Options
New Comprehensive Cytogenetic Scoring System for Primary Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) and Oligoblastic Acute Myeloid Leukemia After MDS Derived From an International Database Merge
ISSN
0732-183X
Date Issued
2012
Author(s)
Tuechler, Heinz
Sole, Francesc
Mallo, Mar
Luno, Elisa
Cervera, Jose
Granada, Isabel
Hildebrandt, Barbara
Slovak, Marilyn L.
Ohyashiki, Kazuma
Steidl, Christian
Fonatsch, Christa
Pfeilstoecker, Michael
Noesslinger, Thomas
Valent, Peter
Giagounidis, Aristoteles A. N.
Aul, Carlo
Luebbert, Michael
Stauder, Reinhard
Krieger, Otto
Garcia-Manero, Guillermo
Faderl, Stefan
Pierce, Sherry
Le Beau, Michelle M.
Bennett, John M.
Greenberg, Peter L.
Germing, Ulrich
DOI
10.1200/JCO.2011.35.6394
Abstract
Purpose The karyotype is a strong independent prognostic factor in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Since the implementation of the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) in 1997, knowledge concerning the prognostic impact of abnormalities has increased substantially. The present study proposes a new and comprehensive cytogenetic scoring system based on an international data collection of 2,902 patients. Patients and Methods Patients were included from the German-Austrian MDS Study Group (n = 1,193), the International MDS Risk Analysis Workshop (n = 816), the Spanish Hematological Cytogenetics Working Group (n = 849), and the International Working Group on MDS Cytogenetics (n = 44) databases. Patients with primary MDS and oligoblastic acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after MDS treated with supportive care only were evaluated for overall survival (OS) and AML evolution. Internal validation by bootstrap analysis and external validation in an independent patient cohort were performed to confirm the results. Results In total, 19 cytogenetic categories were defined, providing clear prognostic classification in 91% of all patients. The abnormalities were classified into five prognostic subgroups (P < .001): very good (median OS, 61 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.5; n = 81); good (49 months; HR, 1.0 [reference category]; n = 1,809); intermediate (26 months; HR, 1.6; n = 529); poor (16 months; HR, 2.6; n = 148); and very poor (6 months; HR, 4.2; n = 187). The internal and external validations confirmed the results of the score. Conclusion In conclusion, these data should contribute to the ongoing efforts to update the IPSS by refining the cytogenetic risk categories. J Clin Oncol 30: 820-829. (C) 2012 by American Society of Clinical Oncology