Now showing 1 - 10 of 21
  • 2011Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","3567"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","12"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Remote Sensing of Environment"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","3581"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","115"],["dc.contributor.author","Pinty, B."],["dc.contributor.author","Jung, M."],["dc.contributor.author","Kaminski, T."],["dc.contributor.author","Lavergne, T."],["dc.contributor.author","Mund, Martina"],["dc.contributor.author","Plummer, S."],["dc.contributor.author","Thomas, E."],["dc.contributor.author","Widlowski, J.-L."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:48:52Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:48:52Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.description.abstract","The Joint Research Centre Two-stream Inversion Package (JRC-TIP) makes use of white sky albedo products-derived from MODIS and MISR observations in the visible and near-infrared domain-to deliver consistent sets of information about the terrestrial environments that gave rise to these data. The baseline version of the JRC-TIP operates at a spatial resolution of 0.01 degrees and yields estimates of the Probability Distribution Functions (PDFs) of the effective canopy Leaf Area Index (LAI), the canopy background albedo, the vegetation scattering properties, as well as, the absorbed, reflected and transmitted fluxes of the vegetation canopy. In this contribution the evaluation efforts of the JRC-TIP products are extended to the deciduous forest site of Hainich (Germany) where multiannual datasets of in-situ estimates of canopy transmission-derived from LAI-2000 observations-are available. As a Fluxnet site, Hainich offers access to camera acquisitions from fixed locations in and above the canopy that are being used in phenological studies. These images qualitatively confirm the seasonal patterns of the effective LAI, canopy transmission and canopy absorption products (in the visible range of the solar spectrum) derived with the JRC-TIP. Making use of the LAI-2000 observations it is found that 3/4 of the JRC-TIP products lie within a +/- 0.15 interval around the in-situ estimates of canopy transmission and absorption. The largest discrepancies occur at the end of the senescence phase when the scattering properties of the vegetation (evidenced by the pictures) and the images qualitatively confirm the seasonal patterns of the effective LAI, canopy transmission and canopy absorption products (in the visible range of the solar spectrum) derived with the JRC-TIP. Making use of the LAI-2000 observations it is found that 3/4 of the JRC-TIP products lie within a +/- 0.15 interval around the in-situ estimates of canopy transmission and absorption. The largest discrepancies occur at the end of the senescence phase when the scattering properties of the vegetation (evidenced by the pictures) and the effective LAI (also derived from LAI-2000 measurements) are experiencing large simultaneous changes. It was also found that the seasonal pattern of vegetation scattering properties derived from MISR observations in the near-infrared varies together with the Excess Green index computed from the various channels of the camera data acquired at the top of the canopy. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.rse.2011.08.018"],["dc.identifier.isi","000298311300050"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/21325"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Elsevier Science Inc"],["dc.relation.issn","0034-4257"],["dc.title","Evaluation of the JRC-TIP 0.01 degrees products over a mid-latitude deciduous forest site"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI WOS
  • 2013Book Chapter
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","157"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","167"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.seriesnr","131"],["dc.contributor.author","Mund, Martina"],["dc.contributor.author","Ammer, Christian"],["dc.contributor.editor","Lehrke, S."],["dc.contributor.editor","Ellwanger, G."],["dc.contributor.editor","Buschmann, A."],["dc.contributor.editor","Frederking, W."],["dc.contributor.editor","Paulsch, C."],["dc.contributor.editor","Schröder, E."],["dc.contributor.editor","Ssymank, A."],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:49:30Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:49:30Z"],["dc.date.issued","2013"],["dc.identifier.gro","3149678"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6368"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.notes.submitter","chake"],["dc.publisher","Bundesamt für Naturschutz"],["dc.publisher.place","Bonn-Bad Godesberg"],["dc.relation.crisseries","Naturschutz und Biologische Vielfalt"],["dc.relation.ispartof","Natura 2000 im Wald. Lebensraumtypen, Erhaltungszustand, Management"],["dc.relation.ispartofseries","Naturschutz und Biologische Vielfalt; 131"],["dc.title","Können FFH-Waldgebiete im besonderen Maße zur Erforschung der Ökosystemleistung Kohlenstoffsequestrierung beitragen?"],["dc.type","book_chapter"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details
  • 2004Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","2005"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","12"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Global Change Biology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","2019"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","10"],["dc.contributor.author","Anthoni, P. M."],["dc.contributor.author","Knohl, A."],["dc.contributor.author","Rebmann, C."],["dc.contributor.author","Freibauer, A."],["dc.contributor.author","Mund, M."],["dc.contributor.author","Ziegler, W."],["dc.contributor.author","Kolle, O."],["dc.contributor.author","Schulze, E.-D."],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:49:58Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:49:58Z"],["dc.date.issued","2004"],["dc.description.abstract","Eddy covariance was used to measure the net CO2 exchange (NEE) over ecosystems differing in land use (forest and agriculture) in Thuringia, Germany. Measurements were carried out at a managed, even‐aged European beech stand (Fagus sylvatica, 70–150 years old), an unmanaged, uneven‐aged mixed beech stand in a late stage of development (F. sylvatica, Fraxinus excelsior, Acer pseudoplantanus, and other hardwood trees, 0–250 years old), a managed young Norway spruce stand (Picea abies, 50 years old), and an agricultural field growing winter wheat in 2001, and potato in 2002. Large contrasts were found in NEE rates between the land uses of the ecosystems. The managed and unmanaged beech sites had very similar net CO2 uptake rates (∼−480 to −500 g C m−2 yr−1). Main differences in seasonal NEE patterns between the beech sites were because of a later leaf emergence and higher maximum leaf area index at the unmanaged beech site, probably as a result of the species mix at the site. In contrast, the spruce stand had a higher CO2 uptake in spring but substantially lower net CO2 uptake in summer than the beech stands. This resulted in a near neutral annual NEE (−4 g C m−2 yr−1), mainly attributable to an ecosystem respiration rate almost twice as high as that of the beech stands, despite slightly lower temperatures, because of the higher elevation. Crops in the agricultural field had high CO2 uptake rates, but growing season length was short compared with the forest ecosystems. Therefore, the agricultural land had low‐to‐moderate annual net CO2 uptake (−34 to −193 g C m−2), but with annual harvest taken into account it will be a source of CO2 (+97 to +386 g C m−2). The annually changing patchwork of crops will have strong consequences on the regions' seasonal and annual carbon exchange. Thus, not only land use, but also land‐use history and site‐specific management decisions affect the large‐scale carbon balance."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00863.x"],["dc.identifier.gro","3147505"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/5035"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.notes.submitter","chake"],["dc.relation.issn","1354-1013"],["dc.title","Forest and agricultural land-use-dependent CO2 exchange in Thuringia, Germany"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI
  • 2014Journal Article Research Paper
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","2411"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","8"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Biogeosciences"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","2427"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","11"],["dc.contributor.author","Otto, Juliane"],["dc.contributor.author","Berveiller, Daniel"],["dc.contributor.author","Bréon, Francois-Marie"],["dc.contributor.author","Delpierre, Nicolas"],["dc.contributor.author","Geppert, Gernot"],["dc.contributor.author","Granier, Andre"],["dc.contributor.author","Jans, Wilma"],["dc.contributor.author","Knohl, Alexander"],["dc.contributor.author","Kuusk, Andres"],["dc.contributor.author","Longdoz, Bernard"],["dc.contributor.author","Moors, Eddy"],["dc.contributor.author","Mund, Martina"],["dc.contributor.author","Pinty, Bernard"],["dc.contributor.author","Schelhaas, Mart-Jan"],["dc.contributor.author","Luyssaert, Sebastiaan"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:50:03Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:50:03Z"],["dc.date.issued","2014"],["dc.description.abstract","Although forest management is one of the instruments proposed to mitigate climate change, the relationship between forest management and canopy albedo has been ignored so far by climate models. Here we develop an approach that could be implemented in Earth system models. A stand-level forest gap model is combined with a canopy radiation transfer model and satellite-derived model parameters to quantify the effects of forest thinning on summertime canopy albedo. This approach reveals which parameter has the largest affect on summer canopy albedo: we examined the effects of three forest species (pine, beech, oak) and four thinning strategies with a constant forest floor albedo (light to intense thinning regimes) and five different solar zenith angles at five different sites (40° N 9° E–60° N 9° E). During stand establishment, summertime canopy albedo is driven by tree species. In the later stages of stand development, the effect of tree species on summertime canopy albedo decreases in favour of an increasing influence of forest thinning. These trends continue until the end of the rotation, where thinning explains up to 50% of the variance in near-infrared albedo and up to 70% of the variance in visible canopy albedo. The absolute summertime canopy albedo of all species ranges from 0.03 to 0.06 (visible) and 0.20 to 0.28 (near-infrared); thus the albedo needs to be parameterised at species level. In addition, Earth system models need to account for forest management in such a way that structural changes in the canopy are described by changes in leaf area index and crown volume (maximum change of 0.02 visible and 0.05 near-infrared albedo) and that the expression of albedo depends on the solar zenith angle (maximum change of 0.02 visible and 0.05 near-infrared albedo). Earth system models taking into account these parameters would not only be able to examine the spatial effects of forest management but also the total effects of forest management on climate."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.5194/bg-11-2411-2014"],["dc.identifier.fs","609989"],["dc.identifier.gro","3147550"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/10219"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/5053"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.notes.submitter","chake"],["dc.relation.issn","1726-4189"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Abteilung Bioklimatologie"],["dc.rights","CC BY 3.0"],["dc.rights.access","openAccess"],["dc.title","Forest summer albedo is sensitive to species and thinning: how should we account for this in Earth system models?"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI
  • 2012Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","5"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Carbon Balance and Management"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","7"],["dc.contributor.author","Böttcher, Hannes"],["dc.contributor.author","Freibauer, Annette"],["dc.contributor.author","Scholz, Yvonne"],["dc.contributor.author","Gitz, Vincent"],["dc.contributor.author","Ciais, Philippe"],["dc.contributor.author","Mund, Martina"],["dc.contributor.author","Wutzler, Thomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Schulze, Ernst-Detlef"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-09T11:53:33Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-09T11:53:33Z"],["dc.date.issued","2012"],["dc.description.abstract","Background No consensus has been reached how to measure the effectiveness of climate change mitigation in the land-use sector and how to prioritize land use accordingly. We used the long-term cumulative and average sectorial C stocks in biomass, soil and products, C stock changes, the substitution of fossil energy and of energy-intensive products, and net present value (NPV) as evaluation criteria for the effectiveness of a hectare of productive land to mitigate climate change and produce economic returns. We evaluated land management options using real-life data of Thuringia, a region representative for central-western European conditions, and input from life cycle assessment, with a carbon-tracking model. We focused on solid biomass use for energy production. Results In forestry, the traditional timber production was most economically viable and most climate-friendly due to an assumed recycling rate of 80% of wood products for bioenergy. Intensification towards \"pure bioenergy production\" would reduce the average sectorial C stocks and the C substitution and would turn NPV negative. In the forest conservation (non-use) option, the sectorial C stocks increased by 52% against timber production, which was not compensated by foregone wood products and C substitution. Among the cropland options wheat for food with straw use for energy, whole cereals for energy, and short rotation coppice for bioenergy the latter was most climate-friendly. However, specific subsidies or incentives for perennials would be needed to favour this option. Conclusions When using the harvested products as materials prior to energy use there is no climate argument to support intensification by switching from sawn-wood timber production towards energy-wood in forestry systems. A legal framework would be needed to ensure that harvested products are first used for raw materials prior to energy use. Only an effective recycling of biomaterials frees land for long-term sustained C sequestration by conservation. Reuse cascades avoid additional emissions from shifting production or intensification."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1186/1750-0680-7-5"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/7714"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/60444"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.rights","CC BY 2.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0"],["dc.title","Setting priorities for land management to mitigate climate change"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI
  • 2015Journal Article Research Paper
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","101"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Forest Ecology and Management"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","108"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","355"],["dc.contributor.author","Herbst, Mathias"],["dc.contributor.author","Mund, Martina"],["dc.contributor.author","Tamrakar, Rijan"],["dc.contributor.author","Knohl, Alexander"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:50:01Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:50:01Z"],["dc.date.issued","2015"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.foreco.2015.05.034"],["dc.identifier.gro","3147531"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/5043"],["dc.notes.status","public"],["dc.notes.submitter","chake"],["dc.relation.issn","0378-1127"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Abteilung Bioklimatologie"],["dc.title","Differences in carbon uptake and water use between a managed and an unmanaged beech forest in central Germany"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI
  • 2010Journal Article Research Paper
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","167"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1-3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Biogeochemistry"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","183"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","100"],["dc.contributor.author","Kutsch, Werner L"],["dc.contributor.author","Persson, Tryggve"],["dc.contributor.author","Schrumpf, Marion"],["dc.contributor.author","Moyano, Fernando Esteban"],["dc.contributor.author","Mund, Martina"],["dc.contributor.author","Andersson, Stefan"],["dc.contributor.author","Schulze, Ernst-Detlef"],["dc.creator.author","Kutsch, Werner L."],["dc.creator.author","Andersson, Stefan"],["dc.creator.author","Schulze, Ernst-Detlef"],["dc.creator.author","Persson, Tryggve"],["dc.creator.author","Mund, Martina"],["dc.creator.author","Schrumpf, Marion"],["dc.creator.author","Moyano, Fernando E."],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-03-03T10:58:04Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-03-03T10:58:04Z"],["dc.date.issued","2010"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s10533-010-9414-9"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/79880"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.title","Heterotrophic soil respiration and soil carbon dynamics in the deciduous Hainich forest obtained by three approaches"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","no"],["dc.type.status","accepted"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI
  • 2022Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","S0378112721010355"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","119942"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Forest Ecology and Management"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","505"],["dc.contributor.author","Annighöfer, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Mund, Martina"],["dc.contributor.author","Seidel, Dominik"],["dc.contributor.author","Ammer, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Ameztegui, Aitor"],["dc.contributor.author","Balandier, Philippe"],["dc.contributor.author","Bebre, Ieva"],["dc.contributor.author","Coll, Lluís"],["dc.contributor.author","Collet, Catherine"],["dc.contributor.author","Hamm, Tobias"],["dc.contributor.author","Jürgen, Bauhus"],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-04-01T10:02:25Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-04-01T10:02:25Z"],["dc.date.issued","2022"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119942"],["dc.identifier.pii","S0378112721010355"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/105906"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-530"],["dc.relation.issn","0378-1127"],["dc.rights.uri","https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/"],["dc.title","Examination of aboveground attributes to predict belowground biomass of young trees"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI
  • 2020Journal Article Research Paper
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","111"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","New Phytologist"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","125"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","226"],["dc.contributor.author","Mund, Martina"],["dc.contributor.author","Herbst, Mathias"],["dc.contributor.author","Knohl, Alexander"],["dc.contributor.author","Matthäus, Bertrand"],["dc.contributor.author","Schumacher, Jens"],["dc.contributor.author","Schall, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Siebicke, Lukas"],["dc.contributor.author","Tamrakar, Rijan"],["dc.contributor.author","Ammer, Christian"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-04-14T08:27:28Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-04-14T08:27:28Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.description.abstract","Summary Controls on tree growth are key issues in plant physiology. The hypothesis of our study was that the interannual variability of wood and fruit production are primarily controlled directly by weather conditions (sink limitation), while carbon assimilation (source limitation) plays a secondary role. We analyzed the interannual variability of weather conditions, gross primary productivity (GPP) and net primary productivity (NPP) of wood and fruits of an old‐growth, unmanaged Fagus sylvatica forest over 14 yr, including six mast years. In a multiple linear regression model, c. 71% of the annual variation in wood‐NPP could be explained by mean air temperature in May, precipitation from April to May (positive influence) and fruit‐NPP (negative influence). GPP of June to July solely explained c. 42% of the variation in wood‐NPP. Fruit‐NPP was positively related to summer precipitation 2 yr before (R2 = 0.85), and negatively to precipitation in May (R2 = 0.83) in the fruit years. GPP had no influence on fruit‐NPP. Our results suggest a complex system of sink and source limitations to tree growth driven by weather conditions and going beyond a simple carbon‐mediated ‘trade‐off’ between regenerative and vegetative growth."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Integrated project CarboEurope‐IP, European Commission, Directorate‐General Research, Sixth Framework Programme, Priority 1.1.6.3: Global Change and Ecosystem http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004965"],["dc.description.sponsorship","Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Germany"],["dc.description.sponsorship","Georg‐August‐University Göttingen, Germany http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003385"],["dc.description.sponsorship","German Research Foundation (DFG) http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001659"],["dc.description.sponsorship","German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF; research infrastructure ICOS)"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/nph.16408"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1469-8137"],["dc.identifier.issn","0028-646X"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/82299"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-399"],["dc.relation.eissn","1469-8137"],["dc.relation.issn","0028-646X"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Zentrum für Biodiversität und Nachhaltige Landnutzung"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Abteilung Bioklimatologie"],["dc.rights","This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited."],["dc.title","It is not just a ‘trade‐off’: indications for sink‐ and source‐limitation to vegetative and regenerative growth in an old‐growth beech forest"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI
  • 2006Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","571"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","5"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Trees"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","586"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","20"],["dc.contributor.author","Skomarkova, M. V."],["dc.contributor.author","Vaganov, E. A."],["dc.contributor.author","Mund, M."],["dc.contributor.author","Knohl, A."],["dc.contributor.author","Linke, P."],["dc.contributor.author","Boerner, A."],["dc.contributor.author","Schulze, E.-D."],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:49:07Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:49:07Z"],["dc.date.issued","2006"],["dc.description.abstract","We investigated the variability of tree-ring width, wood density and 13C/12C in beech tree rings (Fagus sylvatica L.), and analyzed the influence of climatic variables and carbohydrate storage on these parameters. Wood cores were taken from dominant beech trees in three stands in Germany and Italy. We used densitometry to obtain density profiles of tree rings and laser-ablation-combustion-GC-IRMS to estimate carbon isotope composition (δ 13C) of wood. The sensitivity of ring width, wood density and δ 13C to climatic variables differed; with tree-ring width responding to environmental conditions (temperature or precipitation) during the first half of a growing season and maximum density correlated with temperatures in the second part of a growing season (July–September). δ 13C variations indicate re-allocation and storage processes and effects of drought during the main growing season. About 20% of inter-annual variation of tree-ring width was explained by the tree-ring width of the previous year. This was confirmed by δ 13C of wood which showed a contribution of stored carbohydrates to growth in spring and a storage effect that competes with growth in autumn. Only mid-season δ 13C of wood was related to concurrent assimilation and climate. The comparison of seasonal changes in tree-ring maximum wood density and isotope composition revealed that an increasing seasonal water deficit changes the relationship between density and 13C composition from a negative relation in years with optimal moisture to a positive relationship in years with strong water deficit. The climate signal, however, is over-ridden by effects of stand density and crown structure (e.g., by forest management). There was an unexpected high variability in mid season δ 13C values of wood between individual trees (−31 to −24‰) which was attributed to competition between dominant trees as indicated by crown area, and microclimatological variations within the canopy. Maximum wood density showed less variation (930–990 g cm−3). The relationship between seasonal changes in tree-ring structure and 13C composition can be used to study carbon storage and re-allocation, which is important for improving models of tree-ring growth and carbon isotope fractionation. About 20–30% of the tree-ring is affected by storage processes. The effects of storage on tree-ring width and the effects of forest structure put an additional uncertainty on using tree rings of broad leaved trees for climate reconstruction."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00468-006-0072-4"],["dc.identifier.gro","3147113"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/4823"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","public"],["dc.notes.submitter","chake"],["dc.relation.issn","0931-1890"],["dc.title","Inter-annual and seasonal variability of radial growth, wood density and carbon isotope ratios in tree rings of beech (Fagus sylvatica) growing in Germany and Italy"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI