Options
The use of physical and virtual infrastructures for the validation of algal cryopreservation methods in international culture collections
ISSN
0143-2044
Date Issued
2007
Author(s)
Day, John G.
Lorenz, Maike
Wilding, Thomas A.
Harding, Keith
Prochold, Thomas
Brennan, Debra
Mueller, Julia
Santos, Lilia M. A.
Santos, M. Fatima
Osorio, Hugo C.
Amaral, Raquel
Lukesova, Alena
Hrouzek, Pavel
Lukes, Martin
Elster, Josef
Lukavsky, Jaromir
Probert, Ian
Ryan, Matthew J.
Benson, Erica E.
Abstract
Two cryopreservation methods, colligative cryoprotection coupled with controlled cooling and vitrification-based, encapsulation-dehydration were validated by five members of the EU Research Infrastructure consortium, COBRA, and two independent external validators. The test strain Chlorella vulgaris SAG 211-11b was successfully cryopreserved using two-step cooling employing passive (Mr Frosty((R))) and Controlled Rate Freezers (CRF) attaining the desired recovery target within 15% of the median viability level (94%). Significant differences (P<0.05) between cooling regimes were observed where Mr Frosty((R)) was more variable (Inter-Quartile Range being 21.5%, versus 13.0% for CRF samples). Viability assessment using fluorescein diacetate gave significantly (P<0.0001) higher survival than growth in agar with median values being 96% and 89%, respectively. On employing encapsulation-dehydration, greater variability between some validators was observed, with six labs observing recovery in 100% of the beads (84-95% of cells surviving) and one lab observing survival in 80% of the treated beads. Bead disruption followed by algal growth in agar was considered the most reliable and accurate method of assessing cell survival for encapsulation-dehydration.