Options
Late outcomes after acute pulmonary embolism: rationale and design of FOCUS, a prospective observational multicenter cohort study
ISSN
1573-742X
0929-5305
Date Issued
2016
Author(s)
Konstantinides, Stavros V.
Barco, Stefano
Rosenkranz, Stephan
Held, Matthias
Gerhardt, Felix
Bruch, Leonard
Ewert, Ralf
Faehling, Martin
Freise, Julia
Ghofrani, Hossein-Ardeschir
Gruenig, Ekkehard
Halank, Michael
Heydenreich, Nadine
Hoeper, Marius M.
Leuchte, Hanno H.
Mayer, Eckhard
Meyer, F. Joachim
Neurohr, Claus
Opitz, Christian
Pinto, Antonio
Seyfarth, Hans-Juergen
Zaepf, Bianca
Wilkens, Heinrike
Binder, Harald
Wild, Philipp S.
DOI
10.1007/s11239-016-1415-7
Abstract
Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a frequent cause of death and serious disability. The risk of PE-associated mortality and morbidity extends far beyond the acute phase of the disease. In earlier follow-up studies, as many as 30 % of the patients died during a follow-up period of up to 3 years, and up to 50 % of patients continued to complain of dyspnea and/or poor physical performance 6 months to 3 years after the index event. The most feared 'late sequela' of PE is chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), the true incidence of which remains obscure due to the large margin of error in the rates reported by mostly small, single-center studies. Moreover, the functional and hemodynamic changes corresponding to early, possibly reversible stages of CTEPH, have not been systematically investigated. The ongoing Follow-Up after acute pulmonary embolism (FOCUS) study will prospectively enroll and systematically follow, over a 2-year period and with a standardized comprehensive program of clinical, echocardiographic, functional and laboratory testing, a large multicenter prospective cohort of 1000 unselected patients (all-comers) with acute symptomatic PE. FOCUS will possess adequate power to provide answers to relevant remaining questions regarding the patients' long-term morbidity and mortality, and the temporal pattern of post-PE abnormalities. It will hopefully provide evidence for future guideline recommendations regarding the selection of patients for long-term follow-up after PE, the modalities which this follow-up should include, and the findings that should be interpreted as indicating progressive functional and hemodynamic post-PE impairment, or the development of CTEPH.
File(s)
No Thumbnail Available
Name
art_10.1007_s11239-016-1415-7.pdf
Size
550.57 KB
Checksum (MD5)
3a2efcaf75194fb2b50f1ce9d71d32eb