Schreiner, Melanie Steffi

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","625"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","5"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Infancy"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","647"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","21"],["dc.contributor.author","Schreiner, Melanie Steffi"],["dc.contributor.author","Altvater-Mackensen, Nicole"],["dc.contributor.author","Mani, Nivedita"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:49:10Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:49:10Z"],["dc.date.issued","2016"],["dc.description.abstract","We examined 7.5-month-old infants' ability to segment words from infant- and adult-directed speech (IDS and ADS). In particular, we extended the standard design of most segmentation studies by including a phase where infants were repeatedly exposed to target word recordings at their own home (extended exposure) in addition to a laboratory-based familiarization. This enabled us to examine infants' segmentation of words from speech input in their naturalistic environment, extending current findings to learning outside the laboratory. Results of a modified preferential-listening task show that infants listened longer to isolated tokens of familiarized words from home relative to novel control words regardless of register. However, infants showed no recognition of words exposed to during purely laboratory-based familiarization. This indicates that infants succeed in retaining words in long-term memory following extended exposure and recognizing them later on with considerable flexibility. In addition, infants segmented words from both IDS and ADS, suggesting limited effects of speech register on learning from extended exposure in naturalistic environments. Moreover, there was a significant correlation between segmentation success and infants' attention to ADS, but not to IDS, during the extended exposure phase. This finding speaks to current language acquisition models assuming that infants' individual attention to language stimuli drives successful learning."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/infa.12133"],["dc.identifier.gro","3150978"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/7783"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.issn","1525-0008"],["dc.title","Early Word Segmentation in Naturalistic Environments: Limited Effects of Speech Register"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","98"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Cognition"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","102"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","160"],["dc.contributor.author","Schreiner, Melanie Steffi"],["dc.contributor.author","Mani, Nivedita"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:51:36Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:51:36Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.description.abstract","While American English infants typically segment words from fluent speech by 7.5-months, studies of infants from other language backgrounds have difficulty replicating this finding. One possible explanation for this cross-linguistic difference is that the input infants from different language backgrounds receive is not as infant-directed as American English infant-directed speech (Floccia et al., 2016). Against this background, the current study investigates whether German 7.5- and 9-month-old infants segment words from fluent speech when the input is prosodically similar to American English IDS. While 9-month-olds showed successful segmentation of words from exaggerated IDS, 7.5-month-olds did not. These findings highlight (a) the beneficial impact of exaggerated IDS on infant speech segmentation, (b) cross-linguistic differences in word segmentation that are based not just on the kind of input available to children and suggest (c) developmental differences in the role of IDS as an attentional spotlight in speech segmentation."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.cognition.2016.12.003"],["dc.identifier.gro","3151000"],["dc.identifier.pmid","28088040"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/7809"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.issn","0010-0277"],["dc.title","Listen up! Developmental differences in the impact of IDS on speech segmentation"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1623"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","9"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Developmental Psychology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1631"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","56"],["dc.contributor.author","Schreiner, Melanie S."],["dc.contributor.author","van Schaik, Johanna E."],["dc.contributor.author","Sučević, Jelena"],["dc.contributor.author","Hunnius, Sabine"],["dc.contributor.author","Meyer, Marlene"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-04-14T08:23:14Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-04-14T08:23:14Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1037/dev0001079"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/80836"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-399"],["dc.relation.eissn","1939-0599"],["dc.relation.issn","0012-1649"],["dc.title","Let’s talk action: Infant-directed speech facilitates infants’ action learning."],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","333"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","4"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Plant Interactions"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","340"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","7"],["dc.contributor.author","Li, B."],["dc.contributor.author","Krumbein, A."],["dc.contributor.author","Neugart, S."],["dc.contributor.author","Li, L."],["dc.contributor.author","Schreiner, M."],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-11-05T15:00:51Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-11-05T15:00:51Z"],["dc.date.issued","2012"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1080/17429145.2012.714407"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/68444"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-352.5"],["dc.relation.eissn","1742-9153"],["dc.relation.issn","1742-9145"],["dc.title","Mixed cropping with maize combined with moderate UV-B radiations lead to enhanced flavonoid production and root growth in faba bean"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Developmental Science"],["dc.contributor.author","Mani, Nivedita"],["dc.contributor.author","Schreiner, Melanie S."],["dc.contributor.author","Brase, Julia"],["dc.contributor.author","Köhler, Katrin"],["dc.contributor.author","Strassen, Katrin"],["dc.contributor.author","Postin, Danilo"],["dc.contributor.author","Schultze, Thomas"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-04-14T08:28:19Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-04-14T08:28:19Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.description.abstract","Abstract Developmental research, like many fields, is plagued by low sample sizes and inconclusive findings. The problem is amplified by the difficulties associated with recruiting infant participants for research as well as the increased variability in infant responses. With sequential testing designs providing a viable alternative to paradigms facing such issues, the current study implemented a Sequential Bayes Factor (SBF) design on three findings in the developmental literature. In particular, using the framework described by Schönbrödt and colleagues (2017), we examined infants’ sensitivity to mispronunciations of familiar words, their learning of novel word‐object associations from cross‐situational learning paradigms, and their assumption of mutual exclusivity in assigning novel labels to novel objects. We tested an initial sample of 20 participants in each study, incrementally increasing sample size by one and computing a Bayes Factor with each additional participant. In one study, we were able to obtain moderate evidence for the alternate hypotheses despite testing less than half the number of participants as in the original study. We did not replicate the findings of the cross‐situational learning study. Indeed, the data were five times more likely under the null hypothesis, allowing us to conclude that infants did not recognize the trained word‐object associations presented in the task. We discuss these findings in light of the advantages and disadvantages of using a SBF design in developmental research while also providing researchers with an account of how we implemented this design across multiple studies."],["dc.description.abstract","Results of the sequential Bayesian analysis of the mispronunciation effect. image"],["dc.description.sponsorship","Leibniz ScienceCampus Primate Cognition"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/desc.13097"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/82567"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-399"],["dc.relation.eissn","1467-7687"],["dc.relation.issn","1363-755X"],["dc.rights","This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited."],["dc.title","Sequential Bayes Factor designs in developmental research: Studies on early word learning"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","S1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Lebensmittelchemie"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","73"],["dc.contributor.author","Neugart, S"],["dc.contributor.author","Barilari, M"],["dc.contributor.author","Santin, M"],["dc.contributor.author","Sarrocco, S"],["dc.contributor.author","Vannacci, G"],["dc.contributor.author","Schreiner, M"],["dc.contributor.author","Castagna, A"],["dc.contributor.author","Ranieri, A"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-12-08T12:30:38Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-12-08T12:30:38Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1002/lemi.201951044"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/96504"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-476"],["dc.relation.eissn","1521-3811"],["dc.relation.issn","0937-1478"],["dc.title","Pre‐treatment of peach fruits with UVB radiation resulted in structure‐dependent response of the flavonoids after infection with Monilinia fructicola"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","106"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","119"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","35"],["dc.contributor.author","Baldermann, S."],["dc.contributor.author","Blagojević, L."],["dc.contributor.author","Frede, K."],["dc.contributor.author","Klopsch, R."],["dc.contributor.author","Neugart, S."],["dc.contributor.author","Neumann, A."],["dc.contributor.author","Ngwene, B."],["dc.contributor.author","Norkeweit, J."],["dc.contributor.author","Schröter, D."],["dc.contributor.author","Schröter, A."],["dc.contributor.author","Schweigert, F. J."],["dc.contributor.author","Wiesner, M."],["dc.contributor.author","Schreiner, M."],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-11-05T15:00:43Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-11-05T15:00:43Z"],["dc.date.issued","2016"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1080/07352689.2016.1201399"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/68391"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-352.5"],["dc.relation.eissn","1549-7836"],["dc.relation.issn","0735-2689"],["dc.title","Are Neglected Plants the Food for the Future?"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","478"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","4"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Infancy"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","499"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","25"],["dc.contributor.author","Outters, Vivien"],["dc.contributor.author","Schreiner, Melanie S."],["dc.contributor.author","Behne, Tanya"],["dc.contributor.author","Mani, Nivedita"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-04-14T08:26:35Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-04-14T08:26:35Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.description.abstract","Abstract Caregivers typically use an exaggerated speech register known as infant‐directed speech (IDS) in communication with infants. Infants prefer IDS over adult‐directed speech (ADS) and IDS is functionally relevant in infant‐directed communication. We examined interactions among maternal IDS quality, infants’ preference for IDS over ADS, and the functional relevance of IDS at 6 and 13 months. While 6‐month‐olds showed a preference for IDS over ADS, 13‐month‐olds did not. Differences in gaze following behavior triggered by speech register (IDS vs. ADS) were found in both age groups. The degree of infants’ preference for IDS (relative to ADS) was linked to the quality of maternal IDS infants were exposed to. No such relationship was found between gaze following behavior and maternal IDS quality and infants’ IDS preference. The results speak to a dynamic interaction between infants’ preference for different kinds of social signals and the social cues available to them."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Leibniz‐Gemeinschaft http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001664"],["dc.description.sponsorship","Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001659"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/infa.12334"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1532-7078"],["dc.identifier.issn","1525-0008"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/82005"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-399"],["dc.relation.eissn","1532-7078"],["dc.relation.issn","1525-0008"],["dc.rights","This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited."],["dc.title","Maternal input and infants’ response to infant‐directed speech"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]