Rand, Tatyana A.

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","e122"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","5"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","PLoS Biology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","6"],["dc.contributor.author","Tylianakis, Jason M."],["dc.contributor.author","Rand, Tatyana A."],["dc.contributor.author","Kahmen, Ansgar"],["dc.contributor.author","Klein, Alexandra-Maria"],["dc.contributor.author","Buchmann, Nina"],["dc.contributor.author","Perner, Jörg"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:53:49Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:53:49Z"],["dc.date.issued","2008"],["dc.description.abstract","Numerous recent studies have tested the effects of plant, pollinator, and predator diversity on primary productivity, pollination, and consumption, respectively. Many have shown a positive relationship, particularly in controlled experiments, but variability in results has emphasized the context-dependency of these relationships. Complementary resource use may lead to a positive relationship between diversity and these processes, but only when a diverse array of niches is available to be partitioned among species. Therefore, the slope of the diversity-function relationship may change across differing levels of heterogeneity, but empirical evaluations of this pattern are lacking. Here we examine three important functions/properties in different real world (i.e., nonexperimental) ecosystems: plant biomass in German grasslands, parasitism rates across five habitat types in coastal Ecuador, and coffee pollination in agroforestry systems in Indonesia. We use general linear and structural equation modeling to demonstrate that the effect of diversity on these processes is context dependent, such that the slope of this relationship increases in environments where limiting resources (soil nutrients, host insects, and coffee flowers, respectively) are spatially heterogeneous. These real world patterns, combined with previous experiments, suggest that biodiversity may have its greatest impact on the functioning of diverse, naturally heterogeneous ecosystems."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1371/journal.pbio.0060122"],["dc.identifier.gro","3149981"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/8444"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6699"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.issn","1545-7885"],["dc.rights","CC BY 2.5"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5"],["dc.title","Resource Heterogeneity Moderates the Biodiversity-Function Relationship in Real World Ecosystems"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","421"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","4"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Annales Zoologici Fennici"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","432"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","42"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.author","Rand, Tatyana A."],["dc.contributor.author","Bianchi, FJJA"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:56:44Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:56:44Z"],["dc.date.issued","2005"],["dc.description.abstract","Landscape structure influences local diversity and ecosystem processes, including cross-habitat fluxes of organisms coupling the dynamics of different habitats. The flow of organisms across system boundaries is known to occur between different natural habitats as well as across the crop-noncrop interface. Several studies show how field boundaries can enhance predator populations invading arable crops and controlling pest populations. However, generalist arthropods may also spill over from land-use systems to natural areas (mainly grassland) modifying interactions therein. A view of land-use systems as sources and natural habitats as sinks is consistent with the idea that the direction of the organisms' fluxes is from high to low productivity systems, while noncrop habitats are important sources for recolonization of arable fields after they are cleared for harvest. From the perspective of landscape management, enhancement of population exchanges between crop and noncrop areas may include beneficial as well as unwelcome interactions."],["dc.identifier.isi","000232236200011"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/50085"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Finnish Zoological Botanical Publishing Board"],["dc.publisher.place","Univ helsinki"],["dc.relation.conference","Workshop on Spatial Ecology of Insect-Plant Interactions"],["dc.relation.eventlocation","Univ Helsinki, Helsinki, FINLAND"],["dc.relation.issn","0003-455X"],["dc.title","The landscape context of trophic interactions: insect spillover across the crop-noncrop interface"],["dc.type","conference_paper"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","294"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Biological Control"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","309"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","43"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.author","Bommarco, Riccardo"],["dc.contributor.author","Clough, Yann"],["dc.contributor.author","Crist, Thomas O."],["dc.contributor.author","Kleijn, David"],["dc.contributor.author","Rand, Tatyana A."],["dc.contributor.author","Tylianakis, Jason M."],["dc.contributor.author","van Nouhuys, Saskya"],["dc.contributor.author","Vidal, Stefan"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:46:29Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:46:29Z"],["dc.date.issued","2007"],["dc.description.abstract","Conservation biological control in agroecosystems requires a landscape management perspective, because most arthropod species experience their habitat at spatial scales beyond the plot level, and there is spillover of natural enemies across the crop noncrop interface. The species pool in the surrounding landscape and the distance of crop from natural habitat are important for the conservation of enemy diversity and, in particular, the conservation of poorly-dispersing and specialized enemies. Hence, structurally complex landscapes with hi,gh habitat connectivity may enhance the probability of pest regulation. In contrast, generalist and highly vagile enemies may even A p rofit from the high primary productivity of crops at a landscape scale and their abundance may partly compensate for losses in enemy diversity. Conservation biological control also needs a multitrophic perspective. For example, entomopathogenic fungi, plant pathogens and endophytes as well as below- and above-ground microorganisms are known to influence pest-enemy interactions in ways that vary across spatiotemporal scales. Enemy distribution in agricultural landscapes is determined by beta diversity among patches. The diversity needed for conservation biological control may occur where patch heterogeneity at larger spatial scales is high. However, enemy communities in managed systems are more similar across space and time than those in natural systems, emphasizing the importance of natural habitat for a spillover of diverse enemies. According to the insurance hypothesis, species richness can buffer against spatiotemporal disturbances, thereby insuring functioning in changing environments. Seemingly redundant enemy species may become important under global change. Complex landscapes characterized by highly connected crop-noncrop mosaics may be best for long-term conservation biological control and sustainable crop production, but experimental evidence for detailed recommendations to design the composition and configuration of agricultural landscapes that maintain a diversity of generalist and specialist natural enemies is still needed. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.biocontrol.2007.08.006"],["dc.identifier.isi","000251441800007"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/47757"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Academic Press Inc Elsevier Science"],["dc.relation.issn","1049-9644"],["dc.title","Conservation biological control and enemy diversity on a landscape scale"],["dc.type","review"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1720"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","6"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Conservation Biology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1729"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","20"],["dc.contributor.author","Rand, Tatyana A."],["dc.contributor.author","Louda, Svata A."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:52:30Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:52:30Z"],["dc.date.issued","2006"],["dc.description.abstract","Habitat loss and f\\ragmentation can have strong negative impacts on populations of some native species. Spillover of generalist natural enemies from the surrounding landscape matrix is one mechanism potentially generating such effects, yet this has been rarely studied in insects. We examined the influence of habitat conversion to agriculture on the abundance and potential effects of predatory coccinellid beetles on native insect herbivores within 12 grassland remnants in central Nebraska (U.S.A.). Results of sweep sampling revealed that coccinellids were three to six times more abundant at native grassland sites embedded within cropland-dominated landscapes compared with control sites in grassland-dominated landscapes over the 3 years of the study. Exclusion experiments further demonstrated that predation intensity was strongly related to coccinellid abundances across sites and that coccinellids can dramatically reduce densities of a native aphid herbivore. In contrast to studies of specialized insect parasitoids, which have generally found reduced enemy pressure in fragmented landscapes, our results suggest that native herbivores may in some cases experience increased consumer pressure in landscapes with increasing habitat loss because of spillover of generalist predators from surrounding cropland habitats."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00507.x"],["dc.identifier.isi","000242724500022"],["dc.identifier.pmid","17181807"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/22180"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Blackwell Publishing"],["dc.relation.issn","0888-8892"],["dc.title","Spillover of agriculturally subsidized predators as a potential threat to native insect herbivores in fragmented landscapes"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","2046"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","7"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Ecology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","2052"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","85"],["dc.contributor.author","Rand, Tatyana A."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:47:33Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:47:33Z"],["dc.date.issued","2004"],["dc.description.abstract","Herbivore impacts on plants are predicted to be greatest in competitive and stressful environments. Plant neighbors can exert strong facilitative as well as competitive effects, however, and facilitation is often mediated through the reduction of environmental stresses. Thus, neighbors may simultaneously increase plant compensation for herbivory, by reducing environmental stress, and reduce compensation by competing for resources. To determine whether aboveground competition and facilitation influence the ability of an annual forb, Atriplex patula var. hastata, to compensate for herbivory, I performed a field experiment in which the presence of insect herbivores and plant neighbors were manipulated in a factorial design. The, neighbor treatments included removal of dominant rushes (cleared), rushes left intact (vegetated), and rush removal, plus reduction of environmental stress by shading of the soil surface (buffered). In cleared treatments, herbivory reduced survival by almost 50% and reproduction by 37%. In contrast herbivory had no significant effects on plant survival or reproductive output in buffered treatments. Thus, facilitation through soil shading increased plant compensation for herbivory. However, herbivores also strongly reduced fruit production (45%) in vegetated treatments, suggesting that competition magnifies herbivore impacts. The results demonstrate that neighboring plants can simultaneously increase and decrease plant tolerance to herbivory."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1890/03-3087"],["dc.identifier.isi","000223113500036"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/47989"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Ecological Soc Amer"],["dc.relation.issn","0012-9658"],["dc.title","Competition, facilitation, and compensation for insect herbivory in an annual salt marsh forb"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","253"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Biological Control"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","264"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","35"],["dc.contributor.author","Louda, Svata M."],["dc.contributor.author","Rand, Tatyana A."],["dc.contributor.author","Russell, F. L."],["dc.contributor.author","Arnett, A. E."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:53:43Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:53:43Z"],["dc.date.issued","2005"],["dc.description.abstract","Prediction of the outcomes of natural enemy introductions remains the most fundamental challenge in biological control. Quantitative retrospective analyses of ongoing biocontrol. projects provide a systematic strategy to evaluate and further develop ecological risk assessment. In this review, we highlight a crucial assumption underlying a continued reliance on the host specificity paradigm as a quantitative prediction of ecological risk, summarize the status of our retrospective analyses of nontarget effects of two weevils used against exotic thistles in North America, and discuss our prospective assessment of risk to a federally listed, threatened species (Cirsium pitcheri) based on those studies. Our analyses quantify the fact that host range and preference from host specificity tests are not sufficient to predict ecological impact if the introduced natural enemy is not strictly monophagous. The implicit assumption when such use is made of the host specificity data in risk assessment is that population impacts are proportional to relative preference and performance, the key components of host specificity. However, in concert with shifting awareness in the field, our studies demonstrate that the environment influences and can alter host use and population growth, leading to higher than expected direct impacts on the less preferred native host species at several spatial scales. Further, we have found that straightforward, easily anticipated indirect effects, on intraguild foragers as well as on the less preferred native host plant species, can be both widespread and significant. We conclude that intensive retrospective ecological studies provide some guidance for the quantitative prospective studies needed to assess candidate biological control agent dynamics and impacts and, so, contribute to improved rigor in the evaluation of total ecological risk to native species. (c) 2005 Published by Elsevier Inc."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.biocontrol.2005.07.022"],["dc.identifier.isi","000233616800009"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/49408"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Academic Press Inc Elsevier Science"],["dc.publisher.place","San diego"],["dc.relation.conference","Conference on Science and Decision Making in Biological Control of Weeds"],["dc.relation.eventlocation","Denver, CO"],["dc.relation.issn","1049-9644"],["dc.title","Assessment of ecological risks in weed biocontrol: Input from retrospective ecological analyses"],["dc.type","conference_paper"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","238"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Biological Control"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","253"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","45"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.author","Bommarco, Riccardo"],["dc.contributor.author","Clough, Yann"],["dc.contributor.author","Crist, Thomas O."],["dc.contributor.author","Kleijn, David"],["dc.contributor.author","Rand, Tatyana A."],["dc.contributor.author","Tylianakis, Jason M."],["dc.contributor.author","van Nouhuys, Saskya"],["dc.contributor.author","Vidal, Stefan"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T11:15:21Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T11:15:21Z"],["dc.date.issued","2008"],["dc.description.abstract","Conservation biological control in agroecosystems requires a landscape management perspective, because most arthropod species experience their habitat at spatial scales beyond the plot level, and there is spillover of natural enemies across the crop-noncrop interface. The species pool in the surrounding landscape and the distance of crop from natural habitat are important for the conservation of enemy diversity and, in particular, the conservation of poorly-dispersing and specialized enemies. Hence, structurally complex landscapes with high habitat connectivity may enhance the probability of pest regulation. In contrast, generalist and highly vagile enemies may even profit from the high primary productivity of crops at a landscape scale and their abundance may partly compensate for losses in enemy diversity. Conservation biological control also needs a multitrophic perspective. For example, entomopathogenic fungi, plant pathogens and endophytes as well as below- and above-ground microorganisms are known to influence pest-enemy interactions in ways that vary across spatiotemporal scales. Enemy distribution in agricultural landscapes is determined by beta diversity among patches. The diversity needed for conservation biological control may occur where patch heterogeneity at larger spatial scales is high. However, enemy communities in managed systems are more similar across space and time than those in natural systems, emphasizing the importance of natural habitat for a spillover of diverse enemies. According to the insurance hypothesis, species richness can buffer against spatiotemporal disturbances, thereby insuring functioning in changing environments. Seemingly redundant enemy species may become important under global change. Complex landscapes characterized by highly connected crop-noncrop mosaics may be best for long-term conservation biological control and sustainable crop production, but experimental evidence for detailed recommendations to design the composition and configuration of agricultural landscapes that maintain a diversity of generalist and specialist natural enemies is still needed. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/S1049-9644(08)00082-0"],["dc.identifier.isi","000255522700008"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/54346"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Academic Press Inc Elsevier Science"],["dc.relation.issn","1049-9644"],["dc.title","Conservation biological control and enemy diversity on a landscape scale (Reprinted from Biol. Control, vol 43, pg 294-309, 2007)"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","877"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Ecological Applications"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","890"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","16"],["dc.contributor.author","Rand, Tatyana A."],["dc.contributor.author","Louda, Svata M."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:44:31Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:44:31Z"],["dc.date.issued","2006"],["dc.description.abstract","Studies of biogeographic variation in species abundances are fundamental to understanding and predicting the impacts of invasive exotic species. We quantified the abundance of the introduced and now invasive biocontrol weevil, Rhinocyllus conicus, on a newly adopted native host plant, Cirsium canescens (Platte thistle), across the plant's distributional range. We used regression and structural equation analyses to examine variation in weevil abundance at 92-108 sites over three years in relation to variation in abiotic and biotic parameters hypothesized to be important in insect or plant dynamics and distribution. We found that R. conicus now occurs throughout the-majority of the range of C. canescens, even in the center of the native plant's distribution where its coevolved, targeted weed host (Carduus nutans, musk thistle) is absent. In fact, weevil densities were greater in the center of the native plant's distribution in. the Sand Hills formation than in peripheral sand patches closer to areas where the targeted exotic thistle is common. None of the macroclimatic variables examined were consistent predictors of the large-scale variation in weevil abundance on C. canescens. In addition to biogeographic position, the only other consistent predictor of weevil densities across sites was the number of flower heads per C. canescens plant. These results exclude the \"spillover\" hypothesis to explain nontarget feeding on this newly adopted native host species. Instead, the results are consistent with the alternative hypothesis that exotic weevil abundance on C. canescens is related to the. local availability of native floral resources. Because C. canescens densities have declined with increases in R. conicus at sites central in the plant's distribution, these results suggest that isolated, peripheral populations of C. canescens are likely to be critical for persistence of Platte thistle. More generally, this study suggests that the persistence of a native species that is impacted by an exotic natural enemy may require preservation of populations in habitats outside the optimal portion of the native species' distribution."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[0877:IIAVAT]2.0.CO;2"],["dc.identifier.isi","000238451500005"],["dc.identifier.pmid","16826988"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/34413"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Ecological Soc Amer"],["dc.relation.issn","1051-0761"],["dc.title","Invasive insect abundance varies across the biogeographic distribution of a native host plant"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","238"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Biological Control"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","253"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","45"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.author","Bommarco, Riccardo"],["dc.contributor.author","Clough, Yann"],["dc.contributor.author","Crist, Thomas O."],["dc.contributor.author","Kleijn, David"],["dc.contributor.author","Rand, Tatyana A."],["dc.contributor.author","Tylianakis, Jason M."],["dc.contributor.author","Nouhuys, Saskya van"],["dc.contributor.author","Vidal, Stefan"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:54:37Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:54:37Z"],["dc.date.issued","2008"],["dc.description.abstract","Conservation biological control in agroecosystems requires a landscape management perspective, because most arthropod species experience their habitat at spatial scales beyond the plot level, and there is spillover of natural enemies across the crop–noncrop interface. The species pool in the surrounding landscape and the distance of crop from natural habitat are important for the conservation of enemy diversity and, in particular, the conservation of poorly-dispersing and specialized enemies. Hence, structurally complex landscapes with high habitat connectivity may enhance the probability of pest regulation. In contrast, generalist and highly vagile enemies may even profit from the high primary productivity of crops at a landscape scale and their abundance may partly compensate for losses in enemy diversity. Conservation biological control also needs a multitrophic perspective. For example, entomopathogenic fungi, plant pathogens and endophytes as well as below- and above-ground microorganisms are known to influence pest-enemy interactions in ways that vary across spatiotemporal scales. Enemy distribution in agricultural landscapes is determined by beta diversity among patches. The diversity needed for conservation biological control may occur where patch heterogeneity at larger spatial scales is high. However, enemy communities in managed systems are more similar across space and time than those in natural systems, emphasizing the importance of natural habitat for a spillover of diverse enemies. According to the insurance hypothesis, species richness can buffer against spatiotemporal disturbances, thereby insuring functioning in changing environments. Seemingly redundant enemy species may become important under global change. Complex landscapes characterized by highly connected crop–noncrop mosaics may be best for long-term conservation biological control and sustainable crop production, but experimental evidence for detailed recommendations to design the composition and configuration of agricultural landscapes that maintain a diversity of generalist and specialist natural enemies is still needed."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/s1049-9644(08)00082-0"],["dc.identifier.gro","3150064"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6791"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","public"],["dc.relation.issn","1049-9644"],["dc.subject","Agroecosystems; Beta diversity; Dispersal; Habitat fragmentation; Insurance hypothesis; Multitrophic interactions; Parasitoid and predator spillover; SLOSS; Spatial ecology; Specialists vs. generalists; Sustainability"],["dc.title","Reprint of “Conservation biological control and enemy diversity on a landscape scale”"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1353"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","8"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Oikos"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1362"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","116"],["dc.contributor.author","Rand, Tatyana A."],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:50:09Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:50:09Z"],["dc.date.issued","2007"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/j.2007.0030-1299.15871.x"],["dc.identifier.gro","3149850"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6554"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.relation.issn","0030-1299"],["dc.title","Contrasting effects of natural habitat loss on generalist and specialist aphid natural enemies"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]