Stahl, Jutta

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1-2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","International Journal of Psychophysiology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","45"],["dc.contributor.author","Stahl, J."],["dc.contributor.author","Rammsayer, Thomas H."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:21:41Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:21:41Z"],["dc.date.issued","2002"],["dc.format.extent","128"],["dc.identifier.isi","000177095500312"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/42139"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Elsevier Science Bv"],["dc.publisher.place","Amsterdam"],["dc.relation.issn","0167-8760"],["dc.title","Extraversion and accessory stimulation: Effects on the time course of sensory and motor information processing"],["dc.type","conference_abstract"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","164"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie)"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","172"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","55"],["dc.contributor.author","Gibbons, Henning"],["dc.contributor.author","Stahl, Jutta"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T11:19:54Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T11:19:54Z"],["dc.date.issued","2008"],["dc.description.abstract","Negative priming (NP) refers to increased response time (RT) for a probe target that was a distractor in a preceding prime presentation (distractor-target shift, DT), compared to novel targets. The present study used the lateralized readiness potential (LRP) to investigate, in a four-choice identification task, a novel episodic-retrieval explanation of NP introduced by Rothermund, Wentura, and de Houwer (2005). This theory proposes that retrieval reactivates the prime response which interferes with selection of the correct probe response, thereby producing NP. 20 participants responded to pairs of red and blue digits, contingent on the identity of the digit presented in the target color. Behavioral NP involved RT increase by 16ms. With shift trials (different hands used for prime and probe responses), in the DT condition LRP onset was delayed relative to control. By contrast, earlier LRP onset was observed for DT relative to control with no-shift trials (same hand used for prime and probe responses). Behavioral NP effects showed similar magnitude for shift and no-shift trials. Results support the Rothermund et al. (2005) theory of prime-response retrieval."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1027/1618-3169.55.3.164"],["dc.identifier.isi","000257022500004"],["dc.identifier.pmid","18549163"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/55397"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Hogrefe & Huber Publishers"],["dc.relation.issn","1618-3169"],["dc.title","Early activity in the lateralized readiness potential suggests prime-response retrieval as a source of negative priming"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","311"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Psychological Research"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","320"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","72"],["dc.contributor.author","Gibbons, Henning"],["dc.contributor.author","Stahl, Jutta"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T11:15:49Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T11:15:49Z"],["dc.date.issued","2008"],["dc.description.abstract","The present study aimed at investigating whether different aspects of performance on a prospective reproduction task with a standard duration of 2 s had different antecedents in the event-related potentials (ERPs) accompanying standard presentations and reproduced intervals. On each trial, first the standard duration was presented as an empty auditory interval. After a short delay, participants reproduced this interval by means of two button presses defining onset and offset of the reproduced interval. About 25 participants were divided into groups of poor and good time estimators, once based on the coefficient of variation of their reproduced durations, and once based on the absolute error score. Interestingly, for both performance measures differences between participants were accompanied by ERP differences during standard presentations rather than reproduction itself. While larger P300 amplitudes evoked by standard interval offset predicted good reproduction performance in terms of a small coefficient of variation, small absolute error scores were accompanied by larger fronto-central negative slow wave during standard presentations. The results suggest an important role of attention to both the critical events that delimit the to-be-estimated temporal intervals, and to the passing of time between these events."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00426-006-0105-z"],["dc.identifier.isi","000254205400008"],["dc.identifier.pmid","17165087"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/54449"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Springer"],["dc.publisher.place","Heidelberg"],["dc.relation.issn","0340-0727"],["dc.title","ERP predictors of individual performance on a prospective temporal reproduction task"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","262"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3-4"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","International Journal of Psychology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","263"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","43"],["dc.contributor.author","Armbrecht, Anne-Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Gibbons, Henning"],["dc.contributor.author","Stahl, Jutta"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T11:14:34Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T11:14:34Z"],["dc.date.issued","2008"],["dc.identifier.isi","000259264303084"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/54157"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Psychology Press"],["dc.publisher.place","Hove"],["dc.relation.issn","0020-7594"],["dc.title","Effects of error types on error negativity"],["dc.type","conference_abstract"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","595"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","4"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Experimental Brain Research"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","606"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","181"],["dc.contributor.author","Stahl, Jutta"],["dc.contributor.author","Gibbons, Henning"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:59:56Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:59:56Z"],["dc.date.issued","2007"],["dc.description.abstract","Brain-electrical correlates of identity-based negative priming (NP) were investigated, using event-related potentials (ERPs) and the lateralized readiness potential (LRP). Sixteen participants responded to the central digit (\"target\") of a triplet of digits while ignoring the identical flankers (\"distractors\"). In the DT condition designed to produce NP, the target was the preceding distractor. No stimuli were repeated in the control condition. In the TT condition supposed to produce positive priming (PP), the target stimulus was repeated. With this latter condition, design imbalances were avoided and ERP correlates of PP and NP could be compared. Significant behavioural PP (81-ms RT decrease in the TT condition) and NP effects (13-ms RT increase in the DT condition) were observed. Compared to control, left-posterior P300 amplitude was reduced for priming conditions TT and DT. It is argued that P300 findings are better in line with episodic-retrieval than activation/inhibition view since the latter predicts opposite ERP differences-to-control for TT and DT. P300 reduction may reflect an initial evaluation of both TT and DT probe displays as similar to the prime, resulting in a tendency to repeat the prime response. This tendency is correct in the TT condition but wrong in the DT condition, causing response conflict. A response-conflict account of flanker NP also receives support from the present LRP data: onset of the response-locked LRP occurred significantly earlier for DT than control, indicating increased motor processing time. Overall, data support episodic-retrieval explanations of flanker NP."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00221-007-0951-y"],["dc.identifier.isi","000248300900007"],["dc.identifier.pmid","17476488"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/50813"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Springer"],["dc.relation.issn","0014-4819"],["dc.title","Event-related brain potentials support episodic-retrieval explanations of flanker negative priming"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","581"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Clinical Neurophysiology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","596"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","118"],["dc.contributor.author","Stahl, Jutta"],["dc.contributor.author","Gibbons, Henning"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T11:04:15Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T11:04:15Z"],["dc.date.issued","2007"],["dc.description.abstract","Objectives: The aim of the present study was to investigate the functional significance of error (related) negativity Ne/ERN and individual differences in human action monitoring. A response-conflict model of Ne/ERN should be tested applying a stop-signal paradigm. After a few modifications of Ne/ERN response-conflict theory (Yeung N, Botvinick MM, Cohen JD. The neural basis of error detection: conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review 2004:111(4);931-959), strength and time course of response conflict could be modeled as a function of stop-signal delay. Method: In Experiment 1, 35 participants performed a visual two-choice response-time task but tried to withhold the response if an auditory stop signal was presented. Probability of stopping errors was held at 50% using variable delays between visual and auditory stimuli. Experiment 2 (n = 10) employed both auditory go and stop signals and confirmed that Ne/ERN effects are due to conflict induced by the auditory stop signal, and not the mere presence or absence of an additional stimulus. Results: As predicted, amplitudes of both the stimulus-locked and response-locked Ne/ERN were largest for non-stopped responses, followed by successfully stopped and go responses. However, independently of response type Ne/ERN also increased with increasing stop-Signal delay. Since longer delay invokes stronger response conflict, results specifically support the notion of Ne/ERN reflecting response-conflict monitoring. Furthermore, individual differences related to measures of response control and behavioral control were observed. Both low response control estimated from stop-task performance and high psychometric impulsivity were accompanied by smaller Ne/ERN amplitude on stop trials, suggesting reduced response-conflict monitoring. Conclusions: The present study supported the response-conflict view of Ne/ERN. Furthermore, the observed relationship between impulsivity and Ne/ERN amplitude suggested that individuals with low behavioral control were characterized by lower activity in anterior cingulate cortex, the neural generator of Ne/ERN, in situations of strong response conflict. Significance: The present study, for the first time, employed a stop-signal paradigm to verify predictions regarding the temporal dynamics of response-conflict processing as derived from response-conflict theory of ERN. (c) 2006 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.clinph.2006.10.023"],["dc.identifier.isi","000244772600011"],["dc.identifier.pmid","17188565"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/51796"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Elsevier Ireland Ltd"],["dc.relation.issn","1388-2457"],["dc.title","Dynamics of response-conflict monitoring and individual differences in response control and behavioral control: An electrophysiological investigation using a stop-signal task"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","112"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Biological Psychology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","123"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","85"],["dc.contributor.author","Armbrecht, Anne-Simone"],["dc.contributor.author","Woehrmann, Anne"],["dc.contributor.author","Gibbons, Henning"],["dc.contributor.author","Stahl, Jutta"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:39:32Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:39:32Z"],["dc.date.issued","2010"],["dc.description.abstract","The present electrophysiological study investigated the temporal development of response conflict and the effects of diverging conflict sources on error(-related) negativity (Ne). Eighteen participants performed a combined stop-signal flanker task, which was comprised of two different conflict sources: a left-right and a go-stop response conflict. It is assumed that the Ne reflects the activity of a conflict monitoring system and thus increases according to (i) the number of conflict sources and (ii) the temporal development of the conflict activity. No increase of the Ne amplitude after double errors (comprising two conflict sources) as compared to hand- and stop-errors (comprising one conflict source) was found, whereas a higher Ne amplitude was observed after a delayed stop-signal onset. The results suggest that the Ne is not sensitive to an increase in the number of conflict sources, but to the temporal dynamics of a go-stop response conflict. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.06.002"],["dc.identifier.isi","000281182600014"],["dc.identifier.pmid","20542082"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/6128"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/19019"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Elsevier Science Bv"],["dc.relation.issn","0301-0511"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.title","Temporal dynamics of conflict monitoring and the effects of one or two conflict sources on error-(related) negativity"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","203"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Brain and Cognition"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","217"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","83"],["dc.contributor.author","Gibbons, Henning"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiegleb, Nancy"],["dc.contributor.author","Stahl, Jutta"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:18:15Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:18:15Z"],["dc.date.issued","2013"],["dc.description.abstract","Usually, a probe target appearing in a recently ignored distractor location is less efficiently processed. This robust phenomenon is called (visuo-) spatial negative priming (SNP). Among other explanations, concepts of persisting or retrieved spatial inhibition play a major role. Two relevant issues were investigated using event-related brain potentials (ERPs). The first pertains to context sensitivity of inhibition: Is a probe distractor necessary for SNP? The second concerns levels of processing at which spatial inhibition operates: Does SNP affect perception, selection, and/or stimulus classification? A localization task with and without probe distractors was employed while 64-channel EEG was recorded. Obviously, SNP does not require a probe distractor; the distractor-absent SNP effect was larger than the distractor-present SNP effect. Distractor-present SNP had two lateralized ERP effects, N1pc amplitude reduction and N2pc amplitude increase. Smaller N1pc may indeed reflect perceptual decrement, but was inversely related to size of behavioral SNP. By contrast, only strong-SNP participants showed N2pc increase, which points to selection disadvantage due to persisting inhibition of higher-level spatial representations. Distractor-absent SNP had no N1pc/N2pc correlates; instead, reduced amplitude of a broadly distributed P300 component suggests impaired stimulus classification due to episodic retrieval of inappropriate prime information. Overall, SNP seems to emerge from relatively late stages of processing, thus challenging the idea of context-free persisting inhibition of low-level spatial representations. Furthermore, distractor-present and distractor-absent SNP are qualitatively different from each other. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.bandc.2013.08.004"],["dc.identifier.isi","000325740600006"],["dc.identifier.pmid","24056236"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/28364"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Academic Press Inc Elsevier Science"],["dc.relation.issn","1090-2147"],["dc.relation.issn","0278-2626"],["dc.title","Levels of visuo-spatial selection: An ERP study of negative priming"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","12"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","International Journal of Psychophysiology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","21"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","81"],["dc.contributor.author","Fritzsche, Anna-Sophia"],["dc.contributor.author","Stahl, Jutta"],["dc.contributor.author","Gibbons, Henning"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:54:41Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:54:41Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.description.abstract","The present event-related potential (ERP) study aimed at investigating the specific behavioral and electrophysiological correlates of target competition, and their relationships to individual differences in functional impulsivity. Twenty-two participants performed a modified XO task with two conditions. Target competition displays included one up to three identical targets and no distractor, whereas distractor competition displays always included one target among one up to three distractors. On every trial, (one of) the target(s) had to be localized. Behavioral data revealed response time (RI) increases with increasing number of stimuli in both conditions. P2, N2, and P3 components were specifically responsive to target competition. High functional impulsives showed larger P2 for multiple- compared to single-target displays, but no effects on N2, P3, and RT. By contrast, in low functional impulsives target competition led to N2 increase, P3 decrease, and RI increase, while P2 effects were absent. Findings suggest that functional impulsives are better able to adapt to task requirements; in the present task they avoided conflict from multiple-target displays through better target discrimination at early stages of processing. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.03.014"],["dc.identifier.isi","000292489600002"],["dc.identifier.pmid","21510982"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/22729"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Elsevier Science Bv"],["dc.relation.issn","0167-8760"],["dc.title","An ERP study of target competition: Individual differences in functional impulsive behavior"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","150"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Psychophysiology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","151"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","20"],["dc.contributor.author","Stahl, J."],["dc.contributor.author","Armbrecht, A."],["dc.contributor.author","Gibbons, Henning"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:37:40Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:37:40Z"],["dc.date.issued","2006"],["dc.identifier.isi","000238080700189"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/45624"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Hogrefe & Huber Publishers"],["dc.publisher.place","Gottingen"],["dc.title","Response-conflict monitoring while lying: Evidence from error-related negativity"],["dc.type","conference_abstract"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]