Options
Transluminal angioplasty and stenting versus conservative treatment in patients with symptomatic basilar artery stenosis. Perspective for future clinical trials
Date Issued
2016
Author(s)
Lipke, Christina
Mpotsaris, Anastasios
Kabbasch, Christoph
Liebig, Thomas
Faymonville, Andrea
Reich, Arno
Nikoubashman, Omid
Buhk, Jan-Hendrik
von Schoenfeld, Patrick
Weber, Werner
Mikolajczyk, Rafael T.
DOI
10.1007/s00062-016-0528-x
Abstract
Two recent randomized controlled trials (RCT) consistently showed superiority of aggressive medical treatment versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting (PTAS) in patients with intracranial artery stenosis. Patients with symptomatic basilar stenosis have a higher long-term risk of recurrent stroke compared to patients with anterior circulation stenosis but no study has specifically focused on the role of PTAS in this subgroup. The aim of our study was to investigate the subgroup of patients with symptomatic basilar artery stenosis to find evidence for the feasibility of a future clinical trial.