Gerlach, Tanja M.

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","107319112110200"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Assessment"],["dc.contributor.author","Grosz, Michael P."],["dc.contributor.author","Hartmann, Isabel"],["dc.contributor.author","Dufner, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Leckelt, Marius"],["dc.contributor.author","Gerlach, Tanja M."],["dc.contributor.author","Rauthmann, John F."],["dc.contributor.author","Denissen, Jaap J. A."],["dc.contributor.author","Küfner, Albrecht C. P."],["dc.contributor.author","Back, Mitja D."],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-07-05T14:57:47Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-07-05T14:57:47Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.description.abstract","Research on grandiose narcissism distinguishes between self-promotional processes (i.e., narcissistic admiration) and other-derogative processes (i.e., narcissistic rivalry; Back et al., 2013). Moreover, research has begun to assess and investigate narcissistic manifestations in different domains (e.g., communal narcissism). To integrate these two lines of research, we developed the Domain-Specific Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Questionnaire (D-NARQ), a 72-item narcissism questionnaire that contains a self-promotional process scale (narcissistic admiration) and an other-derogatory process scale (narcissistic rivalry) for four domains: intellectual ability, social dominance, communal care, and physical attractiveness. We investigated the psychometric properties of the D-NARQ in a large online study ( N = 1,635). Model fit statistics were largely in line with the theorized factor structure. The D-NARQ scales had good to very good measurement precision, and their correlations with established narcissism scales, the Big Five personality traits, and comparative self-evaluations largely supported their convergent and discriminant validity."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1177/10731911211020075"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/87737"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-441"],["dc.relation.eissn","1552-3489"],["dc.relation.issn","1073-1911"],["dc.title","A Process × Domain Assessment of Narcissism: The Domain-Specific Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Questionnaire"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","412"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","4"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Evolution and Human Behavior"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","423"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","39"],["dc.contributor.author","Jünger, Julia"],["dc.contributor.author","Kordsmeyer, Tobias L."],["dc.contributor.author","Gerlach, Tanja M."],["dc.contributor.author","Penke, Lars"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-24T12:17:22Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-24T12:17:22Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.description.abstract","Ovulatory cycle shifts in women’s mate preferences have been documented for several physical and behavioral traits. Research suggests that, at peak fertility, women tend to prefer men with characteristics that reflect good genes for short-term sexual relationships. However, existing findings have been criticized for methodological flexibility and failing attempts to replicate core results. In a large (N=157), pre-registered, within-subject study spanning two ovulatory cycles, we investigated cycle shifts in women’s mate preferences for masculine bodies. Using a large set of natural stimuli, we found that when fertile, women’s ratings of male bodies increased for sexual as well as for long-term attractiveness. Both effects were partially mediated by the estradiol-to-progesterone-ratio. Furthermore, moderation analyses revealed that both shifts were only evident in women in relationships, but not in singles. Contrary to previous findings, male masculine traits did not interact with cycle phase to predict attraction, indicating that women’s preferential priorities do not shift. Taken together, our results do not support women’s mate preference shifts, as assumed by the good genes ovulatory shift hypothesis, but are consistent with shifting motivational priorities throughout the cycle. Implications of these results for female estrus theories and methodological recommendations for future research are discussed."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.03.007"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/62014"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.relation.issn","1090-5138"],["dc.title","Fertile women evaluate male bodies as more attractive, regardless of masculinity"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","611"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","7"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Social Psychological and Personality Science"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","622"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","7"],["dc.contributor.author","Grossmann, Igor"],["dc.contributor.author","Gerlach, Tanja M."],["dc.contributor.author","Denissen, Jaap J. A."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:09:52Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:09:52Z"],["dc.date.issued","2016"],["dc.description.abstract","How stable vs. dynamic is wisdom in daily life? We conducted a daily diary study of wise reasoning (WR) by recording people's reflections on daily challenges in terms of three facets: intellectual humility, self-transcendence, and consideration of others' perspectives/compromise. We observed substantial and systematic intraindividual variability in WR, with wiser reasoning in the social versus nonsocial contexts. State-level WR variability was potent in predicting a bigger-picture construal of the event, more positive (vs. negative) emotions, greater emotional complexity, lower emotional reactivity, less thought suppression, and more reappraisal and forgiveness. In contrast, on the trait level, we observed only a few associations to emotional complexity and reappraisal. We discuss implications for conceptualization and measurement of wisdom-related thought."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1177/1948550616652206"],["dc.identifier.isi","382705900001"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/39734"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Sage Publications Inc"],["dc.relation.issn","1948-5514"],["dc.relation.issn","1948-5506"],["dc.title","Wise Reasoning in the Face of Everyday Life Challenges"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Personality and Social Psychology"],["dc.contributor.author","Gerlach, Tanja M."],["dc.contributor.author","Arslan, Ruben C."],["dc.contributor.author","Schultze, Thomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Reinhard, Selina K."],["dc.contributor.author","Penke, Lars"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-02-22T11:17:16Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-02-22T11:17:16Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.description.abstract","Although empirical research has investigated what we ideally seek in a romantic partner for decades, the crucial question of whether ideal partner preferences actually guide our mating decisions in real life has remained largely unanswered. One reason for this is the lack of designs that assess individuals' ideal partner preferences before entering a relationship and then follow up on them over an extended period. In the Göttingen Mate Choice Study (GMCS), a preregistered, large-scale online study, we used such a naturalistic prospective design. We investigated partner preferences across 4 preference domains in a large sample of predominantly heterosexual singles (N = 763, aged 18-40 years) and tracked these individuals across a period of 5 months upon a possible transition into romantic relationships. Attesting to their predictive validity, partner preferences prospectively predicted the characteristics of later partners. This was equally true for both sexes, except for vitality-attractiveness where men's preferences were more predictive of their later partners' standing on this dimension than women's. Self-perceived mate value did not moderate the preference-partner characteristics relations. Preferences proved to be relatively stable across the 5 months interval, yet were less stable for those who entered a relationship. Subgroup analyses using a newly developed indicator of preference adjustment toward (vs. away from) partner characteristics revealed that participants adjusted their preferences downward when partners fell short of initial preferences, but showed no consistent adjustment when partners exceeded them. Results and implications are discussed against the background of ongoing controversies in mate choice and romantic relationship research. (PsycINFO Database Record"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1037/pspp0000170"],["dc.identifier.pmid","28921999"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/12430"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.eissn","1939-1315"],["dc.title","Predictive Validity and Adjustment of Ideal Partner Preferences Across the Transition Into Romantic Relationships"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","517"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","6"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Evolution and Human Behavior"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","525"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","40"],["dc.contributor.author","Stern, Julia"],["dc.contributor.author","Arslan, Ruben C."],["dc.contributor.author","Gerlach, Tanja M."],["dc.contributor.author","Penke, Lars"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T14:24:00Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T14:24:00Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2019.08.005"],["dc.identifier.issn","1090-5138"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/72098"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","No robust evidence for cycle shifts in preferences for men's bodies in a multiverse analysis: A response to"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","374"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","4"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","European Journal of Personality"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","389"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","30"],["dc.contributor.author","Wetzel, Eunike"],["dc.contributor.author","Leckelt, Marius"],["dc.contributor.author","Gerlach, Tanja M."],["dc.contributor.author","Back, Mitja D."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:11:47Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:11:47Z"],["dc.date.issued","2016"],["dc.description.abstract","This study investigated grandiose narcissism from a categorical perspective. We tested whether subgroups of narcissists can be distinguished that differ in their expressions of more agentic (narcissistic admiration, ADM) and more antagonistic (narcissistic rivalry, RIV) pathways of narcissism. We analysed three German samples (total N=2211; M-age=26; 70% female) and one US sample (N=971; M-age=35; 74% female) using latent class analysis. Four subgroups of narcissists were consistently identified across samples from Germany and the United States: low narcissists, moderate narcissists primarily characterized by agentic aspects (ADM), moderate narcissists characterized by both agentic and antagonistic aspects (ADM+ RIV), and high narcissists. The subgroups were systematically related to a number of personality traits (e.g. Machiavellianism, impulsivity) and adjustment indicators (e.g. self-esteem, empathy). Members in the moderate narcissists-ADM subgroup showed the most adaptive characteristics while members in the moderate narcissists-ADM+RIV subgroup showed the most maladaptive characteristics. Investigating grandiose narcissism-a primarily quantitative trait-from a categorical perspective can yield valuable insights that would otherwise be overlooked. In addition, our results underline the utility of a self-regulatory process approach to grandiose narcissism that distinguishes between agentic and antagonistic dynamics. Copyright (C) 2016 European Association of Personality Psychology"],["dc.description.sponsorship","German Research Foundation (DFG) [BA 3731/6-1]"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1002/per.2062"],["dc.identifier.isi","000388308100006"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/40112"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Wiley"],["dc.relation.issn","1099-0984"],["dc.relation.issn","0890-2070"],["dc.title","Distinguishing Subgroups of Narcissists with Latent Class Analysis"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","251524592098546"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","4"],["dc.contributor.author","Reins, Louisa M."],["dc.contributor.author","Arslan, Ruben C."],["dc.contributor.author","Gerlach, Tanja M."],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-12-01T09:22:27Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-12-01T09:22:27Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.description.abstract","In psychological science, ego-centered social networks are assessed to investigate the patterning and development of social relationships. In this approach, a focal individual is typically asked to report the people they interact with in specific contexts and to provide additional information on those interaction partners and the relationships with them. Although ego-centered social networks hold considerable promise for investigating various interesting questions from psychology and beyond, their implementation can be challenging. This tutorial provides researchers with detailed instructions on how to set up a study involving ego-centered social networks online using the open-source software formr. By including a fully functional study template for the assessment of social networks and extensions to this design, we hope to equip researchers from different backgrounds with the tools necessary to collect social-network data tailored to their research needs."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1177/2515245920985467"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/94406"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-478"],["dc.relation.eissn","2515-2467"],["dc.relation.issn","2515-2459"],["dc.title","Assessing Ego-Centered Social Networks in formr: A Tutorial"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","175"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Psychological Methods"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","185"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","26"],["dc.contributor.author","Arslan, Ruben C."],["dc.contributor.author","Reitz, Anne K."],["dc.contributor.author","Driebe, Julie C."],["dc.contributor.author","Gerlach, Tanja M."],["dc.contributor.author","Penke, Lars"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-06-01T10:50:32Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-06-01T10:50:32Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1037/met0000294"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/86696"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-425"],["dc.relation.eissn","1939-1463"],["dc.relation.issn","1082-989X"],["dc.title","Routinely randomize potential sources of measurement reactivity to estimate and adjust for biases in subjective reports."],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","441"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Personality and Social Psychology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","446"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","121"],["dc.contributor.author","Arslan, Ruben C."],["dc.contributor.author","Driebe, Julie C."],["dc.contributor.author","Stern, Julia"],["dc.contributor.author","Gerlach, Tanja M."],["dc.contributor.author","Penke, Lars"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-12-01T09:23:08Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-12-01T09:23:08Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1037/pspp0000390"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/94571"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-478"],["dc.relation.eissn","1939-1315"],["dc.relation.issn","0022-3514"],["dc.title","The evidence for good genes ovulatory shifts in Arslan et al. (2018) is mixed and uncertain."],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1013"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","6"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Personality and Social Psychology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1037"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","105"],["dc.contributor.author","Back, Mitja D."],["dc.contributor.author","Kuefner, Albrecht C. P."],["dc.contributor.author","Dufner, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Gerlach, Tanja M."],["dc.contributor.author","Rauthmann, John F."],["dc.contributor.author","Denissen, Jaap J. A."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:17:01Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:17:01Z"],["dc.date.issued","2013"],["dc.description.abstract","We present a process model that distinguishes 2 dimensions of narcissism: admiration and rivalry. We propose that narcissists' overarching goal of maintaining a grandiose self is pursued by 2 separate pathways, characterized by distinct cognitive, affective-motivational, and behavioral processes. In a set of 7 studies, we validated this 2-dimensional model using the newly developed Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Questionnaire (NARQ). We showed that narcissistic admiration and rivalry are positively correlated dimensions, yet they have markedly different nomological networks and distinct intra- and interpersonal consequences. The NARQ showed the hypothesized 2-dimensional multifaceted structure as well as very good internal consistencies (Study 1, N = 953), stabilities (Study 2, N = 93), and self-other agreements (Study 3, N = 96). Narcissistic admiration and rivalry showed unique relations to the Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI), the Big Five, self-esteem, pathological narcissism, and other narcissism-related traits like Machiavellianism, psychopathy, self-enhancement, and impulsivity (Study 4, Ns = 510-1,814). Despite the positive relation between admiration and rivalry, the 2 differentially predicted general interpersonal orientations and reactions to transgressions in friendships and romantic relationships (Study 5, N = 1,085), interpersonal perceptions during group interactions (Study 6, N = 202), and observed behaviors in experimental observations (Study 7, N = 96). For all studies, the NARQ outperformed the standard measure of narcissism, the NPI, in predicting outcome measures. Results underscore the utility of a 2-dimensional conceptualization and measurement of narcissism."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1037/a0034431"],["dc.identifier.isi","000328673800009"],["dc.identifier.pmid","24128186"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/28064"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.relation.issn","1939-1315"],["dc.relation.issn","0022-3514"],["dc.title","Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry: Disentangling the Bright and Dark Sides of Narcissism"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]