methylguanine–DNA Methyltransferase Nonmethylated Glioblastoma: The Randomized GLARIUS Trial
ISSN
1527-7755
0732-183X
Date Issued
2016
Author(s)
Herrlinger, Ulrich
Schäfer, Niklas
Weyerbrock, Astrid
Hau, Peter
Goldbrunner, Roland
Friedrich, Franziska
Ringel, Florian
Schlegel, Uwe
Sabel, Michael
Ronellenfitsch, Michael W.
Uhl, Martin
Maciaczyk, Jaroslaw
Grau, Stefan
Schnell, Oliver
Hänel, Mathias
Krex, Dietmar
Vajkoczy, Peter
Gerlach, Rüdiger
Kortmann, Rolf-Dieter
Mehdorn, Maximilian
Tüttenberg, Jochen
Mayer-Steinacker, Regine
Fietkau, Rainer
Brehmer, Stefanie
Mack, Frederic
Stuplich, Moritz
Kebir, Sied
Kohnen, Ralf
Dunkl, Elmar
Leutgeb, Barbara
Proescholdt, Martin
Pietsch, Torsten
Urbach, Horst
Belka, Claus
Stummer, Walter
Glas, Martin
Steinbach, Joachim Peter
DOI
10.1200/JCO.2015.63.4691
Abstract
Purpose In patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma that harbors a nonmethylated O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promotor, standard temozolomide (TMZ) has, at best, limited efficacy. The GLARIUS trial thus explored bevacizumab plus irinotecan (BEV+IRI) as an alternative to TMZ. Patients and Methods In this phase II, unblinded trial 182 patients in 22 centers were randomly assigned 2: 1 to BEV (10mg/kg every 2 weeks) during radiotherapy (RT) followed by maintenance BEV (10mg/kg every 2 weeks) plus IRI(125 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks) or to daily TMZ (75 mg/m(2)) during RT followed by six courses of TMZ (150-200 mg/m(2)/d for 5 days every 4 weeks). The primary end point was the progression-free survival rate after 6 months (PFS-6). Results In the modified intention-to-treat (ITT) population, PFS-6 was increased from 42.6% with TMZ(95% CI, 29.4% to 55.8%) to 79.3% with BEV+IRI (95% CI, 71.9% to 86.7%; P < .001). PFS was prolonged from a median of 5.99 months (95% CI, 2.7 to 7.3 months) to 9.7 months (95% CI, 8.7 to 10.8 months; P < .001). At progression, crossover BEV therapy was given to 81.8% of all patients who received any sort of second-line therapy in the TMZ arm. Overall survival (OS) was not different in the two arms: the median OS was 16.6 months (95% CI, 15.4 to 18.4 months) with BEV+IRI and was 17.5 months (95% CI, 15.1 to 20.5 months) with TMZ. The time course of quality of life (QOL) in six selected domains of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 and QLQ-BN20 (which included cognitive functioning), of the Karnofsky performance score, and of the Mini Mental State Examination score was not different between the treatment arms. Conclusion BEV+IRI resulted in a superior PFS-6 rate and median PFS compared with TMZ. However, BEV+IRI did not improve OS, potentially because of the high crossover rate. BEV+IRI did not alter QOL compared with TMZ. (C) 2016 by American Society of Clinical Oncology