Options
Detecting significant genotype–phenotype association rules in bipolar disorder: market research meets complex genetics
Date Issued
2018
Author(s)
Breuer, René
Mattheisen, Manuel
Frank, Josef
Krumm, Bertram
Treutlein, Jens
Kassem, Layla
Strohmaier, Jana
Herms, Stefan
Mühleisen, Thomas W.
Degenhardt, Franziska
Cichon, Sven
Nöthen, Markus M.
Karypis, George
Kelsoe, John
Greenwood, Tiffany
Nievergelt, Caroline
Shilling, Paul
Shekhtman, Tatyana
Edenberg, Howard
Craig, David
Szelinger, Szabolcs
Nurnberger, John
Gershon, Elliot
Alliey-Rodriguez, Ney
Zandi, Peter
Goes, Fernando
Schork, Nicholas
Smith, Erin
Koller, Daniel
Zhang, Peng
Badner, Judith
Berrettini, Wade
Bloss, Cinnamon
Byerley, William
Coryell, William
Foroud, Tatiana
Guo, Yirin
Hipolito, Maria
Keating, Brendan
Lawson, William
Liu, Chunyu
Mahon, Pamela
McInnis, Melvin
Murray, Sarah
Nwulia, Evaristus
Potash, James
Rice, John
Scheftner, William
Zöllner, Sebastian
McMahon, Francis J.
Rietschel, Marcella
DOI
10.1186/s40345-018-0132-x
Abstract
Background Disentangling the etiology of common, complex diseases is a major challenge in genetic research. For bipolar disorder (BD), several genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been performed. Similar to other complex disorders, major breakthroughs in explaining the high heritability of BD through GWAS have remained elusive. To overcome this dilemma, genetic research into BD, has embraced a variety of strategies such as the formation of large consortia to increase sample size and sequencing approaches. Here we advocate a complementary approach making use of already existing GWAS data: a novel data mining procedure to identify yet undetected genotype–phenotype relationships. We adapted association rule mining, a data mining technique traditionally used in retail market research, to identify frequent and characteristic genotype patterns showing strong associations to phenotype clusters. We applied this strategy to three independent GWAS datasets from 2835 phenotypically characterized patients with BD. In a discovery step, 20,882 candidate association rules were extracted. Results Two of these rules—one associated with eating disorder and the other with anxiety—remained significant in an independent dataset after robust correction for multiple testing. Both showed considerable effect sizes (odds ratio ~ 3.4 and 3.0, respectively) and support previously reported molecular biological findings. Conclusion Our approach detected novel specific genotype–phenotype relationships in BD that were missed by standard analyses like GWAS. While we developed and applied our method within the context of BD gene discovery, it may facilitate identifying highly specific genotype–phenotype relationships in subsets of genome-wide data sets of other complex phenotype with similar epidemiological properties and challenges to gene discovery efforts.
File(s)
No Thumbnail Available
Name
40345_2018_Article_132.pdf
Size
1.23 MB
Checksum (MD5)
16f5ebd29b9dc3ea27d9007224908f4d