Koschack, Janka

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","249"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Zeitschrift für Allgemeinmedizin"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","252"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","82"],["dc.contributor.author","Scherer, M."],["dc.contributor.author","Koschack, Janka"],["dc.contributor.author","Wetzel, D."],["dc.contributor.author","Kochen, Michael M."],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-09-15T09:14:28Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-09-15T09:14:28Z"],["dc.date.issued","2006"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1055/s-2006-933477"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/89456"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Institut für Allgemeinmedizin"],["dc.title","Kennen Patientinnen und Patienten mit Herzinsuffizienz die Symptome ihrer Erkrankung?"],["dc.title.alternative","Do Patients with Heart Failure Know the Symptoms of Their Disease?"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","e159"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","7"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of medical Internet research"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","e1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","17"],["dc.contributor.author","Koschack, Janka"],["dc.contributor.author","Weibezahl, Lara"],["dc.contributor.author","Friede, Tim"],["dc.contributor.author","Himmel, Wolfgang"],["dc.contributor.author","Makedonski, Filip Dobrinov"],["dc.contributor.author","Grabowski, Jens"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-09T11:42:34Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-09T11:42:34Z"],["dc.date.issued","2015"],["dc.description.abstract","BACKGROUND: The vascular hypothesis of multiple sclerosis (MS), called chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI), and its treatment (known as liberation therapy) was immediately rejected by experts but enthusiastically gripped by patients who shared their experiences with other patients worldwide by use of social media, such as patient online forums. Contradictions between scientific information and lay experiences may be a source of distress for MS patients, but we do not know how patients perceive and deal with these contradictions. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to understand whether scientific and experiential knowledge were experienced as contradictory in MS patient online forums and, if so, how these contradictions were resolved and how patients tried to reconcile the CCSVI debate with their own illness history and experience. METHODS: By using critical discourse analysis, we studied CCSVI-related posts in the patient online forum of the German MS Society in a chronological order from the first post mentioning CCSVI to the time point when saturation was reached. For that time period, a total of 117 CCSVI-related threads containing 1907 posts were identified. We analyzed the interaction and communication practices of and between individuals, looked for the relation between concrete subtopics to identify more abstract discourse strands, and tried to reveal discourse positions explaining how users took part in the CCSVI discussion. RESULTS: There was an emotionally charged debate about CCSVI which could be generalized to 2 discourse strands: (1) the \"downfall of the professional knowledge providers\" and (2) the \"rise of the nonprofessional treasure trove of experience.\" The discourse strands indicated that the discussion moved away from the question whether scientific or experiential knowledge had more evidentiary value. Rather, the question whom to trust (ie, scientists, fellow sufferers, or no one at all) was of fundamental significance. Four discourse positions could be identified by arranging them into the dimensions \"trust in evidence-based knowledge,\" \"trust in experience-based knowledge,\" and \"subjectivity\" (ie, the emotional character of contributions manifested by the use of popular rhetoric that seemed to mask a deep personal involvement). CONCLUSIONS: By critical discourse analysis of the CCSVI discussion in a patient online forum, we reconstruct a lay discourse about the evidentiary value of knowledge. We detected evidence criteria in this lay discourse that are different from those in the expert discourse. But we should be cautious to interpret this dissociation as a sign of an intellectual incapability to understand scientific evidence or a naïve trust in experiential knowledge. Instead, it might be an indication of cognitive dissonance reduction to protect oneself against contradictory information."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.2196/jmir.4103"],["dc.identifier.fs","618834"],["dc.identifier.pmid","26133525"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/13579"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/58698"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.relation.issn","1438-8871"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Institut für Allgemeinmedizin"],["dc.rights","CC BY 2.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0"],["dc.subject.mesh","Chronic Disease"],["dc.subject.mesh","Evidence-Based Medicine"],["dc.subject.mesh","Humans"],["dc.subject.mesh","Internet"],["dc.subject.mesh","Multiple Sclerosis"],["dc.subject.mesh","Patient Satisfaction"],["dc.subject.mesh","Social Media"],["dc.subject.mesh","Spinal Cord"],["dc.subject.mesh","Venous Insufficiency"],["dc.title","Scientific Versus Experiential Evidence: Discourse Analysis of the Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency Debate in a Multiple Sclerosis Forum."],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","185"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Zeitschrift für ärztliche Fortbildung und Qualitätssicherung"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","190"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","101"],["dc.contributor.author","Scherer, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Stanske, Beate"],["dc.contributor.author","Wetzel, Dirk"],["dc.contributor.author","Koschack, Janka"],["dc.contributor.author","Kochen, Michael M."],["dc.contributor.author","Herrmann-Lingen, Christoph"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-09-14T14:43:55Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-09-14T14:43:55Z"],["dc.date.issued","2007"],["dc.description.abstract","Quality of Life (QoL) is an important predictor of mortality and re-admission in patients with heart failure (HF). Our aim was to analyze disease-specific quality of life and its relationship to psycho-social factors and HF severity."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.zgesun.2007.02.021"],["dc.identifier.pmid","17608037"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/89420"],["dc.language.iso","other"],["dc.relation.issn","1431-7621"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Institut für Allgemeinmedizin"],["dc.title","Die krankheitsspezifische Lebensqualität von hausärztlichen Patienten mit Herzinsuffizienz"],["dc.title.alternative","Disease-specific quality of life in primary care patients with heart failure"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","e10"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Medical Internet Research"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","16"],["dc.contributor.author","Sudau, Fabian"],["dc.contributor.author","Friede, Tim"],["dc.contributor.author","Grabowski, Jens"],["dc.contributor.author","Koschack, Janka"],["dc.contributor.author","Makedonski, Filip Dobrinov"],["dc.contributor.author","Himmel, Wolfgang"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:46:33Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:46:33Z"],["dc.date.issued","2014"],["dc.description.abstract","Background: Increasing numbers of patients are raising their voice in online forums. This shift is welcome as an act of patient autonomy, reflected in the term \"expert patient\". At the same time, there is considerable concern that patients can be easily misguided by pseudoscientific research and debate. Little is known about the sources of information used in health-related online forums, how users apply this information, and how they behave in such forums. Objective: The intent of the study was to identify (1) the sources of information used in online health-related forums, and (2) the roles and behavior of active forum visitors in introducing and disseminating this information. Methods: This observational study used the largest German multiple sclerosis (MS) online forum as a database, analyzing the user debate about the recently proposed and controversial Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency (CCSVI) hypothesis. After extracting all posts and then filtering relevant CCSVI posts between 01 January 2008 and 17 August 2012, we first identified hyperlinks to scientific publications and other information sources used or referenced in the posts. Employing k-means clustering, we then analyzed the users' preference for sources of information and their general posting habits. Results: Of 139,912 posts from 11,997 threads, 8628 posts discussed or at least mentioned CCSVI. We detected hyperlinks pointing to CCSVI-related scientific publications in 31 posts. In contrast, 2829 different URLs were posted to the forum, most frequently referring to social media, such as YouTube or Facebook. We identified a total of 6 different roles of hyperlink posters including Social Media Fans, Organization Followers, and Balanced Source Users. Apart from the large and nonspecific residual category of the \"average user\", several specific behavior patterns were identified, such as the small but relevant groups of CCSVI-Focused Responders or CCSVI Activators. Conclusions: The bulk of the observed contributions were not based on scientific results, but on various social media sources. These sources seem to contain mostly opinions and personal experience. A small group of people with distinct behavioral patterns played a core role in fuelling the discussion about CCSVI."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.2196/jmir.2875"],["dc.identifier.isi","000331450500019"],["dc.identifier.pmid","24425598"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/14475"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/34899"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.relation.issn","1438-8871"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Institut für Allgemeinmedizin"],["dc.rights","CC BY 2.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0"],["dc.title","Sources of Information and Behavioral Patterns in Online Health Forums: Observational Study"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","801"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","543"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","British Journal of General Practice"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","807"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","57"],["dc.contributor.author","Scherer, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Himmel, Wolfgang"],["dc.contributor.author","Stanske, Beate"],["dc.contributor.author","Scherer, Franziska"],["dc.contributor.author","Koschack, Janka"],["dc.contributor.author","Kochen, Michael M."],["dc.contributor.author","Herrmann-Lingen, Christoph"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:57:56Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:57:56Z"],["dc.date.issued","2007"],["dc.description.abstract","Background Psychological distress is a common phenomenon in patients with heart failure. Depressive symptoms are often under-diagnosed or inadequately treated in primary care. Aim To analyse anxiety and/or depression in primary care patients with heart failure according to psychosocial factors, and to identify protective factors for the resolution of psychological distress. Design of study Longitudinal observation study. Setting Primary care practices in lower Saxony, Germany. Method In 291 primary care patients with heart failure the following factors were measured using validated questionnaires at baseline and 9 months later: anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS]), quality of life (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire), coping with illness (Freiburg questionnaire for coping with illness), and social support (social support questionnaire). Severity of heart failure (New York Heart Association [NYHA] classification and Goldman's Specific Activity Scale), and sociodemographic characteristics were documented using self-report instruments. Results Twenty-six (32.5%) of the 80 patients who were distressed at baseline had normal HADS scores 9 months later, while the remainder stayed distressed. In logistic regression, baseline distress (odds ratios [OR] 5.51; 95% confidence intervals [Cl] = 2.56 to 11.62), emotional problems (OR = 1.08; 95% Cl = 1.00 to 1.17), social support (OR = 0.54; 95% Cl = 0.35 to 0.83), and NYHA classification (OR = 1.70; 95% Cl = 1.05 to 2.77) independently predicted distress at follow up. High social support contributed to a resolution of anxiety or depression, while partnership and low levels of emotional problems protected patients who began the study in a good emotional state from psychological distress. Conclusion In everyday practice it is important to consider that a high NYHA classification and emotional problems may contribute to anxiety or depression, while high social support and living in a relationship may positively influence the psychological health of patients with heart failure."],["dc.identifier.isi","000250860300008"],["dc.identifier.pmid","17925137"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/50369"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.relation.issn","0960-1643"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Institut für Allgemeinmedizin"],["dc.title","Psychological distress in primary care patients with heart failure: a longitudinal study"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","14"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","BMC Family Practice"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","9"],["dc.contributor.author","Koschack, Janka"],["dc.contributor.author","Scherer, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Luers, Claus"],["dc.contributor.author","Kochen, Michael M."],["dc.contributor.author","Wetzel, Dirk"],["dc.contributor.author","Kleta, Sibylle"],["dc.contributor.author","Pouwels, Claudia"],["dc.contributor.author","Wachter, R. Rolf"],["dc.contributor.author","Herrmann-Lingen, Christoph"],["dc.contributor.author","Pieske, Burkert M."],["dc.contributor.author","Binder, Lutz"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T11:18:13Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T11:18:13Z"],["dc.date.issued","2008"],["dc.description.abstract","Background: Screening of primary care patients at risk for left ventricular systolic dysfunction by a simple blood-test might reduce referral rates for echocardiography. Whether or not natriuretic peptide testing is a useful and cost-effective diagnostic instrument in primary care settings, however, is still a matter of debate. Methods: N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels, clinical information, and echocardiographic data of left ventricular systolic function were collected in 542 family practice patients with at least one cardiovascular risk factor. We determined the diagnostic power of the NT-proBNP assessment in ruling out left ventricular systolic dysfunction and compared it to a risk score derived from a logistic regression model of easily acquired clinical information. Results: 23 of 542 patients showed left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Both NT-proBNP and the clinical risk score consisting of dyspnea at exertion and ankle swelling, coronary artery disease and diuretic treatment showed excellent diagnostic power for ruling out left ventricular systolic dysfunction. AUC of NT-proBNP was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.75 to 0.92) with a sensitivity of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.71 to 0.98) and a specificity of 0.46 (95% CI, 0.41 to 0.50). AUC of the clinical risk score was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.79 to 0.91) with a sensitivity of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.71 to 0.98) and a specificity of 0.64 (95% CI, 0.59 to 0.67). 148 misclassifications using NT-proBNP and 55 using the clinical risk score revealed a significant difference (McNemar test; p < 0.001) that was based on the higher specificity of the clinical risk score. Conclusion: The evaluation of clinical information is at least as effective as NT-proBNP testing in ruling out left ventricular systolic dysfunction in family practice patients at risk. If these results are confirmed in larger cohorts and in different samples, family physicians should be encouraged to rely on the diagnostic power of the clinical information from their patients."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1186/1471-2296-9-14"],["dc.identifier.isi","000254051900001"],["dc.identifier.pmid","18298821"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/8928"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/54989"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.relation.issn","1471-2296"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Institut für Allgemeinmedizin"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.title","Natriuretic peptide vs. clinical information for diagnosis of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in primary care"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","18"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Zeitschrift für Allgemeinmedizin"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","82"],["dc.contributor.author","Marx, Gabriella"],["dc.contributor.author","Witte, Nicole"],["dc.contributor.author","Simmenroth-Nayda, Anne"],["dc.contributor.author","Kühnel, Steffen M."],["dc.contributor.author","Kochen, Michael M."],["dc.contributor.author","Koschack, Janka"],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-04-28T13:12:48Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-04-28T13:12:48Z"],["dc.date.issued","2007"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/106980"],["dc.title","\"Manche Ärzte nehmen sich gar nicht die Zeit\" - Zur Bedeutung der Arzt-Patient-Interaktion innerhalb der Hypertoniebehandlung"],["dc.title.subtitle","Eine qualitative Studie"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","58"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Frontiers in psychiatry"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","10"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","3"],["dc.contributor.author","Nitsche, M. A."],["dc.contributor.author","Koschack, J."],["dc.contributor.author","Pohlers, H."],["dc.contributor.author","Hullemann, S."],["dc.contributor.author","Paulus, W."],["dc.contributor.author","Happe, S."],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-09T11:53:37Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-09T11:53:37Z"],["dc.date.issued","2012"],["dc.description.abstract","The prefrontal cortex is involved in mood and emotional processing. In patients suffering from depression, the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is hypoactive, while activity of the right DLPFC is enhanced. Counterbalancing these pathological excitability alterations by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) or transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) improves mood in these patients. In healthy subjects, however, rTMS of the same areas has no major effect, and the effects of tDCS are mixed. We aimed to evaluate the effects of prefrontal tDCS on emotion and emotion-related cognitive processing in healthy humans. In a first study, we administered excitability-enhancing anodal, excitability-diminishing cathodal, and placebo tDCS to the left DLPFC, combined with antagonistic stimulation of the right frontopolar cortex, and tested acute emotional changes by an adjective checklist. Subjective emotions were not influenced by tDCS. Emotional face identification, however, which was explored in a second experiment, was subtly improved by a tDCS-driven excitability modulation of the prefrontal cortex, markedly by anodal tDCS of the left DLPFC for positive emotional content. We conclude that tDCS of the prefrontal cortex improves emotion processing in healthy subjects, but does not influence subjective emotional state."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00058"],["dc.identifier.fs","586450"],["dc.identifier.pmid","22723786"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/7742"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/60462"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.publisher","Frontiers Research Foundation"],["dc.relation.eissn","1664-0640"],["dc.relation.issn","1664-0640"],["dc.rights","CC BY-NC 3.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0"],["dc.title","Effects of frontal transcranial direct current stimulation on emotional state and processing in healthy humans"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","339"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","British Medical Journal"],["dc.contributor.author","Koschack, Janka"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-09T11:52:47Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-09T11:52:47Z"],["dc.date.issued","2009"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1136/bmj.b4511"],["dc.identifier.fs","568151"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/5953"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/60277"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.relation.issn","1468-5833"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Institut für Allgemeinmedizin"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.subject.ddc","610"],["dc.title","Organ donation. Informed choice, not coercion."],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","letter_ja"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","299"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Clinical Epidemiology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","306"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","63"],["dc.contributor.author","Koschack, Janka"],["dc.contributor.author","Marx, Gabriella"],["dc.contributor.author","Schnakenberg, Joerg"],["dc.contributor.author","Kochen, Michael M."],["dc.contributor.author","Himmel, Wolfgang"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:45:31Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:45:31Z"],["dc.date.issued","2010"],["dc.description.abstract","Objective: In cases of insufficiently controlled blood pressure, it is important for practitioners to distinguish between \"nonadherence\" and \"nonresponse\" to anti hypertensive drug treatment. A reliable and valid adherence measurement based on the patient's self-report may be helpful in daily practice. Study Design and Setting: In a primary care sample with 353 hypertensive patients, we applied two self-rating instruments to assess medication adherence (the \"Hill-Bone Compliance to High Blood Pressure Therapy Scale\" and Morisky's \"Self-Reported Measure of Medication Adherence\") and compared their psychometric properties. Results: Both scales showed low acceptability and insufficiency to moderate internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.25 and 0.73, respectively). Their convergent validity as indexed by kappa = 0.39 could be judged as \"fair\" at best. Testing the power to predict blood pressure > 140/90 mm Hg, both scales showed an accuracy of 57% and 62%, respectively. The positive likelihood, that is, the increase in likelihood of high blood pressure in cases of nonadherence was 1.00 and 1.32, respectively. Conclusion: The use of both scales cannot be recommended. They showed considerable floor effects, and their ability to identify medication adherence was inconsistent for nearly every third patient. The power of both scales to predict uncontrolled blood pressure was essentially a chance. The underlying conceptual framework of medication adherence therefore needs to be rethought. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.011"],["dc.identifier.isi","000274750500009"],["dc.identifier.pmid","19762213"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/6195"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/20461"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.relation.issn","0895-4356"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Institut für Allgemeinmedizin"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.title","Comparison of two self-rating instruments for medication adherence assessment in hypertension revealed insufficient psychometric properties"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dc.type.version","submitted_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]