Kovács-Hostyánszki, Anikó

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","330"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Bird Study"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","337"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","58"],["dc.contributor.author","Kovacs-Hostyanszki, Aniko"],["dc.contributor.author","Batary, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Peach, Will J."],["dc.contributor.author","Baldi, Andras"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:00:19Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:00:19Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.description.abstract","Capsule Despite negative effects of inorganic fertilizer on weeds and invertebrates in cereal fields, impacts on bird usage were weak and non-linear. Aim To assess the effects of inorganic fertilizer application to winter cereals on breeding-season usage by farmland birds. Methods We measured bird usage of winter-sown cereal fields across a gradient of inorganic fertilizer inputs and tested for influences of management intensity and availability of semi-natural habitat on species richness and abundance of farmland birds. Results Avian species richness and bird abundance were unrelated to fertilizer inputs, and declined at higher levels of total vegetation cover. Sky Lark abundance increased, while Yellow Wagtail counts declined with the extent of semi-natural habitat. Sky Lark abundance increased with vegetation cover and peaked at an intermediate level of weed species richness. Yellow Wagtail counts peaked at intermediate levels of fertilizer inputs. Conclusions Compared with much of western Europe, cereal production in central Hungary is characterized by modest fertilizer inputs and large areas of semi-natural habitat. There was little evidence that increased applications of fertilizer are likely to have negative impacts on farmland birds, although increased application might reduce habitat suitability for Yellow Wagtails. Loss of semi-natural habitat is likely to have negative impacts on Sky Larks."],["dc.description.sponsorship","EASY [QLK5-CT-2002-01495]; Faunagenesis project [NKFP 3B023-04]"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1080/00063657.2011.582853"],["dc.identifier.isi","000295732100011"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/24125"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Taylor & Francis Ltd"],["dc.relation.issn","0006-3657"],["dc.title","Effects of fertilizer application on summer usage of cereal fields by farmland birds in central Hungary"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1938"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","8"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Ecological Applications"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1946"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","23"],["dc.contributor.author","Kovács-Hostyánszki, Anikó"],["dc.contributor.author","Haenke, Sebastian"],["dc.contributor.author","Batáry, Péter"],["dc.contributor.author","Jauker, Birgit"],["dc.contributor.author","Báldi, András"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.author","Holzschuh, Andrea"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:53:55Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:53:55Z"],["dc.date.issued","2013"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1890/12-2012.1"],["dc.identifier.gro","3150014"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6735"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.relation.issn","1051-0761"],["dc.title","Contrasting effects of mass-flowering crops on bee pollination of hedge plants at different spatial and temporal scales"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","722"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","6"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Diversity and Distributions"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","730"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","21"],["dc.contributor.author","Sutcliffe, Laura M. E."],["dc.contributor.author","Batáry, Péter"],["dc.contributor.author","Kormann, Urs G."],["dc.contributor.author","Báldi, András"],["dc.contributor.author","Dicks, Lynn V."],["dc.contributor.author","Herzon, Irina"],["dc.contributor.author","Kleijn, David"],["dc.contributor.author","Tryjanowski, Piotr"],["dc.contributor.author","Apostolova, Iva"],["dc.contributor.author","Arlettaz, Raphael"],["dc.contributor.author","Aunins, Ainars"],["dc.contributor.author","Aviron, Stéphanie"],["dc.contributor.author","Baležentienė, Ligita"],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, Christina"],["dc.contributor.author","Halada, Lubos"],["dc.contributor.author","Hartel, Tibor"],["dc.contributor.author","Helm, Aveliina"],["dc.contributor.author","Hristov, Iordan"],["dc.contributor.author","Jelaska, Sven D."],["dc.contributor.author","Kaligarič, Mitja"],["dc.contributor.author","Kamp, Johannes"],["dc.contributor.author","Klimek, Sebastian"],["dc.contributor.author","Koorberg, Pille"],["dc.contributor.author","Kostiuková, Jarmila"],["dc.contributor.author","Kovács-Hostyánszki, Anikó"],["dc.contributor.author","Kuemmerle, Tobias"],["dc.contributor.author","Leuschner, Christoph"],["dc.contributor.author","Lindborg, Regina"],["dc.contributor.author","Loos, Jacqueline"],["dc.contributor.author","Maccherini, Simona"],["dc.contributor.author","Marja, Riho"],["dc.contributor.author","Máthé, Orsolya"],["dc.contributor.author","Paulini, Inge"],["dc.contributor.author","Proença, Vânia"],["dc.contributor.author","Rey Benayas, José M."],["dc.contributor.author","Sans, F. Xavier"],["dc.contributor.author","Seifert, Charlotte"],["dc.contributor.author","Stalenga, Jarosław"],["dc.contributor.author","Timaeus, Johannes"],["dc.contributor.author","Török, Péter"],["dc.contributor.author","van Swaay, Chris"],["dc.contributor.author","Viik, Eneli"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.editor","Kühn, Ingolf"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:54:49Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:54:49Z"],["dc.date.issued","2014"],["dc.description.abstract","A large proportion of European biodiversity today depends on habitat provided by low-intensity farming practices, yet this resource is declining as European agriculture intensifies. Within the European Union, particularly the central and eastern new member states have retained relatively large areas of species-rich farmland, but despite increased investment in nature conservation here in recent years, farmland biodiversity trends appear to be worsening. Although the high biodiversity value of Central and Eastern European farmland has long been reported, the amount of research in the international literature focused on farmland biodiversity in this region remains comparatively tiny, and measures within the EU Common Agricultural Policy are relatively poorly adapted to support it. In this opinion study, we argue that, 10 years after the accession of the first eastern EU new member states, the continued under-representation of the low-intensity farmland in Central and Eastern Europe in the international literature and EU policy is impeding the development of sound, evidence-based conservation interventions. The biodiversity benefits for Europe of existing low-intensity farmland, particularly in the central and eastern states, should be harnessed before they are lost. Instead of waiting for species-rich farmland to further decline, targeted research and monitoring to create locally appropriate conservation strategies for these habitats is needed now."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/ddi.12288"],["dc.identifier.gro","3150100"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/11674"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6830"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.issn","1366-9516"],["dc.rights","CC BY-NC-ND 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0"],["dc.title","Harnessing the biodiversity value of Central and Eastern European farmland"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","296"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3-4"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","301"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","141"],["dc.contributor.author","Kovacs-Hostyanszki, Aniko"],["dc.contributor.author","Korosi, Adam"],["dc.contributor.author","Orci, Kirill Mark"],["dc.contributor.author","Batary, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Baldi, Andras"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:56:17Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:56:17Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.description.abstract","The area of non-cropped habitats has been decreasing in Europe largely due to land conversion into cropland and energy crops. In Hungary, special agri-environment schemes in Environmentally Sensitive Areas require the establishment of sown set-aside fields especially for endangered bird species. We tested if these set-aside fields are beneficial for plants and insects of agricultural landscapes. We compared the herbaceous flora, grasshopper (Orthoptera), bee (Apidae) and butterfly (Rhopalocera) fauna of five field types (1, 2 and 3 year-old set-aside, winter cereal fields and semi-natural grasslands). Species richness, abundance and species composition of insects were tested against field type and plant species richness. The wheat fields were the poorest habitats for all taxa. The species richness and abundance of the studied insects were usually higher in set-aside than in cereal fields with no significant difference between set-aside of different age. We found the highest number of orthopteran species and butterfly individuals in semi-natural grasslands. At community level, field type and plant species richness had a significant effect on orthopteran assemblages. Butterfly assemblages were significantly affected by field type. Bee assemblages were not significantly related to the above variables. We can conclude that set-aside fields provide important habitat patches for plants and insects, in some cases with similar value to semi-natural grasslands. Our results emphasise the importance of set-aside within the Hungarian agri-environment scheme. Establishment of set-aside management in other Central European countries will likely to be of a similar value as the Hungarian set-aside fields. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Helmholtz Association [VH-NG-247]"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.agee.2011.03.004"],["dc.identifier.isi","000292534800005"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/23107"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Elsevier Science Bv"],["dc.relation.issn","0167-8809"],["dc.title","Set-aside promotes insect and plant diversity in a Central European country"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","505"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Applied Ecology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","513"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","51"],["dc.contributor.author","Haenke, Sebastian"],["dc.contributor.author","Kovács-Hostyánszki, Anikó"],["dc.contributor.author","Fründ, Jochen"],["dc.contributor.author","Batáry, Péter"],["dc.contributor.author","Jauker, Birgit"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.author","Holzschuh, Andrea"],["dc.contributor.editor","Osborne, Juliet"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:50:42Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:50:42Z"],["dc.date.issued","2014"],["dc.description.abstract","Human-dominated landscapes are characterized by a mosaic of natural and managed ecosystems, affecting arthropod communities on different spatial scales. Effective landscape management for functionally important organisms suffers from little understanding of organism spillover between semi-natural habitats and adjacent crops, and of how it is affected by the surrounding landscape. We examined syrphid abundance (Diptera: Syrphidae) in three types of linear semi-natural habitats, differing in connectedness to annual crops and forest [forest edges (n = 12), forest-connected hedges (n = 11) and isolated hedges (n = 12)], as well as in the adjacent oilseed rape or winter wheat fields (i.e. altogether n = 70 sites in 35 landscapes). The landscape circles with 1 km radius around the study sites differed in the proportion of oilseed rape (ranging from 0% to 35% oilseed rape) enabling us to test landscape-scale effects of oilseed rape. Aphidophagous syrphids were more abundant in forest-connected hedgerows than in forest edges (with isolated hedges being intermediate), and more abundant in crop fields adjacent to hedgerows than adjacent to forest edges, indicating spillover from semi-natural habitats to the adjacent crop fields. Aphidophagous syrphid abundance was higher in semi-natural habitats adjacent to oilseed rape fields than adjacent to wheat fields if the proportion of oilseed rape in the landscape was low (indicating local concentration). Synthesis and applications. This study highlights the potential of hedgerows to enhance the abundances of beneficial syrphids and their spillover to adjacent crop fields, especially when they are connected with forests. We provide evidence that this local exchange is moderated by the extent of mass-flowering crops in the surrounding landscapes due to local concentration. Therefore, measurements for the improvement in local biological functioning should be evaluated by simultaneously investigating local and regional aspects of crop configurations to allow for region-specific management recommendations. Increasing the total amount of hedgerows in the agricultural matrix under moderate landscape-scale proportions of mass-flowering crops may serve best for the conservation of biodiversity and augmentation of important ecosystem services such as biological control and pollination in landscapes dominated by agricultural cultivations."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/1365-2664.12221"],["dc.identifier.gro","3149873"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6580"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","public"],["dc.relation.issn","0021-8901"],["dc.title","Landscape configuration of crops and hedgerows drives local syrphid fly abundance"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Ecology Letters"],["dc.contributor.author","Martin, Emily A."],["dc.contributor.author","Dainese, Matteo"],["dc.contributor.author","Clough, Yann"],["dc.contributor.author","Báldi, András"],["dc.contributor.author","Bommarco, Riccardo"],["dc.contributor.author","Gagić, Vesna"],["dc.contributor.author","Garratt, Michael P. D."],["dc.contributor.author","Holzschuh, Andrea"],["dc.contributor.author","Kleijn, David"],["dc.contributor.author","Kovács-Hostyánszki, Anikó"],["dc.contributor.author","Marini, Lorenzo"],["dc.contributor.author","Potts, Simon G."],["dc.contributor.author","Smith, Henrik G."],["dc.contributor.author","Al Hassan, Diab"],["dc.contributor.author","Albrecht, Matthias"],["dc.contributor.author","Andersson, Georg K. S."],["dc.contributor.author","Asís, Josep D."],["dc.contributor.author","Aviron, Stéphanie"],["dc.contributor.author","Balzan, Mario V."],["dc.contributor.author","Baños‐Picón, Laura"],["dc.contributor.author","Bartomeus, Ignasi"],["dc.contributor.author","Batáry, Péter"],["dc.contributor.author","Burel, Francoise"],["dc.contributor.author","Caballero‐López, Berta"],["dc.contributor.author","Concepción, Elena D."],["dc.contributor.author","Coudrain, Valérie"],["dc.contributor.author","Dänhardt, Juliana"],["dc.contributor.author","Díaz, Mario"],["dc.contributor.author","Diekötter, Tim"],["dc.contributor.author","Dormann, Carsten F."],["dc.contributor.author","Duflot, Rémi"],["dc.contributor.author","Entling, Martin H."],["dc.contributor.author","Farwig, Nina"],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, Christina"],["dc.contributor.author","Frank, Thomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Garibaldi, Lucas A."],["dc.contributor.author","Hermann, John"],["dc.contributor.author","Herzog, Felix"],["dc.contributor.author","Inclán, Diego"],["dc.contributor.author","Jacot, Katja"],["dc.contributor.author","Jauker, Frank"],["dc.contributor.author","Jeanneret, Philippe"],["dc.contributor.author","Kaiser, Marina"],["dc.contributor.author","Krauß, Jochen"],["dc.contributor.author","Le Féon, Violette"],["dc.contributor.author","Marshall, Jon"],["dc.contributor.author","Moonen, Anna‐Camilla"],["dc.contributor.author","Moreno, Gerardo"],["dc.contributor.author","Riedinger, Verena"],["dc.contributor.author","Rundlöf, Maj"],["dc.contributor.author","Rusch, Adrien"],["dc.contributor.author","Scheper, Jeroen"],["dc.contributor.author","Schneider, Gudrun"],["dc.contributor.author","Schüepp, Christof"],["dc.contributor.author","Stutz, Sonja"],["dc.contributor.author","Sutter, Louis"],["dc.contributor.author","Tamburini, Giovanni"],["dc.contributor.author","Thies, Carsten"],["dc.contributor.author","Tormos, José"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.author","Tschumi, Matthias"],["dc.contributor.author","Uzman, Deniz"],["dc.contributor.author","Wagner, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Zubair‐Anjum, Muhammad"],["dc.contributor.author","Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf"],["dc.contributor.editor","Scherber, Christoph"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-23T07:13:21Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-23T07:13:21Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.description.abstract","Managing agricultural landscapes to support biodiversity and ecosystem services is a key aim of a sustainable agriculture. However, how the spatial arrangement of crop fields and other habitats in landscapes impacts arthropods and their functions is poorly known. Synthesising data from 49 studies (1515 landscapes) across Europe, we examined effects of landscape composition (% habitats) and configuration (edge density) on arthropods in fields and their margins, pest control, pollination and yields. Configuration effects interacted with the proportions of crop and non-crop habitats, and species' dietary, dispersal and overwintering traits led to contrasting responses to landscape variables. Overall, however, in landscapes with high edge density, 70% of pollinator and 44% of natural enemy species reached highest abundances and pollination and pest control improved 1.7-and 1.4-fold respectively. Arable-dominated landscapes with high edge densities achieved high yields. This suggests that enhancing edge density in European agroecosystems can promote functional biodiversity and yield-enhancing ecosystem services."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/ele.13265"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/61862"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.relation.issn","1461-023X"],["dc.relation.issn","1461-0248"],["dc.title","The interplay of landscape composition and configuration: new pathways to manage functional biodiversity and agroecosystem services across Europe"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","108255"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Biological Conservation"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","241"],["dc.contributor.author","Ekroos, Johan"],["dc.contributor.author","Kleijn, David"],["dc.contributor.author","Batáry, Péter"],["dc.contributor.author","Albrecht, Matthias"],["dc.contributor.author","Báldi, András"],["dc.contributor.author","Blüthgen, Nico"],["dc.contributor.author","Knop, Eva"],["dc.contributor.author","Kovács-Hostyánszki, Anikó"],["dc.contributor.author","Smith, Henrik G"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T14:22:37Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T14:22:37Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108255"],["dc.identifier.issn","0006-3207"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/71669"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","High land-use intensity in grasslands constrains wild bee species richness in Europe"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","155"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Community Ecology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","161"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","13"],["dc.contributor.author","Batáry, Péter"],["dc.contributor.author","Kovács-Hostyánszki, A."],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, C."],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.author","Holzschuh, Andrea"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:50:43Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:50:43Z"],["dc.date.issued","2012"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1556/comec.13.2012.2.4"],["dc.identifier.gro","3149884"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6592"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.relation.issn","1585-8553"],["dc.title","Contrasting effect of isolation of hedges from forests on farmland vs. woodland birds"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","40"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Applied Vegetation Science"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","48"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","14"],["dc.contributor.author","Kovacs-Hostyanszki, Aniko"],["dc.contributor.author","Batary, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Baldi, Andras"],["dc.contributor.author","Harnos, Andrea"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:59:41Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:59:41Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.description.abstract","Question: How do local and landscape management contribute to weed diversity in Hungarian winter cereal fields? Location: Central Hungary. Methods: Vascular plants were sampled in 18 winter cereal fields along an intensification gradient according to nitrogen fertilization, in the first cereal rows (edge) and in the interior part of the fields. Weed species were divided into groups according to their residence time in Central Europe (native species, archaeophytes, neophytes) and nitrogen preference (low to medium, LMNP, and high, HNP species). The percentage of semi-natural habitats was calculated in the 500 m radius circle. Effects of fertilizer use, transect position and semi-natural habitats were estimated by general linear mixed models. Results: We recorded 149 weed species. Fertilizer had a negative impact on the species richness of archaeophytes and LMNP species, and on the cover of native weeds. There was greater species richness and weed cover at the edge of the fields than in the centre. A higher percentage of seminatural habitats around the arable fields resulted in greater total species richness, especially of archaeophytes and LMNP species. We found an interaction between the percentage of semi-natural habitats and transect position for species richness of archaeophytes and LMNP species. Conclusions: Reduced use of fertilizers and a high percentage of semi-natural habitats would support native and archaeophyte weed diversity even in winter cereal fields, while large amounts of fertilizer may promote invasion of neophytes. However, the beneficial effect of the semi-natural habitats and greater species pool on the arable flora may prevail only in the crop edges."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/j.1654-109X.2010.01098.x"],["dc.identifier.isi","000286207100005"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/23962"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Wiley-blackwell"],["dc.relation.issn","1402-2001"],["dc.title","Interaction of local and landscape features in the conservation of Hungarian arable weed diversity"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","86"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Wildlife Biology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","94"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","22"],["dc.contributor.author","Schlinkert, Hella"],["dc.contributor.author","Ludwig, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Batáry, Péter"],["dc.contributor.author","Holzschuh, Andrea"],["dc.contributor.author","Kovács-Hostyánszki, Anikó"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, Christina"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:50:52Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:50:52Z"],["dc.date.issued","2016"],["dc.description.abstract","Agricultural intensification often leads to fragmentation of natural habitats, such as forests, and thereby negatively affects forest specialist species. However, human introduced habitats, such as hedges, may counteract negative effects of forest fragmentation and increase dispersal, particularly of forest specialists. We studied effects of habitat type (forest edge versus hedge) and hedge isolation from forests (connected versus isolated hedge) in agricultural landscapes on abundance, species richness and community composition of mice, voles and shrews in forest edges and hedges. Simultaneously to these effects of forest edge/hedge type we analysed impacts of habitat structure, namely percentage of bare ground and forest edge/hedge width, on abundance, species richness and community composition of small mammals. Total abundance and forest specialist abundance (both driven by the most abundant species Myodes glareolus, bank vole) were higher in forest edges than in hedges, while hedge isolation had no effect. In contrast, abundance of habitat generalists was higher in isolated compared to connected hedges, with no effect of habitat type (forest edge versus hedge). Species richness as well as abundance of the most abundant habitat generalist Sorex araneus (common shrew), were not affected by habitat type or hedge isolation. Decreasing percentage of bare ground and increasing forest edge/hedge width was associated with increased abundance of forest specialists, while habitat structure was unrelated to species richness or abundance of any other group. Community composition was driven by forest specialists, which exceeded habitat generalist abundance in forest edges and connected hedges, while abundances were similar to each other in isolated hedges. Our results show that small mammal forest specialists prefer forest edges as habitats over hedges, while habitat generalists are able to use unoccupied ecological niches in isolated hedges. Consequently even isolated hedges can be marginal habitats for forest specialists and habitat generalists and thereby may increase regional farmland biodiversity."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.2981/wlb.00176"],["dc.identifier.gro","3149943"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/14130"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6656"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","public"],["dc.relation.issn","0909-6396"],["dc.rights","CC BY-NC-ND 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0"],["dc.title","Forest specialist and generalist small mammals in forest edges and hedges"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]