Options
Grassland management intensification weakens the associations among the diversities of multiple plant and animal taxa
ISSN
1939-9170
0012-9658
Date Issued
2015
Author(s)
Manning, Pete
Gossner, Martin M.
Bossdorf, Oliver
Allan, Eric
Zhang, Y.
Prati, Daniel
Bluethgen, Nico
Boch, Steffen
Boehm, Stefan
Boerschig, Carmen
Hoelzel, Norbert
Jung, Kirsten
Klaus, Valentin H.
Kleinebecker, Till
Lange, Markus
Mueller, Joerg
Pasalic, Esther
Socher, Stephanie A.
Tschapka, Marco
Tuerke, Manfred
Weiner, Christiane N.
Werner, Michael
Gockel, Sonja
Hemp, Andreas
Renner, Swen C.
Wells, Konstans
Buscot, Francois
Kalko, Elisabeth K. V.
Linsenmair, Karl Eduard
Weisser, Wolfgang W.
Fischer, Markus
DOI
10.1890/14-1307.1
Abstract
Land-use intensification is a key driver of biodiversity change. However, little is known about how it alters relationships between the diversities of different taxonomic groups, which are often correlated due to shared environmental drivers and trophic interactions. Using data from 150 grassland sites, we examined how land-use intensification (increased fertilization, higher livestock densities, and increased mowing frequency) altered correlations between the species richness of 15 plant, invertebrate, and vertebrate taxa. We found that 54% of pairwise correlations between taxonomic groups were significant and positive among all grasslands, while only one was negative. Higher land-use intensity substantially weakened these correlations(35% decrease in rand 43% fewer significant pairwise correlations at high intensity), a pattern which may emerge as a result of biodiversity declines and the breakdown of specialized relationships in these conditions. Nevertheless, some groups (Coleoptera, Heteroptera, Hymenoptera and Orthoptera) were consistently correlated with multidiversity, an aggregate measure of total biodiversity comprised of the standardized diversities of multiple taxa, at both high and lowland-use intensity. The form of intensification was also important; increased fertilization and mowing frequency typically weakened plant-plant and plant-primary consumer correlations, whereas grazing intensification did not. This may reflect decreased habitat heterogeneity under mowing and fertilization and increased habitat heterogeneity under grazing. While these results urge caution in using certain taxonomic groups to monitor impacts of agricultural management on biodiversity, they also suggest that the diversities of some groups are reasonably robust indicators of total biodiversity across a range of conditions.