Fischer, Christina

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","21"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","24"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","277"],["dc.contributor.author","Gayer, Christoph"],["dc.contributor.author","Kurucz, Kornélia"],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, Christina"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.author","Batáry, Péter"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-23T07:04:24Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-23T07:04:24Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.description.abstract","Agricultural intensification constrains the occurrences of birds from local through landscape to regional scales. Here, we tested effects of landscape configuration (comparing regions with small vs. large field size, thereby contrasting former West and East Germany), local farming practice (organic vs. conventional) and within-field position (edge vs. centre) on the abundance and species richness of farmland birds in winter wheat fields, with particular reference to skylarks (Alauda arvensis). We surveyed birds by point counts during breeding season within nine pairs of organic and conventional managed winter wheat fields along the Western (ca. 3 ha fields) and Eastern (ca. 20 ha fields) side of the former Iron Curtain in central Germany (n = 18 pairs). Bird abundance and species richness within arable field centres was highest in the small organic fields of the West, whereas skylarks showed a strong preference for open field conditions provided by field centres in the larger fields in East Germany. In conclusion, overall bird abundance and richness within arable fields would benefit from reducing local intensification of farming practices and field size, whereas open-land species such as skylarks benefit from large fields."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.agee.2019.03.006"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/61859"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.relation.issn","0167-8809"],["dc.title","Agricultural intensification at local and landscape scales impairs farmland birds, but not skylarks (Alauda arvensis)"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","297"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","4"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","303"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","13"],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, Christina"],["dc.contributor.author","Thies, Carsten"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:49:59Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:49:59Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.ppees.2011.08.001"],["dc.identifier.gro","3149811"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6511"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.relation.issn","1433-8319"],["dc.title","Mixed effects of landscape complexity and farming practice on weed seed removal"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","3663"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","14"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Biodiversity and Conservation"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","3681"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","20"],["dc.contributor.author","Guerrero, Irene"],["dc.contributor.author","Morales, Manuel B."],["dc.contributor.author","Oñate, Juan J."],["dc.contributor.author","Aavik, Tsipe"],["dc.contributor.author","Bengtsson, Jan"],["dc.contributor.author","Berendse, Frank"],["dc.contributor.author","Clement, Lars W."],["dc.contributor.author","Dennis, Christopher"],["dc.contributor.author","Eggers, Sönke"],["dc.contributor.author","Emmerson, Mark"],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, Christina"],["dc.contributor.author","Flohre, Andreas"],["dc.contributor.author","Geiger, Flavia"],["dc.contributor.author","Hawro, Violetta"],["dc.contributor.author","Inchausti, Pablo"],["dc.contributor.author","Kalamees, Andres"],["dc.contributor.author","Kinks, Riho"],["dc.contributor.author","Liira, Jaan"],["dc.contributor.author","Meléndez, Leandro"],["dc.contributor.author","Pärt, Tomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Thies, Carsten"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.author","Olszewski, Adam"],["dc.contributor.author","Weisser, Wolfgang W."],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:54:40Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:54:40Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.description.abstract","In eight European study sites (in Spain, Ireland, Netherlands, Germany, Poland, Estonia and Sweden), abundance of breeding farmland bird territories was obtained from 500 × 500 m survey plots (30 per area, N = 240) using the mapping method. Two analyses were performed: (I) a Canonical Correspondence Analysis of species abundance in relation to geographical location and variables measuring agricultural intensification at field and farm level to identify significant intensification variables and to estimate the fractions of total variance in bird abundance explained by geography and agricultural intensification; (II) several taxonomic and functional community indices were built and analysed using GLM in relation to the intensification variables found significant in the CCA. The geographical location of study sites alone explains nearly one fifth (19.5%) of total variation in species abundance. The fraction of variance explained by agricultural intensification alone is much smaller (4.3%), although significant. The intersection explains nearly two fifths (37.8%) of variance in species abundance. Community indices are negatively affected by correlates of intensification like farm size and yield, whereas correlates of habitat availability and quality have positive effects on taxonomic and functional diversity of assemblages. Most of the purely geographical variation in farmland bird assemblage composition is associated to Mediterranean steppe species, reflecting the bio-geographical singularity of that assemblage and reinforcing the need to preserve this community. Taxonomic and functional diversity of farmland bird communities are negatively affected by agricultural intensification and positively affected by increasing farmland habitat availability and quality."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s10531-011-0156-3"],["dc.identifier.gro","3150075"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6803"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","public"],["dc.relation.issn","0960-3115"],["dc.title","Taxonomic and functional diversity of farmland bird communities across Europe: effects of biogeography and agricultural intensification"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","722"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","6"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Diversity and Distributions"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","730"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","21"],["dc.contributor.author","Sutcliffe, Laura M. E."],["dc.contributor.author","Batáry, Péter"],["dc.contributor.author","Kormann, Urs G."],["dc.contributor.author","Báldi, András"],["dc.contributor.author","Dicks, Lynn V."],["dc.contributor.author","Herzon, Irina"],["dc.contributor.author","Kleijn, David"],["dc.contributor.author","Tryjanowski, Piotr"],["dc.contributor.author","Apostolova, Iva"],["dc.contributor.author","Arlettaz, Raphael"],["dc.contributor.author","Aunins, Ainars"],["dc.contributor.author","Aviron, Stéphanie"],["dc.contributor.author","Baležentienė, Ligita"],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, Christina"],["dc.contributor.author","Halada, Lubos"],["dc.contributor.author","Hartel, Tibor"],["dc.contributor.author","Helm, Aveliina"],["dc.contributor.author","Hristov, Iordan"],["dc.contributor.author","Jelaska, Sven D."],["dc.contributor.author","Kaligarič, Mitja"],["dc.contributor.author","Kamp, Johannes"],["dc.contributor.author","Klimek, Sebastian"],["dc.contributor.author","Koorberg, Pille"],["dc.contributor.author","Kostiuková, Jarmila"],["dc.contributor.author","Kovács-Hostyánszki, Anikó"],["dc.contributor.author","Kuemmerle, Tobias"],["dc.contributor.author","Leuschner, Christoph"],["dc.contributor.author","Lindborg, Regina"],["dc.contributor.author","Loos, Jacqueline"],["dc.contributor.author","Maccherini, Simona"],["dc.contributor.author","Marja, Riho"],["dc.contributor.author","Máthé, Orsolya"],["dc.contributor.author","Paulini, Inge"],["dc.contributor.author","Proença, Vânia"],["dc.contributor.author","Rey Benayas, José M."],["dc.contributor.author","Sans, F. Xavier"],["dc.contributor.author","Seifert, Charlotte"],["dc.contributor.author","Stalenga, Jarosław"],["dc.contributor.author","Timaeus, Johannes"],["dc.contributor.author","Török, Péter"],["dc.contributor.author","van Swaay, Chris"],["dc.contributor.author","Viik, Eneli"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.editor","Kühn, Ingolf"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:54:49Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:54:49Z"],["dc.date.issued","2014"],["dc.description.abstract","A large proportion of European biodiversity today depends on habitat provided by low-intensity farming practices, yet this resource is declining as European agriculture intensifies. Within the European Union, particularly the central and eastern new member states have retained relatively large areas of species-rich farmland, but despite increased investment in nature conservation here in recent years, farmland biodiversity trends appear to be worsening. Although the high biodiversity value of Central and Eastern European farmland has long been reported, the amount of research in the international literature focused on farmland biodiversity in this region remains comparatively tiny, and measures within the EU Common Agricultural Policy are relatively poorly adapted to support it. In this opinion study, we argue that, 10 years after the accession of the first eastern EU new member states, the continued under-representation of the low-intensity farmland in Central and Eastern Europe in the international literature and EU policy is impeding the development of sound, evidence-based conservation interventions. The biodiversity benefits for Europe of existing low-intensity farmland, particularly in the central and eastern states, should be harnessed before they are lost. Instead of waiting for species-rich farmland to further decline, targeted research and monitoring to create locally appropriate conservation strategies for these habitats is needed now."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/ddi.12288"],["dc.identifier.gro","3150100"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/11674"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6830"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.issn","1366-9516"],["dc.rights","CC BY-NC-ND 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0"],["dc.title","Harnessing the biodiversity value of Central and Eastern European farmland"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1027"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","5"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Insect Conservation"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1038"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","17"],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, Christina"],["dc.contributor.author","Schlinkert, Hella"],["dc.contributor.author","Ludwig, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Holzschuh, Andrea"],["dc.contributor.author","Gallé, Róbert"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.author","Batáry, Péter"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:53:56Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:53:56Z"],["dc.date.issued","2013"],["dc.description.abstract","Agricultural intensification in terms of decreasing landscape complexity and connectivity has negatively affected biodiversity. Linear landscape elements composed of woody vegetation like hedges may counteract this negative trend by providing habitats and enhancing habitat connectivity for different organisms. Here, we tested the impacts of habitat type (forest edges vs. hedges) and hedges’ isolation (connected vs. isolated hedges) from forests as well as microhabitat conditions (percentage of bare ground and width) on trait-specific occurrence of ground-dwelling arthropods, namely spiders and carabids. Arthropods were grouped by habitat specialisation (forest vs. open-habitat species vs. generalists), hunting strategy (web-building or hunting spiders) and dispersal ability (wing morphology of carabids). Spider and carabid assemblage composition was strongly influenced by habitat type and isolation, but not by microhabitat conditions. Activity density of forest species and brachypterous carabids was higher in forest edges compared to hedges, whereas open-habitat species and macropterous carabids showed reverse patterns, with no effects of isolation. Occurrence of generalist carabids, but not spiders, was higher in hedges compared to forest edges. Habitat type and isolation did not affect spiders with different hunting strategy. Microhabitat conditions were less important for spider and carabid occurrence. Our study concludes that on a landscape scale, type of linear woody habitat is more important for arthropod occurrence than isolation effects and microhabitat conditions, depending on traits. Hedges provide refuges for species specialised to open habitats and species with high dispersal ability, such as macropterous carabids. Forest edges enhance persistence of species specialised to forests and species with low dispersal ability, such as brachypterous carabids."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s10841-013-9586-4"],["dc.identifier.gro","3150029"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6751"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","public"],["dc.relation.issn","1366-638X"],["dc.title","The impact of hedge-forest connectivity and microhabitat conditions on spider and carabid beetle assemblages in agricultural landscapes"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1279"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","9"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Nature ecology & evolution"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1284"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","1"],["dc.contributor.author","Batáry, Péter"],["dc.contributor.author","Gallé, Róbert"],["dc.contributor.author","Riesch, Friederike"],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, Christina"],["dc.contributor.author","Dormann, Carsten F."],["dc.contributor.author","Mußhoff, Oliver"],["dc.contributor.author","Császár, Péter"],["dc.contributor.author","Fusaro, Silvia"],["dc.contributor.author","Gayer, Christoph"],["dc.contributor.author","Happe, Anne-Kathrin"],["dc.contributor.author","Kurucz, Kornélia"],["dc.contributor.author","Molnár, Dorottya"],["dc.contributor.author","Rösch, Verena"],["dc.contributor.author","Wietzke, Alexander"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-03-13T13:50:24Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-03-13T13:50:24Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.description.abstract","Agricultural intensification drives biodiversity loss and shapes farmers' profit, but the role of legacy effects and detailed quantification of ecological-economic trade-offs are largely unknown. In Europe during the 1950s, the Eastern communist bloc switched to large-scale farming by forced collectivization of small farms, while the West kept small-scale private farming. Here we show that large-scale agriculture in East Germany reduced biodiversity, which has been maintained in West Germany due to >70% longer field edges than those in the East. In contrast, profit per farmland area in the East was 50% higher than that in the West, despite similar yield levels. In both regions, switching from conventional to organic farming increased biodiversity and halved yield levels, but doubled farmers' profits. In conclusion, European Union policy should acknowledge the surprisingly high biodiversity benefits of small-scale agriculture, which are on a par with conversion to organic agriculture."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1038/s41559-017-0272-x"],["dc.identifier.pmid","29046556"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/12998"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.eissn","2397-334X"],["dc.title","The former Iron Curtain still drives biodiversity-profit trade-offs in German agriculture"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","570"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Applied Ecology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","579"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","48"],["dc.contributor.author","Winqvist, Camilla"],["dc.contributor.author","Bengtsson, Jan"],["dc.contributor.author","Aavik, Tsipe"],["dc.contributor.author","Berendse, Frank"],["dc.contributor.author","Clement, Lars W."],["dc.contributor.author","Eggers, Sönke"],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, Christina"],["dc.contributor.author","Flohre, Andreas"],["dc.contributor.author","Geiger, Flavia"],["dc.contributor.author","Liira, Jaan"],["dc.contributor.author","Pärt, Tomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Thies, Carsten"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.author","Weisser, Wolfgang W."],["dc.contributor.author","Bommarco, Riccardo"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:54:41Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:54:41Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.description.abstract","Organic farming in Europe has been shown to enhance biodiversity locally, but potential interactions with the surrounding landscape and the potential effects on ecosystem services are less well known.2. In cereal fields on 153 farms in five European regions, we examined how the species richness and abundance of wild plants, ground beetles and breeding birds, and the biological control potential of the area, were affected by organic and conventional farming, and how these effects were modified by landscape complexity (percentage of arable crops within 1000 m of the study plots). Information on biodiversity was gathered from vegetation plots, pitfall traps and by bird territory mapping. The biological control potential was measured as the percentage of glued, live aphids removed from plastic labels exposed in cereal fields for 24 h.3. Predation on aphids was highest in organic fields in complex landscapes, and declined with increasing landscape homogeneity. The biological control potential in conventional fields was not affected by landscape complexity, and in homogenous landscapes it was higher in conventional fields than in organic fields, as indicated by an interaction between farming practice and landscape complexity.4. A simplification of the landscape, from 20% to 100% arable land, reduced plant species richness by about 16% and cover by 14% in organic fields, and 33% and 5·5% in conventional fields. For birds, landscape simplification reduced species richness and abundance by 34% and 32% in organic fields and by 45·5% and 39% in conventional fields. Ground beetles were more abundant in simple landscapes, but were unaffected by farming practice.5. Synthesis and applications. This Europe-wide study shows that organic farming enhanced the biodiversity of plants and birds in all landscapes, but only improved the potential for biological control in heterogeneous landscapes. These mixed results stress the importance of taking both local management and regional landscape complexity into consideration when developing future agri-environment schemes, and suggest that local-regional interactions may affect other ecosystem services and functions. This study also shows that it is not enough to design and monitor agri-environment schemes on the basis of biodiversity, but that ecosystem services should be considered too."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01950.x"],["dc.identifier.gro","3150068"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6795"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.issn","0021-8901"],["dc.title","Mixed effects of organic farming and landscape complexity on farmland biodiversity and biological control potential across Europe"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Ecology Letters"],["dc.contributor.author","Martin, Emily A."],["dc.contributor.author","Dainese, Matteo"],["dc.contributor.author","Clough, Yann"],["dc.contributor.author","Báldi, András"],["dc.contributor.author","Bommarco, Riccardo"],["dc.contributor.author","Gagić, Vesna"],["dc.contributor.author","Garratt, Michael P. D."],["dc.contributor.author","Holzschuh, Andrea"],["dc.contributor.author","Kleijn, David"],["dc.contributor.author","Kovács-Hostyánszki, Anikó"],["dc.contributor.author","Marini, Lorenzo"],["dc.contributor.author","Potts, Simon G."],["dc.contributor.author","Smith, Henrik G."],["dc.contributor.author","Al Hassan, Diab"],["dc.contributor.author","Albrecht, Matthias"],["dc.contributor.author","Andersson, Georg K. S."],["dc.contributor.author","Asís, Josep D."],["dc.contributor.author","Aviron, Stéphanie"],["dc.contributor.author","Balzan, Mario V."],["dc.contributor.author","Baños‐Picón, Laura"],["dc.contributor.author","Bartomeus, Ignasi"],["dc.contributor.author","Batáry, Péter"],["dc.contributor.author","Burel, Francoise"],["dc.contributor.author","Caballero‐López, Berta"],["dc.contributor.author","Concepción, Elena D."],["dc.contributor.author","Coudrain, Valérie"],["dc.contributor.author","Dänhardt, Juliana"],["dc.contributor.author","Díaz, Mario"],["dc.contributor.author","Diekötter, Tim"],["dc.contributor.author","Dormann, Carsten F."],["dc.contributor.author","Duflot, Rémi"],["dc.contributor.author","Entling, Martin H."],["dc.contributor.author","Farwig, Nina"],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, Christina"],["dc.contributor.author","Frank, Thomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Garibaldi, Lucas A."],["dc.contributor.author","Hermann, John"],["dc.contributor.author","Herzog, Felix"],["dc.contributor.author","Inclán, Diego"],["dc.contributor.author","Jacot, Katja"],["dc.contributor.author","Jauker, Frank"],["dc.contributor.author","Jeanneret, Philippe"],["dc.contributor.author","Kaiser, Marina"],["dc.contributor.author","Krauß, Jochen"],["dc.contributor.author","Le Féon, Violette"],["dc.contributor.author","Marshall, Jon"],["dc.contributor.author","Moonen, Anna‐Camilla"],["dc.contributor.author","Moreno, Gerardo"],["dc.contributor.author","Riedinger, Verena"],["dc.contributor.author","Rundlöf, Maj"],["dc.contributor.author","Rusch, Adrien"],["dc.contributor.author","Scheper, Jeroen"],["dc.contributor.author","Schneider, Gudrun"],["dc.contributor.author","Schüepp, Christof"],["dc.contributor.author","Stutz, Sonja"],["dc.contributor.author","Sutter, Louis"],["dc.contributor.author","Tamburini, Giovanni"],["dc.contributor.author","Thies, Carsten"],["dc.contributor.author","Tormos, José"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.author","Tschumi, Matthias"],["dc.contributor.author","Uzman, Deniz"],["dc.contributor.author","Wagner, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Zubair‐Anjum, Muhammad"],["dc.contributor.author","Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf"],["dc.contributor.editor","Scherber, Christoph"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-23T07:13:21Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-23T07:13:21Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.description.abstract","Managing agricultural landscapes to support biodiversity and ecosystem services is a key aim of a sustainable agriculture. However, how the spatial arrangement of crop fields and other habitats in landscapes impacts arthropods and their functions is poorly known. Synthesising data from 49 studies (1515 landscapes) across Europe, we examined effects of landscape composition (% habitats) and configuration (edge density) on arthropods in fields and their margins, pest control, pollination and yields. Configuration effects interacted with the proportions of crop and non-crop habitats, and species' dietary, dispersal and overwintering traits led to contrasting responses to landscape variables. Overall, however, in landscapes with high edge density, 70% of pollinator and 44% of natural enemy species reached highest abundances and pollination and pest control improved 1.7-and 1.4-fold respectively. Arable-dominated landscapes with high edge densities achieved high yields. This suggests that enhancing edge density in European agroecosystems can promote functional biodiversity and yield-enhancing ecosystem services."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/ele.13265"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/61862"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.relation.issn","1461-023X"],["dc.relation.issn","1461-0248"],["dc.title","The interplay of landscape composition and configuration: new pathways to manage functional biodiversity and agroecosystem services across Europe"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","155"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Community Ecology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","161"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","13"],["dc.contributor.author","Batáry, Péter"],["dc.contributor.author","Kovács-Hostyánszki, A."],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, C."],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.author","Holzschuh, Andrea"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:50:43Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:50:43Z"],["dc.date.issued","2012"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1556/comec.13.2012.2.4"],["dc.identifier.gro","3149884"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6592"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.relation.issn","1585-8553"],["dc.title","Contrasting effect of isolation of hedges from forests on farmland vs. woodland birds"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","50"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Acta Oecologica"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","56"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","45"],["dc.contributor.author","Ludwig, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Schlinkert, Hella"],["dc.contributor.author","Holzschuh, Andrea"],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, Christina"],["dc.contributor.author","Scherber, Christoph"],["dc.contributor.author","Trnka, Alfréd"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.author","Batáry, Péter"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:54:39Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:54:39Z"],["dc.date.issued","2012"],["dc.description.abstract","Landscape-scale agricultural intensification has caused severe declines in biodiversity. Hedges and forest remnants may mitigate biodiversity loss by enhancing landscape heterogeneity and providing habitat to a wide range of species, including birds. However, nest predation, the major cause of reproductive failure of birds, has been shown to be higher in forest edges than in forest interiors. Little is known about how spatial arrangement (configuration) of hedges affects the avian nest predation. We performed an experiment with artificial ground and elevated nests (resembling yellowhammer and whitethroat nests) baited with quail and plasticine eggs. Nests were placed in three habitat types with different degrees of isolation from forests: forest edges, hedges connected to forests and hedges isolated from forests. Nest predation was highest in forest edges, lowest in hedges connected to forests and intermediate in isolated hedges. In the early breeding season, we found similar nest predation on ground and elevated nests, but in the late breeding season nest predation was higher on ground nests than on elevated nests. Small mammals were the main predators of ground nests and appeared to be responsible for the increase in predation from early to late breeding season, whereas the elevated nests were mainly depredated by small birds and small mammals. High predation pressure at forest edges was probably caused by both forest and open-landscape predators. The influence of forest predators may be lower at hedges, leading to lower predation pressure than in forest edges. Higher predation pressure in isolated than connected hedges might be an effect of concentration of predators in these isolated habitats. We conclude that landscape configuration of hedges is important in nest predation, with connected hedges allowing higher survival than isolated hedges and forest edges."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.actao.2012.08.008"],["dc.identifier.gro","3150071"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/6799"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","public"],["dc.relation.issn","1146-609X"],["dc.title","Landscape-moderated bird nest predation in hedges and forest edges"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]