Riechers, Maraja

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","645"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Sustainability"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","11"],["dc.contributor.author","Riechers, Maraja"],["dc.contributor.author","Strack, Micha"],["dc.contributor.author","Barkmann, Jan"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-02-19T15:47:05Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-02-19T15:47:05Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3390/su11030645"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/57598"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DeepGreen Import"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.publisher","MDPI"],["dc.relation.eissn","2071-1050"],["dc.rights","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"],["dc.title","Cultural Ecosystem Services Provided by Urban Green Change along an Urban-Periurban Gradient"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","715"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Urban Ecosystems"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","727"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","20"],["dc.contributor.author","Riechers, Maraja"],["dc.contributor.author","Noack, Eva Maria"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:54:50Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:54:50Z"],["dc.date.issued","2016"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s11252-016-0616-3"],["dc.identifier.gro","3150114"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6843"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.relation.issn","1083-8155"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Department für Agrarökonomie und Rurale Entwicklung"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Department für Nutzpflanzenwissenschaften"],["dc.title","Experts’ versus laypersons’ perception of urban cultural ecosystem services"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","33"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Ecosystem Services"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","39"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","17"],["dc.contributor.author","Riechers, Maraja"],["dc.contributor.author","Barkmann, Jan"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:50:01Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:50:01Z"],["dc.date.issued","2015"],["dc.description.abstract","Cultural ecosystem services are growing in importance and their substantial contribution to well-being is well recognized. Yet, significant conceptual and methodological gaps exist, especially for urban ecosystems. We analyzed perceptions of cultural ecosystem services in the urban context of Berlin, based on qualitative research methods. Using expert and problem-centered interviews, we show how cultural ecosystem services are understood and which focus areas were emphasized. We compared our inductive codes with the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. While our findings show supporting evidence for the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment classification, some categories had to be substituted and others adjusted to local citizen understandings. The results reveal a variety of intricate cultural ecosystem service perceptions. Hence, selecting and emphasizing only a few services without prior studies could misinform decision-makers and lead to biased policy outcome. Regionally specific perceptions of cultural benefits from urban green are important information for planning processes. Cultural ecosystem services could be one way to achieve awareness of socio-ecological aspects, as our results show linkages between cultural ecosystem services and urban social sustainability. Using qualitative cultural ecosystem service research could foster public participation and increase the input of regionally specific perceptions."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.11.007"],["dc.identifier.gro","3149817"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6517"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","public"],["dc.relation.issn","2212-0416"],["dc.subject","Cultural values; Sustainable development; Qualitative research; Urban social sustainability; Valuation"],["dc.title","Perceptions of cultural ecosystem services from urban green"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","165"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal for Nature Conservation"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","172"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","43"],["dc.contributor.author","Meinecke, Laura"],["dc.contributor.author","Soofi, Mahmood"],["dc.contributor.author","Riechers, Maraja"],["dc.contributor.author","Khorozyan, Igor"],["dc.contributor.author","Hosseini, Hamid"],["dc.contributor.author","Schwarze, Stefan"],["dc.contributor.author","Waltert, Matthias"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T14:25:15Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T14:25:15Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.jnc.2018.04.005"],["dc.identifier.issn","1617-1381"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/72495"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","Crop variety and prey richness affect spatial patterns of human-wildlife conflicts in Iran’s Hyrcanian forests"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","2601"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","11"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Landscape Ecology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","2612"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","35"],["dc.contributor.author","Riechers, Maraja"],["dc.contributor.author","Balázsi, Ágnes"],["dc.contributor.author","Betz, Lydia"],["dc.contributor.author","Jiren, Tolera S."],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, Joern"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T14:11:43Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T14:11:43Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s10980-020-01012-w"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1572-9761"],["dc.identifier.issn","0921-2973"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/71174"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","The erosion of relational values resulting from landscape simplification"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","161"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Landscape and Urban Planning"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","168"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","175"],["dc.contributor.author","Riechers, Maraja"],["dc.contributor.author","Barkmann, Jan"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-23T08:08:51Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-23T08:08:51Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.description.abstract","Global environmental and social changes will have great impact on the development of cities in the coming decades. Impacts of climate change, demographic shifts and conservation of biodiversity should be incorporated into urban green space planning to balance for the increasing development pressure of cities. Urban green spaces provide multiple ecosystem service benefits to diverse social groups. In this paper, we analyzed inhabitant perceptions of cultural ecosystem services provided by urban green spaces in the city of Berlin based on a face-to-face questionnaire (n = 558). As analysis tool, we used proportionate cluster sampling and focused on non-monetary statements on the perceived importance of a broad spectrum of cultural ecosystem services. Results show that cultural ecosystem services can be perceived through bundles and that those bundles may have negative influence on each other. The perceived importance of cultural ecosystem services was influenced by spatial and social factors: Older inhabitants living in periurban areas preferred cultural ecosystem services related to nature experiences. Younger inner city dwellers tended to prefer cultural ecosystem services facilitating social interactions. Those diverging perceptions should to be taken into account through urban development strategies to create a socially just and sustainable city planning in the face of global environmental changes. The ecosystem service framework can be one tool to facilitate a more participatory planning process to find solutions for urban sustainability challenges."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.03.017"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/61879"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.relation.issn","0169-2046"],["dc.title","Diverging perceptions by social groups on cultural ecosystem services provided by urban green"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","262"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","People and Nature"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","272"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","1"],["dc.contributor.author","Grass, Ingo"],["dc.contributor.author","Loos, Jacqueline"],["dc.contributor.author","Bänsch, Svenja"],["dc.contributor.author","Batáry, Péter"],["dc.contributor.author","Librán‐Embid, Felipe"],["dc.contributor.author","Ficiciyan, Anoush"],["dc.contributor.author","Klaus, Felix"],["dc.contributor.author","Rosa, Julia"],["dc.contributor.author","Tiede, Julia"],["dc.contributor.author","Udy, Kristy"],["dc.contributor.author","Westphal, Catrin"],["dc.contributor.author","Wurz, Annemarie"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.author","Riechers, Maraja"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-23T07:07:34Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-23T07:07:34Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.description.abstract","1. The land-sharing versus land-sparing debate recently stagnated, lacking an integrating perspective in agricultural landscapes as well as consideration of ecosystem services. Here, we argue that land-sharing (i.e. wildlife-friendly farming systems) and land-sparing (i.e. separation of high-yielding agriculture and natural habitats) are not mutually exclusive, as both are needed to balance management needs for the multifunctionality of agricultural landscapes. 2. Land-sharing promotes ecosystem services in agricultural settings, thereby allowing for environmentally friendly production. Land set aside in protected areas by land-sparing is crucial for conservation of those species that are incompatible with agriculture. 3. Importantly, as species move throughout the landscape and exploit different habitats, increased connectivity between environmentally friendly managed and protected areas is needed to (a) promote spillover of ecosystem service providers from land-sharing/-sparing measures to agricultural production and rescue service providing species from extinction in hostile areas, (b) to facilitate immigration and counteract possible extinctions in spared habitats and (c) to conserve response diversity of species communities for ensuring resilience of ecosystem services in changing environments. 4. In conclusion, the successful management of multifunctional landscapes requires the combination of context-specific land-sharing and land-sparing measures within spatially well-connected landscape mosaics, resulting in land-sharing/-sparing connectivity landscapes."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002347"],["dc.description.sponsorship","Volkswagenstiftung‐MWK Niedersachsen http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001663"],["dc.description.sponsorship","Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100007636"],["dc.description.sponsorship","Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001659"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1002/pan3.21"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/16785"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/61861"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.relation.issn","2575-8314"],["dc.relation.issn","2575-8314"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Zentrum für Biodiversität und Nachhaltige Landnutzung"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.title","Land‐sharing/‐sparing connectivity landscapes for ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]