Lindena-Gläß, Gabriele

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","2297"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","45"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","DMW - Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","2301"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","136"],["dc.contributor.author","Alt-Epping, Bernd"],["dc.contributor.author","Suerig, R."],["dc.contributor.author","Lindena-Gläß, Gabriele"],["dc.contributor.author","Nauck, Friedemann"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:50:16Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:50:16Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.description.abstract","How much diagnostics is required in palliative care? Results from a representative survey and own experiences Background: Applying diagnostic techniques in palliative care (PC) requires a thorough balance between a physical, psychosocial (and financial) burden and its therapeutic relevance in far advanced diseases. The extent of diagnostic employment in PC, preferred techniques, application problems, its informative value and therapeutic significance still have to be described. Methods: The Hospice and Palliative Care Evaluation (HOPE) 2007 collected data from the application of microbiological and imaging techniques in German PC institutions. Furthermore, 70 consecutive ultrasound scans in our PC unit have been retrospectively analyzed. In 691 PC patients (from a total of 3184 in HOPE), diagnostic techniques (DIA) were applied and documented. Results: In-patients with DIA (86,1%) and the HOPE collective showed a comparable age and duration of hospital stay. Microbiological techniques contributed to 26,1% of all documented in-patient investigations, imaging techniques 69,1%. Ultrasound was the preferred imaging technique on PC units (67,1%), whilst radiography, CT or MRI scans were rather employed on oncology wards. Nuclear imaging was rarely documented. In 80,8%, imaging diagnostics were considered relevant for further treatment decisions (inpatients only); transportation problems and pain during imaging were relevant obstacles. In our own patient cohort, ultrasound was applied rather for general prognostic purposes, less often resulting in immediate therapeutic actions. Transportation problems could be almost entirely avoided by using a mobile ultrasound device. Conclusion: DIA in PC are applied independently of age or duration of hospital stay; its therapeutic significance is considered to be high; procedural problems may be resolvable. Therefore, this survey might challenge the tradition of low technology in PC."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1055/s-0031-1292042"],["dc.identifier.isi","000296724600005"],["dc.identifier.pmid","22048934"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/21659"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.relation.issn","0012-0472"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Klinik für Palliativmedizin"],["dc.title","Wieviel Diagnostik braucht die Palliativmedizin? Ergebnisse einer multizentrischen Studie und Fallserie"],["dc.title.alternative","How much diagnostics is required in palliative care? Results from a representative survey and own experiences"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","442"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","7"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Supportive Care in Cancer"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","451"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","11"],["dc.contributor.author","Radbruch, Lukas"],["dc.contributor.author","Nauck, Friedemann"],["dc.contributor.author","Ostgathe, Christoph"],["dc.contributor.author","Elsner, Frank"],["dc.contributor.author","Bausewein, Claudia"],["dc.contributor.author","Fuchs, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Lindena-Gläß, Gabriele"],["dc.contributor.author","Neuwöhner, Karl"],["dc.contributor.author","Schulenberg, Dieter"],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-03-01T09:28:39Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-03-01T09:28:39Z"],["dc.date.issued","2003-07"],["dc.description.abstract","The development of a standardised core documentation for palliative care was initiated in Germany in 1996. Results from previous evaluations have shown the wide variability of the documentation in participating units. A different documentation form was used in 2001 using free text entries to find out what problems palliative care specialists perceive in their patients. Fifty-five of the 83 palliative inpatient units in Germany (66% of the units) as well as one unit each from Austria and Switzerland, documented 1304 patients in the core documentation in 2001. Inpatient care was continued until death for 531 patients, 604 patients were discharged home and 169 patients were transferred to other places of care. Palliative care treatment effectively reduced mean physical symptom intensity. Mean intensities of psychological and social problems also were reduced although not as much as physical symptom load. Nursing problems were reduced for those patients discharged but not for those who died in the unit. Anxiety and depression were the most frequent psychological problems. Nursing problems were focussed on impairment of mobility and other activities of daily living such as washing, nutrition and drinking. Excessive distress on caregivers and the organisation of home care were the predominant social problems. In conclusion, this representative prospective survey with the majority of palliative care units in Germany showed the high effectiveness of symptom relief. Using the categories identified in this study, checklists were constructed and included in the documentation forms that are currently used for the core documentation project."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00520-003-0472-6"],["dc.identifier.pmid","12774219"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/102762"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.relation.issn","0941-4355"],["dc.title","What are the problems in palliative care? Results from a representative survey"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","no"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","45"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Der Schmerz"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","52"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","35"],["dc.contributor.author","Kaiser, Ulrike"],["dc.contributor.author","Nagel, Bernd"],["dc.contributor.author","Petzke, Frank"],["dc.contributor.author","Pfingsten, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Gärtner, Anne"],["dc.contributor.author","Isenberg, Thomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Augustin, Katharina"],["dc.contributor.author","Martin, Carolin"],["dc.contributor.author","Lindena, Gabriele"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-04-14T08:30:39Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-04-14T08:30:39Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00482-020-00527-0"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/83323"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-399"],["dc.relation.eissn","1432-2129"],["dc.relation.issn","0932-433X"],["dc.title","Vermeidung chronischer Schmerzen in der deutschen Gesundheitsversorgung"],["dc.title.alternative","Derzeitiger Stand und Ausblick"],["dc.title.translated","Prevention of chronic pain in the German healthcare system : Current state and perspective"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","471"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","6"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Pain and Symptom Management"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","483"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","23"],["dc.contributor.author","Radbruch, Lukas"],["dc.contributor.author","Nauck, Friedemann"],["dc.contributor.author","Fuchs, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Neuwöhner, Karl"],["dc.contributor.author","Schulenberg, Dieter"],["dc.contributor.author","Lindena-Gläß, Gabriele"],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-03-01T09:28:59Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-03-01T09:28:59Z"],["dc.date.issued","2002"],["dc.description.abstract","The recent development of palliative care inpatient units in Germany has been impressive. As a first step for quality assurance, a core documentation form was developed in 1996. The core documentation form consisted of 4 pages with 35 items documenting physical and psychosocial symptoms at the time of admission, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures before and during inpatient treatment, and outcome of physical and psychosocial dimensions. Checklists were used for most items and free text entries could be added. Of the 65 palliative inpatient units in Germany, 44 participated in the second phase of the evaluation of the core documentation in 2000. Eight units were affiliated with anesthesiology departments, 31 with internal medicine, two with radiotherapy, 1 with a surgical department, and 2 units were not affiliated with a department of the hospital. A total of 1087 patients were assessed in the 44 units during a period of up to 3 months. There was a high variability between units in all checklist items of the core documentation. Compared to units affiliated with internal medicine departments, units affiliated with anesthesiology departments performed less chemotherapy, but more immunotherapy; gave fewer infusions and blood transfusions but more skin and wound care, and more lymphatic drainage and massage; and documented psychosocial interventions more frequently for patients as well as for relatives. In one-third of the patients, a consent for omission of therapeutic options was documented. Inpatient treatment ended with the death of the patient in 45.3% of patients and with discharge in 51.6% (not documented 3.1%). The efficacy of inpatient treatment was rated very high by the staff. In conclusion, we found large variation in the documentation pertaining to palliative care patients at the time of admission, as well as for inpatient treatment, among palliative care units in Germany. This was related to the affiliation of the units at least to some degree, but also to differences in interests and documentation discipline. We suggest that training procedures for documentation should be included in crossectional surveys, as the results may not be comparable otherwise. However, common documentation instruments may be the first step towards an interdisciplinary discussion on aims and methods in palliative care."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/S0885-3924(02)00408-6"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/102765"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.relation.issn","0885-3924"],["dc.title","What Is Palliative Care in Germany? Results from a Representative Survey"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","no"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","672"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","6"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Palliative Medicine"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","680"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","15"],["dc.contributor.author","Jaspers, Birgit"],["dc.contributor.author","Nauck, Friedemann"],["dc.contributor.author","Lindena, Gabriele"],["dc.contributor.author","Elsner, Frank"],["dc.contributor.author","Ostgathe, Christoph"],["dc.contributor.author","Radbruch, Lukas"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:09:49Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:09:49Z"],["dc.date.issued","2012"],["dc.description.abstract","Background: Little is known about the practice of palliative sedation (PS) in Germany. This paper presents an analysis of sedation-related data obtained from the German standardized core documentation system (HOPE) for palliative care patients. Methods: HOPE was complemented by an optional module on ethical decision making (EDM) which was pretested in 2004, data was collected in 2005-6 during the annual 3-month census. Data was analyzed descriptively from palliative care units (PCU - representative) and inpatient hospice (H - non-representative control group). Chi(2) test was used to test for differences between the reported data per item and year within one kind of setting (significance level p <= 0.05). Free-text entries were categorized inductively. Results: Datasets were obtained for 1,944 patients (P) with EDM. PS was performed in 13.0/11.8% (2005/2006) P in palliative care units (PCU) and 25.5/22.9% in hospices (H). Main reasons for PS in PCU were dyspnea, pain, fear or anxiety, in H reasons were inconsistent, high prevalence of psychosocial reasons. Most PS in PCU and about half of the PS in H were intermittent. Sedated P were younger than non-sedated. Only 7 P received PS after asking for euthanasia. The most used medication was midazolam. Conclusions: This study reveals a first insight into the use and practice of PS in German PCU and H. For a more detailed systematic survey into the course of decision-making and procedures, a new complementary optional module on PS is being developed by the HOPE group."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1089/jpm.2011.0395"],["dc.identifier.isi","000304778200010"],["dc.identifier.pmid","22656056"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/26351"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Mary Ann Liebert Inc"],["dc.relation.issn","1096-6218"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Klinik für Palliativmedizin"],["dc.title","Palliative Sedation in Germany: How Much Do We Know? A Prospective Survey"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1157"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","9"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Supportive Care in Cancer"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1163"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","18"],["dc.contributor.author","Ostgathe, Christoph"],["dc.contributor.author","Gaertner, Jan"],["dc.contributor.author","Kotterba, Maren"],["dc.contributor.author","Klein, Sebastian"],["dc.contributor.author","Lindena, Gabriele"],["dc.contributor.author","Nauck, Friedemann"],["dc.contributor.author","Radbruch, Lukas"],["dc.contributor.author","Voltz, Raymond"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:40:13Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:40:13Z"],["dc.date.issued","2010"],["dc.description.abstract","Cancer may affect the central nervous system either by primary or secondary brain tumours (PBT/SBT). Specific needs of these patients and special requirements of services caring for them have not been adequately addressed so far. Since 1999, an annual, 3-month census is being conducted in different palliative care settings throughout Germany. Pooled data from the years 2002-2005 were analysed to test for differences between patients with PBT, SBT and other palliative care patients (OP). Symptom frequencies, ECOG status and nursing needs were tested for differences (chi A(2)). Free text entries for reasons for admission were recorded, categorised and analysed descriptively. A total of 5,684 patients were documented (PBT n = 153, 2.7%; SBT n = 661, 11.9%; OP n = 4,872, 85.4%). For patients with PBT, poor functional status and high need for nursing support was reported more frequently than for patients with SBT and OP. For patients with PBT/SBT physical symptoms (pain, nausea, vomiting, constipation and loss of appetite) were documented less frequently and in lower intensity than for OP. However, nursing, psychological, and social problems/symptoms were documented significantly more often and showed higher intensity, particularly the patients' need for support with the activities of daily living, disorientation/confusion of the patients and overburdening of the family. For 67% of all patients, a reason for admission was documented in free text. Main reasons were symptom control (OP > SBT > PBT), social issues (PBT > SBT > OP), functional deficits (PBT > SBT > OP) and cognitive impairment (PBT/SBT > OP). Distinct neurological deficits and problems were documented more often as secondary ICD-diagnoses than as a leading reason for admission. The specific palliative care problems and the rationales leading to health care utilisation point to the need for an appropriate interdisciplinary and multi-professional provision of care for patients with brain malignancies, with a particular view on the needs of the families and an early integration of social and psychological support."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00520-009-0735-y"],["dc.identifier.isi","000280405800006"],["dc.identifier.pmid","19763633"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/6760"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/19174"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Springer"],["dc.relation.issn","0941-4355"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Klinik für Palliativmedizin"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.title","Differential palliative care issues in patients with primary and secondary brain tumours"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","226"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Der Schmerz"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","235"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","33"],["dc.contributor.author","Chenot, Jean‑François"],["dc.contributor.author","Pfingsten, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Marnitz, Ulf"],["dc.contributor.author","Pfeifer, Klaus"],["dc.contributor.author","Kohlmann, Thomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Lindena, Gabriele"],["dc.contributor.author","Schmidt, Carsten Oliver"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T14:10:47Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T14:10:47Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00482-019-0362-6"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1432-2129"],["dc.identifier.issn","0932-433X"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/70876"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","Effekte einer risikoadaptierten Kurzintervention zur Prävention der Chronifizierung bei akuten Rückenschmerzen"],["dc.title.alternative","Effectiveness of a risk-tailored short intervention to prevent chronic low back pain. A cluster-randomized study in general practice"],["dc.title.subtitle","Eine clusterrandomisierte Studie in Hausarztpraxen"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Der Schmerz"],["dc.contributor.author","Kaiser, Ulrike"],["dc.contributor.author","Petzke, Frank"],["dc.contributor.author","Nagel, Bernd"],["dc.contributor.author","Marschall, Ursula"],["dc.contributor.author","Casser, Hans-Raimund"],["dc.contributor.author","Isenberg, Thomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Kohlmann, Thomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Lindena, Gabriele"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-04-14T08:23:35Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-04-14T08:23:35Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00482-020-00497-3"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/80975"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-399"],["dc.relation.eissn","1432-2129"],["dc.relation.issn","0932-433X"],["dc.title","Evaluation eines frühen interdisziplinären multimodalen Assessments für Patienten mit Schmerzen"],["dc.title.alternative","Protokoll einer randomisierten kontrollierten Studie (PAIN2020)"],["dc.title.translated","Evaluation of an early interdisciplinary multimodal assessment for patients with pain: Protocol of a randomized controlled study (PAIN2020)"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","325"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Supportive Care in Cancer"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","333"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","20"],["dc.contributor.author","Stiel, Stephanie"],["dc.contributor.author","Krumm, Norbert"],["dc.contributor.author","Pestinger, Martina"],["dc.contributor.author","Lindena, Gabriele"],["dc.contributor.author","Nauck, Friedemann"],["dc.contributor.author","Ostgathe, Christoph"],["dc.contributor.author","Radbruch, Lukas"],["dc.contributor.author","Elsner, Frank"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:14:10Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:14:10Z"],["dc.date.issued","2012"],["dc.description.abstract","Patients with advanced cancer are highly susceptible to infections. The decision whether to treat an active or suspected infection or to withhold or withdraw an antibiotic treatment in end-of-life care may be difficult. In order to quantify the antimicrobial prescribing practices and decision-making processes in palliative care units in Germany, a survey was performed as part of the Hospice and Palliative Evaluation in 2006. With a specifically designed questionnaire, 448 patients for whom an active or suspected infection and antibiotic treatment was discussed were documented. Data on the use of and indication for antibiotic treatment and the decision-making on withdrawal or withholding of antibiotic therapy were collected. 286 (63.8%) received an antibiotic therapy. In 88 cases, withdrawal of an ongoing treatment was documented. The most frequent reasons for withdrawal were: deterioration of general status (41.4%), inefficiency of therapy (25.7%), and explicit wish of patient (14.3%; multiple answers possible). Outcome of antimicrobial therapy was rated poor or very poor for a fifth of the cases and accordingly, antibiotics were more likely to be withdrawn if the clinical success was considered to be poor. The initiation of therapy was often decided by physicians solely, whereas withdrawing and withholding therapy demanded more often involvement of other team members in the decision-making process. The initiation of therapy seems to be easier than withdrawing and withholding, as involvement of other team members in the decision-making process was then sought more often. When antibiotics were given until death, the indication should be reconsidered because of a possibly undesirable prolongation of the dying process. Clinical practice may benefit from clear definitions of treatment goals and outcome criteria to better evaluate the necessity for and success of antimicrobial treatment."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00520-011-1084-1"],["dc.identifier.isi","000298356500014"],["dc.identifier.pmid","21274577"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/27343"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.relation.issn","0941-4355"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Klinik für Palliativmedizin"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.title","Antibiotics in palliative medicine-results from a prospective epidemiological investigation from the HOPE survey"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","46"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Der Schmerz"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","53"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","26"],["dc.contributor.author","Jansky, Maximiliane"],["dc.contributor.author","Lindena, Gabriele"],["dc.contributor.author","Nauck, F."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:13:44Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:13:44Z"],["dc.date.issued","2012"],["dc.description.abstract","A major goal of palliative care is sustaining quality of life (QoL) for patients suffering from severe symptoms, which is determined by physical and psychological consequences of an illness as well as other factors, such as the meaning of life and family support. Patients have reported high levels of QoL despite worsening symptoms. The self-estimated QoL of patients receiving outpatient and inpatient palliative care was analyzed using retrospective data from the German Hospice and Palliative Care Evaluation (HOPE). A descriptive analysis of questionnaires given to 2,030 patients (1,616 inpatients, 414 outpatients) and their professional care takers was carried out assessing symptoms, well-being and care-related information. At the beginning of treatment inpatients had a higher symptom burden than outpatients. Reduced pain, tiredness and weakness and improved well-being allowed inpatients to be discharged. Outpatients suffering from severe dyspnea, constipation and anxiety were more likely to be admitted to hospital. Well-being was associated with symptom burden, weakness and tiredness in both self-evaluation and care-taker assessment particularly for outpatients. While tiredness and weakness influenced QoL especially for outpatients, patient-specific factors may surpass them in patient perception. To improve the QoL of palliative care patients, individual factors must be assessed in addition to symptom control."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00482-011-1119-z"],["dc.identifier.isi","000300773400007"],["dc.identifier.pmid","22138730"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/27238"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Springer"],["dc.relation.issn","0932-433X"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Klinik für Palliativmedizin"],["dc.title","Well-being of patients receiving specialized palliative care at home or in hospital"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]