Klaus, Felix

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","14"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Agriculture & Food Security"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","3"],["dc.contributor.author","Klatt, Björn K."],["dc.contributor.author","Klaus, Felix"],["dc.contributor.author","Westphal, Catrin"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:54:49Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:54:49Z"],["dc.date.issued","2014"],["dc.description.abstract","Background: Globally, high amounts of food are wasted due to insufficient quality and decay. Although pollinationhas been shown to increase crop quality, a possible impact on shelf life has not been quantitatively studied.Results: We tested how shelf life, represented by fruit decay, firmness and weight, changes as a function of pollinationlimitation in two European, commercially important strawberry varieties. Pollination limitation resulted in lower amountsof deformed fruits. Whereas 65% of wind-pollinated fruits were deformed, open pollination resulted in only 20% deformedfruits. During storage, the proportion of decayed fruits increased in relation to the degree of deformation. In the varietyYamaska, 80% of the fruits with high degrees of deformation decayed after four days, whereas in the variety Sonata, allhighly deformed fruits had already decayed after three days. Fruit weight decreased independent from thedegree of deformation. However, strongest deformations resulted in a generally lower fruit weight in Sonata,whereas in Yamaska, also medium deformed fruits had a lower weight than highly deformed fruits. Effects ofdeformation on firmness declines were mostly variety dependent. Whereas firmness declined similarly for alldegrees of deformation for Yamaska, highly deformed fruits lost firmness fastest in Sonata.Conclusions: Our results suggest that crop pollination has the potential to reduce food loss and waste inpollinated crops and thus to contribute to global food security. However, this relationship between pollinationand food waste has so far been almost completely ignored. Future pollination research should therefore focusnot only on yield effects but also on crop quality. A more comprehensive understanding of how pollinationcan benefit global food security should lead to a more efficient crop production to help meeting future fooddemands."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1186/2048-7010-3-14"],["dc.identifier.gro","3150120"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/10986"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6849"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.relation.issn","2048-7010"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"],["dc.subject","Decay, Deformation, Food loss, Food waste, Fruit quality, Pollination limitation"],["dc.title","Enhancing crop shelf life with pollination"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","e01474"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Global Ecology and Conservation"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","26"],["dc.contributor.author","Klaus, Felix"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.author","Uhler, Johannes"],["dc.contributor.author","Grass, Ingo"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-06-01T09:41:19Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-06-01T09:41:19Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.description.sponsorship","Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2021"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01474"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/84882"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-425"],["dc.relation.issn","2351-9894"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Abteilung Pflanzenbau"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.title","Calcareous grassland fragments as sources of bee pollinators for the surrounding agricultural landscape"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","668"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","4"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Ecology Letters"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","675"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","24"],["dc.contributor.author","Klaus, Felix"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.author","Bischoff, Gabriela"],["dc.contributor.author","Grass, Ingo"],["dc.contributor.editor","Irwin, Rebecca"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-04-14T08:30:04Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-04-14T08:30:04Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.description.abstract","Abstract Pollinator declines in agricultural landscapes are driven by multiple stressors, but potential interactions of these remain poorly studied. Using a highly replicated semi‐field study with 56 mesocosms of varying wild plant diversity (2–16 species) and oilseed rape treated with a neonicotinoid, we tested the interacting effects of resource diversity and insecticides on reproduction of a solitary wild bee. Compared to mesocosms with oilseed rape monocultures, availability of resources from wild plants complementing oilseed rape doubled brood cell production. In addition, bee reproduction increased due to plant diversity and identity effects. Exposure to neonicotinoid‐treated oilseed rape reduced bee larval to adult development by 69%, but only in mesocosms with oilseed rape monocultures. Availability of complementary flower resources can thus offset negative effects of neonicotinoid‐treated oilseed rape on wild bee reproduction. Policy should encourage the implementation of diverse floral resources mitigating negative effects of crop monocultures and insecticides, thereby sustaining solitary bee populations in agricultural landscapes."],["dc.description.abstract","Pollinator declines in agricultural landscapes are driven by multiple stressors, but potential interactions of these remain poorly studied. Using a semi‐field study, we tested the interacting effects of resource diversity and insecticides on solitary bee reproduction, which increased with wild flowers complementing oilseed rape and was driven by plant diversity and identity effects. Neonicotinoid exposure negatively affected bee reproduction only in oilseed rape monocultures suggesting that complementary floral resources can mitigate insecticide effects. Policy should therefore encourage the implementation of diverse floral resources to sustain solitary bee populations in agricultural landscapes. image"],["dc.description.sponsorship","German Research Association (DFG) Research Training Group 1644 \"Scaling Problems in Statistics\""],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/ele.13683"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/83092"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-399"],["dc.relation.eissn","1461-0248"],["dc.relation.issn","1461-023X"],["dc.rights","This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited."],["dc.title","Floral resource diversification promotes solitary bee reproduction and may offset insecticide effects – evidence from a semi‐field experiment"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","262"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","People and Nature"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","272"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","1"],["dc.contributor.author","Grass, Ingo"],["dc.contributor.author","Loos, Jacqueline"],["dc.contributor.author","Bänsch, Svenja"],["dc.contributor.author","Batáry, Péter"],["dc.contributor.author","Librán‐Embid, Felipe"],["dc.contributor.author","Ficiciyan, Anoush"],["dc.contributor.author","Klaus, Felix"],["dc.contributor.author","Rosa, Julia"],["dc.contributor.author","Tiede, Julia"],["dc.contributor.author","Udy, Kristy"],["dc.contributor.author","Westphal, Catrin"],["dc.contributor.author","Wurz, Annemarie"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.author","Riechers, Maraja"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-23T07:07:34Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-23T07:07:34Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.description.abstract","1. The land-sharing versus land-sparing debate recently stagnated, lacking an integrating perspective in agricultural landscapes as well as consideration of ecosystem services. Here, we argue that land-sharing (i.e. wildlife-friendly farming systems) and land-sparing (i.e. separation of high-yielding agriculture and natural habitats) are not mutually exclusive, as both are needed to balance management needs for the multifunctionality of agricultural landscapes. 2. Land-sharing promotes ecosystem services in agricultural settings, thereby allowing for environmentally friendly production. Land set aside in protected areas by land-sparing is crucial for conservation of those species that are incompatible with agriculture. 3. Importantly, as species move throughout the landscape and exploit different habitats, increased connectivity between environmentally friendly managed and protected areas is needed to (a) promote spillover of ecosystem service providers from land-sharing/-sparing measures to agricultural production and rescue service providing species from extinction in hostile areas, (b) to facilitate immigration and counteract possible extinctions in spared habitats and (c) to conserve response diversity of species communities for ensuring resilience of ecosystem services in changing environments. 4. In conclusion, the successful management of multifunctional landscapes requires the combination of context-specific land-sharing and land-sparing measures within spatially well-connected landscape mosaics, resulting in land-sharing/-sparing connectivity landscapes."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002347"],["dc.description.sponsorship","Volkswagenstiftung‐MWK Niedersachsen http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001663"],["dc.description.sponsorship","Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100007636"],["dc.description.sponsorship","Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001659"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1002/pan3.21"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/16785"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/61861"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.relation.issn","2575-8314"],["dc.relation.issn","2575-8314"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Zentrum für Biodiversität und Nachhaltige Landnutzung"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.title","Land‐sharing/‐sparing connectivity landscapes for ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","139204"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Science of The Total Environment"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","732"],["dc.contributor.author","Librán-Embid, Felipe"],["dc.contributor.author","Klaus, Felix"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.author","Grass, Ingo"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-04-14T08:24:33Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-04-14T08:24:33Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139204"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/81330"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-399"],["dc.relation.issn","0048-9697"],["dc.title","Unmanned aerial vehicles for biodiversity-friendly agricultural landscapes - A systematic review"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]