Salzer, Simone

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","224"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Psychotherapy"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","245"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","51"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Salzer, Simone"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:39:02Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:39:02Z"],["dc.date.issued","2014"],["dc.description.abstract","Although there is evidence for the efficacy of psychodynamic therapy (PDT) in anxiety disorders, results are not yet satisfactory, for example, if rates of remission and response are considered. To address this problem, a unified psychodynamic protocol for anxiety disorders (UPP-ANXIETY) is proposed that integrates the treatment principles of those methods of PDT that have proven to be efficacious in anxiety disorders. In addition, this protocol is transdiagnostic, implying that is it is applicable to various forms of anxiety disorders and related disorders (generalized anxiety disorder, social phobia, panic disorders, avoidant personality disorder). Based on supportive-expressive therapy, the UPP-ANXIETY represents an integrated form of psychodynamic therapy that allows for a flexible use of empirically supported treatment principles. UPP-ANXIETY encompasses the following 9 treatment principles (modules): (1) socializing the patient for psychotherapy, (2) motivating and setting treatment goals, (3) establishing a secure helping alliance, (4) identifying the core conflict underlying anxiety, (5) focusing on the warded-off wish/affect, (6) modifying underlying internalized object relations, (7) changing underlying defenses and avoidance, (8) modifying underlying response of self, and (9) termination and relapse prevention. Some principles are regarded as core components to be used in every treatment (principles 3-8). A unified protocol for the psychodynamic treatment of anxiety disorders has several advantages, that is (1) integrating the most effective treatment principles of empirically supported psychodynamic treatments for anxiety disorders can be expected to further improve the efficacy of PDT; (2) using a unified protocol in efficacy studies has the potential to enhance the evidence-based status of PDT by aggregating the evidence; (3) a unified protocol will facilitate both training in PDT and transfer of research to clinical practice; and (4) thus, a unified protocol can be expected to have a significant impact on the health care system. We are planning to test the UPP-ANXIETY in a multicenter randomized controlled trial."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1037/a0033815"],["dc.identifier.isi","000345153500005"],["dc.identifier.pmid","24377407"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/33195"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Amer Psychological Assoc, Div Psychotherapy"],["dc.relation.issn","1939-1536"],["dc.relation.issn","0033-3204"],["dc.title","A Unified Protocol for the Transdiagnostic Psychodynamic Treatment of Anxiety Disorders: An Evidence-Based Approach"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","304"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Psychotherapy"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","310"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","48"],["dc.contributor.author","Salzer, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Pincus, Aaron L."],["dc.contributor.author","Winkelbach, Christel"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Leibing, Eric"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:52:39Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:52:39Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.description.abstract","Interpersonal problems are highly relevant to the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) patients. Previous studies using the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems identified several interpersonal subtypes in GAD patients. In this study, we wanted to replicate earlier findings of interpersonal subtypes in GAD. We investigated whether these interpersonal subtypes are characterized by different types of interpersonal problems and different levels of interpersonal distress, and we further examined whether they differed with regard to improvement of interpersonal problems after short-term treatment. This study is based on results from a randomized controlled trial that investigated short-term treatments in GAD outpatients. For secondary analysis, interpersonal subtypes were identified by cluster analysis and Inventory of Interpersonal Problems profiles were calculated for both the total sample (N = 52) and the interpersonal subtypes using the Structural Summary Method for Circumplex Data. This study confirmed previous results demonstrating the existence of interpersonal subtypes in GAD. Four interpersonal subtypes were identified: Overly Nurturant, Intrusive, Socially Avoidant, and Nonassertive. Short-term treatment significantly improved interpersonal problems (d = 0.46) within the total GAD sample. Interestingly, the effect sizes of the four clusters differed considerably (d = 0.19-1.24) and the clusters displayed different changes in the two circumplex axes Dominance and Nurturance. Our study indicates that change of interpersonal problems needs to be specifically analyzed, even within homogenous diagnostic groups."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1037/a0022013"],["dc.identifier.isi","000294612000014"],["dc.identifier.pmid","21604899"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/22222"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Amer Psychological Assoc, Div Psychotherapy"],["dc.relation.issn","0033-3204"],["dc.title","Interpersonal Subtypes and Change of Interpersonal Problems in the Treatment of Patients With Generalized Anxiety Disorder: A Pilot Study"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","875"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","8"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","American Journal of Psychiatry"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","881"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","166"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Salzer, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Jaeger, Ulrich"],["dc.contributor.author","Kaechele, Horst"],["dc.contributor.author","Kreische, Reinhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Leweke, Frank"],["dc.contributor.author","Rueger, Ulrich"],["dc.contributor.author","Winkelbach, Christel"],["dc.contributor.author","Leibing, Eric"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T11:25:48Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T11:25:48Z"],["dc.date.issued","2009"],["dc.description.abstract","Objective: While several studies have shown that cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is an efficacious treatment for generalized anxiety disorder, few studies have addressed the outcome of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy, even though this treatment is widely used. The aim of this study was to compare short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy and CBT with regard to treatment outcome in generalized anxiety disorder. Method: Patients with generalized anxiety disorder according to DSM-IV were randomly assigned to receive either CBT (N=29) or short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy (N=28). Treatments were carried out according to treatment manuals and included up to 30 weekly sessions. The primary outcome measure was the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, which was applied by trained raters blind to the treatment conditions. Assessments were carried out at the completion of treatment and 6 months afterward. Results: Both CBT and short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy yielded significant, large, and stable improvements with regard to symptoms of anxiety and depression. No significant differences in outcome were found between treatments in regard to the primary outcome measure. These results were corroborated by two self-report measures of anxiety. In measures of trait anxiety, worry, and depression, however, CBT was found to be superior. Conclusions: The results suggest that CBT and short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy are beneficial for patients with generalized anxiety disorder. In future research, large-scale multicenter studies should examine more subtle differences between treatments, including differences in the patients who benefit most from each form of therapy."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [LE 1250/1-1/1-2]"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09030441"],["dc.identifier.isi","000268638900009"],["dc.identifier.pmid","19570931"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/6170"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/56710"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Amer Psychiatric Publishing, Inc"],["dc.relation.issn","0002-953X"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.title","Short-Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in Generalized Anxiety Disorder: A Randomized, Controlled Trial"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","126"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","131"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","35"],["dc.contributor.author","Irle, Eva"],["dc.contributor.author","Ruhleder, Mirjana"],["dc.contributor.author","Lange, Claudia"],["dc.contributor.author","Seidler-Brandler, Ulrich"],["dc.contributor.author","Salzer, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Dechent, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Weniger, Godehard"],["dc.contributor.author","Leibing, Eric"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:45:32Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:45:32Z"],["dc.date.issued","2010"],["dc.description.abstract","Background: Structural and functional brain imaging studies suggest abnormalities of the amygdala and hippocampus in posttraumatic stress disorder and major depressive disorder. However, structural brain imaging studies in social phobia are lacking. Methods: In total, 24 patients with generalized social phobia (GSP) and 24 healthy controls underwent 3-dimensional structural magnetic resonance imaging of the amygdala and hippocampus and a clinical investigation. Results: Compared with controls, GSP patients had significantly reduced amygdalar (13%) and hippocampal (8%) size. The reduction in the size of the amygdala was statistically significant for men but not women. Smaller right-sided hippocampal volumes of GSP patients were significantly related to stronger disorder severity. Limitations: Our sample included only patients with the generalized subtype of social phobia. Because we excluded patients with comorbid depression, our sample may not be representative. Conclusion: We report for the first time volumetric results in patients with GSP. Future assessment of these patients will clarify whether these changes are reversed after successful treatment and whether they predict treatment response."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Ministry of Education and Research, Germany [BMBF 01GV0607]"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1503/jpn.090041"],["dc.identifier.isi","000274851600007"],["dc.identifier.pmid","20184810"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/6891"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/20469"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Cma-canadian Medical Assoc"],["dc.relation.issn","1180-4882"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.title","Reduced amygdalar and hippocampal size in adults with generalized social phobia"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","759"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","7"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","American Journal of Psychiatry"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","767"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","170"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Salzer, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Beutel, Manfred E."],["dc.contributor.author","Herpertz, Stephan"],["dc.contributor.author","Hiller, Wolfgang"],["dc.contributor.author","Hoyer, Juergen"],["dc.contributor.author","Huesing, Johannes"],["dc.contributor.author","Joraschky, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Nolting, Bjoern"],["dc.contributor.author","Poehlmann, Karin"],["dc.contributor.author","Ritter, Viktoria"],["dc.contributor.author","Stangier, Ulrich"],["dc.contributor.author","Strauss, Bernhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Stuhldreher, Nina"],["dc.contributor.author","Tefikow, Susan"],["dc.contributor.author","Teismann, Tobias"],["dc.contributor.author","Willutzki, Ulrike"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiltink, Joerg"],["dc.contributor.author","Leibing, Eric"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:23:10Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:23:10Z"],["dc.date.issued","2013"],["dc.description.abstract","Objective: Various approaches to cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) have been shown to be effective for social anxiety disorder. For psychodynamic therapy, evidence for efficacy in this disorder is scant. The authors tested the efficacy of psychodynamic therapy and CBT in social anxiety disorder in a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Method: In an outpatient setting, 495 patients with social anxiety disorder were randomly assigned to manual-guided CBT (N=209), manual-guided psychodynamic therapy (N=207), or a waiting list condition (N=79). Assessments were made at baseline and at end of treatment. Primary outcome measures were rates of remission and response, based on the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale applied by raters blind to group assignment. Several secondary measures were assessed as well. Results: Remission rates in the CBT, psychodynamic therapy, and waiting list groups were 36%, 26%, and 9%, respectively. Response rates were 60%, 52%,. and 15%, respectively. CBT and psychodynamic therapy were significantly superior to waiting list for both remission and response. CBT was significantly superior to psychodynamic therapy for remission but not for response. Between-group effect sizes for remission and response were small. Secondary outcome measures showed significant differences in favor of CBT for measures of social phobia and interpersonal problems, but not for depression. Conclusions: CBT and psychodynamic therapy were both efficacious in treating social anxiety disorder, but there were significant differences in favor of CBT. For CBT, the response rate was comparable to rates reported in Swedish and German studies in recent years. For psychodynamic therapy, the response rate was comparable to rates reported for pharmacotherapy and cognitive-behavioral group therapy."],["dc.description.sponsorship","German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [01GV0607]"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.12081125"],["dc.identifier.isi","000321023700012"],["dc.identifier.pmid","23680854"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/29520"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Amer Psychiatric Publishing, Inc"],["dc.relation.issn","0002-953X"],["dc.title","Psychodynamic Therapy and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in Social Anxiety Disorder: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","215"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Health and Quality of Life Outcomes"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","11"],["dc.contributor.author","Sonntag, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Konnopka, Alexander"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Salzer, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Beutel, Manfred E."],["dc.contributor.author","Herpertz, Stephan"],["dc.contributor.author","Hiller, Wolfgang"],["dc.contributor.author","Hoyer, Juergen"],["dc.contributor.author","Joraschky, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Nolting, Bjoern"],["dc.contributor.author","Poehlmann, Karin"],["dc.contributor.author","Stangier, Ulrich"],["dc.contributor.author","Strauss, Bernhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Willutzki, Ulrike"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiltink, Joerg"],["dc.contributor.author","Leibing, Eric"],["dc.contributor.author","Koenig, Hans-Helmut"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:16:28Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:16:28Z"],["dc.date.issued","2013"],["dc.description.abstract","Objective: The aim of the study was to analyse the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D in patients with social phobia. Methods: We used a sample of 445 patients with social phobia with five measurement points over a 30 month period. The discriminative ability of the EQ-5D was analysed by comparing the patients' responses with the general population and between different disease severity levels. For test-retest reliability we assessed the level of agreement in patients' responses over time, when there was no change in the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS). Construct validity was analysed by identifying correlations of the EQ-5D with more specific instruments. For responsiveness we compared the means of EQ VAS/EQ-5D index anchored on improved (deteriorated) health status and computed effect sizes as well as a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results: Compared to the general population, patients with social phobia reported more problems in the dimensions \"usual activities\", \"pain/discomfort\", and \"anxiety/depression\" and less problems in \"mobility\" and \"self-care\". The EQ-5D was able to distinguish between different disease severity levels. The test-retest reliability was moderate (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.6). Correlations between the EQ-5D and other instruments were mostly small except for correlations with Beck Depression Inventory. The EQ-5D index seemed to be more responsive than the EQ VAS, but with only medium effect sizes (0.5 < effect size < 0.8) in the British EQ-5D index and only significant in patients with improved health status. The ROC analysis revealed no significant results. Conclusions: The EQ-5D was moderately reliable and responsive in patients with improved health status. Construct validity was limited."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1186/1477-7525-11-215"],["dc.identifier.isi","000330115400002"],["dc.identifier.pmid","24365384"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/12495"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/27941"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Biomed Central Ltd"],["dc.relation.issn","1477-7525"],["dc.rights","CC BY 2.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0"],["dc.title","Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D in assessing and valuing health status in patients with social phobia"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","292"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Personality Assessment"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","299"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","90"],["dc.contributor.author","Salzer, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Pincus, Aaron L."],["dc.contributor.author","Hoyer, Juergen"],["dc.contributor.author","Kreische, Reinhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Leibing, Eric"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T11:15:39Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T11:15:39Z"],["dc.date.issued","2008"],["dc.description.abstract","In this study, we addressed the heterogeneity in interpersonal problems across patients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). We assessed interpersonal problems by the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP-C; Horowitz, Alden, Wiggins, & Pincus, 2000) in a sample of 78 GAD patients. We used HP-C profiles describing interpersonal characteristics of the total GAD sample as well as clustered GAD interpersonal subtypes. Although the overall sample was located in the friendly submissive quadrant of the circumplex model, this was true only for the Exploitable cluster, which includes more than 50% of the patients. Importantly, clusters of GAD patients with other locations reporting predominantly Cold, Nonassertive, or Intrusive interpersonal problems were also identified. The 4 clusters did not differ in terms of gender, comorbid disorders, or the severity of depression or anxiety. Thus, the assessment of interpersonal problems provides additional diagnostic information covering the heterogeneity of GAD patients. This information could be used for differential indication and individual case formulation in GAD."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1080/00223890701885076"],["dc.identifier.isi","000256187300010"],["dc.identifier.pmid","18444126"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/54413"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd"],["dc.relation.issn","0022-3891"],["dc.title","Interpersonal subtypes within generalized anxiety disorder"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","89"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1-2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Contemporary Psychoanalysis"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","130"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","50"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Klein, Susanne"],["dc.contributor.author","Salzer, Simone"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:46:11Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:46:11Z"],["dc.date.issued","2014"],["dc.description.abstract","This article reviews the empirical evidence for psychodynamic therapy for specific mental disorders in adults. The focus is on randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, this does not imply that RCTs are uncritically accepted as the gold standard for demonstrating that a treatment works. According to the results presented here, there is evidence from RCTs that psychodynamic therapy is efficacious in common mental disorders, that is, depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, somatic symptom disorders, personality disorders, eating disorders, complicated grief, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and substance-related disorder. These results clearly contradict assertions repeatedly made by representatives of other psychotherapeutic approaches claiming psychodynamic psychotherapy is not empirically supported. However, further research is needed, both on outcome and processes of psychodynamic psychotherapy. There is a need, for example, for RCTs of psychodynamic psychotherapy of PTSD. Furthermore, research on long-term psychotherapy for specific mental disorders is required."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1080/00107530.2014.880310"],["dc.identifier.isi","000336482400008"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/34809"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd"],["dc.relation.issn","2330-9091"],["dc.relation.issn","0010-7530"],["dc.title","THE EFFICACY OF PSYCHODYNAMIC PSYCHOTHERAPY IN SPECIFIC MENTAL DISORDERS: A 2013 UPDATE OF EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE"],["dc.type","review"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","329"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","4"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","335"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","56"],["dc.contributor.author","Stefini, Annette"],["dc.contributor.author","Salzer, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Reich, Günter"],["dc.contributor.author","Horn, Hildegard"],["dc.contributor.author","Winkelmann, Klaus"],["dc.contributor.author","Bents, Hinrich"],["dc.contributor.author","Rutz, Ursula"],["dc.contributor.author","Frost, Ulrike"],["dc.contributor.author","von Boetticher, Antje"],["dc.contributor.author","Ruhl, Uwe E."],["dc.contributor.author","Specht, Nicole"],["dc.contributor.author","Kronmuller, Klaus-Thomas"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:25:37Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:25:37Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.description.abstract","Objective: The authors compared cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and psychodynamic therapy (PDT) for the treatment of bulimia nervosa (BN) in female adolescents. Method: In this randomized controlled trial, 81 female adolescents with BN or partial BN according to the DSM-IV received a mean of 36.6 sessions of manualized disorder-oriented PDT or CBT. Trained psychologists blinded to treatment condition administered the outcome measures at baseline, during treatment, at the end of treatment, and 12 months after treatment. The primary outcome was the rate of remission, defined as a lack of DSM-IV diagnosis for BN or partial BN at the end of therapy. Several secondary outcome measures were evaluated. Results: The remission rates for CBT and PDT were 33.3% and 31.0%, respectively, with no significant differences between them (odds ratio [OR] = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.35-2.28, p =.82). The within-group effect sizes were 11 = 1.22 for CBT and h = 1.18 for PDT. Significant improvements in all secondary outcome measures were found for both CBT (d = 0.51-0.82) and PDT (d = 0.24-1.10). The improvements remained stable at the 12-month follow-up in both groups. There were small between-group effect sizes for binge eating (d = 0.23) and purging (d = 0.26) in favor of CBT and for eating concern (d = -0.35) in favor of PDT. Conclusion: CBT and PDT were effective in promoting recovery from BN in female adolescents. The rates of remission for both therapies were similar to those in other studies evaluating CBT. This trial identified differences with small effects in binge eating, purging, and eating concern."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.jaac.2017.01.019"],["dc.identifier.isi","000398884600010"],["dc.identifier.pmid","28335877"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/42887"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","PUB_WoS_Import"],["dc.relation.issn","1527-5418"],["dc.relation.issn","0890-8567"],["dc.title","Cognitive-Behavioral and Psychodynamic Therapy in Female Adolescents With Bulimia Nervosa: A Randomized Controlled Trial"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","503"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","8"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","508"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","56"],["dc.contributor.author","Salzer, Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Winkelbach, Christel"],["dc.contributor.author","Leweke, Frank"],["dc.contributor.author","Leibing, Eric"],["dc.contributor.author","Leichsenring, Falk"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-06-01T10:47:54Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-06-01T10:47:54Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.description.abstract","Objective: In a previous randomized controlled trial (RCT), short-term efficacy of cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) and short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy (STPP) in generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) was demonstrated. In this article, long-term stability of these effects will be examined. Effects of CBT and STPP will be compared. Method: In the original RCT, patients with GAD were treated with either CBT ( n = 29) or STPP ( n = 28). Treatments were carried out according to manuals and included up to 30 sessions. As the primary outcome measure the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale was used. In addition to short-term outcome previously reported, treatment effects were assessed 12 months after termination of treatment. Results: Both CBT and STPP yielded large improvements at 12-month follow-up. No significant differences were found between treatments concerning the primary outcome measure. This result was corroborated by 3 self-report measures of anxiety. However, in measures of trait anxiety and worry, CBT was superior. Concerning depression, differences reported at posttreatment were no longer significant at 12-month follow-up. Conclusions: In GAD, both CBT and STPP yield large and stable effects 12 months after treatment. Concerning trait anxiety and worry, CBT seems to be superior. For STPP, further studies should be carried out to confirm the results."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1177/070674371105600809"],["dc.identifier.isi","000294045000009"],["dc.identifier.pmid","21878162"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/85759"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-425"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Canadian Psychiatric Assoc"],["dc.relation.eissn","1497-0015"],["dc.relation.issn","0706-7437"],["dc.title","Long-Term Effects of Short-Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy and Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy in Generalized Anxiety Disorder: 12-Month Follow-up"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]