Options
Schacht, Annekathrin
Loading...
Preferred name
Schacht, Annekathrin
Official Name
Schacht, Annekathrin
Alternative Name
Schacht, A.
Main Affiliation
Now showing 1 - 10 of 89
2016Book Chapter [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","207"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","224"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","10"],["dc.contributor.author","Schacht, Annekathrin"],["dc.contributor.editor","Horváth, Márta"],["dc.contributor.editor","Mellmann, Katja"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-11-15T08:45:02Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-11-15T08:45:02Z"],["dc.date.issued","2016"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/9993"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.publisher","Mentis"],["dc.publisher.place","Münster"],["dc.relation.crisseries","Poetogenesis"],["dc.relation.isbn","3-89785-463-5"],["dc.relation.isbn","978-3-89785-463-5"],["dc.relation.ispartof","Die biologisch-kognitiven Grundlagen narrativer Motivierung"],["dc.relation.ispartofseries","Poetogenesis - Studien zur empirischen Anthropologie der Literatur;"],["dc.title","Determining the dynamics of perceived suspense in literary classics: A data-driven approach"],["dc.type","book_chapter"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details2013Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","e70314"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","7"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","PLoS ONE"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","8"],["dc.contributor.author","Sommer, Werner"],["dc.contributor.author","Stürmer, Birgit"],["dc.contributor.author","Shmuilovich, Olga"],["dc.contributor.author","Martin-Loeches, Manuel"],["dc.contributor.author","Schacht, Annekathrin"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:53:43Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:53:43Z"],["dc.date.issued","2013"],["dc.description.abstract","Although research addresses the effects of a meal’s context on food preference, the psychological consequences of meal situations are largely unexplored. We compared the cognitive and emotional effects of a restaurant meal eaten in the company of others to a solitary meal consumed in a plain office using pre- and post-tests analysis and controlling for the kind and amount of food consumed. Three tasks were conducted, measuring: (1) semantic memory (2) cognitive control and error monitoring, and (3) processing of emotional facial expressions. Covert processes in these tasks were assessed with event-related brain potentials. A mood rating questionnaire indicated a relaxation effect of the restaurant as compared to the plain meal situation. The restaurant meal increased sensitivity to threatening facial expressions and diminished cognitive control and error monitoring. No effects were observed for semantic memory. These findings provide the first experimental evidence that a restaurant meal with a social component may be more relaxing than a meal eaten alone in a plain setting and may reduce cognitive control."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1371/journal.pone.0070314"],["dc.identifier.gro","3151354"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/9208"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/8148"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","public"],["dc.notes.submitter","chake"],["dc.relation.issn","1932-6203"],["dc.rights","CC BY 2.5"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5"],["dc.title","How about Lunch? Consequences of the Meal Context on Cognition and Emotion"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI2019Preprint [["dc.contributor.author","Lausen, Adi"],["dc.contributor.author","Hammerschmidt, Kurt"],["dc.contributor.author","Schacht, Annekathrin"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-30T07:28:09Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-30T07:28:09Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.description.abstract","Our speech expresses emotional meaning, not only through words, but also through certain attributes of our voice, such as pitch or loudness. These prosodic attributes are well-documented within the vocal emotion literature. However, there is considerable variability in the types of stimuli and procedures used to examine their influence on emotion recognition. In addition, the confidence we have in our assessments of another person’s emotional state has been argued to strongly influence performance accuracy in emotion recognition tasks. Nevertheless, such associations have rarely been studied previously. We addressed this knowledge gap by examining the impact of vocal stimulus type and prosodic speech attributes on emotion recognition and a person’s confidence in a given response. We analyzed a total of 1038 emotional expressions spoken in an angry, disgusted, fearful, happy, neutral, sad and surprised tone of voice according to a baseline set of prosodic acoustic parameters (N = 13). Two classification procedures (linear discriminant analysis and random forest) established that these acoustic measures provided sufficient discrimination between expressions of emotional categories to permit accurate statistical classification. Logistic regression- and linear models showed that emotion recognition and confidence judgments essentially depended on stimulus material as they could be predicted by different constellations of acoustic features. Results also demonstrated that emotional expressions which were correctly identified elicited confident judgments. Together, these findings extend previous work by showing that vocal stimulus type and prosodic attributes of speech strongly influence emotion recognition and listeners’ confidence in a given response."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.31234/osf.io/kqy2n"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/62168"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.title","Emotion recognition and confidence ratings predicted by vocal stimulus type and acoustic parameters"],["dc.type","preprint"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI2017Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1261"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","10"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Language, Cognition and Neuroscience"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1272"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","32"],["dc.contributor.author","Martín-Loeches, Manuel"],["dc.contributor.author","Ouyang, Guang"],["dc.contributor.author","Rausch, Philip"],["dc.contributor.author","Stürmer, Birgit"],["dc.contributor.author","Palazova, Marina"],["dc.contributor.author","Schacht, Annekathrin"],["dc.contributor.author","Sommer, Werner"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:53:48Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:53:48Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.description.abstract","The N400 component of the event-related potential is considered an index of semantic processing and therefore may be an ideal biomarker of semantic system disorders or individual differences. To this purpose, it is necessary to assess its test–retest reliability. Only one previous study has addressed this question, reporting good test–retest reliability (r = 0.85). However, that study had used a word-pair priming paradigm, which differs in many respects from the more typical and ecologically valid sentence-reading. The present study surveys test–retest reliability of the N400 in a sentence-reading paradigm. The best value obtained was r = 0.63, implying a relatively poor test–retest reliability. Crucial factors for this result may be the long interval between context and critical word as well as more complex contexts in sentence-reading paradigms. These factors might make the N400 effects in sentences more vulnerable to linguistic and non-linguistic factors increasing the variance across sessions."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1080/23273798.2017.1330485"],["dc.identifier.gro","3151382"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/8178"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.notes.submitter","chake"],["dc.relation.issn","2327-3798"],["dc.title","Test–retest reliability of the N400 component in a sentence-reading paradigm"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI2015Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","211"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Scientific Study of Literature"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","232"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","4"],["dc.contributor.author","Riese, Katrin"],["dc.contributor.author","Bayer, Mareike"],["dc.contributor.author","Lauer, Gerhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Schacht, Annekathrin"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:53:46Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:53:46Z"],["dc.date.issued","2015"],["dc.description.abstract","Plot suspense is one of the most important components of narrative fiction that motivate recipients to follow fictional characters through their worlds. The present study investigates the dynamic development of narrative suspense in excerpts of literary classics from the 19th century in a multi-methodological approach. For two texts, differing in suspense as judged by a large independent sample, we collected (a) data from questionnaires, indicating different affective and cognitive dimensions of receptive engagement, (b) continuous ratings of suspense during text reception from both experts and lay recipients, and (c) registration of pupil diameter as a physiological indicator of changes in emotional arousal and attention during reception. Data analyses confirmed differences between the two texts at different dimensions of receptive engagement and, importantly, revealed significant correlations of pupil diameter and the course of suspense over time. Our findings demonstrate that changes of the pupil diameter provide a reliable ‘online’ indicator of suspense."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1075/ssol.4.2.05rie"],["dc.identifier.gro","3151372"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/8168"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.notes.submitter","chake"],["dc.relation.issn","2210-4372"],["dc.title","In the eye of the recipient"],["dc.title.subtitle","Pupillary responses to suspense in literary classics"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI2011Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","335"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Frontiers in Psychology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","2"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Stürmer, Birgit; 1Department of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Berlin, Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Nigbur, Roland; 1Department of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Berlin, Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Schacht, Annekathrin; 2Courant Research Centre Text Structures, University of Göttingen Göttingen, Germany"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Sommer, Werner; 1Department of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Berlin, Germany"],["dc.contributor.author","Stürmer, Birgit"],["dc.contributor.author","Nigbur, Roland"],["dc.contributor.author","Schacht, Annekathrin"],["dc.contributor.author","Sommer, Werner"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:53:52Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:53:52Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.date.updated","2022-02-09T13:22:51Z"],["dc.description.abstract","Recently, positive affect has been reported to reduce cognitive conflicts and adaptations related to conflict control. van Steenbergen et al. (2009) proposed that the aversive quality of conflicts drives short-term adaptations following a conflict. They reasoned that monetary gain and its positive emotional consequences might counteract the aversive quality of conflict and hence reduce subsequent adaptations. In two experiments, we combined Simon-type conflicts with monetary gains and losses in between trials and analyzed event-related brain potentials. In Experiment 1, gains and losses occurred randomly between trials as a lottery, whereas in Experiment 2 gains and losses were contingent upon performance, either rewarding the 25% fastest responses or penalizing the 25% slowest responses. In Experiment 1, conflict adaptation was completely unaffected by gains or losses; contrary to predictions, in Experiment 2, conflict adaptation in reward blocks was more pronounced after a gain. In Experiment 2 we also investigated the error-related negativity (ERN) – a brain signal proposed to be related to performance monitoring. The ERN and behavioral post-error slowing were enlarged in the context of reward; therefore, reward increases error adaptation, possibly by enhancing the subjective value of errors. In conclusion, affective modulations of conflict adaptations seem to be much more limited than previously asserted and adaptive mechanisms triggered by errors and conflicts dissociate."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00335"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1664-1078"],["dc.identifier.gro","3151405"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/8203"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DeepGreen Import"],["dc.notes.status","public"],["dc.notes.submitter","chake"],["dc.publisher","Frontiers Research Foundation"],["dc.relation.eissn","1664-1078"],["dc.relation.issn","1664-1078"],["dc.rights","http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement"],["dc.rights.uri","http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement"],["dc.title","Reward and punishment effects on error processing and conflict control"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI2010Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","349"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","356"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","10"],["dc.contributor.author","Schacht, Annekathrin"],["dc.contributor.author","Dimigen, Olaf"],["dc.contributor.author","Sommer, Werner"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:53:47Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:53:47Z"],["dc.date.issued","2010"],["dc.description.abstract","It has been suggested that cognitive conflicts require effortful processing and, therefore, are aversive (Botvinick, 2007). In the present study, we compared conflicts emerging from the inhibition of a predominant response tendency in a go/no-go task with those between incompatible response activations in a Simon task in a within-subjects design, using the same type of stimuli. Whereas no-go trials elicited reduced skin conductance and pupillometric responses, but prolonged corrugator muscle activity, as compared with go trials, incompatible and compatible Simon trials were indistinguishable with respect to these parameters. Furthermore, the conflictsensitive N2 components of the event-related brain potential were similar in amplitude, but showed significantly different scalp distributions, indicating dissociable neural generator systems. The present findings suggest the involvement of different emotional and cognitive processes in both types of cognitive conflicts—none being aversive, however. In addition, the N2 findings call into question claims of common monitoring systems for all kinds of cognitive conflicts."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3758/cabn.10.3.349"],["dc.identifier.gro","3151368"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/8164"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","public"],["dc.notes.submitter","chake"],["dc.relation.issn","1530-7026"],["dc.title","Emotions in cognitive conflicts are not aversive but are task specific"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI2020Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","104719"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Psychoneuroendocrinology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","119"],["dc.contributor.author","Lausen, Adi"],["dc.contributor.author","Broering, Christina"],["dc.contributor.author","Penke, Lars"],["dc.contributor.author","Schacht, Annekathrin"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-04-14T08:23:21Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-04-14T08:23:21Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.psyneuen.2020.104719"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/80882"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-399"],["dc.relation.issn","0306-4530"],["dc.title","Hormonal and modality specific effects on males’ emotion recognition ability"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI2018Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","14"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Advances in Cognitive Psychology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","20"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","14"],["dc.contributor.author","Stürmer, Birgit"],["dc.contributor.author","Ouyang, Guang"],["dc.contributor.author","Palazova, Marina"],["dc.contributor.author","Schacht, Annekathrin"],["dc.contributor.author","Martín-Loeches, Manuel"],["dc.contributor.author","Rausch, Philip"],["dc.contributor.author","Sommer, Werner"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T18:48:00Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T18:48:00Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.5709/acp"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1895-1171"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/78976"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","Lunching for Relaxation or Cognitive Control? After-Effects of Social and Solitary Meals"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI2008Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1365"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","7"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1379"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","21"],["dc.contributor.author","Martín-Loeches, Manuel"],["dc.contributor.author","Schacht, Annekathrin"],["dc.contributor.author","Casado, Pilar"],["dc.contributor.author","Hohlfeld, Annette"],["dc.contributor.author","Abdel Rahman, Rasha"],["dc.contributor.author","Sommer, Werner"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:53:46Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:53:46Z"],["dc.date.issued","2008"],["dc.description.abstract","Whether syntactic and semantic processes during sentence comprehension follow strict sets of rules or succumb to context-dependent heuristics was studied by recording event-related potentials in a dual-task design. In one condition, sentence-extraneous acoustic material was either semantically congruent or incongruent relative to an adjective in the visually presented sentence, the latter being either semantically correct or incorrect within the sentence context. Homologous syntactic (gender) manipulations were performed in another condition. Syntactic processing within the sentence appeared to be blind to the syntactic content of the second task. In contrast, semantically incongruous material of the second task induced fluctuations typically associated with the detection of within-sentence semantic anomalies (N400) even in semantically correct sentences. Subtle but extant differences in topography between this N400 and that obtained with within-sentence semantic violations add to recent proposals of separate semantic subsystems differing in their specificity for sentence structure and computational procedures. Semantically incongruous material of the second task also influenced later stages of the processing of semantically incorrect adjectives (P600 component), which are traditionally assumed to pertain to the syntactic domain. This result is discussed in the light of current proposals of a third combinatorial stream in sentence comprehension."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1162/jocn.2009.21106"],["dc.identifier.gro","3151356"],["dc.identifier.pmid","18752393"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/8150"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.notes.submitter","chake"],["dc.relation.issn","0898-929X"],["dc.title","Rules and Heuristics during Sentence Comprehension: Evidence from a Dual-task Brain Potential Study"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","no"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI PMID PMC