Hansen, Solveig Lena

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","23"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Ethik in der Medizin"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","34"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","27"],["dc.contributor.author","Hansen, Solveig Lena"],["dc.contributor.author","Woehlke, Sabine"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:00:38Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:00:38Z"],["dc.date.issued","2015"],["dc.description.abstract","Background In the movie Never Let Me Go, clones are depicted as highly vulnerable and heteronomous individuals, forced to donate their organs anonymously. In this paper, we analyze the depiction of the clones' socialization and personal development, scrutinizing references to bioethical aspects. Arguments As a symbolic work of fiction, this movie can be regarded as an abstract negotiation of limited agency. The clones are situated in \"privileged deprivation\"; from the audience's point of view, they are deprived and unable to evolve into autonomous agents-but from their own perspective within the dystopian system, they are still \"privileged\". We argue that this movie symbolically focuses on individuals who do not profit from modern medical progress or do not have enough agency to refuse it. Results Movies such as Never Let Me Go evoke a confrontation with underprivileged positions in the medical system, encouraging the audience to take the perspective of the marginalized.."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00481-014-0331-7"],["dc.identifier.isi","000349766500003"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/37849"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Springer"],["dc.relation.issn","1437-1618"],["dc.relation.issn","0935-7335"],["dc.title","\"We all know it; we just never say it.\" - Institutionalized disinformation as a precondition for vulnerability in the context of cloning and organ donation in Never Let Me Go"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","69"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Ethik in der Medizin"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","80"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","27"],["dc.contributor.author","Mitra, Sayani"],["dc.contributor.author","Hansen, Solveig Lena"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:00:38Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:00:38Z"],["dc.date.issued","2015"],["dc.description.abstract","The spread of commercial surrogacy and its rapidly growing global market has raised many concerns among academics and activists alike. In this paper, we present some of the ethical issues associated with the practice of transnational surrogacy in India in the light of a documentary film. Arguments By discussing the nuances of the daily events occurring in the lives of the surrogate mothers as shown in the film, we point out that the discourse of commercial surrogacy in India needs to contextualize itself to the cultural expectations, social vulnerabilities and moral sensibilities of the actors. Results The perspective of Surabhi Sharma is helpful as an impulse for the discussion, focusing on surrogacy as labor and taking into consideration not only the physical risks that the surrogate mothers are prone to but also their social vulnerability."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00481-014-0334-4"],["dc.identifier.isi","000349766500007"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/37851"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Springer"],["dc.relation.issn","1437-1618"],["dc.relation.issn","0935-7335"],["dc.title","On the other side of the camera - Surrogacy in India and the moral concern of the film maker Surabhi Sharma"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","201"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Ethik in der Medizin"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","203"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","32"],["dc.contributor.author","Hansen, Solveig Lena"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T14:10:43Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T14:10:43Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00481-020-00579-x"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1437-1618"],["dc.identifier.issn","0935-7335"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/70857"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","„Die kommen alle her und gaffen.“ Hohes Körpergewicht als medizinische, ethische und gesellschaftliche Herausforderung"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Social Epistemology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","8"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","36"],["dc.contributor.author","Hansen, Solveig Lena"],["dc.contributor.author","Hilbrich, Iris"],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-01-11T14:05:50Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-01-11T14:05:50Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.description.abstract","The idea for this special issue arose from years of multidisciplinary exchange on participation and communication in technology and medicine. Which epistemological, normative, and empirical questions do arise, when endeavors of public participation deal with rejection, skepticism, and critique? This question guides our multidisciplinary perspectives. The empirical examples and theoretical accounts point out that moral justification and social effects of deliberative techniques are as controversial as the question of how to deal with moral dissent. Comprised of five interdisciplinary accounts and followed by two comments, this collection offers a complex picture of deliberative processes. These accounts show that discourses at the intersection of academia, policy, and public institutions tend to render skeptical positions as irrational, personal, or uninformed attitudes, countering them with different techniques. These techniques, so our underlying hypothesis, can be clustered into three types: exclusion, engagement, and empathy. Consequently, the papers ask which prerequisites are needed to engage in deliberations about science and technology; they analyze what happens when engagement fails due to social exclusion or misrecognition; and they scrutinize the epistemic and moral functions of empathy in deliberative engagement. The two comments summarize these papers from a viewpoint of trust and epistemic injustice."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1080/02691728.2021.2004622"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/97760"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-507"],["dc.relation.eissn","1464-5297"],["dc.relation.issn","0269-1728"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Institut für Ethik und Geschichte der Medizin"],["dc.title","Exclusion, Engagement, and Empathy: Revisiting Public Discourse from a Communication Perspective"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","306"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","4"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Ethik in der Medizin"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","322"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","29"],["dc.contributor.author","Hansen, Solveig Lena"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-10-24T11:24:00Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-10-24T11:24:00Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.description.abstract","Der vorliegende Beitrag erläutert anhand ausgewählter Beispiele das Potential von Dystopien für die Bioethik. Hierfür werden bestehende Ansätze narrativer Ethik kritisch rekonstruiert und erweitert. Mittels eines Theorieangebots aus der Literaturwissenschaft wird vorgeschlagen, moralische Überzeugungen, die Dystopien motivieren, in kohärentistische Reflexions- und Begründungsverfahren einzubeziehen. Weiterhin wird systematisch herausgearbeitet, welches Potential Dystopien durch sozio-kulturell dichte Szenarien, einen zeitgeschichtlichen Kontext und durch eine Sensibilisierung für die moralische Relevanz der Sprache für die bioethische Forschung bieten. Die dargestellten methodologischen Überlegungen bieten zum einen praktische Bezugspunkte für didaktische Ansätze und zum anderen für die öffentliche Deliberation. Die Analyse zeigt jedoch auch, dass Dystopien jenseits einer Illustration oder Warnung eigene moralische Positionen zur Diskussion stellen."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00481-017-0462-8"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/62525"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.relation.issn","0935-7335"],["dc.relation.issn","1437-1618"],["dc.title","Dystopie und Methode: zur fiktionalen Verhandlung moralischer Überzeugungen in der Bioethik"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","The New Bioethics"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","16"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","26"],["dc.contributor.author","Heyder, Clemens"],["dc.contributor.author","Hansen, Solveig Lena"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiesemann, Claudia"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T18:15:32Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T18:15:32Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1080/20502877.2020.1724708"],["dc.identifier.eissn","2050-2885"],["dc.identifier.issn","2050-2877"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/74876"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","Ethical Aspects of Translating Research with Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Products into Clinical Practice: A Stakeholder Approach"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","77"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Ethik in der Medizin"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","80"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","24"],["dc.contributor.author","Hansen, Solveig Lena"],["dc.contributor.author","Heyder, Clemens"],["dc.contributor.author","Stroop, Barbara"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-09T11:53:19Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-09T11:53:19Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00481-011-0145-9"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/7326"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/60399"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.publisher","Springer"],["dc.publisher.place","Berlin/Heidelberg"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.subject.ddc","610"],["dc.title","Kinderwunsch und Reproduktionsmedizin"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","199"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Nanoethics"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","207"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","13"],["dc.contributor.author","Balistreri, Maurizio"],["dc.contributor.author","Hansen, Solveig Lena"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T14:13:27Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T14:13:27Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s11569-019-00359-y"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1871-4765"],["dc.identifier.issn","1871-4757"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/71286"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","Moral and Fictional Discourses on Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Current Responses, Future Scenarios"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","231"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Bioethical Inquiry"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","242"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","15"],["dc.contributor.author","Hansen, Solveig L."],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-10-24T11:16:08Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-10-24T11:16:08Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.description.abstract","In the traditions of narrative ethics and casuistry, stories have a well-established role. Specifically, illness narratives provide insight into patients' perspectives and histories. However, because they tend to see fiction as an aesthetic endeavour, practitioners in these traditions often do not realize that fictional stories are valuable moral sources of their own. In this paper I employ two arguments to show the mutual relationship between bioethics and fiction, specifically, science fiction. First, both discourses use imagination to set a scene and determine a perspective. Second, bioethics and science fiction share the family resemblance of expressing moral beliefs. I then consider how understanding bioethics and science fiction as interrelated discourses can be the basis of a methodology for inquiry into relational autonomy in the context of biotechnologies and medicine. As an example of this methodology, I analyse Fay Weldon's novel The Cloning of Joanna May (1989)."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s11673-018-9842-0"],["dc.identifier.pmid","29520736"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/62524"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.relation.issn","1176-7529"],["dc.title","Family Resemblances: Human Reproductive Cloning as an Example for Reconsidering the Mutual Relationships between Bioethics and Science Fiction"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","161"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Bioethics"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","172"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","35"],["dc.contributor.author","Hansen, Solveig Lena"],["dc.contributor.author","Pfaller, Larissa"],["dc.contributor.author","Schicktanz, Silke"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-04-14T08:25:28Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-04-14T08:25:28Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.description.abstract","Abstract Given the need for organs, public organizations use social marketing strategies to increase the number of donors. Their campaigns employ a variety of moral appeals. However, their effects on audiences are unclear. We identified 14 campaigns in Germany from over the last 20 years. Our approach combined a multimodal analysis of categorized posters with a qualitative analysis of responses, collected in interviews or focus groups, of 53 persons who were either skeptical or undecided about organ donation. The combined analyses revealed that the posters failed to motivate laypersons in general to donate, and were even less effective on skeptical or undecided individuals. We explain this in terms of the types of moral messages found on posters and the limits of such social marketing strategies. Furthermore, we discuss certain ethical aspects of organ donation campaigns pertaining to communicating norms and trust in public institutions."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/bioe.12774"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/81638"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-399"],["dc.relation.eissn","1467-8519"],["dc.relation.issn","0269-9702"],["dc.rights","This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made."],["dc.title","Critical analysis of communication strategies in public health promotion: An empirical‐ethical study on organ donation in Germany"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]