Options
Emele, Matthias Frederik
Loading...
Preferred name
Emele, Matthias Frederik
Official Name
Emele, Matthias Frederik
Alternative Name
Emele, M. F.
Emele, Matthias
Emele, Matthias F.
Emele, M.
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
2019Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","2087"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Frontiers in Microbiology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","10"],["dc.contributor.author","Emele, Matthias F."],["dc.contributor.author","Joppe, Felix M."],["dc.contributor.author","Riedel, Thomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Overmann, Jörg"],["dc.contributor.author","Rupnik, Maja"],["dc.contributor.author","Cooper, Paul"],["dc.contributor.author","Kusumawati, R. Lia"],["dc.contributor.author","Berger, Fabian K."],["dc.contributor.author","Laukien, Friederike"],["dc.contributor.author","Zimmermann, Ortrud"],["dc.contributor.author","Bohne, Wolfgang"],["dc.contributor.author","Groß, Uwe"],["dc.contributor.author","Bader, Oliver"],["dc.contributor.author","Zautner, Andreas E."],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-09-24T08:07:22Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-09-24T08:07:22Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.description.abstract","Clostridioides difficile, a Gram-positive spore-forming bacterium, is the leading cause of nosocomial diarrhea worldwide and therefore a substantial burden to the healthcare system. During the past decade, hypervirulent PCR-ribotypes (RT) e.g., RT027 or RT176 emerged rapidly all over the world, associated with both, increased severity and mortality rates. It is thus of great importance to identify epidemic strains such as RT027 and RT176 as fast as possible. While commonly used diagnostic methods, e.g., multilocus sequence typing (MLST) or PCR-ribotyping, are time-consuming, proteotyping offers a fast, inexpensive, and reliable alternative solution. In this study, we established a MALDI-TOF-based typing scheme for C. difficile. A total of 109 ribotyped strains representative for five MLST clades were analyzed by MALDI-TOF. MLST, based on whole genome sequences, and PCR-ribotyping were used as reference methods. Isoforms of MS-detectable biomarkers, typically ribosomal proteins, were related with the deduced amino acid sequences and added to the C. difficile proteotyping scheme. In total, we were able to associate nine biomarkers with their encoding genes and include them in our proteotyping scheme. The discriminatory capacity of the C. difficile proteotyping scheme was mainly based on isoforms of L28-M (2 main isoforms), L35-M (4 main isoforms), and S20-M (2 main isoforms) giving rise to at least 16 proteotyping-derived types. In our test population, five of these 16 proteotyping-derived types were detected. These five proteotyping-derived types did not correspond exactly to the included five MLST-based C. difficile clades, nevertheless the subtyping depth of both methods was equivalent. Most importantly, proteotyping-derived clade B contained only isolates of the hypervirulent RT027 and RT176. Proteotyping is a stable and easy-to-perform intraspecies typing method and a promising alternative to currently used molecular techniques. It is possible to distinguish the group of RT027 and RT176 isolates from non-RT027/non-RT176 isolates using proteotyping, providing a valuable diagnostic tool."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3389/fmicb.2019.02087"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/16398"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/62451"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.relation.issn","1664-302X"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"],["dc.title","Proteotyping of Clostridioides difficile as Alternate Typing Method to Ribotyping Is Able to Distinguish the Ribotypes RT027 and RT176 From Other Ribotypes"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI2019Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","European Journal of Microbiology and Immunology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","10"],["dc.contributor.author","Emele, Matthias F."],["dc.contributor.author","Karg, Matti"],["dc.contributor.author","Hotzel, Helmut"],["dc.contributor.author","Graaf-van Bloois, Linda"],["dc.contributor.author","Groß, Uwe"],["dc.contributor.author","Bader, Oliver"],["dc.contributor.author","Zautner, Andreas E."],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-09T11:51:43Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-09T11:51:43Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.description.abstract","ampylobacter fetus is a causative agent of intestinal illness and, occasionally, severe systemic infections and meningitis. C. fetus currently comprises three subspecies: C. fetus subspecies fetus (Cff), C. fetus subspecies venerealis (Cfv), and C. fetus subspecies testudinum (Cft). Cff and Cfv are primarily associated with mammals whereas Cft is associated with reptiles. To offer an alternative to laborious sequence-based techniques such as multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-ribotyping for this species, the purpose of the study was to develop a typing scheme based on proteotyping. In total, 41 representative C. fetus strains were analyzed by intact cell mass spectrometry and compared to MLST results. Biomarkers detected in the mass spectrum of C. fetus subsp. fetus reference strain LMG 6442 (NCTC 10842) as well as corresponding isoforms were associated with the respective amino acid sequences and added to the C. fetus proteotyping scheme. In combination, the 9 identified biomarkers allow the differentiation of Cft subspecies strains from Cff and Cfv subspecies strains. Biomarkers to distinguish between Cff and Cfv were not found. The results of the study show the potential of proteotyping to differentiate different subspecies, but also the limitations of the method."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1556/1886.2019.00006"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/16175"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/59994"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.relation.issn","2062-8633"],["dc.rights","CC BY-NC 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0"],["dc.subject.ddc","610"],["dc.title","Differentiation of Campylobacter fetus subspecies by proteotyping"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI2019Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","4244"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Scientific Reports"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","9"],["dc.contributor.author","Emele, Matthias Frederik"],["dc.contributor.author","Možina, Sonja Smole"],["dc.contributor.author","Lugert, Raimond"],["dc.contributor.author","Bohne, Wolfgang"],["dc.contributor.author","Masanta, Wycliffe Omurwa"],["dc.contributor.author","Riedel, Thomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Groß, Uwe"],["dc.contributor.author","Bader, Oliver"],["dc.contributor.author","Zautner, Andreas Erich"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-09T11:50:14Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-09T11:50:14Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.description.abstract","Besides Campylobacter jejuni, Campylobacter coli is the most common bacterial cause of gastroenteritis worldwide. C. coli is subdivided into three clades, which are associated with sample source. Clade 1 isolates are associated with acute diarrhea in humans whereas clade 2 and 3 isolates are more commonly obtained from environmental waters. The phylogenetic classification of an isolate is commonly done using laborious multilocus sequence typing (MLST). The aim of this study was to establish a proteotyping scheme using MALDI-TOF MS to offer an alternative to sequence-based methods. A total of 97 clade-representative C. coli isolates were analyzed by MALDI-TOF-based intact cell mass spectrometry (ICMS) and evaluated to establish a C. coli proteotyping scheme. MLST was used as reference method. Different isoforms of the detectable biomarkers, resulting in biomarker mass shifts, were associated with their amino acid sequences and included into the C. coli proteotyping scheme. In total, we identified 16 biomarkers to differentiate C. coli into the three clades and three additional sub-clades of clade 1. In this study, proteotyping has been successfully adapted to C. coli. The established C. coli clades and sub-clades can be discriminated using this method. Especially the clinically relevant clade 1 isolates can be differentiated clearly."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1038/s41598-019-40842-w"],["dc.identifier.pmid","30862911"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/15886"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/59727"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.relation.issn","2045-2322"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"],["dc.subject.ddc","610"],["dc.title","Proteotyping as alternate typing method to differentiate Campylobacter coli clades"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI PMID PMC2017Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","1210"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Frontiers in Microbiology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","8"],["dc.contributor.author","Zautner, Andreas Erich"],["dc.contributor.author","Groß, Uwe"],["dc.contributor.author","Emele, Matthias F"],["dc.contributor.author","Hagen, Ralf Matthias"],["dc.contributor.author","Frickmann, Hagen"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-10-09T07:38:10Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-10-09T07:38:10Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.description.abstract","Modern molecular diagnostic approaches in the diagnostic microbiological laboratory like real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) have led to a considerable increase of diagnostic sensitivity. They usually outperform the diagnostic sensitivity of culture-based approaches. Culture-based diagnostics were found to be insufficiently sensitive for the assessment of the composition of biofilms in chronic wounds and poorly standardized for screenings for enteric colonization with multi-drug resistant bacteria. However, the increased sensitivity of qPCR causes interpretative challenges regarding the attribution of etiological relevance to individual pathogen species in case of multiple detections of facultative pathogenic microorganisms in primarily non-sterile sample materials. This is particularly the case in high-endemicity settings, where continuous exposition to respective microorganisms leads to immunological adaptation and semi-resistance while considerable disease would result in case of exposition of a non-adapted population. While biofilms in chronic wounds show higher pathogenic potential in case of multi-species composition, detection of multiple pathogens in respiratory samples is much more difficult to interpret and asymptomatic enteric colonization with facultative pathogenic microorganisms is frequently observed in high endemicity settings. For respiratory samples and stool samples, cycle-threshold-value-based semi-quantitative interpretation of qPCR results has been suggested. Etiological relevance is assumed if cycle-threshold values are low, suggesting high pathogen loads. Although the procedure is challenged by lacking standardization and methodical issues, first evaluations have led to promising results. Future studies should aim at generally acceptable quantitative cut-off values to allow discrimination of asymptomatic colonization from clinically relevant infection."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2017"],["dc.fs.pkfprnr","78017"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3389/fmicb.2017.01210"],["dc.identifier.fs","632158"],["dc.identifier.pmid","28706515"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/14581"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/15897"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"],["dc.title","More Pathogenicity or Just More Pathogens? - On the Interpretation Problem of Multiple Pathogen Detections with Diagnostic Multiplex Assays"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI PMID PMC